gcc archive
date index for June, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2004
23:16 Re: altivec questions Janis Johnson
23:15 Re: bootstrap of 3.4.1 RC1 failed on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Joe Buck
23:09 gcc-ss-3.3-20040630 is now available gccadmin
22:57 Re: bootstrap of 3.4.1 RC1 failed on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Jakub Jelinek
22:46 Re: altivec questions Ziemowit Laski
22:44 more 3.4.1 RC1 tests Joe Buck
22:32 Re: bootstrap of 3.4.1 RC1 failed on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Joe Buck
22:15 Re: Bugs which require external patches to reproduce Mark Mitchell
22:14 Re: bootstrap of 3.4.1 RC1 failed on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Mark Mitchell
21:49 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
21:34 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Joseph S. Myers
19:51 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Phil Edwards
19:38 Re: mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle Zack Weinberg
19:22 Re: mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle Joe Buck
18:22 Re: EP9312 gcc: undefined reference to __divdf3 Vladimir Ivanov
18:19 Re: EP9312 gcc: undefined reference to __divdf3 Paul Brook
18:11 Re: EP9312 gcc: undefined reference to __divdf3 Vladimir Ivanov
17:20 Re: Performance testing shared vs. static libs Scott Bronson
17:18 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Mark Mitchell
17:01 Information douglas_gennetten
16:58 Hi fernandamosso
16:48 reply soon mariam abacha
16:45 =?big5?b?ocCxwMLLp0EhISelaLZSJy0tLS2ms773rbmrfqZ2sHS69KHAIDmn6Q==?= Dgcc5
16:45 Re: EP9312 gcc: undefined reference to __divdf3 Petko Manolov
16:43 Re: mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle Richard Kenner
16:43 Hi mseventos
16:39 hello mikem
16:37 Incoming message Burley
16:32 ÊÓËÃѺ¼Ùé·Õèµéͧ¡Òà sale
16:32 ÊÓËÃѺ¼Ùé·Õèµéͧ¡Òà sale
16:25 Re: mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle Joe Buck
16:22 Re: altivec questions Segher Boessenkool
16:22 Звоните и записывайтесь! Звоните и записывайтесь! Зинаи
16:19 information support
16:04 Gestion de la Logistique Formation Haut de Gamme
16:02 hello geldridge
16:01 ep9312 Maverick Crunch support Petko Manolov
16:00 **카드고민 완전해결 ARS 상담** sxvyyiu ivrpg Keven Bender
15:56 下.载试.用:企业管理软件-进销存:390元 action02
15:00 Re: EP9312 gcc: undefined reference to __divdf3 Richard Earnshaw
14:09 vohem garbage collector andrea cavalli
13:31 About the 2nd instruction scheduling Hsin-Hsien Wu
13:25 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Terry L Moore
13:24 Re: UPDATE: Does not exist error during libjava compile in gcc Terry L Moore
12:37 Re: EP9312 gcc: undefined reference to __divdf3 Wouter van Heyst
10:55 Re: EP9312 gcc: undefined reference to __divdf3 Wouter van Heyst
10:25 RE: UPDATE: grep problem Dave \"I do not speak for AT&T
09:59 Performance testing shared vs. static libs Scott Bronson
09:45 Re: EP9312 gcc: undefined reference to __divdf3 Richard Earnshaw
09:45 Re: Performance testing function pointers Scott Bronson
09:10 Re: mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle Gabriel Dos Reis
09:09 Re: Lost configuration parameters Ranjit Mathew
08:54 Lost configuration parameters Leszek Włodarski
08:02 Re: mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle Nathan Sidwell
07:44 Re: Dealing with NOP instructions Eric Christopher
07:35 Dealing with NOP instructions Hsin-Hsien Wu
07:20 crosstool-0.28-rc26: 118 ugly toolchains and 74 pretty ones Dan Kegel
07:09 Re: mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle Arnaud Charlet
05:08 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Ranjit Mathew
03:44 Re: mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle Chris Lattner
02:00 Re: mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle llewelly
00:53 Re: mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle Joe Buck
00:46 Re: bootstrap of 3.4.1 RC1 failed on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Joe Buck
00:25 RE: mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle Chris Lattner

June 29, 2004
23:02 mutually-recursive types and an old puzzle Joe Buck
22:50 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Locke
22:37 ASM_OUTPUT_WEAK_ALIAS documentation Aaron W. LaFramboise
22:34 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Richard Kenner
22:23 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Locke
21:48 Re: bootstrap failure on ia64 Diego Novillo
20:58 altivec questions Janis Johnson
20:40 Bugs which require external patches to reproduce Richard Guenther
20:33 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Kai Henningsen
20:20 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Tom Tromey
20:04 Re: bootstrap failure on ia64 Richard Guenther
20:03 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Zack Weinberg
19:44 Re: bootstrap of 3.4.1 RC1 failed on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 David Edelsohn
19:36 Re: bootstrap of 3.4.1 RC1 failed on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Joe Buck
19:36 Re: #pragma once Jim Wilson
19:25 Re: UPDATE: Does not exist error during libjava compile in gcc Phil Edwards
19:22 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Terry L Moore
19:20 update: Does not exist error during libjava compile in gcc Terry L Moore
19:03 Re: bootstrap failure on ia64 Andrew Pinski
18:59 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Richard Kenner
18:58 Re: bootstrap of 3.4.1 RC1 failed on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 David Edelsohn
18:50 Re: bootstrap failure on ia64 Diego Novillo
18:45 bootstrap failure on ia64 Richard Guenther
18:30 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Andreas Schwab
18:30 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Richard Henderson
18:27 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Tom Tromey
18:17 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Jim Wilson
18:13 Re: UPDATE: Does not exist error during libjava compile in gcc Andreas Schwab
17:33 Re: #pragma once llewelly
17:30 Re: Function, file and line information out of '_Unwind_Context' ptr Jim Wilson
17:22 Re: Function, file and line information out of '_Unwind_Context' ptr Jim Wilson
17:17 RE: UPDATE: Does not exist error during libjava compile in gcc Dave Korn
17:14 Re: objective C binfos Ziemowit Laski
16:50 Re: UPDATE: Does not exist error during libjava compile in gcc Terry L Moore
16:46 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Terry L Moore
16:26 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available H. J. Lu
16:23 Re: UPDATE: Does not exist error during libjava compile in gcc Phil Edwards
15:46 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Eric Botcazou
15:23 RE: UPDATE: grep problem Dave Korn
15:12 Re: UPDATE: grep problem Eric Botcazou
14:52 RE: UPDATE: grep problem Dave Korn
14:41 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Locke
14:30 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Mike Stump
14:21 UPDATE: grep problem Terry L Moore
14:18 Re: EP9312 gcc: undefined reference to __divdf3 Wouter van Heyst
14:16 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Mike Stump
14:13 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Mike Stump
14:09 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Mike Stump
14:05 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Kaz Kojima
14:04 UPDATE: Does not exist error during libjava compile in gcc Terry L Moore
13:51 Rememberable URL for gccnews rd flowers
13:50 Re: EP9312 gcc: undefined reference to __divdf3 Paul Koning
13:22 #pragma once Daniel Sievers
13:16 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Mike Stump
12:24 Re: Function, file and line information out of '_Unwind_Context'ptr Gerrit BruchhÃuser
12:08 Solaris installation notes Dimitri Papadopoulos-Orfanos
12:05 Re: Member function pointer woes Giovanni Bajo
12:02 Re: What happened to -frename-registers? Ulrich Weigand
11:51 Member function pointer woes Albert Antony
11:24 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Richard Kenner
11:15 RE: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Dave Korn
11:11 suggestion to add item to "Installing GCC: Binaries" web page Thomas Lotterer
11:09 R_PPC_EMB_SDA21 relocation Dave Murphy
11:01 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Michael Matz
10:59 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Michael Matz
10:50 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Joseph S. Myers
10:30 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Paolo Bonzini
10:17 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Andrew Haley
10:15 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Andrew Haley
10:15 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Andreas Schwab
10:06 objective C binfos Nathan Sidwell
09:56 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Michael Matz
09:22 EP9312 gcc: undefined reference to __divdf3 Wouter van Heyst
09:22 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Joseph S. Myers
09:12 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Michael Matz
08:20 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Nathan Sidwell
07:46 Re: What happened to -frename-registers? Paolo Bonzini
07:31 Re: What happened to -frename-registers? Paolo Bonzini
07:27 Re: Function, file and line information out of '_Unwind_Context'ptr Gerrit BruchhÃuser
06:55 RE: Requiring GAS for mips-sgi-irix* Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)
05:16 Mainline regressions on powerpc-apple-darwin Andrew Pinski
04:20 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Jan Hubicka
03:55 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Richard Kenner
03:48 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Geert Bosch
03:48 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Zack Weinberg
03:46 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Daniel Berlin
03:37 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Richard Kenner
03:35 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Richard Kenner
03:35 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Zack Weinberg
03:33 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Daniel Berlin
03:20 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Richard Kenner
03:12 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Richard Kenner
03:08 Re: Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Andrew Pinski
03:05 Re: GREG Expansion Problem Jim Wilson
03:02 Question on tree-walking and mutually-recursive types Richard Kenner
01:36 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Ian Lance Taylor
01:33 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Zack Weinberg
01:26 Re: Status of for Argonaut ARC port? Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
01:14 bootstrap of 3.4.1 RC1 failed on powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Joe Buck

June 28, 2004
22:50 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Joe Buck
22:13 Status of for Argonaut ARC port? Steven Bosscher
22:00 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Aaron W. LaFramboise
21:25 Re: bound-checks Frank Ch. Eigler
21:21 Re: What happened to -frename-registers? Ulrich Weigand
21:11 Re: What happened to -frename-registers? David Edelsohn
21:06 What happened to -frename-registers? Ulrich Weigand
21:01 Re: <built-in> vs <internal> Zack Weinberg
20:56 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
20:55 Re: named warnings & individual warning control llewelly
20:52 Does not exist error during libjava compile in gcc Terry L Moore
20:30 <built-in> vs <internal> Per Bothner
19:26 Re: libgcc2 exception clause inconsistent Jeffrey A Law
19:10 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Ian Lance Taylor
18:26 Re: Tru64 Problem / gcc 3.4.0 Jim Wilson
18:22 Re: bound-checks S.Hockenhull
18:19 Re: i386/x86-64 UNSPEC_NOP usage Jim Wilson
18:13 Re: A question about tree-pretty-printing Richard Kenner
18:10 Re: A question about tree-pretty-printing Richard Kenner
18:10 Re: The 3.4.1 Ada texi bug Mark Mitchell
18:09 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Paul Brook
18:07 Re: The 3.4.1 Ada texi bug Michael Elizabeth Chastain
18:04 Re: Function, file and line information out of '_Unwind_Context' ptr Jim Wilson
17:40 Re: where the compilation process stops in gcc Jim Wilson
17:27 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Robert Dewar
17:25 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Robert Dewar
16:51 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Dale Johannesen
16:48 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Joe Buck
16:46 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Joe Buck
16:37 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Jeffrey A Law
16:27 RE: scope of templates (WAS: contributing & bound-checks) Dave Korn
16:07 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Stuart Hastings
15:40 PR c++/16240 Ian Lance Taylor
15:18 The 3.4.1 Ada texi bug Kelley Cook
15:15 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Mark Mitchell
15:10 scope of templates (WAS: contributing & bound-checks) S.Hockenhull
14:54 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Jan Hubicka
14:48 Re: A question about tree-pretty-printing Gabriel Dos Reis
14:46 Re: A question about tree-pretty-printing Gabriel Dos Reis
14:44 Re: A question about tree-pretty-printing Gabriel Dos Reis
14:32 Re: gcc news #4 Gabriel Dos Reis
14:25 Re: Function, file and line information out of '_Unwind_Context'ptr Gerrit Bruchhäuser
13:53 Re: A question about tree-pretty-printing Robert Dewar
13:38 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Paul Brook
13:29 Re: [PATCH] Check rtx_costs in combine.c's try_combine Roger Sayle
13:18 Re: possible structure layout bug Stephen Kennedy
12:44 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Kenneth Zadeck
12:22 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Paolo Bonzini
11:58 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Paul Brook
11:57 Re: gcc news #4 Paolo Carlini
11:44 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Mircea Namolaru
11:41 Re: gcc news #4 Mathieu Lacage
11:31 Re: gcc news #4 Paolo Carlini
11:25 Re: gcc news #4 Paul Brook
11:19 Re: A question about tree-pretty-printing Paul Brook
11:15 Block SCR-Files messages_Notify Mail Admin
11:14 RE: where the compilation process stops in gcc Dave Korn
11:09 [RFC] Adding bison, lex, etc. build modules? Paolo Bonzini
10:08 Re: G++ ABI compatibility document Nathan Sidwell
09:44 Re: Function, file and line information out of '_Unwind_Context' ptr Arnaud Charlet
09:13 Re: Tru64 Problem / gcc 3.4.0 Aron Vrtala, Vienna Univ. Comp
08:36 Re: A question about tree-pretty-printing Theodore Papadopoulo
08:20 Re: A question about tree-pretty-printing Joseph S. Myers
07:40 Re: Bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3 on GNU/Linux x86 Mark Mitchell
07:37 Help in Load Store Instrumentation Rajkishore Barik
07:26 Re: Bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3 on GNU/Linux x86 Mark Mitchell
07:25 RE: [rfc] proposal for compilation unit wide alias analyis Chris Lattner
07:08 Re: Bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3 on GNU/Linux x86 Ranjit Mathew
07:04 Re: i386/x86-64 UNSPEC_NOP usage Jan Beulich
06:59 gcc news #4 Mathieu Lacage
06:38 Re: Bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3 on GNU/Linux x86 Eric Botcazou
06:17 Re: gcc call tree Jeyasankar Kottalam
06:16 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Mark Mitchell
06:10 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Mark Mitchell
05:32 Re: Mainline as 27 June crash on MacOS X Andrew Pinski
05:26 Mainline as 27 June crash on MacOS X Bill Northcott
05:10 Bootstrap failure in libstdc++-v3 on GNU/Linux x86 Florian Weimer
04:44 Re: A question about tree-pretty-printing Gabriel Dos Reis
04:42 Re: A question about tree-pretty-printing Jason Merrill
04:34 A question about tree-pretty-printing Gabriel Dos Reis
04:27 GCC-3.3.x status Gabriel Dos Reis
04:09 SORRY ABOUT THE SPAM! Christopher Faylor
04:07 gcc call tree Hsin-Hsien Wu
03:59 message.. Marion Collins
03:58 Fw: Thanks for your 0rder Tabitha Miller
03:56 Re: contributing & bound-checks llewelly
03:51 Cd -диcк "Инвecтuции в нeдвuжимость." нкo ВПEРВЫЕ
03:51 Cd -диск "Инвестuцuи в недвuжимocть." та ВПEPВЫE
03:46 Re: text wish-dreamweaver
03:44 Update: Insurance Information S. Perkins
03:35 ШТОРЫ, ЖАЛЮЗИ, КАРНИЗЫ ое Выезд БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ
03:24 The M.ortgage Information you wanted Trenton Lake
03:24 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Joe Buck
03:23 MENSAGEM BLOQUEADA: Re: Thanks :) postmaster
03:23 Re: Thanks :) Majordomo
03:00 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and Richard Henderson
01:33 Re: G++ ABI compatibility document llewelly
01:26 Re: Release schedule? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:11 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Diego Novillo
00:36 Re: contributing & bound-checks Frank Ch. Eigler
00:21 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and Andrew Pinski
00:01 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and Richard Kenner

