This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Regressions on mainline\

From: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: Steven Bosscher <stevenb at suse dot de>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, mark at codesourcery dot com (Mark Mitchell), gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:49:59 -0400
Subject: Re: Regressions on mainline\
References: <200406212232.i5LMWQW20317@tin.geop.uc.edu> <200406220034.49487.stevenb@suse.de> <87y8mg8rb0.fsf@taltos.codesourcery.com>

>>>>> Zack Weinberg writes:

>> There are also patches pending for profiling stuff, perhaps they help
>> (and perhaps not...).  Unfortunately they've been ignored four times now :-(
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-06/msg01674.html

Zack> This is a beautiful example of patches that are not getting reviewed
Zack> mainly because no one who can officially review them feels qualified
Zack> to do so.  I'd be willing to sign off on a review done by the author
Zack> of the profiling code, but I'm not sure who that is.

	I believe that Honza has performed most of the recent work in the
profiling areas of GCC.  I have heard second-hand that he thinks the
patches are okay.  Maybe he would comment publically?

David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Regressions on mainline\
  - From: Jan Hubicka

References:
- Re: Regressions on mainline\
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Regressions on mainline\
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Regressions on mainline\
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]