This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?

On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 02:24:32PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 13 May 2004, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > > What's going to happen with the tree-ssa-20020619-branch based branches
> > > now that the tree-ssa branch is closed?  I know only of lno and
> > > tree-profiling, but maybe there are others.  I first thought they would
> > > perhaps be merged into tree-ssa-20020619-branch and development continues
> > > there.
> >
> > I think the idea about lno-branch is to merge at least the more stable
> > parts to mainline soon; for the rest, I think the branch should continue
> > to exist, based on mainline (is there some easy way how to do it,
> > or do I have to just create a new branch and commit the changes to it?)
> Yes, this was my question - I don't think there is a way to re-base a
> branch, i.e. you'd have to create a new one.  But that isn't bad in
> general, as we'll probably have some sort of new "rtlopt" on top of HEAD
> anyway.  So I guess after merging the mature parts of lno/profiling we
> could create a new branch and move the missing parts there (maybe together
> with rtlopt).

CVS doesn't care what the 'base' is.  The first merge to the branch
will be a little trickier, but that's it.

Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]