June 27, 2004
23:47 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and Gerald Pfeifer
23:36 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and Andrew Pinski
23:31 Re: contributing & bound-checks Giovanni Bajo
23:26 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF andCOMPONENT_REF Gerald Pfeifer
22:54 Release schedule? Gerald Pfeifer
22:46 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Zack Weinberg
22:40 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Zack Weinberg
21:55 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Laurent GUERBY
21:27 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Daniel Berlin
20:19 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Richard Henderson
19:37 Re: libstdc++ web pages, help required Paolo Carlini
19:00 libstdc++ web pages, help required Gerald Pfeifer
18:04 gcc-ss-3.5-20040627 is now available gccadmin
16:03 Re: contributing & bound-checks S.Hockenhull
15:26 Function Versioning Revital Eres
15:15 Re: Bugzilla bug id 16223 Giovanni Bajo
13:40 Re: Function, file and line information out of '_Unwind_Context' ptr Gerrit Bruchhäuser
13:35 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Kenneth Zadeck
12:08 Bugzilla bug id 16223 Erik de Castro Lopo
12:00 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Joseph S. Myers
09:01 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Paul Jarc
08:55 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Eric Botcazou
08:32 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Matthias Klose
07:07 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Joe Buck
04:33 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Erik de Castro Lopo
03:13 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available tbp
02:01 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Mark Mitchell
00:43 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Michael Elizabeth Chastain
00:19 G++ ABI compatibility document Shelly Adhikari
00:13 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Erik de Castro Lopo

June 26, 2004
23:22 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Giovanni Bajo
23:10 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Tom Tromey
22:54 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis David Edelsohn
22:32 Re: GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Erik de Castro Lopo
20:29 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Richard Henderson
20:24 Re: proposal for compilation unit wide alias analyis Richard Henderson
20:02 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Richard Kenner
19:49 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Mark Mitchell
19:37 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Mark Mitchell
19:36 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Zack Weinberg
19:18 GCC 3.4.1 RC1 available Mark Mitchell
19:13 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Zack Weinberg
18:46 Re: where the compilation process stops in gcc perugupa
18:25 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Mark Mitchell
18:09 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Zack Weinberg
17:14 Re: libgcc2 exception clause inconsistent Robert Dewar
14:38 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Robert Dewar
11:00 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Stelios Xanthakis
10:59 Re: proposal for compilation unit wide alias analyis Paul Brook
10:43 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Jan Hubicka
10:40 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Jan Hubicka
10:31 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Jan Hubicka
09:11 Re: Bootstrap of 3.5 with --enable-intermodule Vaclav Haisman
08:29 Re: Bootstrap of 3.5 with --enable-intermodule Andrew Pinski
08:24 Bootstrap of 3.5 with --enable-intermodule Vaclav Haisman
07:54 Re: g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Mike Stump
06:00 g++.old-deja/g++.mike/p7325.C - suspected bogus test case Zack Weinberg
05:09 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Geoffrey Keating
05:04 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Mike Stump
04:17 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Mike Stump
04:06 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Alexandre Oliva
03:48 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Mike Stump
03:33 Re: turning off range simplification Mike Stump
03:24 Re: Two similar functions optimized differently Jim Wilson
03:03 Re: Build problem with gcc 3.4 on Mac OS X Phil Edwards
03:03 Re: Suboptimal code generated for _Bool Jim Wilson
02:51 Re: Build problem with gcc 3.4 on Mac OS X Jim Wilson
02:33 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Andrew Pinski
02:32 Re: Function, file and line information out of '_Unwind_Context'ptr Jim Wilson
02:18 Re: Performance testing function pointers Jim Wilson
01:36 Re: [RTL]Access rtx oprands Jim Wilson
01:34 Re: [RTL]Access rtx oprands Jim Wilson
01:21 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Kenneth Zadeck
01:12 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Stan Shebs
00:49 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Devang Patel
00:45 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Joe Buck
00:33 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Zack Weinberg
00:24 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Diego Novillo
00:18 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Dale Johannesen
00:08 Re: mainline g++ built for apple-ppc-darwin causes crash on compiling g++.dg/eh/cleanup1.C Richard Henderson

June 25, 2004
23:38 V5BfR7f::: Men have seen results 0f 1-4 !:nches !:n gr0wth! BigGuy1
23:35 mainline g++ built for apple-ppc-darwin causes crash on compiling g++.dg/eh/cleanup1.C Fariborz Jahanian
23:27 gcc-ss-3.4-20040625 is now available gccadmin
23:21 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Mark Mitchell
23:02 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Stan Shebs
22:24 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Kenneth Zadeck
22:17 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
22:08 Re: proposal for compilation unil wide alias analyis Jan Hubicka
22:04 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Joe Buck
21:57 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Joe Buck
21:57 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Matt Austern
21:56 GCC 3.4.1 Frozen Mark Mitchell
21:56 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Gabriel Dos Reis
21:54 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Gabriel Dos Reis
21:52 Re: Problem in GCC 3.4 MIPS -march=mips1 Paul Koning
21:48 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
21:48 Re: Problem in GCC 3.4 MIPS -march=mips1 Eric Christopher
21:46 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Gabriel Dos Reis
21:42 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Gabriel Dos Reis
21:24 Re: c.opt doesn't use Var() ? DJ Delorie
21:24 Re: Problem in GCC 3.4 MIPS -march=mips1 David Daney
21:04 Problem in GCC 3.4 MIPS -march=mips1 Paul Koning
20:54 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Matt Austern
20:30 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
20:00 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Phil Edwards
19:50 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Gabriel Dos Reis
19:48 Re: named warnings & individual warning control David Taylor
19:09 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
19:07 Re: c.opt doesn't use Var() ? Neil Booth
19:00 Re: Performance testing function pointers Jed Davis
18:55 Re: turning off range simplification Joe Buck
18:54 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Geert Bosch
18:51 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Geert Bosch
18:49 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Daniel Berlin
18:49 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Diego Novillo
18:48 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Daniel Berlin
18:47 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Richard Kenner
18:46 Re: turning off range simplification Richard Henderson
18:45 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Mark Mitchell
18:40 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Nathan Sidwell
18:25 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
18:21 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Richard Kenner
18:17 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Paul Brook
18:15 Re: RFC: Requiring GAS for mips-sgi-irix* Richard Sandiford
18:14 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Richard Kenner
18:10 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Paul Brook
18:06 Re: i386/x86-64 UNSPEC_NOP usage Jim Wilson
18:02 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Richard Sandiford
18:00 Re: i386/x86-64 UNSPEC_NOP usage Jim Wilson
17:59 Re: Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Richard Kenner
17:50 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Richard Henderson
17:48 Using C++ in gcc (was Re: [RFC] type safe trees) Matt Austern
17:42 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Dale Johannesen
17:08 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Zack Weinberg
17:06 Re: RFC: Requiring GAS for mips-sgi-irix* Eric Christopher
15:45 Re: Crash if function_end_locus not set Andreas Schwab
15:41 RE: status (parrt@jguru.com) parrt
15:30 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
15:28 Re: Crash if function_end_locus not set Richard Kenner
15:27 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
15:27 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Nick Burrett
15:22 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
15:21 Crash if function_end_locus not set Andreas Schwab
15:20 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Nathan Sidwell
15:18 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
15:07 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Daniel Jacobowitz
15:02 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
14:55 Re: [RFC] type safe trees H. J. Lu
14:41 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Paul Brook
14:25 Re: RFC: Requiring GAS for mips-sgi-irix* Albert Chin-A-Young
14:25 RE: turning off range simplification Conway, Christopher L (Christo
14:17 Re: insn-attrtab for unsigned comparisons Kaz Kojima
14:14 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Daniel Jacobowitz
14:04 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
14:03 Re: turning off range simplification Paul Brook
13:51 turning off range simplification Conway, Christopher L (Christo
13:34 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Paul Brook
13:05 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
12:42 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
12:39 df.c bug fix for gcc_3_4_0_release Leehod Baruch
12:39 [RFC] Exploiting dual mode operation - preliminary code for phase 1 Leehod Baruch
12:08 RE: Requiring GAS for mips-sgi-irix* Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)
11:06 Re: [lno] 50% runtime performance regression since yesterday Richard Guenther
10:04 RFC: Requiring GAS for mips-sgi-irix* Richard Sandiford
09:44 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Andrew Haley
09:03 Re: Posts regarding deleting the VAX form of GCC from the next series Jan-Benedict Glaw
08:29 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Richard Sandiford
08:28 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Richard Sandiford
08:21 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Nathan Sidwell
06:53 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Benjamin Kosnik
06:38 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
06:28 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Benjamin Kosnik
06:14 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Mark Mitchell
06:02 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Geoff Keating
05:28 Re: Posts regarding deleting the VAX form of GCC from the nextseries Andreas Jaeger
05:26 Re: Spurious differences between 32 and 64 bit mode numeric results Andreas Jaeger
05:13 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Steven Bosscher
05:02 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Mark Mitchell
04:43 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Mark Mitchell
04:35 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Geoff Keating
04:28 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Andrew Pinski
04:25 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Dale Johannesen
04:21 Re: ColdFire softfloat optimization Peter Barada
04:19 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Mark Mitchell
04:18 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Alexandre Oliva
04:15 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Alexandre Oliva
04:12 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Geoff Keating
03:37 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
03:28 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Mark Mitchell
03:13 Re: ColdFire softfloat optimization Jim Wilson
03:10 Re: Tru64 Problem / gcc 3.4.0 Jim Wilson
02:56 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Daniel Berlin
02:39 Re: insn-attrtab for unsigned comparisons Jim Wilson
02:35 Re: Fwd: RTL help needed Jim Wilson
02:34 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Ian Lance Taylor
02:24 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
02:20 Re: Problem with movqi pattern Jim Wilson
01:49 Re: c.opt doesn't use Var() ? DJ Delorie
01:34 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Phil Edwards
01:12 Re: alternate keywords in C Jim Wilson
01:00 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Giovanni Bajo
00:48 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Gabriel Dos Reis
00:23 Re: inline assembly operands Jim Wilson

