gcc archive
date index for May, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

May 31, 2004

23:33	Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Kaz Kojima
22:37	GCC Release Status (2004-05-31)	Mark Mitchell
22:18	Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Eric Botcazou
22:01	Re: Warnings in templates	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:39	Re: Compilation at -O3 Still Broken	Steven Bosscher
21:30	Re: Compilation at -O3 Still Broken	Steven Bosscher
20:56	Re: Warnings in templates	Mark Mitchell
20:30	Re: Warnings in templates	Jason Merrill
19:44	Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:40	Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Mark Mitchell
19:35	Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:30	Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Matthias Klose
19:24	Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Mark Mitchell
19:17	Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:48	Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Matthias Klose
18:17	Warnings in templates	Mark Mitchell
16:31	Re: g++ assumes libstdc++ in library path?	Andreas Jaeger
16:27	g++ assumes libstdc++ in library path?	Georg Schwarz
13:59	Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Richard Guenther
13:57	Re: Feedback on -iquote	Daniel Jacobowitz
13:09	Re: binutils at 2.15?	Andreas Schwab
12:34	Feedback on -iquote	Carlo Wood
12:25	binutils at 2.15?	Georg Schwarz
10:37	Re: Compilation at -O3 Still Broken	Steven Bosscher
10:22	Re: Compilation at -O3 Still Broken	Ranjit Mathew
07:37	Re: GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Bauke van Dijk
07:09	Re: Compilation at -O3 Still Broken	Eric Botcazou
07:02	Compilation at -O3 Still Broken	Ranjit Mathew
03:19	Escribeme	Paulina Andrea

May 30, 2004

23:32	Re: ICE on mainline with m68k-uclinux (verify_stmts failed)	Bernardo Innocenti
21:51	--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs and libgcc_s	Andreas Jaeger
19:45	Re: ICE on mainline with m68k-uclinux (verify_stmts failed)	Andrew Pinski
19:39	ICE on mainline with m68k-uclinux (verify_stmts failed)	Bernardo Innocenti
17:58	gcc-ss-3.5-20040530 is now available	gccadmin
14:29	GCC-3.3.4 second prerelease available for testing	Gabriel Dos Reis

May 29, 2004

23:45	Re: ICE on 2.6.7-rc1 kernel at -O2 (SPARC)	Eric Botcazou
23:27	i386 simulator...	The Thodes
18:55	Re: [lno] bootstrap failure with -ftree-vectorize	Devang Patel
18:31	Re: [lno] bootstrap failure with -ftree-vectorize	Dorit Naishlos
15:13	Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire	Bernardo Innocenti
10:51	Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523) II	Rene Rebe
10:06	PL/I Front-end for GCC v0.0.7	Henrik Sorensen
06:57	Re: cross-compilation documentation	Zack Weinberg
06:41	Re: Bug 15718 dispute: showstopper or WONTFIX?	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:25	Re: cross-compilation documentation	Dan Kegel
06:06	Bug 15718 dispute: showstopper or WONTFIX?	Joe Buck
03:52	Re: new ICE in 3.3.4 on alpha	Gabriel Dos Reis

May 28, 2004

23:52	new ICE in 3.3.4 on alpha	Joe Buck
21:28	Re: Building a Solaris cross compiler	Mark Cuss
21:21	Re: Building a Solaris cross compiler	Mark Cuss
20:53	Re: [lno] bootstrap failure with -ftree-vectorize	Dorit Naishlos
20:42	Re: Building a Solaris cross compiler	Eric Botcazou
20:20	Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523)	Laurent GUERBY
19:51	Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523)	Rene Rebe
19:33	PATCH for Re: GCC-3.3.4 Status Report	Gerald Pfeifer
19:13	[lno] bootstrap failure with -ftree-vectorize	Devang Patel
18:56	Re: Building a Solaris cross compiler	Mark Cuss
18:53	Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523)	Laurent GUERBY
17:10	Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire	Bernardo Innocenti
16:36	GCC Summit Schedule	Richard Kenner
16:28	Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523)	Rene Rebe
15:55	Re: Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523)	James A. Morrison
15:49	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Joe Buck
15:05	Various GCC compared (2.95.3 - 3.5-20040523)	Rene Rebe
14:07	Re: template static member instantiation	Michael Elizabeth Chastain
14:00	Re: template static member instantiation	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:46	template static member instantiation	Michael Elizabeth Chastain
13:33	GCC-3.3.4 Status Report	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:05	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Paul Koning
10:10	ICE on 2.6.7-rc1 kernel at -O2 (SPARC)	Eric Botcazou
10:06	RE: Building a Solaris cross compiler	Dave Korn
07:20	Re: Miscompilation of glibc by GCC 3.5?	Andreas Jaeger
06:42	Re: [PATCH] Change <bits/mathinline.h> for GCC 3.{2,4,5}+	Ulrich Drepper
05:41	Re: [toplevel] Add --enable-bootstrap configure switch	Alexandre Oliva
05:28	Ecartis command results: -- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --	Ecartis
03:11	Re: gcc-3.4.0 incorrect error message	Giovanni Bajo
01:30	gcc-3.4.0 incorrect error message	2boxers
01:16	sign_extending to values wider than hard registers	d9910490
00:47	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Joe Buck
00:12	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:03	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Richard Henderson

