This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: mudflap versus cgraph
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:24:30 +0200
> Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> > > > Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> > > > > I think that's the problem. In the cgraph world, the arbiter of
> > > > > what things are needed is cgraph itself. There should be a hook
> > > > > that cgraph calls to add additional functions -- after it has
> > > > > already decided on everything else.
> > >
> > > I can implement such a function, but it will definitly have a
> > > restrictions in a way that it should not touch anything that was not
> > > marked as possible entry point. Objc is using similar hacks as
> > > mudflap do BTW (bypassing cgraph and adding functions directly)
> > > I will be partly offline till 30th, but I can definitly do it after
> > > that.
> >
> > And also I can do it before 30th if this gets urgent (like fixing
> > 3.4.1, just I won't be able to respond very quickly).
>
> It is not urgent. I believe I have an alternative way forward (see my
> response to Frank).
Good to hear, ignore second pass of my previous message then ;)
I guess your problem was that the functions emitted at the side were
static and thus needed to be renamed by IMA...
Still helping hand on solving the issue would be greatly appreciated...
Honza