June 24, 2004
23:44 libgcc2 exception clause inconsistent Mike Stump
23:39 Re: gcc mainline does not build on apple-ppc-darwin DJ Delorie
23:31 Re: gcc mainline does not build on apple-ppc-darwin Frank Ch. Eigler
23:27 Re: [PATCH] Improved target tuning in simplify-rtx.c Jim Wilson
23:19 Re: gcc mainline does not build on apple-ppc-darwin Andrew Pinski
23:18 Re: C++ -- a valid idea? Joe Buck
23:05 Re: alternate keywords in C Joe Buck
22:47 Re: g++.dg/ext/stmtexpr2.C failure Jason Merrill
22:43 Re: alternate keywords in C Jim Wilson
22:31 Re: No Compilation Warning... Jim Wilson
22:31 gcc mainline does not build on apple-ppc-darwin Fariborz Jahanian
22:11 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
22:04 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Richard Henderson
21:42 [rfc] proposal for compilation unit wide alias analyis Kenneth Zadeck
21:41 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Richard Guenther
21:24 g++.dg/ext/stmtexpr2.C failure Ulrich Weigand
21:22 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Geoff Keating
21:08 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Dale Johannesen
20:55 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Geoff Keating
20:32 Re: c.opt doesn't use Var() ? DJ Delorie
20:29 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Jan Hubicka
20:27 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Jan Hubicka
20:23 Re: c.opt doesn't use Var() ? Zack Weinberg
20:11 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Richard Henderson
20:11 Re: Posts regarding deleting the VAX form of GCC from the next series Jan-Benedict Glaw
20:08 Re: bootstrap failure on ia64 Jim Wilson
20:04 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Zack Weinberg
20:02 c.opt doesn't use Var() ? DJ Delorie
20:01 Re: TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS vs STATEMENT_LIST vs recompute_side_effects Richard Henderson
19:51 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Alexandre Oliva
19:11 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Zack Weinberg
18:56 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Dale Johannesen
18:48 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Zack Weinberg
18:45 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Dale Johannesen
18:40 Re: TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS vs STATEMENT_LIST vs recompute_side_effects Richard Kenner
18:11 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Zack Weinberg
17:58 Re: TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS vs STATEMENT_LIST vs recompute_side_effects Jeffrey A Law
17:55 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Dale Johannesen
17:52 Re: TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS vs STATEMENT_LIST vs recompute_side_effects Richard Henderson
17:34 Re: TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS vs STATEMENT_LIST vs recompute_side_effects Richard Kenner
17:30 TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS vs STATEMENT_LIST vs recompute_side_effects Jeffrey A Law
17:26 Re: No Compilation Warning... Manje Gowda S G
17:13 Re: possible structure layout bug Nathan Sidwell
17:08 Re: C++ and inlining Richard Guenther
16:58 Re: function structure Jim Wilson
16:50 Re: possible structure layout bug Stephen Kennedy
16:42 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Andrew Pinski
16:35 Re: where the compilation process stops in gcc Jim Wilson
16:27 Re: Posts regarding deleting the VAX form of GCC from the next series Jan-Benedict Glaw
16:25 Spurious differences between 32 and 64 bit mode numeric results Andreas Svrcek-Seiler
16:03 RE: Bogus REG_EQUIV note generation [was RE: Deep CSE bug!] Jeffrey A Law
16:00 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Gabriel Dos Reis
15:52 Re: C++ and inlining Andrew Pinski
15:16 Re: a quick few questions Mike Stump
14:58 Re: [lno] Bootstrap failure on ia64 Zdenek Dvorak
14:56 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Mike Stump
14:51 C++ and inlining Richard Guenther
14:17 Paradies Bundesrepublik - Rente fuer die Welt - [Id:4805] jbuck
13:53 GREG Expansion Problem Philip Brown
13:14 Re: C++ -- a valid idea? Mike Stump
13:04 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Kenner
13:03 Re: [lno] Bootstrap failure on ia64 Falk Hueffner
13:00 Re: [lno] Bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
12:55 Re: New C++ regression: g++.dg/template/copy1.C Robert Dewar
12:25 Re: c++ optimisation fails badly Teddy Todorov
11:17 [lno] Bootstrap failure on ia64 Andreas Schwab
10:49 Re: New C++ regression: g++.dg/template/copy1.C Richard Kenner
10:30 RE: Bogus REG_EQUIV note generation [was RE: Deep CSE bug!] Dave Korn
10:14 Re: c++ optimisation fails badly Giovanni Bajo
09:22 [SC] Require C++ for bootstrapping Nathan Sidwell
09:10 SuperH target in CSiBE Gábor Lóki
08:54 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Nathan Sidwell
08:24 Re: function attribute syntax question Ranjit Mathew
07:11 Re: unexpected memmove() invokation Richard Henderson
06:38 c++ optimisation fails badly Andrew Dorrell
06:29 Re: New C++ regression: g++.dg/template/copy1.C Mark Mitchell
06:29 unexpected memmove() invokation Andrew Morton
06:25 Re: New C++ regression: g++.dg/template/copy1.C Andrew Pinski
06:10 New C++ regression: g++.dg/template/copy1.C Mark Mitchell
05:57 Re: a quick few questions Tom Lord
04:30 Re: [RTL]Access rtx oprands 王 逸
03:35 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Geoff Keating
03:34 Re: a quick few questions Geert Bosch
03:25 Re: [lno] 50% runtime performance regression since yesterday Sebastian Pop
03:18 Re: a quick few questions Mike Stump
03:12 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Mark Mitchell
03:07 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Zack Weinberg
03:06 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Geoff Keating
03:06 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Mark Mitchell
03:01 Libanesen in Berlin bug-gcc
02:58 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Mark Mitchell
02:58 Re: IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Geoff Keating
02:43 IMA corner case with forward declarations of statics Zack Weinberg
02:11 Re: a quick few questions Eric Christopher
02:11 Re: a quick few questions Tom Lord
02:05 Re: a quick few questions Tom Lord
02:01 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Mike Stump
01:59 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
01:50 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
01:47 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Kenner
01:44 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Kenner
01:42 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Kenner
01:35 Re: ICE with gcc 3.4, would like to add test case in Dejagnu test suite Ben Elliston
01:21 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Gabriel Dos Reis
01:14 Re: contributing & bound-checks S.Hockenhull
01:14 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Gabriel Dos Reis
01:13 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
01:04 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Geoffrey Keating
00:57 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Robert Dewar
00:54 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Gabriel Dos Reis
00:49 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Gabriel Dos Reis
00:43 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Geoffrey Keating
00:42 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Gabriel Dos Reis
00:34 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Geert Bosch
00:31 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF andCOMPONENT_REF Dan Nicolaescu
00:12 Re: contributing & bound-checks Nicholas Nethercote
00:11 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Geert Bosch

June 23, 2004
23:56 Re: [RFC] type safe trees B. Kosnik
23:56 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Richard Henderson
23:54 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Geert Bosch
23:34 Re: [lno] 50% runtime performance regression since yesterday Sebastian Pop
23:32 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Henderson
23:27 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Henderson
23:27 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
23:22 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Henderson
23:20 gcc-ss-3.3-20040623 is now available gccadmin
23:15 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
23:10 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Kenner
23:06 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Mark Mitchell
23:02 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Tom Tromey
22:56 Re: a quick few questions Tom Tromey
22:54 Re: Question on internal_get_tmp_var Richard Kenner
22:51 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
22:49 Re: Proposal for reference annotations Richard Kenner
22:48 Re: Question on internal_get_tmp_var Richard Henderson
22:48 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Neil Booth
22:46 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Kenner
22:45 Re: Proposal for reference annotations Richard Henderson
22:42 Re: Question on internal_get_tmp_var Richard Kenner
22:39 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Neil Booth
22:37 Re: Question on internal_get_tmp_var Richard Henderson
22:30 Re: Proposal for reference annotations Richard Kenner
22:29 function attribute syntax question Per Bothner
22:27 Re: Proposal for reference annotations Richard Henderson
22:25 Question on internal_get_tmp_var Richard Kenner
22:20 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
22:14 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode David Carlton
22:13 Re: contributing & bound-checks Bernardo Innocenti
21:53 Re: Pthread support on Arm-elf Daniel Jacobowitz
21:50 Re: contributing & bound-checks Frank Ch. Eigler
21:21 Pthread support on Arm-elf Vijay Deep Kongubangaram Pani
21:06 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
21:00 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Mark Mitchell
20:53 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
20:40 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Geert Bosch
20:25 Re: implicit narrowing conversion. Joseph S. Myers
20:17 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode B. Kosnik
20:14 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF andCOMPONENT_REF Gerald Pfeifer
20:11 Re: implicit narrowing conversion. Adam Sulmicki
20:10 Proposal for reference annotations Richard Kenner
20:07 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Adam Nemet
20:06 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Phil Edwards
19:53 contributing & bound-checks rv
19:42 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
19:40 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Kenner
19:30 Re: implicit narrowing conversion. Joseph S. Myers
19:28 a quick few questions Tom Lord
19:16 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode David Carlton
19:00 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Kenner
18:58 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
18:56 Re: implicit narrowing conversion. Adam Sulmicki
18:51 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode B. Kosnik
18:43 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Mark Mitchell
18:39 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Steven Bosscher
18:33 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Geoffrey Keating
18:33 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Geoffrey Keating
18:32 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
18:19 Re: V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode B. Kosnik
18:13 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Henderson
18:09 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Daniel Berlin
17:58 RE: Bogus REG_EQUIV note generation [was RE: Deep CSE bug!] Dave Korn
17:44 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Kenner
17:42 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Ian Lance Taylor
17:41 V3 patch causes EH failures in ILP32 mode Mark Mitchell
17:40 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Richard Henderson
17:38 RE: Bogus REG_EQUIV note generation [was RE: Deep CSE bug!] Jeffrey A Law
17:29 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Matt Austern
17:29 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Henderson
17:17 RE: [RFC] type safe trees (aka, reinventing C++ in C) Chris Lattner
17:05 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Theodore Papadopoulo
17:04 Re: [lno] 50% runtime performance regression since yesterday Sebastian Pop
16:23 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Nathan Sidwell
15:34 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Gabriel Dos Reis
15:28 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Nathan Sidwell
15:11 Re: [lno] 50% runtime performance regression since yesterday Richard Guenther
15:06 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Paolo Bonzini
15:00 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Nathan Sidwell
14:53 Re: [lno] 50% runtime performance regression since yesterday Richard Guenther
14:50 Re: [RFC] type safe trees Paolo Bonzini
14:38 Re: [lno] 50% runtime performance regression since yesterday Sebastian Pop
14:33 [RFC] type safe trees Nathan Sidwell
14:32 RE: Bogus REG_EQUIV note generation [was RE: Deep CSE bug!] Dave Korn
14:23 Re: [lno] 50% runtime performance regression since yesterday Zdenek Dvorak
14:16 Re: implicit narrowing conversion. Joseph S. Myers
13:55 Re: [lno] 50% runtime performance regression since yesterday Sebastian Pop
13:36 Re: [lno] 50% runtime performance regression since yesterday Sebastian Pop
12:55 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Gabriel Dos Reis
12:49 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Robert Dewar
12:49 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Gabriel Dos Reis
12:40 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Gabriel Dos Reis
12:32 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Nathan Sidwell
11:34 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Kenner
11:17 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Paul Brook
11:07 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Nathan Sidwell
10:35 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Richard Kenner
10:32 Re: Patch to allow Ada to work with tree-ssa Richard Kenner
10:08 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Richard Kenner
09:50 RE: [RTL]Access rtx oprands Dave Korn
08:32 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Richard Henderson
08:28 [lno] 50% runtime performance regression since yesterday Richard Guenther
05:21 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Steven Bosscher
05:04 Re: Bogus REG_EQUIV note generation [was RE: Deep CSE bug!] Jeffrey A Law
04:53 RE: Deep CSE bug! Jeffrey A Law
04:50 RE: Deep CSE bug! Jeffrey A Law
04:49 [RTL]Access rtx oprands 王 逸
04:17 [RTL]Access rtx oprands 王 逸
04:10 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Jeffrey A Law
04:07 Performance testing function pointers Scott Bronson
03:10 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Andrew Pinski
03:07 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Geert Bosch
02:28 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Richard Kenner
02:20 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Robert Dewar
01:58 Re: Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Richard Henderson
01:44 Das kann unmoeglich sein -Leserbrief- -Id:7541- jfc
01:30 Paradies Bundesrepublik - Rente fuer die Welt - #Id:9225# burley
01:13 Proposed location for variable sizes etc in ARRAY_REF and COMPONENT_REF Richard Kenner
01:06 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Ian Lance Taylor
00:59 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
00:52 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Ian Lance Taylor
00:41 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
00:13 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Ian Lance Taylor

June 22, 2004
22:52 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
22:23 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Joseph S. Myers
22:19 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Per Bothner
22:14 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
21:47 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Joseph S. Myers
21:25 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Andreas Tobler
20:54 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Joseph S. Myers
20:50 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Richard Henderson
20:36 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Richard Henderson
20:17 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Mark Mitchell
20:09 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
19:16 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Mark Mitchell
19:15 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
19:06 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Andrew Pinski
19:01 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Andreas Schwab
18:54 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
18:53 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Geert Bosch
18:50 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
18:39 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Joseph S. Myers
18:32 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Stan Shebs
18:22 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski
18:10 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
18:09 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Zack Weinberg
18:09 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Zack Weinberg
17:54 implicit narrowing conversion. Adam Sulmicki
17:54 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Zack Weinberg
17:50 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Zack Weinberg
17:41 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Mark Mitchell
17:36 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Mark Mitchell
17:31 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Richard Henderson
17:14 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
17:12 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Joseph S. Myers
16:34 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
16:11 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Mark Mitchell
16:00 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Frank Ch. Eigler
15:38 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Joseph S. Myers
14:13 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Andreas Tobler
14:09 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Paolo Bonzini
14:00 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
13:23 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Andreas Tobler
13:21 Re: i386/x86-64 UNSPEC_NOP usage Jan Beulich
11:54 ICE with gcc 3.4, would like to add test case in Dejagnu test suite Nitin Yewale
11:38 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Robert Dewar
11:34 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Robert Dewar
10:49 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Report Jan Hubicka
09:37 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Jan Hubicka
09:35 Re: Var-tracking generates broken DW_AT_frame_base on s390 Josef Zlomek
09:29 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Jan Hubicka
09:27 Re: Var-tracking generates broken DW_AT_frame_base on s390 Ulrich Weigand
09:24 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Jan Hubicka
09:17 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Jan Hubicka
09:06 Re: Regressions on mainline Mark Mitchell
09:04 Seu SUCESSO em 520 pginas, por apenas R$ 10,00. Divonsir
09:03 Seu SUCESSO em 520 pginas, por apenas R$ 10,00. Divonsir
08:56 Re: Regressions on mainline Joseph S. Myers
08:30 GCC 3.4.1 Status Mark Mitchell
08:30 Is anyone interested in __float128 support on ia64 and x86_64? H. J. Lu
07:05 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Geoffrey Keating
06:22 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Zack Weinberg
06:18 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Mark Mitchell
05:05 Re: mudflap versus cgraph Mark Mitchell
04:52 Re: INLINER_FOR_JAVA Andrew Pinski
04:42 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Mark Mitchell
04:14 mudflap versus cgraph Zack Weinberg
03:55 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
03:45 tree-inline.c documentation Richard Kenner
03:42 INLINER_FOR_JAVA Richard Kenner
03:25 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Geoffrey Keating
01:17 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Ben Elliston
00:10 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Mark Mitchell

