This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 08 Jun 2004 11:10:52 -0600
Subject: Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism
References: <ca44hn$ddm$1@sea.gmane.org><Pine.LNX.4.58.0406081524470.16585@wotan.suse.de>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Michael" == Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> writes:

Michael> Why should untested "please-try-if-they-fix-the-problem"
Michael> patches be copied to gcc-patches?

It would be helpful if bugzilla comments are also forwarded, so we can
distinguish these cases.  It seems to me that most of us already have
to filter gcc-patches, so a little more noise won't hurt.

If this is going to happen I would like it if gcj patches were
forwarded to java-patches.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism
  - From: Geert Bosch
- Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism
  - From: Michael Matz

References:
- Bugzilla's Patch mechanism
  - From: Kelley Cook
- Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism
  - From: Michael Matz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]