This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce?

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 11:52:54 -0700
Subject: Re: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce?

On Monday, May 3, 2004, at 10:46 PM, H. J. Lu wrote:

Should we start moving toward COMDAT section group? It will help fix
DWARF2 problems.

We are in favor of this. Our platform doesn't yet have group COMDAT, but, that is the way we know we need to go. Thanks.

Follow-Ups:
- PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce?
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]