June 21, 2004
23:58 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Richard Henderson
23:21 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Mark Mitchell
23:01 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Andrew Pinski
22:54 Re: Regressions on mainline\ David Edelsohn
22:53 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Diego Novillo
22:50 Re: Regressions on mainline\ David Edelsohn
22:46 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Mark Mitchell
22:44 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Mark Mitchell
22:44 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Zack Weinberg
22:42 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Mark Mitchell
22:39 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Zack Weinberg
22:35 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Steven Bosscher
22:32 Re: Regressions on mainline\ Andrew Pinski
22:31 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Steven Bosscher
22:22 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Matt Thomas
22:19 Regressions on mainline Mark Mitchell
21:46 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Jan-Benedict Glaw
21:44 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Jan-Benedict Glaw
21:37 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Report Mark Mitchell
21:30 Re: target hooks for structure layout DJ Delorie
21:26 RE: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Paul Koning
21:19 RE: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets E. Weddington
21:19 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Steven Bosscher
20:53 Re: target hooks for structure layout Zack Weinberg
20:50 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Matt Thomas
20:47 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets tm_gccmail
20:44 Re: Posts regarding deleting the VAX form of GCC from the next series Gregg C Levine
20:41 Re: Posts regarding deleting the VAX form of GCC from the next series DJ Delorie
20:41 Re: Posts regarding deleting the VAX form of GCC from the next series Gregg C Levine
20:39 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
20:34 Re: Posts regarding deleting the VAX form of GCC from the next series Christoph Hellwig
20:33 target hooks for structure layout DJ Delorie
20:32 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Phil Edwards
20:30 Posts regarding deleting the VAX form of GCC from the next series Gregg C Levine
20:04 Re: named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
19:51 Re: named warnings & individual warning control Phil Edwards
19:08 named warnings & individual warning control DJ Delorie
19:06 Re: Bogus REG_EQUIV note generation [was RE: Deep CSE bug!] Roger Sayle
19:00 Crossjump heuristics Pat Haugen
18:54 compiling g++ 3.2.3 Tan-Long Phan
18:39 RE: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Bob Wilson
18:31 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Per Bothner
18:29 Re: WITH_CLEANUP_EXPR oddity Richard Henderson
18:05 RE: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Dave Korn
18:05 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Daniel Berlin
17:52 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Per Bothner
17:44 Bogus REG_EQUIV note generation [was RE: Deep CSE bug!] Dave Korn
17:26 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Robert Dewar
17:24 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Per Bothner
17:08 Re: Var-tracking generates broken DW_AT_frame_base on s390 Josef Zlomek
17:05 Re: Question about CASE_DROPS_THROUGH Ulrich Weigand
16:47 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets E. Weddington
15:45 Re: Question about CASE_DROPS_THROUGH Kai Henningsen
15:02 Re: Var-tracking generates broken DW_AT_frame_base on s390 Ulrich Weigand
13:55 Status of tree-ssa work for Ada Richard Kenner
13:54 RE: Deep CSE bug! Dave Korn
13:42 gcc news #3 Mathieu Lacage
13:23 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Dave Hudson
13:09 Re: Var-tracking generates broken DW_AT_frame_base on s390 Josef Zlomek
12:24 Var-tracking generates broken DW_AT_frame_base on s390 Ulrich Weigand
11:22 Re: WITH_CLEANUP_EXPR oddity Richard Kenner
11:18 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Richard Sandiford
10:33 Re: [lno] need help with setting may-aliases in the vectorizer Dorit Naishlos
10:28 Re: LNO optimizing out operations it shouldn't? Dorit Naishlos
10:26 Function, file and line information out of '_Unwind_Context' ptr Gerrit Bruchhäuser
10:22 RE: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets S. Bosscher
10:16 RE: Deep CSE bug! Dave Korn
10:11 RE: Deep CSE bug! Dave Korn
09:00 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Richard Sandiford
08:51 Re: Question about CASE_DROPS_THROUGH Richard Henderson
08:42 Re: WITH_CLEANUP_EXPR oddity Richard Henderson
05:32 Re: Question about CASE_DROPS_THROUGH Zack Weinberg
04:35 Visualization tools sevtov
04:15 Re: Question about CASE_DROPS_THROUGH Roger Sayle
03:11 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Kei Sakamoto
01:51 Re: [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Joseph S. Myers
01:27 Re: contributing to g++ Ben Elliston
01:20 Re: Build problem with gcc 3.4 on Mac OS X Andreas Schwab
00:25 Re: Build problem with gcc 3.4 on Mac OS X llewelly

June 20, 2004
23:10 [RFC] A policy for supported ports and targets Steven Bosscher
22:11 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Colin Douglas Howell
21:57 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Robert Dewar
21:53 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
21:51 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Henderson
21:40 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Aaron W. LaFramboise
21:32 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Robert Dewar
21:25 WITH_CLEANUP_EXPR oddity Richard Kenner
21:24 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Robert Dewar
21:17 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
21:02 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Zack Weinberg
20:59 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
20:56 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Henderson
20:48 Re: FP comparisons, C, X86, and NaN's Chris Lattner
20:44 Re: FP comparisons, C, X86, and NaN's Gabriel Dos Reis
20:44 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Steven Bosscher
20:33 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries John Marshall
20:24 Re: Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Dave Hudson
20:04 Re: FP comparisons, C, X86, and NaN's Chris Lattner
19:53 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Aaron W. LaFramboise
19:51 Re: Question about CASE_DROPS_THROUGH Zack Weinberg
19:47 Re: Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Robert Dewar
19:43 Licensing of libgcc and libstdc++ as shared libraries Aaron W. LaFramboise
18:49 FP comparisons, C, X86, and NaN's Gabriel Dos Reis
18:26 Re: Suboptimal code generated for _Bool Andi Kleen
18:00 gcc-ss-3.5-20040620 is now available gccadmin
17:12 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
16:35 Re: Build problem with gcc 3.4 on Mac OS X Andreas Schwab
16:33 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
16:31 Re: Move IF_STMT, CLEANUP_STMT out of C front end Richard Henderson
16:27 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Henderson
16:10 Re: Question about CASE_DROPS_THROUGH Roger Sayle
15:40 Proposed targets to obsolete for 3.5, first pass Steven Bosscher
13:32 Re: Build problem with gcc 3.4 on Mac OS X Eljay Love-Jensen
13:30 Question about CASE_DROPS_THROUGH Steven Bosscher
12:22 Re: Suboptimal code generated for _Bool Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
11:43 Build problem with gcc 3.4 on Mac OS X Davide Angelocola
11:31 Re: FP comparisons, C, X86, and NaN's Robert Dewar
10:56 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
10:55 Re: Move IF_STMT, CLEANUP_STMT out of C front end Richard Kenner
10:45 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
10:14 Suboptimal code generated for _Bool Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
09:49 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Henderson
09:28 Re: FP comparisons, C, X86, and NaN's Joseph S. Myers
07:14 Re: FP comparisons, C, X86, and NaN's Chris Lattner
04:35 Re: FP comparisons, C, X86, and NaN's Gabriel Dos Reis
04:16 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Zack Weinberg
03:06 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
02:59 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
02:47 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Andrew Pinski
02:24 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
02:19 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Diego Novillo
02:12 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
02:10 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Andrew Pinski
01:56 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner
01:51 Re: How to debug ssa optimizer Daniel Berlin
01:44 FP comparisons, C, X86, and NaN's Chris Lattner
01:43 How to debug ssa optimizer Richard Kenner

June 19, 2004
19:09 Two similar functions optimized differently Alfie
19:00 Re: Problem with ssa optimization making an uninitialized variable Richard Kenner
17:45 contributing to g++ Korcan Hussein
16:52 Re: Problem with ssa optimization making an uninitialized variable Diego Novillo
14:50 Problem with ssa optimization making an uninitialized variable Richard Kenner
14:09 [PATCH] Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Ulrich Weigand
13:46 Re: Libanesen in Berlin Florian Weimer
13:39 Libanesen in Berlin domcipin
12:54 Re: tree-dfa.c: find_hidden_use_vars_r Diego Novillo
12:49 Re: tree-dfa.c: find_hidden_use_vars_r Richard Kenner
12:46 Re: tree-dfa.c: find_hidden_use_vars_r Diego Novillo
11:04 tree-dfa.c: find_hidden_use_vars_r Richard Kenner
07:37 Re: Does any one have the idea how the gcc FR-V port solves thiskind of problem ? Richard Sandiford
03:02 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Report John David Anglin
02:28 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski
02:22 Re: Flow crash for conditional branches against a constant Daniel Jacobowitz
02:12 Question on second call to unshare_all_trees in gimplify_body Richard Kenner
01:41 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Richard Henderson
01:01 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski

June 18, 2004
23:55 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Richard Henderson
23:43 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski
23:14 gcc-ss-3.4-20040618 is now available gccadmin
23:08 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Richard Henderson
22:53 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski
22:30 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Richard Henderson
22:03 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski
21:39 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Richard Henderson
21:13 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski
21:06 Re: libffi bug? Eric Botcazou
21:05 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Eric Botcazou
20:54 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski
20:45 Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040609 is now available Tom Tromey
20:45 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Report Gabriel Dos Reis
20:23 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Richard Henderson
20:17 Re: libffi bug? Tom Tromey
19:00 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Geoffrey Keating
18:21 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Richard Kenner
18:16 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Joern Rennecke
17:58 libffi bug? Thomas Heller
17:29 RE: Copy Constructor Problem with 3.2.2?? Rupert Wood
16:20 Re: Copy Constructor Problem with 3.2.2?? Joe Buck
16:08 Re: LNO optimizing out operations it shouldn't? Dorit Naishlos
15:34 Does any one have the idea how the gcc FR-V port solves this kind of problem ? Hsin-Hsien Wu
15:26 Re: Error occurs in libstdc++-v3/include is ignored Hideki IWAMOTO
14:58 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Ulrich Weigand
14:56 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Ulrich Weigand
14:28 RE: Deep CSE bug! Roger Sayle
14:20 RE: Deep CSE bug! Roger Sayle
13:05 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Michael Matz
11:17 Re: Copy Constructor Problem with 3.2.2?? Giovanni Bajo
11:15 RE: Copy Constructor Problem with 3.2.2?? Jyotirmoy Das
11:08 Copy Constructor Problem with 3.2.2?? Phil Prentice
10:42 Re: Outdated recommendation? Diego Novillo
09:24 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski
09:22 i386/x86-64 UNSPEC_NOP usage Jan Beulich
09:04 RE: Deep CSE bug! Dave Korn
08:13 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Christoph Hellwig
08:11 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Zack Weinberg
08:11 [lno] performance comparison to mainline Richard Guenther
08:02 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Andrew Pinski
07:41 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Zack Weinberg
07:32 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski
07:05 Re: Error occurs in libstdc++-v3/include is ignored Alexandre Oliva
05:56 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Eric Botcazou
03:26 LNO optimizing out operations it shouldn't? Timothy J . Wood
03:25 Re: Deep CSE bug! Jie Zhang
02:41 Outdated recommendation? Chris Lattner
02:19 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski
02:07 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Mark Mitchell
02:03 Re: Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Andrew Pinski
01:57 Why does casting a function generate a run-time abort? Ziemowit Laski

June 17, 2004
23:05 Re: tree-eh.c vs. CFGs Stuart Hastings
20:35 Re: tree-eh.c vs. CFGs Richard Henderson
20:09 Re: __builtin_extend_pointer Benjamin Kosnik
20:01 tree-eh.c vs. CFGs Stuart Hastings
19:57 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Richard Kenner
19:55 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Richard Kenner
19:21 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Report Jan Hubicka
18:58 Re: Question w.r.t. inside class defined struct for C++ language lawer. llewelly
17:30 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Christopher Faylor
16:59 RE: Deep CSE bug! Dave Korn
16:43 Re: Error occurs in libstdc++-v3/include is ignored Benjamin Kosnik
16:39 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Richard Earnshaw
16:08 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Ulrich Weigand
15:53 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Ulrich Weigand
15:40 RE: Deep CSE bug! Dave Korn
15:24 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Report Gabriel Dos Reis
14:40 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Richard Earnshaw
14:24 Re: Error occurs in libstdc++-v3/include is ignored Hideki IWAMOTO
14:12 header of the build system is used for cross compiling libstdc++ Hideki IWAMOTO
14:05 RE: Deep CSE bug! Dave Korn
13:51 Re: GCC 3.4.1 Status Report Jan Hubicka
13:48 Re: Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Richard Kenner
13:16 Use-and-clobber insns and some ancient combine.c code Ulrich Weigand
11:20 Deep CSE bug! Dave Korn
09:53 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? John Lee
07:01 GCC 3.4.1 Status Report Mark Mitchell
06:57 Re: Question w.r.t. inside class defined struct for C++ language lawer. Vladimir Prus
06:47 Question w.r.t. inside class defined struct for C++ language lawer. Karel Gardas
03:49 Re: [lno] need help with setting may-aliases in the vectorizer Diego Novillo
03:24 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Michael Elizabeth Chastain
02:09 Re: possible structure layout bug Jie Zhang
00:16 Re: RFC: offsettable problem Dale Johannesen
00:10 Re: RFC: offsettable problem Geoffrey Keating

June 16, 2004
23:50 Re: Need doc of debug output produced by -fdump-translation-unit Jim Wilson
23:36 RFC: offsettable problem Dale Johannesen
23:29 Re: POT file for cpplib Jim Wilson
23:18 gcc-ss-3.3-20040616 is now available gccadmin
23:02 Re: Trouble building gcc-3.4.0 cygwin->linux Jim Wilson
22:48 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Ben Elliston
22:19 Re: __builtin_extend_pointer Jim Wilson
21:26 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failurewhile running aclocal in libcpp) Robert Dewar
20:58 Re: __builtin_extend_pointer Joseph S. Myers
20:41 Re: __builtin_extend_pointer Benjamin Kosnik
19:56 Re: Error occurs in libstdc++-v3/include is ignored Alexandre Oliva
19:53 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Alexandre Oliva
18:16 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failure while running aclocal in libcpp) Joe Buck
17:57 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failurewhile running aclocal in libcpp) Robert Dewar
17:33 Error occurs in libstdc++-v3/include is ignored Hideki IWAMOTO
17:31 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failure while running aclocal in libcpp) Joe Buck
17:22 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failurewhile running aclocal in libcpp) Gerald Pfeifer
16:30 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Joe Buck
16:27 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Joe Buck
15:31 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Michael Elizabeth Chastain
15:07 Re: Loop optimizer / unroller Zdenek Dvorak
15:03 Re: [RFC] completely peel loops unconditionally Zdenek Dvorak
14:53 [lno] need help with setting may-aliases in the vectorizer Dorit Naishlos
13:47 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Andrew Cagney
12:19 Loop optimizer / unroller Richard Guenther
12:00 Re: Bug in tsi_link_before/after or wrong comment? Diego Novillo
11:52 Re: [RFC] completely peel loops unconditionally Richard Guenther
11:26 RE: Neue Voelkerwanderung droht! <Id:2090> (rus5) russ
11:00 [RFC] completely peel loops unconditionally Richard Guenther
09:27 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failure while running aclocal in libcpp) Alexandre Oliva
08:51 Re: [PATCH] Improved target tuning in simplify-rtx.c tm_gccmail
08:48 Re: Bug in tsi_link_before/after or wrong comment? Steven Bosscher
08:41 Bug in tsi_link_before/after or wrong comment? Mostafa Hagog
08:41 Re: Again, bootstrap failure(s) on ia64 Andreas Schwab
08:21 Again, bootstrap failure(s) on ia64 Richard Guenther
08:09 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failurewhile running aclocal in libcpp) Joseph S. Myers
07:52 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failurewhile running aclocal in libcpp) Paolo Bonzini
07:08 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Alexandre Oliva
06:15 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Ben Elliston
06:11 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Joel Brobecker
04:07 Re: SSA operand interface change proposal Andrew MacLeod
03:38 Re: SSA operand interface change proposal Zdenek Dvorak
03:35 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Ben Elliston
03:34 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Alexandre Oliva
00:49 Re: __builtin_extend_pointer Jim Wilson

