This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: mudflap versus cgraph


On 22 Jun 2004 12:00:28 -0400
fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) wrote:

> > > Is this for your IMA fixes?  It might be that mudflap has to be
> > > broken for a while, while IMA gets fixed...
> > 
> > Yeah, it's for IMA.  If it's mudflap's turn to be broken for awhile
> > I don't have a problem with that [...]
> 
> Please first think through the issue so there is some design for doing
> what mudflap (and several other compiler parts) have to do, in a way
> that doesn't twitch the "eww, that's ugly" knee-jerk nerves.  Maybe
> the nerves just need some botox.

For the record, I currently think I can get away with just delaying
invocation of mudflap_finish() until after all translation units have
been processed.  That doesn't solve any of the larger issues but it does
make IMA happy.

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]