May 27, 2004

23:33	More pre-DRs	Joseph S. Myers
23:08	Re: VLIW pack and DFA scheduler:Register sharing question	Ayal Zaks
22:23	Building a Solaris cross compiler	Mark Cuss
21:11	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Andrew Pinski
21:08	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	llewelly
20:06	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Stan Shebs
19:02	The Linux binutils 2.15.91.0.1 is released	H. J. Lu
18:54	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	DJ Delorie
18:51	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	DJ Delorie
18:36	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Andrew Pinski
18:28	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Stan Shebs
18:20	Re: GCC Summit schedule	Andrew J. Hutton
18:13	Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake:*** [all-libiberty] Error 2	DJ Delorie
17:36	RE: Warning wrapping (was RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings)	Ruth Ivimey-Cook
16:40	Re: Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does notbuild.	Paolo Bonzini
15:54	Re: Miscompilation of glibc by GCC 3.5?	Jakub Jelinek
15:52	Re: Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does not build.	Steven Bosscher
15:46	Miscompilation of glibc by GCC 3.5?	Andreas Jaeger
15:40	Re: Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does notbuild.	Paolo Bonzini
14:44	Re: Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does not build.	Jan Hubicka
14:42	Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2	Dom
14:18	Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire (maybe a fix)	peter
14:18	Re: Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does notbuild.	Bryce McKinlay
14:16	Mainline broken on alpha and x86-64. SPEC2000's eon does notbuild.	Diego Novillo
14:12	Re: Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC	Ghassan Shobaki
13:57	Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire	Peter Barada
13:55	Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : g make: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2	Eric Botcazou
13:45	Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2	Dom
13:43	Re: Any way to do branch hints?	Jan Hubicka
13:24	Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : g make: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2	Eric Botcazou
13:18	RE: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2	Dom
13:09	Re: gcc-3.4.0 bootstrap link error on Solaris 8	Wang h
12:59	gcc-3.4.0 bootstrap link error on Solaris 8	Wang h
12:58	Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire	Andreas Schwab
12:36	Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire	Peter Barada
12:34	Re: gcc-3.4.0 bootstrap link error on Solaris 8	Eric Botcazou
12:34	Re: [Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake: *** [all-libiberty] Error 2	Eric Botcazou
12:28	Re: [gui] [merge] java-gui-merge for may 26	Michael Koch
12:06	gcc-3.4.0 bootstrap link error on Solaris 8	Wang h
11:33	[Make failure with GCC-3.3.X and GCC-3.4.0 on Solaris 8 ] : gmake:*** [all-libiberty] Error 2	Dom
11:08	New snipped urls for regression queries	giovannibajo\ at libero\ dot i
10:07	Re: Exception Handling Broken in the Last 24 Hours	Ranjit Mathew
09:50	Re: [gui] [merge] java-gui-merge for may 26	Andreas Schwab
09:47	[PATCH] Change <bits/mathinline.h> for GCC 3.{2,4,5}+	Jakub Jelinek
09:27	Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire	Andreas Schwab
08:47	RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Joseph S. Myers
08:34	Re: Warning wrapping (was RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings)	Phil Edwards
08:33	Re: Casts, types, pointers, and ADDR_EXPR	Joseph S. Myers
08:07	Warning wrapping (was RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings)	Ruth Ivimey-Cook
07:53	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Robert Dewar
07:24	Exception Handling Broken in the Last 24 Hours	Ranjit Mathew
06:49	DrDobb's Benchmarks	deploy.kde
06:45	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Steven Bosscher
04:53	RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Banibrata Dutta
04:37	GCC Summit schedule	Richard Kenner
03:54	Generate tree/rtx for address-of exp?	MajorZ
03:23	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Alexander E. Kopilovich
03:04	Re: replace_ssa_names abort that started last week	Bradley Lucier
02:59	Re: replace_ssa_names abort that started last week	Andrew Pinski
02:50	replace_ssa_names abort that started last week	Bradley Lucier
01:58	Casts, types, pointers, and ADDR_EXPR	Andrew Pinski

May 26, 2004

23:40	e500 breakage caused by altivec patch	Aldy Hernandez
23:13	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Falk Hueffner
23:02	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Joe Buck
22:58	Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire	Peter Barada
22:49	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Matt Austern
22:23	Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire	Andreas Schwab
21:45	Re: [m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire	Falk Hueffner
21:41	Re: debugging gcc/cc1	sashan
21:39	[m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire	Peter Barada
21:27	[m68k]: patch to fix m68k_output_mi_thunk() for ColdFire	Peter Barada
21:23	Re: debugging gcc/cc1	Johnny Huynh
21:21	Re: debugging gcc/cc1	Janis Johnson
21:15	Re: debugging gcc/cc1	Paolo Carlini
21:10	Re: debugging gcc/cc1	sashan
20:59	Re: debugging gcc/cc1	Mike Stump
20:55	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Stan Shebs
20:42	Re: debugging gcc/cc1	Zack Weinberg
20:39	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Dale Johannesen
20:35	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:29	debugging gcc/cc1	Johnny Huynh
20:15	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Zack Weinberg
20:04	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Dale Johannesen
19:50	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Phil Edwards
19:35	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Geert Bosch
19:17	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	llewelly
19:10	Re: Missing patch after tree-ssa merge?	Pat Haugen
19:06	Re: Erlang and gcc?	Joe Buck
18:51	Erlang and gcc?	Christian Joensson
18:17	Q about edge structures	jlquinn
17:56	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Mike Stump
17:55	RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Eric Christopher
17:20	Re: Missing patch after tree-ssa merge?	Diego Novillo
17:16	Re: Missing patch after tree-ssa merge?	Pat Haugen
17:10	Re: __enable_executable_stack	Richard Henderson
16:48	Re: Missing patch after tree-ssa merge?	Zdenek Dvorak
16:20	Re: Missing patch after tree-ssa merge?	Diego Novillo
16:06	Missing patch after tree-ssa merge?	Pat Haugen
16:05	gcc-3.4.0 Bootstrap failure	Arthur I Schwarz
15:00	[PATCH] <bits/string2.h> changes for GCC 3.2+ and 3.4+	Jakub Jelinek
10:37	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:21	Re: VLIW pack and DFA scheduler:Register sharing question	tm_gccmail
09:50	RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Banibrata Dutta
09:41	Re: Installing GCC and other packages on Linux	Luca Saiu
09:10	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Joseph S. Myers
08:57	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Steven Bosscher
08:46	RE: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Banibrata Dutta
08:31	Re: are ".da" files platform-independent?	Nathan Sidwell
08:27	Re: Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Ranjit Mathew
08:21	Suppressing specific compiler warnings	Banibrata Dutta
07:47	__enable_executable_stack	Eric Botcazou
07:13	Re: [RFH] changing linkfile name depending on a flag passed	Paolo Bonzini
02:36	[RFH] changing linkfile name depending on a flag passed	Andrew Pinski
01:25	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Janis Johnson
01:02	Re: gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire	Peter Barada
00:24	gcc 3.4.0 m68k-elf generates illegal code for ColdFire	peter