June 15, 2004
23:51 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries onMMU-lessARM? Eric Christopher
23:48 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? Bernardo Innocenti
23:40 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Andreas Schwab
23:15 Re: Objective-C++ Stan Shebs
23:08 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Andrew Cagney
23:07 Re: Is "memory" clobber required for all inline asm which does atomic operation??? Geoff Keating
22:56 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Daniel Jacobowitz
22:50 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Joe Buck
22:43 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Ben Elliston
22:29 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Zack Weinberg
22:24 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Alexandre Oliva
21:32 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Zack Weinberg
21:14 Re: Is "memory" clobber required for all inline asm which does atomic operation??? Richard Henderson
20:46 Re: Objective-C++ Ziemowit Laski
20:35 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Alexandre Oliva
20:13 Re: Flow crash for conditional branches against a constant Alexandre Oliva
20:06 Re: Is "memory" clobber required for all inline asm which does atomic operation??? Alexandre Oliva
20:01 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failure while running aclocal in libcpp) Alexandre Oliva
19:59 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? Alexandre Oliva
19:57 Re: playing nice with cvs/rsync Phil Edwards
19:41 Re: gccbug reports? Paul Brook
19:20 Re: HELP: finding the patch for a regression test case Janis Johnson
19:16 Re: gccbug reports? Phil Edwards
19:13 Re: SSA operand interface change proposal Andrew MacLeod
19:03 Re: SSA operand interface change proposal Zdenek Dvorak
18:58 Re: Build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.0 Andrew Pinski
18:58 Re: SSA operand interface change proposal Andrew MacLeod
18:56 Re: SSA operand interface change proposal Andrew MacLeod
18:55 Re: SSA operand interface change proposal Andrew MacLeod
18:45 Re: SSA operand interface change proposal Zdenek Dvorak
18:42 Re: SSA operand interface change proposal Zdenek Dvorak
18:38 Re: SSA operand interface change proposal Zdenek Dvorak
18:33 Re: [PATCH] Improved target tuning in simplify-rtx.c Geert Bosch
18:31 LNO branch merge Zdenek Dvorak
17:32 Re: ColdFire softfloat optimization Richard Henderson
17:27 Re: IEEE extended real formats Richard Henderson
17:24 SSA operand interface change proposal Andrew MacLeod
16:54 Re: Objective-C++ Andrew Pinski
16:44 Re: No Compilation Warning... Joe Buck
16:33 Re: Objective-C++ Timothy J . Wood
16:10 Re: [PATCH] Improved target tuning in simplify-rtx.c Roger Sayle
16:10 RE: HELP: finding the patch for a regression test case perugupa
15:54 Re: updating edge profiling Pat Haugen
15:53 ColdFire softfloat optimization Peter Barada
15:07 Re: [lno] Error with -funroll-loops and tramp3d-v3 testcase Richard Guenther
14:58 Re: [lno] Error with -funroll-loops and tramp3d-v3 testcase Mark Mitchell
13:33 Re: possible structure layout bug Andrew Haley
13:21 Re: possible structure layout bug Stephen Kennedy
12:54 Re: stolen support
12:15 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? Bernardo Innocenti
12:00 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? Bernardo Innocenti
11:54 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? Bernardo Innocenti
11:50 [lno] Error with -funroll-loops and tramp3d-v3 testcase Richard Guenther
10:36 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? themadrasi
09:00 Re: No Compilation Warning... Manje Gowda S G
07:25 Re: Build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.0 Andreas Jaeger
05:37 Re: IEEE extended real formats Robert Dewar
05:37 Re: Objective-C++ Ziemowit Laski
05:07 Re: gcc news #2 Mathieu Lacage
04:37 Re: PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Michael Elizabeth Chastain
04:15 PROPOSAL: removing src/expect Ben Elliston
04:11 Re: IEEE extended real formats Zack Weinberg
04:05 Re: IEEE extended real formats Ian Lance Taylor
03:51 IEEE extended real formats Zack Weinberg
03:38 Re: gccbug reports? Daniel Berlin
03:37 Re: gccbug reports? Andrew Pinski
03:31 Re: gccbug reports? Steve Kargl
03:28 Re: gccbug reports? Daniel Berlin
03:21 Re: gccbug reports? Andrew Pinski
03:16 Re: gccbug reports? Steve Kargl
03:13 playing nice with cvs/rsync Sean McNeil
02:58 Re: gccbug reports? Daniel Berlin
02:54 Re: gccbug reports? Giovanni Bajo
02:46 Re: gccbug reports? Daniel Berlin
02:43 Re: gccbug reports? Steve Kargl
02:40 Re: gccbug reports? Giovanni Bajo
02:38 Re: gccbug reports? Steve Kargl
02:30 Re: gccbug reports? Daniel Berlin
02:20 __builtin_extend_pointer Benjamin Kosnik
02:19 Re: gccbug reports? Steve Kargl
02:10 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? John Lee
02:02 Re: gccbug reports? Daniel Berlin
01:59 inline assembly operands Luchezar Belev
01:54 Re: gccbug reports? Steve Kargl
01:44 Re: Compile time improvement, runtime regression (ia64) Daniel Berlin
01:40 Re: gccbug reports? Daniel Berlin
01:19 gccbug reports? Steve Kargl
00:50 Re: [PATCH] Improved target tuning in simplify-rtx.c Ian Lance Taylor

June 14, 2004
23:55 Re: gcc news #2 Bernardo Innocenti
23:06 Re: LOAD_EXTEND_OP crippled Daniel Jacobowitz
21:59 Re: Cannot compile with recent cvs Andrew Pinski
21:56 Cannot compile with recent cvs Sean McNeil
21:42 Re: LOAD_EXTEND_OP crippled Daniel Jacobowitz
21:32 Re: replace_ssa_names abort that started last week Bradley Lucier
21:24 alternate keywords in C Randy.Dunlap
21:23 Re: Mainline bootstrap broken by Zdenek Dvorak Zdenek Dvorak
21:09 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Tom Lord
20:38 Re: replace_ssa_names abort that started last week Jeffrey A Law
20:16 Re: Build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.0 David Edelsohn
20:12 Re: Build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.0 Andreas Jaeger
20:05 LOAD_EXTEND_OP crippled Daniel Jacobowitz
19:35 Re: gcc news #2 llewelly
19:27 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Tom Lord
19:16 Build is broken on powerpc-apple-darwin7.4.0 Matt Austern
18:34 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? Bernardo Innocenti
18:25 Re: DFA_BUBBLE stuff Vladimir Makarov
17:54 Re: gcc news #2 Robert Dewar
17:49 Re: gcc news #2 Robert Dewar
17:44 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Tom Lord
17:43 Re: Question on scalar replacement Diego Novillo
17:39 Re: Question on scalar replacement Richard Henderson
17:23 Re: gcc news #2 Paul Brook
17:22 Mainline bootstrap broken by Zdenek Dvorak Steve Kargl
17:19 Re: gcc news #2 Jean-Pierre Radley
17:19 Re: gcc news #2 Randy.Dunlap
17:06 Re: gcc news #2 Joe Buck
16:37 Re: No Compilation Warning... llewelly
16:30 Re: gcc news #2 llewelly
15:49 Re: Question on scalar replacement Diego Novillo
15:41 Re: Question on scalar replacement Richard Kenner
15:31 Objective-C++ Mark Mitchell
15:18 Re: Question on scalar replacement Jason Merrill
15:09 Re: Question on scalar replacement Richard Kenner
15:08 Re: [lno] Yet another merge Dorit Naishlos
14:17 Re: Question on scalar replacement Diego Novillo
14:06 Re: Question on scalar replacement Richard Kenner
13:58 Re: Question on scalar replacement Diego Novillo
13:50 Re: Question on scalar replacement Richard Kenner
13:40 Re: Question on scalar replacement Diego Novillo
13:35 Re: [lno] Yet another merge Zdenek Dvorak
13:24 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failurewhile running aclocal in libcpp) Gerald Pfeifer
12:54 Re: Question on scalar replacement Richard Kenner
12:49 Re: G77 Compiler Users Guide? Bud Davis
12:45 Re: Question on scalar replacement Richard Kenner
12:23 No Compilation Warning... Manje Gowda S G
11:27 Re: [lno] Yet another merge Andreas Schwab
10:18 G77 Compiler Users Guide? Heggli Mark
09:45 gcc news #2 Mathieu Lacage
07:32 Re: Why did libffi change it's soname? Paolo Bonzini
06:42 Tru64 Problem / gcc 3.4.0 Aron Vrtala, Vienna Univ. Comp
02:27 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? John Lee
00:49 Re: LAPACK: good news and bad news Steve Kargl
00:20 Re: LAPACK: good news and bad news Tobias Schlüter
00:10 Re: Question on scalar replacement Diego Novillo

June 13, 2004
23:43 insn-attrtab for unsigned comparisons Kaz Kojima
23:01 Re: Question on scalar replacement Richard Kenner
19:36 Re: Question on scalar replacement Diego Novillo
19:32 where the compilation process stops in gcc perugupa
19:07 Re: lno-branch vs ptr-to-member Mark Mitchell
18:09 Re: Question on scalar replacement Richard Kenner
17:56 gcc-ss-3.5-20040613 is now available gccadmin
17:40 configure check for MPFR? Steve Kargl
17:34 Re: Question on scalar replacement Richard Henderson
17:27 Re: tree-nested.c:walk_stmt, case CATCH_EXPR Richard Henderson
15:21 Why did libffi change it's soname? Matthias Klose
14:55 Question on scalar replacement Richard Kenner
14:06 Re: parse errors in netinet/in.h Andreas Jaeger
13:55 tree-nested.c:walk_stmt, case CATCH_EXPR Richard Kenner
12:19 Compile time improvement, runtime regression (ia64) Richard Guenther
11:12 Re: parse errors in netinet/in.h skg
11:09 Re: parse errors in netinet/in.h skg
10:46 Re: parse errors in netinet/in.h Andreas Jaeger
09:35 parse errors in netinet/in.h skg
08:11 Re: Flags parameter in comptypes Mark Mitchell
08:02 Re: C++ -- a valid idea? Florian Weimer
05:22 C++ -- a valid idea? Alexis Wilke

June 12, 2004
17:43 Re: Microsoft patent Laurent GUERBY
15:19 Re: Microsoft patent Ian Lance Taylor
14:57 Re: Microsoft patent Robert Dewar
14:49 Microsoft patent dlw
13:00 Re: [gui] [merge] java-gui-merge for may 26 Mark Wielaard
00:34 Re: QA-oriented features for a version control system Branko Äibej
00:20 Re: QA-oriented features for a version control system Branko Äibej

June 11, 2004
23:43 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybe a fix) Richard Henderson
23:18 gcc-ss-3.4-20040611 is now available gccadmin
22:51 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Bernardo Innocenti
21:27 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? Bernardo Innocenti
19:55 Successful build of gcc-3.4.0 on i686-pc-mingw32 Aaron W. LaFramboise
18:57 Re: libiberty and getopt and getopt long Marc Espie
18:18 Re: sh-elf: PR target/15886 Joern Rennecke
17:05 Re: Flow crash for conditional branches against a constant Daniel Jacobowitz
17:02 Re: Flow crash for conditional branches against a constant Richard Earnshaw
17:00 Re: Flow crash for conditional branches against a constant Richard Earnshaw
15:54 Re: Flow crash for conditional branches against a constant Daniel Jacobowitz
15:49 Re: f_options x common.opt Zdenek Dvorak
15:47 Re: Flow crash for conditional branches against a constant Ian Lance Taylor
15:44 Flow crash for conditional branches against a constant Daniel Jacobowitz
15:40 Re: [RFC] MIPS division by zero and libgcj... Maciej W. Rozycki
15:36 Re: [RFC] MIPS division by zero and libgcj... David Daney
15:00 Re: sh-elf: PR target/15886 Kaz Kojima
14:34 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybe afix) Andreas Schwab
14:21 Re: sh-elf: PR target/15886 Joern Rennecke
14:08 Re: [lno] Yet another merge Andrew Pinski
14:05 [lno] Yet another merge Zdenek Dvorak
14:01 Re: [RFC] MIPS division by zero and libgcj... Maciej W. Rozycki
13:18 Re: c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
11:49 Is "memory" clobber required for all inline asm which does atomic operation??? Ashok.A
11:41 Re: bootstrap failure on ia64 compiling libstdc++ Diego Novillo
11:35 Re: bootstrap failure on ia64 compiling libstdc++ Andreas Schwab
11:29 DFA_BUBBLE stuff Steven Bosscher
11:26 bootstrap failure on ia64 compiling libstdc++ Richard Guenther
11:24 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Lars Segerlund
10:11 Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040609 is now available Thomas Heller
08:53 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? John Lee
08:23 Re: f_options x common.opt Joseph S. Myers
07:05 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? John Lee
06:56 Fwd: RTL help needed kripashankar
06:55 Fwd: RTL help needed kripashankar
06:45 Re: Caching of include files breaks compilation? Andreas Jaeger
05:44 Re: f_options x common.opt Zack Weinberg
05:40 Re: [C++/debug] SDB_DEBUG (-gcoff) vs record_builtin_type vs GAS Zack Weinberg
04:34 Re: replace_ssa_names abort that started last week Jeffrey A Law
04:30 Re: export templates llewelly
02:52 Format for auto-regression testers to submit new fails for inclusion into bugzilla Daniel Berlin
02:41 Re: export templates Gabriel Dos Reis
02:09 Re: export templates Ian Lance Taylor
00:58 f_options x common.opt Zdenek Dvorak

