This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Kelley Cook <kcook at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:22:11 -0400
Subject: Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism
References: <ca44hn$ddm$1@sea.gmane.org> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0406081524470.16585@wotan.suse.de>

On Jun 8, 2004, at 9:28 AM, Michael Matz wrote:

Hi,

On Tue, 8 Jun 2004, Kelley Cook wrote:
I believe that Bugzilla should autoforward any patch (along with any
comments added at that time) attached via the Bugzilla webpage to GCC
Patches.
How would you differ between patches and testcase attachements?


There is a patch flag that is set on patches
:)

References:
- Bugzilla's Patch mechanism
  - From: Kelley Cook
- Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism
  - From: Michael Matz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]