May 25, 2004

23:23	Re: prerequisites.html	Ben Elliston
22:48	Re: What to do with gcc 3.4 regression on Itanium 1?	H. J. Lu
22:45	Re: What to do with gcc 3.4 regression on Itanium 1?	Vladimir Makarov
22:34	What to do with gcc 3.4 regression on Itanium 1?	H. J. Lu
22:29	Re: categorize_decl_for_section bogosity	Richard Henderson
21:37	Installing GCC and other packages on Linux	Justin Lundeen
19:41	are ".da" files platform-independent?	Johnny Huynh
19:36	prolog/epilog	sevtov
18:38	Re: categorize_decl_for_section bogosity	Zack Weinberg
18:31	Re: Any way to do branch hints?	Geert Bosch
18:23	categorize_decl_for_section bogosity	Dave Korn
17:54	Re: Any way to do branch hints?	Andi Kleen
17:26	Re: Any way to do branch hints?	Kean Johnston
17:16	Re: Any way to do branch hints?	Andrew Pinski
17:12	Re: Any way to do branch hints?	Kean Johnston
17:12	Re: Any way to do branch hints?	Joe Buck
17:12	Re: Bootstrap failure on ia64-linux (since the last 4 days)	Andrew Pinski
16:56	Re: Any way to do branch hints?	Andi Kleen
16:42	Re: Any way to do branch hints?	Andrew Pinski
16:38	Any way to do branch hints?	Kean Johnston
16:24	Re: gcc mainline [RFH] reload of 8-character vector into memory causes bad pattern	David Edelsohn
16:18	Re: gcc mainline [RFH] reload of 8-character vector into memory causes bad pattern	Fariborz Jahanian
15:44	TREE_OVERFLOW	Zdenek Dvorak
14:44	TYPE_PTRMEMFUNC_P	Zdenek Dvorak
14:31	RE: how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work?	Dave Korn
14:31	RE: how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work?	Dave Korn
14:26	Re: how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work?	Joern Rennecke
14:25	Re: Help: LD_LIBRARY_PATH needed for gcc to find libgcc_s.so.1	Andrew Walrond
14:07	Re: mainline wants too much memory?	Joern Rennecke
14:07	Re: Help: LD_LIBRARY_PATH needed for gcc to find libgcc_s.so.1	Andrew Walrond
14:05	Re: how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work?	David Edelsohn
13:40	Re: how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work?	Nathan Sidwell
12:33	how can RETURN_ADDR_RTX possibly do its work?	Dave Korn
12:26	Re: I need help.	mike
12:01	Re: Write a md about a cpu having a risc unit and a dsp unit	Paul Brook
11:47	I need help.	Andre Pena
10:48	RE: Write a md about a cpu having a risc unit and a dsp unit	Dave Korn
10:35	VLIW pack and DFA scheduler:Register sharing question	mike
10:29	Help: LD_LIBRARY_PATH needed for gcc to find libgcc_s.so.1	Andrew Walrond
10:05	mainline wants too much memory?	Andrew Haley
10:04	Bootstrap failure on ia64-linux (since the last 4 days)	Richard Guenther
09:51	mainline wants too much memory?	Eyal Lebedinsky
09:02	Re: RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch)	Jan Hubicka
08:30	Re: Ready-to-use GCC toolchains	Gerald Pfeifer
07:38	Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3	Andrew Walrond
06:04	gcc summit lodging...	Dan Kegel
06:01	Write a md about a cpu having a risc unit and a dsp unit	mike
05:44	Ready-to-use GCC toolchains	GNU Support
01:44	Re: gcc mainline [RFH] reload of 8-character vector into memory causes bad pattern	David Edelsohn
01:33	Re: RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch)	Stuart Hastings
01:28	gcc mainline [RFH] reload of 8-character vector into memory causes bad pattern	Fariborz Jahanian
00:53	Re: Question...	Robert Dewar
00:32	Re: Question...	Robert Dewar
00:30	Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3	Andrew Walrond
00:23	prerequisites.html	Andrew Pinski