June 10, 2004
23:59 sh-elf: PR target/15886 Kaz Kojima
23:50 Re: Puzzling error message about templates (gcc 3.4.0) Giovanni Bajo
23:42 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? Bernardo Innocenti
23:35 Re: [C++/debug] SDB_DEBUG (-gcoff) vs record_builtin_type vs GAS Danny Smith
22:57 Re: Parser or parsing tools? sashan
22:53 Re: export templates sashan
22:52 Parser or parsing tools? Yu Wang
22:31 Re: export templates Mike Stump
22:22 export templates joseph erickson
21:33 Re: bootstrap failure on ia64 Eric Botcazou
21:27 Re: [C++/debug] SDB_DEBUG (-gcoff) vs record_builtin_type vs GAS Zack Weinberg
21:11 Re: Puzzling error message about templates (gcc 3.4.0) Paul Koning
20:57 Re: Puzzling error message about templates (gcc 3.4.0) Ian Lance Taylor
20:56 [C++/debug] SDB_DEBUG (-gcoff) vs record_builtin_type vs GAS Danny Smith
20:32 Re: [RFC] MIPS division by zero and libgcj... David Daney
20:29 bootstrap failure on ia64 Richard Guenther
20:29 Re: Small task for someone with access to the CVS repository files Ian Lance Taylor
20:29 Re: QA-oriented features for a version control system Zack Weinberg
20:27 Re: [RFC] MIPS division by zero and libgcj... Ralf Baechle
20:20 Re: Puzzling error message about templates (gcc 3.4.0) Paul Koning
20:08 Your fix to PR c++/15227 triggers a bootstrap failure on x86 Diego Novillo
19:59 Re: [RFC] MIPS division by zero and libgcj... Andrew Haley
19:49 Re: [RFC] MIPS division by zero and libgcj... David Daney
19:40 [RFC] MIPS division by zero and libgcj... Andrew Haley
19:33 Re: #pragma interface in test cases Zack Weinberg
19:33 [RFC] MIPS division by zero and libgcj... Andrew Haley
19:27 Re: Caching of include files breaks compilation? Zack Weinberg
19:26 Re: Caching of include files breaks compilation? Geoff Keating
19:15 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Gerald Pfeifer
19:14 [RFC] MIPS division by zero and libgcj... David Daney
19:13 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Jeffrey A Law
19:07 Puzzling error message about templates (gcc 3.4.0) Paul Koning
19:03 Re: c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Zack Weinberg
18:36 Re: Tracking auto-tester regressions better through bugzilla bugs Zack Weinberg
18:35 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Zack Weinberg
18:15 Re: Header files depending on tree.h Zack Weinberg
16:54 Re: Flags parameter in comptypes Zack Weinberg
16:47 RE: HELP: finding the patch for a regression test case perugupa
16:46 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Henderson
16:10 RE: HELP: finding the patch for a regression test case Dave Korn
15:43 Re: Small task for someone with access to the CVS repository files Gerald Pfeifer
15:16 HELP: finding the patch for a regression test case perugupa
14:29 Re: -fmudflapth on head Frank Ch. Eigler
13:05 Re: possible structure layout bug Daniel Jacobowitz
13:04 Re: [RFC] IPA constant propagation - very preliminary code Razya Ladelsky
12:29 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybe afix) Andreas Schwab
11:56 Re: Do we still need libf2c? Andreas Jaeger
11:50 Re: Do we still need libf2c? Paul Brook
11:23 -fmudflapth on head Eyal Lebedinsky
11:20 Re: Small task for someone with access to the CVS repository files Jakub Jelinek
11:15 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failure while running aclocal in libcpp) Paolo Bonzini
10:51 Small task for someone with access to the CVS repository files Laurent GUERBY
10:02 Re: possible structure layout bug Jie Zhang
09:48 Do we still need libf2c? Andreas Jaeger
09:41 Re: possible structure layout bug Jie Zhang
09:38 Re: Throwing C++ exceptions from signal handlers Jakub Jelinek
09:28 Re: Throwing C++ exceptions from signal handlers Andrew Haley
09:20 Re: Throwing C++ exceptions from signal handlers Yuval Kfir
09:10 Throwing C++ exceptions from signal handlers Andrew Haley
08:51 Throwing C++ exceptions from signal handlers Yuval Kfir
08:38 Caching of include files breaks compilation? Andreas Jaeger
08:29 Problem with movqi pattern Petar Penchev
07:36 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failure while running aclocal in libcpp) Aaron W. LaFramboise
07:08 Improved Symbian GCC Akos Kiss
06:58 Re: Error in stl_bvector.h and vector.tcc Gabriel Dos Reis
06:55 Re: Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failure while running aclocal in libcpp) Paolo Bonzini
06:52 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? John Lee
06:22 Re: possible structure layout bug Jie Zhang
05:58 Fix gcc_update for libcpp (Was: Re: Mainline bootstrap failurewhile running aclocal in libcpp) Andreas Jaeger
05:50 Mainline bootstrap failure while running aclocal in libcpp Aaron W. LaFramboise
04:11 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Jason Merrill
03:42 Re: possible structure layout bug Daniel Jacobowitz
02:34 Re: 17.201.21.139 and rsync://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-cvs Christopher Faylor
02:29 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? Bernardo Innocenti
02:03 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Bernardo Innocenti
00:52 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Kenner
00:50 Re: Checking of TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW in integer_(non)zerop Joseph S. Myers
00:48 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Kenner
00:46 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Henderson
00:37 Re: More on gimplify:create_tmp_var Richard Henderson
00:27 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Henderson
00:27 Re: More on gimplify:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
00:23 Re: More on gimplify:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
00:19 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Kenner
00:14 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Kenner

June 09, 2004
23:57 17.201.21.139 and rsync://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-cvs Matthew Sachs
23:06 Re: Need doc of debug output produced by -fdump-translation-unit Don Lindsay
23:02 Re: Documentation in tree-ssa-operands.c Richard Kenner
22:59 gcc-ss-3.3-20040609 is now available gccadmin
22:09 Re: Error in stl_bvector.h and vector.tcc Marcus Meissner
21:06 Re: possible structure layout bug Richard Henderson
21:02 Re: Re: Error in stl_bvector.h and vector.tcc Sabba
20:48 Re: possible structure layout bug Andrew Haley
19:44 Re: possible structure layout bug Richard Henderson
18:39 Checking of TREE_CONSTANT_OVERFLOW in integer_(non)zerop Zdenek Dvorak
18:23 Re: More on gimplify:create_tmp_var Jason Merrill
18:15 Re: More on gimplify:create_tmp_var Geert Bosch
17:42 Re: Error in stl_bvector.h and vector.tcc Theodore Papadopoulo
17:39 Re: More on gimplify:create_tmp_var Jason Merrill
17:22 possible structure layout bug Stephen Kennedy
17:15 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Jason Merrill
17:14 Re: Error in stl_bvector.h and vector.tcc Sabba
16:08 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Henderson
15:25 Re: gimple weirdness for Java Andrew Haley
15:23 Re: gimple weirdness for Java Diego Novillo
15:22 Re: gimple weirdness for Java Jeffrey A Law
15:12 Re: gimple weirdness for Java Andrew Haley
14:56 #pragma interface in test cases Ulrich Weigand
14:52 Re: gimple weirdness for Java Diego Novillo
14:43 gimple weirdness for Java Andrew Haley
14:31 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Christopher Faylor
14:28 Re: Error in stl_bvector.h and vector.tcc Sabba
14:03 Re: Comments on mudflap Eyal Lebedinsky
13:45 Re: Documentation in tree-ssa-operands.c Andrew MacLeod
13:37 Re: decrement & branch isns Zdenek Dvorak
13:35 Re: [RFC] IPA constant propagation - very preliminary code Jan Hubicka
12:48 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Diego Novillo
12:33 Re: Omniscient Debugging for C... Bil Lewis
12:29 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
12:25 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Kenner
12:14 Re: Omniscient Debugging for C... themadrasi
12:08 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Diego Novillo
12:01 decrement & branch isns Nathan Sidwell
11:25 Re: long compilation times with current cvs Sean McNeil
11:10 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-less ARM? Alexandre Oliva
11:09 Re: long compilation times with current cvs Andreas Jaeger
10:55 Re: POT file for cpplib Paolo Bonzini
10:23 long compilation times with current cvs Sean McNeil
10:14 Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism Michael Matz
10:08 Public apology [was RE: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit] Dave Korn
10:08 RE: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Dave Korn
09:27 function structure 王 逸
09:13 Re: POT file for cpplib Paolo Bonzini
07:44 Re: ICE profiledbootstrapping on ia64 Richard Guenther
05:34 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Ben Elliston
05:30 Re: Error in stl_bvector.h and vector.tcc Gabriel Dos Reis
03:23 Re: latest toolset for linux-2.4.26vrs1 Ben Elliston
03:20 Re: [RTL]--emit lib call got error 王 逸
03:01 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Kenner
03:00 Re: lno-branch versioning and branches in cvs.html Jim Wilson
02:57 Re: Problem with GNU CC 2.7.2 Jim Wilson
02:52 Re: What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-lessARM? Jim Wilson
02:49 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Kenner
02:41 Re: Is regmove.c:discover_flags_reg still needed? Jim Wilson
02:28 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Henderson
02:27 Re: Flags parameter in comptypes Jim Wilson
02:24 Re: [Gdb] removing src/dejagnu, src/expect Michael Elizabeth Chastain
02:21 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Henderson
02:21 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Kenner
02:20 Re: Trouble building gcc-3.4.0 cygwin->linux Christopher Faylor
02:04 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Diego Novillo
02:00 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Kenner
01:59 Re: Trouble building gcc-3.4.0 cygwin->linux Jim Wilson
01:56 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Paul Brook
01:37 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Kenner
01:34 Re: Trouble building gcc-3.4.0 cygwin->linux Christopher Faylor
01:29 Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism Geert Bosch
01:28 Re: removing src/dejagnu, src/expect Christopher Faylor
01:06 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Geert Bosch
00:54 Re: [Gdb] removing src/dejagnu, src/expect Christopher Faylor
00:37 Re: Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Henderson
00:34 Re: lno-branch vs ptr-to-member Andrew Pinski
00:25 Re: lno-branch vs ptr-to-member Zdenek Dvorak
00:11 Re: Your change to floor_log2_wide DJ Delorie

June 08, 2004
23:35 Re: C++ pointer to member regression (?) Andrew Pinski
23:35 Re: ICE profiledbootstrapping on ia64 Jim Wilson
23:31 Re: C++ pointer to member regression (?) Mike Stump
23:23 Re: gimple-low.c:lower_function_body Richard Kenner
23:22 Re: POT file for cpplib Jim Wilson
23:18 Re: gimple-low.c:lower_function_body Diego Novillo
22:59 Question on aggregates and GIMPLE Richard Kenner
22:49 Re: lno-branch vs ptr-to-member Dale Johannesen
22:32 Re: lno-branch vs ptr-to-member Andrew Pinski
21:46 Re: bootstrap broken on mainline for targets not using DFA Bernardo Innocenti
21:35 Documentation in tree-ssa-operands.c Richard Kenner
21:17 stmt.c:expand_stack_alloc Richard Kenner
20:54 gimple-low.c:lower_function_body Richard Kenner
20:52 Re: [Gdb] removing src/dejagnu, src/expect Christopher Faylor
20:50 Re: bootstrap broken on mainline for targets not using DFA Vladimir Makarov
20:42 Re: Your change to floor_log2_wide Richard Kenner
20:41 Re: bootstrap broken on mainline for targets not using DFA Mostafa Hagog
20:38 Re: Your change to floor_log2_wide DJ Delorie
20:30 Re: bootstrap broken on mainline for targets not using DFA Vladimir Makarov
20:27 Your change to floor_log2_wide Richard Kenner
20:25 Re: bootstrap broken on mainline for targets not using DFA Vladimir Makarov
20:22 Re: bootstrap broken on mainline for targets not using DFA Richard Henderson
20:14 bootstrap broken on mainline for targets not using DFA Bernardo Innocenti
20:00 Re: Error in stl_bvector.h and vector.tcc Paolo Carlini
19:56 Re: lno-branch vs ptr-to-member Dale Johannesen
19:52 Error in stl_bvector.h and vector.tcc Sabba
19:38 Re: lno-branch vs ptr-to-member Zdenek Dvorak
19:29 ezmlm warning gcc-help
19:29 lno-branch vs ptr-to-member Dale Johannesen
18:25 using delta Daniel S. Wilkerson
17:23 Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism Tom Tromey
17:18 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Phil Edwards
16:56 RE: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.4-20040517 snapshot on i686-pc-cygwin Dave Korn
16:52 RE: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Dave Korn
16:52 latest toolset for linux-2.4.26vrs1 Brock Denson
16:50 RE: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.4-20040517 snapshot on i686-pc-cygwin Kelley Cook
15:23 Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism Daniel Berlin
15:15 Re: [RFC] IPA constant propagation - very preliminary code Steven Bosscher
15:03 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Frank Ch. Eigler
15:02 [RFC] IPA constant propagation - very preliminary code Razya Ladelsky
13:54 C++ pointer to member regression (?) Martin Reinecke
13:29 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Paul Koning
13:29 Re: Bugzilla's Patch mechanism Michael Matz
13:07 updating edge profiling Qiong Cai
11:30 Bugzilla's Patch mechanism Kelley Cook
11:10 Re: reload and asms Nathan Sidwell
09:48 RE: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.4-20040517 snapshot on i686-pc-cygwin Dave Korn
07:45 Re: What to do with gcc 3.4 regression on Itanium 1? Jim Wilson
06:01 Re: [RTL]--emit lib call got error Jim Wilson
05:56 re: gcc news Dan Kegel
05:10 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Jim Wilson
04:17 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Ben Elliston
03:18 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
03:15 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Jeffrey A Law
02:50 Suggestion for gimplify_compound_lval Richard Kenner
01:05 Re: Trouble building gcc-3.4.0 cygwin->linux Dan Kegel

