This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>
Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Steven T. Hatton" <hattons at globalsymmetry dot com>
Date: 02 Jun 2004 06:57:24 +0200
Subject: Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation
Organization: Integrable Solutions
References: <200406011542.55151.hattons@globalsymmetry.com><20040601171018.A1548@synopsys.com><1DF3BB44-B450-11D8-B24F-000A95BCF344@apple.com>

Matt Austern <austern@apple.com> writes:

| On Jun 1, 2004, at 5:10 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
| 
| > On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 03:42:42PM -0400, Steven T. Hatton wrote:
| >
| >> I've been experimenting with the #pragma directives ...
| >
| > I would advise against the use of #pragma interface and #pragma
| > implementation.  They are perhaps not quite obsolete, but they are
| > little-used today.
| 
| Is there a good reason for us not to just declare them obsolete and
| remove them?

I'd vote for their removal.

-- Gaby

References:
- #pragma interface and #pragma implementation
  - From: Steven T. Hatton
- Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation
  - From: Matt Austern

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]