May 24, 2004

23:05	Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3	Phil Edwards
22:39	Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3	Andrew Walrond
21:54	Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3	Joe Buck
21:37	Re: About "define_expand" having names which are not standard pattern names.	David Edelsohn
21:36	Re: About "define_expand" having names which are not standard pattern names.	DJ Delorie
21:32	About "define_expand" having names which are not standard pattern names.	mike
20:03	Re: RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch)	Steven Bosscher
19:46	Re: RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch)	Stuart Hastings
19:40	PATCH for: "exotic" machine modes	Gerald Pfeifer
19:38	No requests found	University of Colorado at Boul
19:24	Re: cpplib.h is breaking bootstrap on mainline	Ziemowit Laski
18:58	Re: Question...	Zack Weinberg
18:55	Re: Question...	Gerald Pfeifer
18:46	Question...	Valeriu Palos
18:12	cpplib.h is breaking bootstrap on mainline	Steve Kargl
18:10	Re: error for _muldi3.o	Shinpei Kato
17:57	Re: Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.4-20040517 snapshot on i686-pc-cygwin	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:57	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:47	Re: What does "define_bypass" mean?	Vladimir N. Makarov
17:21	Successful bootstrap of gcc-3.3.4-20040517 snapshot on i686-pc-cygwin	Dave Korn
16:55	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Joe Buck
16:45	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Richard Henderson
16:38	Re: RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch)	Richard Henderson
15:43	Re: "exotic" machine modes	Paolo Bonzini
15:07	[toplevel] Add --enable-bootstrap configure switch	Paolo Bonzini
15:06	Re: Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3	Benjamin Kosnik
14:43	Re: "exotic" machine modes	Jan Beulich
14:17	Re: "exotic" machine modes	Paolo Bonzini
14:11	Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)	Jan Hubicka
13:59	Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)	Paolo Bonzini
13:46	Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)	Jan Hubicka
13:24	Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)	Richard Kenner
13:18	Suspicious C++ stringstream crashes, gcc 3.3.3	Andrew Walrond
13:15	Re: "exotic" machine modes	Andrew Walrond
13:02	Re: Inclusion of g95 in gcc	Paul Brook
12:40	Re: "exotic" machine modes	Jan Beulich
09:15	Inclusion of g95 in gcc	THOMAS Paul Richard
08:43	Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)	Paolo Bonzini
08:23	Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)	Steven Bosscher
08:13	Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)	Ranjit Mathew
07:45	Re: Why function overloading doesn't happen when I use friend functiontemplates in class templates?	Nathan Sidwell
06:34	Re: Conversion to bool.	Falk Hueffner
05:53	Why function overloading doesn't happen when I use friend functiontemplates in class templates?	Yueh-Wei Hu
05:52	Why function overloading doesn't happen when I use friend functiontemplates in class templates?	Yueh-Wei Hu
05:35	Re: *-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian)	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:48	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Roger Sayle
04:33	Re: *-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian)	Matthias Klose

May 23, 2004

23:22	Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)	Mark Mitchell
23:00	Re: GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)	Steven Bosscher
22:33	GCC Release Status (2004-05-23)	Mark Mitchell
22:31	Conversion to bool.	Jan Ringoš
21:01	RFC: support for multiple CFGs (necessary for the tree-profiling branch)	Steven Bosscher
19:19	gcc-ss-3.5-20040523 is now available	gccadmin
18:02	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:53	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:00	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Richard Henderson
15:39	Re: Objective C++ question	llewelly
14:38	Re: [PATCH] improve C++ code by changing fold-const.c	Richard Kenner
14:34	Re: [PATCH] improve C++ code by changing fold-const.c	Richard Kenner
14:29	gcc-3.4.0 + glibc-2.2.5 generate static apps that segfault at startup?	Dan Kegel
13:54	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Marc Espie
13:51	Re: more test results for Gaby's 3.3.4-prerelease tarball	Marc Espie
11:58	What does "define_bypass" mean?	mike
11:33	Add myself to MAINTAINERS (write after approval)	Mostafa Hagog
11:31	Re: Tree representation in GCC Front End	Paul Brook
09:45	Re: -masm=intel examples	Robert Dewar
09:22	Tree representation in GCC Front End	srinivas koppadi
07:41	Re: *-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian)	Matthias Klose
07:16	Re: *-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian)	Matthias Klose
02:02	Re: Objective C++ question	llewelly
01:53	Re: Objective C++ question	llewelly

May 22, 2004

20:17	Objective C++ question	Dolgov, Alex (Contractor)
19:36	Re: error for _muldi3.o	Eric Christopher
16:24	Re: more test results for Gaby's 3.3.4-prerelease tarball	Alexandre Oliva
15:07	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Gerald Pfeifer
13:39	Re: 3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:44	Re: *-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian)	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:39	Re: question on double to int conversion	Andrew Haley
02:20	Re: RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes	Mark Mitchell
01:51	Re: New target submission deadlines	Mark Mitchell
00:05	Re: Pass specific annotation data for trees	Daniel Berlin

May 21, 2004

23:06	Re: Long and short jumps	Mike Stump
20:46	*-linux test results for 3.3 branch (Debian)	Matthias Klose
20:43	Re: question on double to int conversion	Richard Henderson
20:24	Re: libmudflap and RUNTESTFLAGS	Frank Ch. Eigler
19:49	Re: Pass specific annotation data for trees	Andrew MacLeod
18:24	more test results for Gaby's 3.3.4-prerelease tarball	Joe Buck
18:12	Pass specific annotation data for trees	Daniel Berlin
18:10	Re: precompiled header support	Marc Espie
17:50	Long and short jumps	Nathan Sidwell
17:46	Re: libmudflap and RUNTESTFLAGS	Janis Johnson
17:31	Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure	Daniel Berlin
17:04	RE: HELP: GCC Passes and Files	Dave Korn
16:26	HELP: GCC Passes and Files	perugupa
16:15	Re: [tree-profiling-branch] Fix mudflap	Steven Bosscher
16:07	Re: question on double to int conversion	Geert Bosch
16:05	Re: [tree-profiling-branch] Fix mudflap	Frank Eigler
13:44	Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available	Gerald Pfeifer
13:43	RE: Porting gcc	Dave Korn
13:22	Re: New CSiBE benchmark released	Giovanni Bajo
13:18	Re: New CSiBE benchmark released	Arpad Beszedes
13:09	Porting gcc	Mile Davidovic
11:11	libmudflap and RUNTESTFLAGS	Christian Joensson
10:46	Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?	Paolo Carlini
10:35	Re: FYI: LWN.net on Tree-SSA	Nathan Sidwell
10:32	Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?	Gerald Pfeifer
08:39	Re: Mainline failed to boostrap on Linux/ia64	Andreas Schwab
08:07	Re: question on double to int conversion	Jaeyoun Chung
04:54	Re: powerpc-eabispe bugs	Aldy Hernandez
04:36	Re: question on double to int conversion	James A. Morrison
04:30	Re: Installation Problems..	llewelly
04:29	Re: calling function in .init and .fini gives problem	Zack Weinberg
04:12	Re: calling function in .init and .fini gives problem	mohanlal jangir
04:02	Mainline failed to boostrap on Linux/ia64	H. J. Lu
03:50	question on double to int conversion	Jaeyoun Chung
00:49	successful gcc-3.3.4-prerelease builds: i686-pc-linux-gnu; hppa-hpux	Joe Buck