June 07, 2004
23:28 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Tom Lord
23:07 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Tom Lord
22:48 Re: gcc news Bernardo Innocenti
22:21 Re: Need doc of debug output produced by -fdump-translation-unit Jim Wilson
22:04 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Alexandre Oliva
21:28 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
21:21 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Andreas Schwab
21:19 Re: Trouble building gcc-3.4.0 cygwin->linux Andreas Schwab
21:12 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Laurent GUERBY
21:08 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
21:05 Header files depending on tree.h (was: Add missing dependency togcc/c-common.h) Mark G. Adams
21:02 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
20:59 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit James A. Morrison
20:48 Re: lno-branch versioning and branches in cvs.html Zdenek Dvorak
20:42 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
20:36 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
20:31 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Joseph S. Myers
20:30 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit David Edelsohn
20:17 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Laurent GUERBY
20:04 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Alexandre Oliva
19:37 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit graydon hoare
19:25 Re: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.4-20040517 snapshot on i686-pc-cygwin Gerrit P. Haase
19:25 Re: Trouble building gcc-3.4.0 cygwin->linux Gerrit P. Haase
18:28 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Ian Lance Taylor
18:16 Re: SSA usage question Paul Brook
18:07 Comments on mudflap Doug Graham
18:01 Re: Need doc of debug output produced by -fdump-translation-unit Joseph S. Myers
17:47 Re: Need doc of debug output produced by -fdump-translation-unit Jim Wilson
17:22 Re: MIPS 3.4.0 ABI and one-sized arrays Jim Wilson
17:17 Exploiting dual mode operation Mircea Namolaru
17:15 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
17:13 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
17:04 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Henderson
17:02 Re: SSA usage question Diego Novillo
17:02 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
17:00 Re: SSA usage question Diego Novillo
16:58 Re: HELP: GCC Passes and Files Jim Wilson
16:58 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
16:55 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
16:53 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
16:50 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
16:43 Re: Question about apparently obsolete comment in gcse.c Richard Henderson
16:40 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
16:39 Re: SSA usage question Richard Henderson
16:37 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Henderson
16:35 Re: SSA usage question Diego Novillo
16:31 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
16:07 Re: SSA usage question Paul Brook
16:03 Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build Jörn Engel
15:50 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Frank Ch. Eigler
15:43 Re: SSA usage question Diego Novillo
15:40 Re: SSA usage question Diego Novillo
15:24 Re: SSA usage question Diego Novillo
15:21 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
15:19 Re: Tracking auto-tester regressions better through bugzilla bugs Daniel Berlin
15:13 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
15:11 Re: Tracking auto-tester regressions better through bugzilla bugs Joern Rennecke
15:11 Re: HELP: GCC Passes and Files perugupa
15:00 Re: SSA usage question Diego Novillo
14:47 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Paul Brook
14:21 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
14:19 Re: Omniscient Debugging for C... Paul Koning
14:17 Re: SSA usage question Diego Novillo
14:15 Dead Link Phillip Attean
14:14 RE: Calling convetions question Nitin.Gupta
14:12 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
14:06 Re: SSA usage question Jeffrey A Law
14:04 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
13:35 Re: SSA usage question Jeffrey A Law
13:26 re: Feedback to The Virtual Quill Virtual Quill
12:44 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
12:40 Problem with GNU CC 2.7.2 Stephane . Danilo
12:02 Re: Trouble building gcc-3.4.0 cygwin->linux Dan Kegel
11:54 Re: Perhaps fundamental SSA problem with variable-size types Richard Kenner
11:44 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
11:40 Norman Ramsey away from email until April 5 Norman Ramsey's email daemon
11:19 Re: Calling convetions question Andreas Jaeger
10:49 Calling convetions question Petar Penchev
10:32 Question about apparently obsolete comment in gcse.c Steven Bosscher
09:59 Re: error in finding a register to spill Shinpei Kato
09:04 Re: MIPS 3.4.0 ABI and one-sized arrays Eric Botcazou
08:31 Re: gcc news Eric Christopher
08:27 gcc news Mathieu Lacage
06:53 Re: Omniscient Debugging for C... Mathieu Lacage
06:14 Re: GCC summit papers Ranjit Mathew
05:30 Re: ColdFire soft-float optimizations Jim Wilson
05:24 Re: naked functions on x86 Jim Wilson
05:20 Re: MIPS 3.4.0 ABI and one-sized arrays Jim Wilson
05:10 Re: Undefined reference ? Jim Wilson
05:08 Re: reload and asms Jim Wilson
05:07 What is needed to support uclinux shared libraries on MMU-less ARM? John Lee
04:51 Re: anonymous structures within a union do not compile by c++ compiler Jim Wilson
04:45 Re: Linker API Proposal Jim Wilson
04:23 Re: Perhaps fundamental SSA problem with variable-size types Diego Novillo
04:18 Re: SSA usage question Diego Novillo
04:06 Re: Additional default include directory on Tru64 UNIX Jim Wilson
04:01 RE: GCC inline assembler David Daney
04:01 Re: Does anyone know about how the FRV port does the VLIW pack? Jim Wilson
03:55 Re: ICE on m68k-linux in 3_4-branch Jim Wilson
03:35 Re: error in finding a register to spill Jim Wilson
03:29 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Colin Walters
03:07 Re: QA-oriented features for a version control system Kevin Puetz
01:59 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Tom Lord
01:52 Re: GCC inline assembler Ben Elliston
01:41 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
01:24 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Henderson
01:15 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Tom Lord
00:57 Re: Trouble building gcc-3.4.0 cygwin->linux Jim Wilson
00:53 Re: HELP: GCC Passes and Files Jim Wilson
00:51 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
00:21 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Daniel Berlin
00:04 Re: GCC CVS head Ada compile problem. F. Heitkamp

June 06, 2004
23:55 Re: GCC inline assembler Jonathan Wilson
23:47 GCC inline assembler Jonathan Wilson
23:42 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
23:39 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
23:37 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
23:29 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Henderson
23:25 Re: SSA usage question Richard Henderson
23:16 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Henderson
23:05 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
23:04 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
22:45 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Henderson
22:40 Re: SSA usage question Richard Henderson
22:31 Flags parameter in comptypes Joseph S. Myers
22:30 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
22:02 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
21:54 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
21:50 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
21:44 Re: Re[2]: prolog/epilog Jim Wilson
21:39 Re: SSA usage question Richard Kenner
21:35 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Henderson
21:34 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Henderson
21:09 Re: SSA usage question Richard Henderson
20:58 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
20:57 Re: libiberty and getopt and getopt_long Joseph S. Myers
20:54 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
20:52 libiberty and getopt and getopt_long Andrew Pinski
20:52 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
20:42 Re: More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Henderson
20:39 Trouble building gcc-3.4.0 cygwin->linux Dan Kegel
20:15 Re: More on addressof: how to fix the backends that use them? Richard Henderson
19:35 Re: c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
19:32 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
19:27 Re: c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Daniel Berlin
19:26 Re: c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
19:19 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Henderson
19:13 Re: c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Eric Christopher
19:06 Re: c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
19:04 Perhaps fundamental SSA problem with variable-size types Richard Kenner
19:02 Re: c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Eric Christopher
18:55 SSA usage question Richard Kenner
18:39 Re: It's time to merge new-ra branch into mainline Daniel Berlin
18:20 It's time to merge new-ra branch into mainline Bradley Lucier
18:02 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
17:57 gcc-ss-3.5-20040606 is now available gccadmin
17:51 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
17:46 Re: More on gimplify:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
17:33 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Henderson
17:23 More on c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
17:21 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
17:21 Re: More on gimplify:create_tmp_var Richard Henderson
17:16 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Henderson
16:30 c-gimplify.c:gimplify_decl_stmt Richard Kenner
15:39 Re: What to do with gcc 3.4 regression on Itanium 1? Vladimir N. Makarov
11:53 [RTL]--emit lib call got error 王 逸
09:40 Re: Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Steven Bosscher
07:40 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Dr. Franz Fehringer
04:57 More on gimplify:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
04:48 Question on gimplify.c:create_tmp_var Richard Kenner
04:25 Re: Closing PRs for 3.4.1 Gabriel Dos Reis
04:01 Re: Closing PRs for 3.4.1 Giovanni Bajo
03:41 Re: GCC summit papers Andrew J. Hutton
03:29 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
03:24 Re: Closing PRs for 3.4.1 Gabriel Dos Reis
02:11 Re: Closing PRs for 3.4.1 Giovanni Bajo
00:50 Tracking auto-tester regressions better through bugzilla bugs Daniel Berlin
00:29 Re: 10% compile time decrease! Daniel Berlin

June 05, 2004
23:53 Re: GCC summit papers Bernardo Innocenti
23:33 Re: GCC summit papers Ian Lance Taylor
23:21 Re: Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Joseph S. Myers
23:18 successful gcc 3.4.0 build on slackware 9.1 bluedragon
22:26 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Patrick Bennett
22:23 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
22:17 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
22:07 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Patrick Bennett
21:53 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
20:26 Closing PRs for 3.4.1 Mark Mitchell
18:44 Re: BUILT_IN usage in tree-nested.c Gabriel Dos Reis
18:27 Re: BUILT_IN usage in tree-nested.c Richard Kenner
18:20 Re: BUILT_IN usage in tree-nested.c Steven Bosscher
17:48 Is regmove.c:discover_flags_reg still needed? Daniel Jacobowitz
17:47 Re: GCC CVS head Ada compile problem. Manfred Hollstein
17:44 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Alan Modra
17:30 Re: GCC CVS head Ada compile problem. John R. Shannon
17:26 Re: GCC CVS head Ada compile problem. Richard Kenner
17:21 Re: BUILT_IN usage in tree-nested.c Richard Kenner
17:21 GCC CVS head Ada compile problem. F. Heitkamp
17:19 Re: BUILT_IN usage in tree-nested.c Richard Kenner
17:00 Re: 10% compile time decrease! Randy.Dunlap
16:41 Re: BUILT_IN usage in tree-nested.c Steven Bosscher
16:41 Re: BUILT_IN usage in tree-nested.c Andrew Pinski
16:33 Re: BUILT_IN usage in tree-nested.c Richard Kenner
16:25 Re: BUILT_IN usage in tree-nested.c Andrew Pinski
16:18 BUILT_IN usage in tree-nested.c Richard Kenner
16:13 Re: [Gdb] removing src/dejagnu, src/expect Daniel Jacobowitz
15:56 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Greg Hudson
15:28 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Ian S. Nelson
15:09 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Walter Landry
14:39 Re: [Gdb] removing src/dejagnu, src/expect Michael Elizabeth Chastain
13:50 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Ian Lance Taylor
13:41 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Ian Lance Taylor
13:37 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Ian Lance Taylor
13:12 Re: 10% compile time decrease! Jan-Benedict Glaw
11:53 Re: stolen Peter Harding
10:23 removing src/dejagnu, src/expect Ben Elliston
09:50 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
09:47 Notes from the testing BOF at the summit Ben Elliston
09:38 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
09:37 [ANNOUNCE] GCC 3.4 ColdFire/ARM toolchain for uClinux (20040604) Bernardo Innocenti
08:58 Re: QA-oriented features for a version control system Karel Gardas
06:54 GCC summit papers Bernardo Innocenti
04:12 QA-oriented features for a version control system Michael Elizabeth Chastain
03:39 High Rank Link Exchange links
03:30 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Walter Landry
02:17 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Ian Lance Taylor

June 04, 2004
23:43 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Joseph S. Myers
22:59 gcc-ss-3.4-20040604 is now available gccadmin
22:50 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
22:46 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Andrew Pinski
22:43 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Kai Henningsen
22:42 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Joe Buck
22:38 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
22:35 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Matt Austern
22:30 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Florian Weimer
21:13 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Daniel Berlin
21:03 Re: Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Joseph S. Myers
20:29 Notes from the version control BOF at the summit Ian Lance Taylor
20:12 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Mike Stump
19:57 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Theodore Papadopoulo
19:32 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Andrew Haley
18:16 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Geoff Keating
17:55 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Zack Weinberg
17:24 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
17:18 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Richard Kenner
17:18 Re: [G++] templates not instantiated early enough Chris Lattner
17:15 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Andrew Pinski
17:13 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Andrew Pinski
17:12 Re: i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure (Was: Re: building sh-elf / sh-linux) Andrew Pinski
17:09 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Per Abrahamsen
17:07 i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure (Was: Re: building sh-elf / sh-linux) Joern Rennecke
17:05 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
17:04 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
16:54 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Andrew Pinski
16:49 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Stephan T. Lavavej
16:19 Re: building sh-elf / sh-linux (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/13250) Joern Rennecke
15:39 Re: Omniscient Debugging for C... Paul Koning
15:24 RE: Porting GCC Gyle Yearsley
15:04 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Zack Weinberg
14:38 Re: 3.3.4 build report: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Albert Chin
11:31 Re: Omniscient Debugging for C... Bil Lewis
09:57 Re: Omniscient Debugging for C... themadrasi
08:58 Re: Omniscient Debugging for C... Joseph S. Myers
08:52 ICE profiledbootstrapping on ia64 Richard Guenther
08:25 Re: [G++] templates not instantiated early enough Gabriel Dos Reis
08:19 Re: [G++] templates not instantiated early enough Gabriel Dos Reis
07:46 Re: [G++] templates not instantiated early enough Chris Lattner
07:41 Re: [G++] templates not instantiated early enough Chris Lattner
07:30 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Gabriel Dos Reis
07:16 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Phil Edwards
07:15 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Phil Edwards
04:00 Re: Omniscient Debugging for C... Kevin Puetz
03:58 Re: Omniscient Debugging for C... Mike Stump
03:41 Re: using offsetof with g++ Gabriel Dos Reis
03:29 Re: using offsetof with g++ Trevor Blackwell
03:24 Re: 3.3.4 build report: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Gabriel Dos Reis
03:08 Re: 3.3.4 build report: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Ian Lance Taylor
03:05 Re: Modem na porta serial Ian Lance Taylor
03:01 Re: [G++] templates not instantiated early enough Gabriel Dos Reis
02:58 Re: [G++] templates not instantiated early enough Andrew Pinski
02:28 Re: 3.3.4 build report: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Gabriel Dos Reis
02:24 [G++] templates not instantiated early enough Chris Lattner
01:40 Omniscient Debugging for C... Bil Lewis
00:28 GCC 3.3.4: successful build and installation on GNU/Linux PowerPC Luca Saiu
00:03 Re: 3.3.4 build report: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Joe Buck
00:02 Re: GCC 3.[34] snapshots not running Joseph S. Myers

