Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets

[Dave Hudson <dave at cyclicode dot net>]

Hi Steven,

Steven Bosscher wrote:

>                        c    m    x    i         i    i    m
>                        r    m    t    p    f    q    8    3
>                        i    i    s    2    r    2    6    2
>                        s    x    a    k    v    k    0    r
>                        ------------------------------------
> uses cc0               x              x              x     
> no RTL pro/epilogue    x              x              x     
> old scheduler model              x1             x         x
> define_peephole        x              x                    
> not define_constant    x              x                    
>
> supported by GDB       x    x              x              x
> free simulator exists       x    ?    ?    x    ?    ?     
>
> silicon exists         x     2   x    ?    ?    ?    x    ?
> silicon in production  x         x    ?    ?    ?         x3

For the ip2k silicon exists and has been in production since 2001 and is 
still very much in production.  It is supported by gdb although I need 
to check with our gdb maintainer what the status of merging that back to 
the FSF tree is.  There is a free simulator, ip2k-sim (it's what we use 
to regression test gcc).

FWIW there was no scheduler description becaust there is nothing 
interesting to describe.  If someone has a dummy scheduler description 
that does precisely nothing and they'd prefer this port to use then I'd 
be more than happy to generate the patches :-)


Regards,
Dave