May 20, 2004

22:51	3.3.4-prerelease fails to build on alphaev6-dec-osf5.1	Joe Buck
22:40	Re: Input charsets - What's going on?	Tom Tromey
21:01	Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?	Paolo Carlini
20:50	Re: error for _muldi3.o	Shinpei Kato
20:37	Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure	Dorit Naishlos
20:28	What about providing changes.html in the tarball?	Paolo Carlini
20:28	Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure	Diego Novillo
20:26	Installation Problems..	ARUN Sundararaman
18:38	Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure	Dorit Naishlos
17:58	Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available	Kelley Cook
17:43	Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?	Joseph S. Myers
17:29	Re: Janis Johnson appointed GCC compat testsuite maintainer	Janis Johnson
16:40	Re: calling function in .init and .fini gives problem	Janis Johnson
16:30	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Joe Buck
16:27	Re: powerpc testsuite regressions (was Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled)	Andrew Pinski
16:13	Re: powerpc testsuite regressions	Zack Weinberg
16:06	Re: powerpc testsuite regressions (was Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled)	Devang Patel
16:01	Re: powerpc testsuite regressions (was Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled)	Andrew Pinski
15:59	Re: FYI: LWN.net on Tree-SSA	Joe Buck
15:58	Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?	Paolo Carlini
15:51	Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?	Paolo Carlini
15:45	Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?	Paolo Carlini
15:38	Re: What about providing changes.html in the tarball?	Joseph S. Myers
15:24	Re: calling function in .init and .fini gives problem	Diego Novillo
15:22	Re: Control register spilling: Is it possible ?	Ian Lance Taylor
15:16	Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available	Joseph S. Myers
14:41	What about providing changes.html in the tarball?	Paolo Carlini
14:37	calling function in .init and .fini gives problem	mohanlal jangir
13:53	Re: Calculating elements addresses from arrays once	Gruik
13:53	Re: gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available	Kelley Cook
13:49	Control register spilling: Is it possible ?	Petar Penchev
13:39	Re: powerpc testsuite regressions (was Re: Bootstrap miscomparisonon mainline with checking disabled)	Diego Novillo
13:15	powerpc testsuite regressions (was Re: Bootstrap miscomparison onmainline with checking disabled)	Diego Novillo
13:15	New target submission deadlines	Nitin Gupta
13:00	Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure	Diego Novillo
12:57	Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:18	Re: Calculating elements addresses from arrays once	Ranjit Mathew
10:43	RE: Calculating elements addresses from arrays once	Gruik
10:06	RE: Calculating elements addresses from arrays once	Dave Korn
09:38	Calculating elements addresses from arrays once	Gruik
09:14	FYI: LWN.net on Tree-SSA	Ranjit Mathew
07:19	Can't build gcc for sparc64-linux: cgraph.c:150: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size	Christian Joensson
06:32	Re: About standard pattern names in the gcc source files	Zack Weinberg
06:20	About standard pattern names in the gcc source files	mike
05:38	Re: error for _muldi3.o	Ranjit Mathew
05:15	Re: error for _muldi3.o	Ian Lance Taylor
04:25	Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	llewelly
04:17	Re: error for _muldi3.o	Shinpei Kato
02:11	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:19	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Gerald Pfeifer