June 03, 2004
23:59 gcc-ss-3.3-20040603 is now available gccadmin
23:48 Re: ColdFire soft-float optimizations Mike Stump
23:46 Modem na porta serial Luiz Bernardi
21:46 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
21:43 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Ian Lance Taylor
20:08 Re: naked functions on x86 James Lemke
19:30 Re: 3.3.4 build report: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Gabriel Dos Reis
19:26 GCC 3.[34] snapshots not running Kelley Cook
19:22 Re: 3.3.4 build report: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Joe Buck
19:18 Re: 3.3.4 build report: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Gabriel Dos Reis
19:12 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
18:11 Re: 10% compile time decrease! Andreas Jaeger
18:11 Re: bootstrap -j 2 failure for gcc 3.4.1 20040602 on i686-linux:make[4]: stage2/xgcc: Command not found Andreas Jaeger
18:01 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Joe Buck
17:56 Re: Compiled Glibc (cvs 2004-05-30) with Gcc 3.4.0 causes internal compiler error Andrew Pinski
17:53 Compiled Glibc (cvs 2004-05-30) with Gcc 3.4.0 causes internal compiler error Andrew Walrond
17:32 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Matt Austern
17:03 3.3.4 build report: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.3.0 Joe Buck
16:42 ColdFire soft-float optimizations Peter Barada
16:05 successful build of gcc on Interix 3.5 (windows XP) Bob Frazier
15:38 Re: Porting GCC Richard Sandiford
14:34 naked functions on x86 Jonathan Wilson
13:14 Successfully built and installed gcc 3.4.0 on i586-pc-linux-gnu (PentiumMMX-233) André Frick
12:33 Re: Trouble with rsync-access Ian Lance Taylor
12:30 Re: RFD: fixup_fallthru_exit_predecessor bug (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/13250) Joern Rennecke
12:22 Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523) III Rene Rebe
11:58 Re: 10% compile time decrease! Andrew Pinski
11:43 Re: 10% compile time decrease! Richard Guenther
11:41 Answered Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Steven T. Hatton
11:35 10% compile time decrease! Richard Guenther
10:32 Re: Trouble with rsync-access Marc Espie
10:18 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Steven T. Hatton
10:15 MIPS 3.4.0 ABI and one-sized arrays Eric Botcazou
10:00 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
09:37 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Steven T. Hatton
08:32 Re[2]: prolog/epilog sevtov
07:42 Re: POT file for cpplib Paolo Bonzini
06:26 Re: Compilation error llewelly
06:10 Compilation error Jose
05:42 an early GCC Summit report Joe Buck
05:14 Undefined reference ? Konark Goel
02:41 Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523) III Giovanni Bajo
02:14 Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523) III Rene Rebe
01:40 Re: Feedback on -iquote Carlo Wood
01:25 Re: Feedback on -iquote Mike Stump
01:08 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Bernardo Innocenti
01:07 Re: Feedback on -iquote Carlo Wood
00:56 Re: MAX_CODE_ALIGN Bernardo Innocenti
00:51 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Kai Henningsen

June 02, 2004
23:42 Re: Feedback on -iquote Mike Stump
22:33 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Bernardo Innocenti
21:50 Re: 3.3.4 build reports and test results Eric Botcazou
21:46 Re: Long and short jumps Nathan Sidwell
21:40 Re: Building a Solaris cross compiler Mark Cuss
21:39 reload and asms Nathan Sidwell
21:28 Re: 3.3.4 build reports and test results Joe Buck
21:16 Re: 3.3.4 build reports and test results Eric Botcazou
21:09 anonymous structures within a union do not compile by c++ compiler Alex Babkin
20:53 Re: gcc-3.3.2-sd-11.00.depot Joe Buck
20:44 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Gabriel Dos Reis
20:27 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Peter Barada
20:00 RE: gcc-3.3.2-sd-11.00.depot Moore, Jerry C
19:50 Re: What to do with gcc 3.4 regression on Itanium 1? H. J. Lu
19:24 Linker API Proposal Kirkegaard, Knud J
19:18 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
19:14 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Phil Edwards
19:09 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Phil Edwards
19:07 RFD: fixup_fallthru_exit_predecessor bug (Was: Re: [PATCH/RFA] PR target/13250) Joern Rennecke
19:07 Re: gcc-3.3.2-sd-11.00.depot Zack Weinberg
19:01 Re: POT file for cpplib Joseph S. Myers
18:29 Re: link.exe /DRIVER flag Christopher Faylor
18:08 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Steven T. Hatton
17:54 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
17:07 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
16:49 Porting GCC Gyle Yearsley
16:47 Re: Bug 15718 dispute: showstopper or WONTFIX? Joe Buck
16:42 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
16:42 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
16:38 3.3.4 build reports and test results Joe Buck
15:59 Re: Little C-benchmarks of gcc-XXX: Compilation timings of make foreach GCC's version. Scott Robert Ladd
15:55 The Case for OpenMP in GCC Scott Robert Ladd
14:49 RE: gcc-3.3.2-sd-11.00.depot Moore, Jerry C
14:19 Compile on Solaris9, gcc 3.3.2 Terry L Moore
13:29 Need doc of debug output produced by -fdump-translation-unit Holger Peine
13:07 Little C-benchmarks of gcc-XXX: Compilation timings of make for each GCC's version. jc-nospam
12:22 lno-branch versioning and branches in cvs.html Volker Reichelt
11:04 re: Feedback to The Virtual Quill Virtual Quill
10:38 Re: POT file for cpplib Paolo Bonzini
10:30 Re: POT file for cpplib Joseph S. Myers
09:59 POT file for cpplib Paolo Bonzini
09:18 Re: bootstrap -j 2 failure for gcc 3.4.1 20040602 on i686-linux: make[4]: stage2/xgcc: Command not found Christian Joensson
09:18 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Peter Jakubek
09:11 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Peter Jakubek
09:06 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Giovanni Bajo
08:35 Re: MAX_CODE_ALIGN Andreas Schwab
08:07 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Steven T. Hatton
07:29 bootstrap -j 2 failure for gcc 3.4.1 20040602 on i686-linux: make[4]: stage2/xgcc: Command not found Christian Joensson
07:20 link.exe /DRIVER flag Craig Edwards
07:11 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Per Bothner
06:51 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 [auto-locating libraries] Per Bothner
06:36 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Paul Jarc
05:39 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Steven T. Hatton
04:56 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Gabriel Dos Reis
04:50 Re: Bug 15718 dispute: showstopper or WONTFIX? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:49 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Matt Austern
04:21 Re: Bug 15718 dispute: showstopper or WONTFIX? Joe Buck
04:12 Re: Long and short jumps Jeffrey A Law
04:12 Re: Partially redundant casts Jeffrey A Law
02:48 Re: Bug 15718 dispute: showstopper or WONTFIX? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:31 MAX_CODE_ALIGN Bernardo Innocenti
01:11 Re: Bug 15718 dispute: showstopper or WONTFIX? Joe Buck
00:46 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Mark Mitchell
00:44 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
00:29 Re: gcc-3.3.2-sd-11.00.depot Russ Allbery
00:17 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
00:10 Re: #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Joe Buck

June 01, 2004
22:21 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Neil Booth
22:08 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
22:08 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
22:05 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Peter Barada
22:03 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
22:02 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Peter Barada
21:59 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Bernardo Innocenti
21:46 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Stan Shebs
21:41 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
21:39 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
21:37 More on addressof: how to fix the backends that use them? Steven Bosscher
21:32 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
21:28 Re: Trouble with rsync-access Volker Reichelt
21:20 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Bernardo Innocenti
21:14 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
21:13 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
20:47 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
20:35 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Bernardo Innocenti
20:35 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
20:23 Re: Trouble with rsync-access Alexandre Oliva
20:21 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Bernardo Innocenti
20:16 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Andreas Schwab
20:04 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Neil Booth
19:52 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Peter Barada
19:47 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
19:42 #pragma interface and #pragma implementation Steven T. Hatton
19:28 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
19:06 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
19:05 Re: gcc 3.3.3 trouble Gabriel Dos Reis
18:58 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Joe Buck
18:55 Re: Building a Solaris cross compiler Mark Cuss
18:24 gcc 3.3.3 trouble Mile Davidovic
18:06 RE: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Dave Korn
17:45 Re: cross-compilation documentation Peter Barada
17:38 RE: cross-compilation documentation Dave Korn
17:38 RE: categorize_decl_for_section bogosity Dave Korn
17:17 Re: Trouble with rsync-access Christopher Faylor
17:12 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Peter Jakubek
17:05 HELP: GCC Passes and Files perugupa
17:05 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Peter Barada
17:03 gcc-3.3.2-sd-11.00.depot Moore, Jerry C
16:55 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Peter Jakubek
16:52 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
16:42 Re: Little C-benchmarks of gcc-2.95.4-ss,gcc-3.3.4-ss,gcc-3.4.1-ss & gcc-3.5.0-ss. jc-nospam
16:36 Re: Little C-benchmarks of gcc-2.95.4-ss,gcc-3.3.4-ss,gcc-3.4.1-ss & gcc-3.5.0-ss. Andrew Pinski
16:35 Re: cross-compilation documentation Dan Kegel
16:31 Re: Little C-benchmarks of gcc-2.95.4-ss,gcc-3.3.4-ss,gcc-3.4.1-ss & gcc-3.5.0-ss. jc-nospam
16:26 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Scott Robert Ladd
16:23 Re: Little C-benchmarks of gcc-2.95.4-ss,gcc-3.3.4-ss,gcc-3.4.1-ss & gcc-3.5.0-ss. Steven Bosscher
16:19 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Peter Barada
16:16 Re: Question concerning loop-iv package Revital Eres
16:09 Re: Little C-benchmarks of gcc-2.95.4-ss,gcc-3.3.4-ss,gcc-3.4.1-ss& gcc-3.5.0-ss. Andreas Jaeger
16:01 RE: Building a Solaris cross compiler Dave Korn
15:57 Re: Trouble with rsync-access Volker Reichelt
15:53 Little C-benchmarks of gcc-2.95.4-ss,gcc-3.3.4-ss,gcc-3.4.1-ss & gcc-3.5.0-ss. jc-nospam
15:49 i'm new user: there is nothing, empty, .. jc-nospam
15:47 Re: Trouble with rsync-access Andreas Schwab
15:38 Re: Trouble with rsync-access Frank Ch. Eigler
15:29 Re: Trouble with rsync-access Ian Lance Taylor
15:18 Additional default include directory on Tru64 UNIX Albert Chin
15:17 Trouble with rsync-access Volker Reichelt
14:59 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Bernardo Innocenti
14:52 Re: ICE on m68k-linux in 3_4-branch Bernardo Innocenti
14:18 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Peter Barada
14:18 gctest failure for i686-linux in gcc 3.3.4 prerelease 20040530 Christian Joensson
14:12 Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybea fix) Bernardo Innocenti
13:38 Re: ICE on m68k-linux in 3_4-branch Andreas Schwab
13:20 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Bernardo Innocenti
13:11 ICE on m68k-linux in 3_4-branch Bernardo Innocenti
13:10 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Theodore Papadopoulo
12:42 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Richard Kenner
12:39 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
12:30 Re: precompiled header support Marc Espie
12:19 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Richard Kenner
12:12 Re: precompiled header support Gunther Nikl
11:39 Re: Criteria for GCC 4.0 Steven Bosscher
10:54 Re: GCJ compilation problems Michael Koch
10:42 RE: GCJ compilation problems Ranga Reddy M - CTD ,Chennai.
10:19 Re: GCJ compilation problems Michael Koch
10:03 Does anyone know about how the FRV port does the VLIW pack? mike
09:58 Re: Loop unrolling bug still present Eric Botcazou
09:47 GCJ compilation problems Ranga Reddy M - CTD ,Chennai.
09:44 Loop unrolling bug still present micis
09:31 error in finding a register to spill Shinpei Kato
08:15 Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire Jim Wilson
08:03 Criteria for GCC 4.0 Phil Edwards
07:59 Re: Support for 32-bit stack processors? Jim Wilson
07:52 Re: transparent way of inserting insns Jim Wilson
07:44 Re: gcc-3.4.0 + glibc-2.2.5 generate static apps that segfault atstartup? Jim Wilson
07:32 Re: prolog/epilog Jim Wilson
07:30 Re: gcc-3.4.0 Bootstrap failure Jim Wilson
07:27 Re: What to do with gcc 3.4 regression on Itanium 1? Jim Wilson
07:15 Re: [RFH] changing linkfile name depending on a flag passed Jim Wilson
07:10 Re: Q about edge structures Jim Wilson
07:06 Re: Generate tree/rtx for address-of exp? Jim Wilson
06:59 Re: sign_extending to values wider than hard registers Jim Wilson
02:49 Re: crosstool-0.28-rc21: support gcc-3.4.0 everywhere except cris,hppa, s390 Dan Kegel
02:48 crosstool-0.28-rc21: support gcc-3.4.0 everywhere except cris, hppa,s390 Dan Kegel
00:32 gcc-3_3-branch frozen for release purpose Gabriel Dos Reis
00:04 Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing Gabriel Dos Reis


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3