This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523)
- From: ja2morri at csclub dot uwaterloo dot ca (James A. Morrison)
- To: Rene Rebe <rene at rocklinux-consulting dot de>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 May 2004 11:55:11 -0400
- Subject: Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523)
- References: <20040528.170549.424267580.rene@rocklinux-consulting.de>
Rene Rebe <rene@rocklinux-consulting.de> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I started generating some benchmark numbers.
>
> My first and "preleminary" results are a bit unexpected and thus here
> are two links for public comments:
>
> Various build %-buildtimes with gcc-2.95.2 as base:
> http://rocklinux-consulting.de/stat-bt2.png
>
> Various runtimes with gcc-2.95.3 as base:
> http://rocklinux-consulting.de/stat-rt2.png
>
I think it would be a good idea to specify that your times are percentages,
not actual times. Also, I'm unsure if a line graph is a good representation
as your nodes have no relation to each other.
--
Thanks,
Jim
http://www.student.cs.uwaterloo.ca/~ja2morri/
http://phython.blogspot.com
http://open.nit.ca/wiki/?page=jim