May 19, 2004

23:45	Support for 32-bit stack processors?	The Thodes
23:34	Re: ARM PIC/PID code generation	Jim Wilson
23:19	Re: tree to rtl conversion optimizations	Jim Wilson
23:11	gcc-ss-3.3-20040519 is now available	gccadmin
23:09	Re: gcc 3.4 nukes __guard	Jim Wilson
23:02	Re: types of new builtins	Jim Wilson
22:27	Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	Mark Mitchell
21:27	Re: tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure	Dorit Naishlos
21:13	Re: Input charsets - What's going on?	Zack Weinberg
21:11	Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	Zack Weinberg
20:47	Re: Input charsets - What's going on?	Joseph S. Myers
20:43	Re: RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes	Matt Austern
20:30	Re: RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:27	Re: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes	Giovanni Bajo
20:25	Re: RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes	Matt Austern
20:25	Re: Input charsets - What's going on?	Zack Weinberg
20:23	Re: RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes	Andrew Pinski
20:18	RFC: C++: __attribute__((visibility)) for classes	Matt Austern
19:58	Re: New CSiBE benchmark released	Diego Novillo
19:31	Re: Variables whose types are anonymous structs, once again	Matt Austern
19:09	Re: Variables whose types are anonymous structs, once again	law
18:57	Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:30	Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	Joseph S. Myers
17:21	Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	Ian Lance Taylor
17:20	Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	Andrew Pinski
17:18	Re: Why is a const array pointer with -fPIC mapped in ".data"?	Richard Earnshaw
17:14	Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	Ian Lance Taylor
17:04	Re: error for _muldi3.o	Ian Lance Taylor
16:52	Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled	law
16:47	Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: Beginner GCC projects question)	Joe Buck
16:46	Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	Joe Buck
16:44	Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled	Andrew Pinski
16:40	Re: transparent way of inserting insns	Joe Buck
16:35	Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled	law
16:33	Input charsets - What's going on?	Paolo Bonzini
16:25	Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled	Diego Novillo
16:15	Re: RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	Ian Lance Taylor
16:08	Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled	law
15:30	Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled	law
15:15	transparent way of inserting insns	Johnny Huynh
15:08	Re: Mail Authentication	zonida
15:07	Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled	Andrew Pinski
14:57	New CSiBE benchmark released	Arpad Beszedes
14:54	Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled	Diego Novillo
14:48	Re: Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled	law
14:30	State of Pentium4 optimization in v3.4.0?	Steve Snyder
14:03	Control register spilling: Is it possible ?	Petar Penchev
13:48	Bootstrap miscomparison on mainline with checking disabled	Diego Novillo
10:48	Re: How to mirror?	Jan-Benedict Glaw
10:20	How to mirror?	Astharot
09:33	error for _muldi3.o	Shinpei Kato
08:05	Re: Bootstrap broken with checking disabled on at least i686	Ranjit Mathew
08:03	Re: Bootstrap broken with checking disabled on at least i686	Dan Nicolaescu
07:45	Bootstrap broken with checking disabled on at least i686	Steven Bosscher
06:57	Bootstrap failure after IMA fixes	Steven Bosscher
06:51	Re: permit unary plus to be used with vector types	Jan Beulich
06:36	Re: porting new arch	Shinpei Kato
04:14	Re: Why is a const array pointer with -fPIC mapped in ".data"?	Kazuomi Kato
02:55	RFC: Stricter semantics for renaming pragmas	Zack Weinberg
02:33	Re: porting new arch	Shinpei Kato
02:28	Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: BeginnerGCC projects question)	Kean Johnston
01:31	Re: PATCH: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:18	Re: PATCH: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Mark Mitchell
01:13	PATCH: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	H. J. Lu

May 18, 2004

23:46	Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0	Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
23:28	Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: BeginnerGCC projects question)	Bernardo Innocenti
22:31	Re: Why is a const array pointer with -fPIC mapped in ".data"?	Alexandre Oliva
22:01	Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: Beginner GCC projects question)	Joe Buck
21:35	Re: Failed compile of 3.4 on Solaris 8	Eric Botcazou
21:11	Re: Failed compile of 3.4 on Solaris 8	DJ Delorie
21:06	Failed compile of 3.4 on Solaris 8	Garey Mills
21:02	Re: Fix for PR 15235 libgfortran doesn't build on Solaris	Joseph S. Myers
21:00	Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement	Zack Weinberg
20:50	Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: Beginner GCC projects question)	Andrew Pinski
20:46	Re: RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement	Zack Weinberg
20:44	RFC: Dropping the non-GCC bootstrap requirement (Was: Beginner GCCprojects question)	Bernardo Innocenti
20:13	RE: MIPS gcc/crtstuff.c force_to_data[] not working for me	Graeme Peterson
20:11	Re: change the sampling time in the gprof	Ian Lance Taylor
19:59	Re: change the sampling time in the gprof	perugupa
19:03	Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0	Mike Stump
18:57	Re: change the sampling time in the gprof	Ian Lance Taylor
18:46	Re: change the sampling time in the gprof	Zack Weinberg
18:41	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Zack Weinberg
18:39	Re: Fix for PR 15235 libgfortran doesn't build on Solaris	Andrew Pinski
18:37	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Zack Weinberg
18:35	Re: change the sampling time in the gprof	Ian Lance Taylor
18:32	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Ian Lance Taylor
18:18	Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)	Diego Novillo
18:09	change the sampling time in the gprof	perugupa
18:05	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Mark G. Adams
17:54	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Mark G. Adams
16:58	RE: order of passes (was: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL))	Luchezar Belev
16:50	MIPS gcc/crtstuff.c force_to_data[] not working for me	Graeme Peterson
16:24	RE: permit unary plus to be used with vector types	Dave Korn
16:23	Re: permit unary plus to be used with vector types	Zack Weinberg
16:06	Re: permit unary plus to be used with vector types	Jan Beulich
16:04	Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0	Joe Buck
16:03	Re: Testsuite duplication	Zack Weinberg
15:42	Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:08	RE: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64?	Lu, Hongjiu
14:38	RE: order of passes (was: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL))	Dave Korn
14:35	ARM PIC/PID code generation	Oren Sokoler
14:28	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	H. J. Lu
14:10	Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)	Luchezar Belev
14:06	order of passes (was: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL))	Luchezar Belev
13:40	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:23	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:19	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Gabriel Dos Reis
13:11	Re: Can GMP be replaced by trees?	Tobias Schlüter
13:07	Re: porting new arch	Shinpei Kato
12:38	Re: porting new arch	Steven Bosscher
12:30	Re: Can GMP be replaced by trees?	Paul Brook
12:26	Testsuite duplication	Dave Korn
12:23	Re: porting new arch	Shinpei Kato
12:15	Re: Can GMP be replaced by trees?	Joseph S. Myers
12:08	Re: porting new arch	Steven Bosscher
12:04	Re: Can GMP be replaced by trees?	Steven Bosscher
11:46	porting new arch	Shinpei Kato
11:33	Re: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64?	Uros Bizjak
11:32	Can GMP be replaced by trees?	Tobias Schlüter
10:36	powerpc-eabispe bugs	arcjai
08:36	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Mark Mitchell
08:31	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Gerald Pfeifer
08:28	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Gerald Pfeifer
07:44	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Zack Weinberg
07:28	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Paolo Bonzini
05:53	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Mark Mitchell
05:11	Re: dejagnu version requiered, 1.4.4?	Eric Christopher
04:17	Re: First GCC-3.3.4 prerelease available	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:15	Re: 2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:04	2 x86-64 ABI bugs in gcc 3.3 and 3.4	H. J. Lu
03:54	Re: dejagnu version requiered, 1.4.4?	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:56	Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0	Mike Stump
01:24	Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report	Jie Zhang
01:17	dejagnu version requiered, 1.4.4?	Mike Stump
00:47	Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0	Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
00:14	Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0	Joe Buck
00:09	Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0	Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf

May 17, 2004

23:55	Re: Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0	Mike Stump
23:34	Successful Bootstrap/Install of prerelease-3.3.4-20040517 on i686-apple-darwin7.0.0	Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
21:49	Re: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64?	H. J. Lu
21:39	Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header	Mike Stump
21:34	Re: casting return values	Jim Wilson
21:13	Re: GCC runs SPEC2000 189.lucas for the first time	Andrew Pinski
21:12	Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header	Ian Lance Taylor
21:05	Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header	Geoff Keating
20:10	Re: First GCC-3.3.4 prerelease available	Ulrich Weigand
19:33	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Andrew MacLeod
19:29	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Zack Weinberg
19:10	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	law
19:08	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	law
19:06	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	law
18:47	A framework for static analysis of RTL: RTL-Check	Patrice Lacroix
18:44	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Paolo Bonzini
18:33	Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header	Mike Stump
18:31	Re: GCC runs SPEC2000 189.lucas for the first time	Joe Buck
18:23	Re: tree to rtl conversion optimizations	Johnny Huynh
18:00	GCC runs SPEC2000 189.lucas for the first time	Diego Novillo
17:58	tree to rtl conversion optimizations	Johnny Huynh
17:21	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Zack Weinberg
16:29	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Tom Tromey
16:05	Re: Tree-profiling branch status	Andrew MacLeod
15:51	Re: Tree-profiling branch status	Stuart Hastings
15:49	Re: Tree-profiling branch status	Stuart Hastings
15:44	Re: Tree-profiling branch status	Richard Guenther
15:39	Re: Tree-profiling branch status	Jan Hubicka
15:32	RE: why m68k-linux target is not building?	Dave Korn
15:24	Re: Tree-profiling branch status	Richard Guenther
15:20	Tree-profiling branch status	Jan Hubicka
15:06	Re: why m68k-linux target is not building?	Andreas Schwab
15:03	Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)	Frank Ch. Eigler
15:00	re: Linking ELF on Mac OS X with GCC	Dan Kegel
14:53	Re: why m68k-linux target is not building?	arcjai
14:50	re: why m68k-linux target is not building?	Dan Kegel
14:45	Re: why m68k-linux target is not building?	Andreas Schwab
14:31	Re: why m68k-linux target is not building?	arcjai
14:26	Build report for AIX 5.1	Mario Linke
14:25	Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)	Diego Novillo
14:23	Re: why m68k-linux target is not building?	Peter Barada
14:21	Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)	Diego Novillo
14:15	Re: Re: Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report	zhanrk
14:15	Re: Still tree-ssa warnings in the rs6000 backend?	Diego Novillo
13:53	Still tree-ssa warnings in the rs6000 backend?	Steven Bosscher
13:53	why m68k-linux target is not building?	arcjai
13:18	RE: Beginner GCC projects question	Michael Veksler
11:29	RE: Beginner GCC projects question	Dave Korn
11:10	RE: Overriding cc1	Dave Korn
11:04	Re: Why is a const array pointer with -fPIC mapped in ".data"?	Richard Earnshaw
10:41	Why is a const array pointer with -fPIC mapped in ".data"?	Kazuomi Kato
10:38	Re: Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report	zhanrk
10:00	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Michael Veksler
09:24	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Paolo Bonzini
09:21	Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header	Jan Beulich
09:09	gcc 3.4 nukes __guard	Travis Tilley
09:07	Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report	Andreas Schwab
09:00	Re: Beginner GCC projects question	Gerald Pfeifer
08:41	types of new builtins	Jan Beulich
06:31	Re: -masm=intel examples	Ranjit Mathew
05:32	Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location	Dan Kegel
05:19	Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report	Gabriel Dos Reis
05:06	Re: Why is gcc-3.3.3 in a strange directory on ftp.gnu.org?	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:45	First GCC-3.3.4 prerelease available	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:40	Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report	Jim Wilson
04:03	Re: casting return values	Dan Nicolaescu
03:59	Re: debug option mising?	Jim Wilson
03:49	Re: Default values of "struct item *items[MAX_ITEMS]" array?	Daniel Jacobowitz
03:45	Re: [Patch] Re-enable Tree Browser for All Front Ends (WAS: Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions)	Jim Wilson
03:06	Re: Reload Problem	Jim Wilson
02:53	Re: casting return values	Jim Wilson
02:39	Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report	Jim Wilson
02:31	Re: Why is gcc-3.3.3 in a strange directory on ftp.gnu.org?	Jim Wilson
02:24	Beginner GCC projects question	Mark G. Adams
02:20	Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location	Jim Wilson
01:39	Re: Linking ELF on Mac OS X with GCC	Mike Stump
01:35	Re: Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report	zhanrk
01:31	Re: GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report	Jie Zhang
01:28	Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)	Jim Wilson
01:14	Re: GCC-3.3.4 status report	Giovanni Bajo
00:46	Linking ELF on Mac OS X with GCC	Jonathan Johnson

May 16, 2004

23:08	GCC-3.3.4 status report	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:30	Re: [lno] missing optimization	Zdenek Dvorak
18:02	gcc-ss-3.5-20040516 is now available	gccadmin
17:30	[lno] missing optimization	Dale Johannesen
12:40	Re: [RFC] Reload Problem	tm_gccmail
09:56	Re:IPA Constant Propagation Optimization	Razya Ladelsky
05:07	Re: Overriding cc1	Alexandre Oliva
02:44	Re: -masm=intel examples	Robert Dewar

May 15, 2004

19:51	Re: -masm=intel examples	Andi Kleen
18:20	RE: building 3.4.0 for powerpc-elf target	Dave Murphy
15:29	Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)	Luchezar Belev
14:45	debug option mising?	Prashanth T
14:21	Re: -masm=intel examples	Robert Dewar
14:16	Re: -masm=intel examples	llewelly
13:51	Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location	DJ Delorie
13:28	Re: [RFC] Reload Problem	Robert Dewar
13:25	Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)	Robert Dewar
13:22	[RFC] Reload Problem	C Jaiprakash, Noida
13:20	Re: importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)	Luchezar Belev
13:11	Re: -masm=intel examples	Robert Dewar
13:09	Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location	Andreas Schwab
12:35	Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location	Gerald Pfeifer
12:16	Re: -masm=intel examples	Marek Peteraj
11:54	importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)	Andrew Haley
11:28	Re: -masm=intel examples	Florian Weimer
10:00	Re: -masm=intel examples	Marek Peteraj
09:46	Re: -masm=intel examples	Robert Dewar
09:33	RE: Namespace Issue	Stephan T. Lavavej
09:09	-masm=intel examples	Marek Peteraj
08:59	Re: Namespace Issue	Giovanni Bajo
06:00	Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location	Dan Kegel
03:17	importing code in IR (GIMPLE and/or RTL)	Luchezar Belev
02:17	Re: canadian cross trouble with libiberty location	DJ Delorie
02:10	Namespace Issue	Stephan T. Lavavej
00:24	canadian cross trouble with libiberty location	Daniel Kegel
00:14	Re: error: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new	Joe Buck
00:02	Re: error: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new	Giovanni Bajo

May 14, 2004

23:49	error: ISO C++ forbids initialization in array new	Maurizio Monge
23:09	gcc-ss-3.4-20040514 is now available	gccadmin
22:49	Re: misoptimization causing der_io.f90 failures	Tobias Schlüter
22:42	Re: misoptimization causing der_io.f90 failures	Joe Buck
22:37	misoptimization causing der_io.f90 failures	Tobias Schlüter
19:30	Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header	Geoff Keating
19:19	Re: Multiplatform binary generation	Mike Stump
17:00	RFA: make reg_equiv_memory_loc visible to garbage collector (Was: Re: reg_equiv_memory_loc vs. garbage collection)	Joern Rennecke
16:56	re: Multiplatform binary generation	Dan Kegel
16:17	Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header	Ian Lance Taylor
16:12	Re: compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header	Paul Brook
16:03	compiler rebuild invalidates precompiled header	Jan Beulich
15:55	Re: Default values of "struct item *items[MAX_ITEMS]" array?	Joe Buck
13:40	Re: Fw: IPA Constant Propagation Optimization	Steven Bosscher
13:31	RE: Multiplatform binary generation	Dave Korn
13:25	Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions	Diego Novillo
13:20	Multiplatform binary generation	deploy.kde
12:31	Why is gcc-3.3.3 in a strange directory on ftp.gnu.org?	Dan Kegel
12:01	Re: reg_equiv_memory_loc vs. garbage collection	Joern Rennecke
11:49	Re: template aliasing	llewelly
11:17	template aliasing	Marco Correia
10:30	RE: Overriding cc1	Dave Korn
10:24	GCC-3.4.0 on FRV architecture BUG report	zhanrk-gcc
09:05	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Gunther Nikl
08:55	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Gunther Nikl
08:54	RE: Default values of "struct item *items[MAX_ITEMS]" array?	Andriy Korud
06:40	Re: gcc 3.4.0 running error for 173.applu on Itanium 2	Qiong Cai
06:38	Re: reg_equiv_memory_loc vs. garbage collection	Jim Wilson
06:21	Re: gcc 3.4.0 running error for 173.applu on Itanium 2	Jim Wilson
05:49	Re: building 3.4.0 for powerpc-elf target	Jim Wilson
05:49	Re: Overriding cc1	Alexandre Oliva
04:50	Re: Arm-elf-gcc	Ranjit Mathew
04:49	Reload Problem	Konark
02:44	casting return values	Dan Nicolaescu
02:43	Re: Configure problem	Jim Wilson
01:28	Re: Question about the order global declarations are output	Jim Wilson
01:24	Re: Web archive at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-05/ stuck?	Jim Wilson
01:21	Re: HELP: GCC Passes and Files	Jim Wilson
01:16	Re: Arm-elf-gcc	Jim Wilson
01:11	Re: template matching variable size array	Jim Wilson
01:03	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Segher Boessenkool
01:03	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Segher Boessenkool
00:52	Re: Overriding cc1	Ben Elliston
00:48	Re: Contributing to GCC / copyright assignment request	Jim Wilson
00:46	Re: FDO regression in Skidmarks component ParserVid	Jim Wilson

May 13, 2004

22:28	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Diego Novillo
22:14	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Mike Stump
21:12	Patch config.gcc to accept --with-cpu=85xx for PowerPC	Michael Eager
20:05	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Daniel Jacobowitz
20:04	Re: [RFC] Attributes on types	Joseph S. Myers
19:35	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Zdenek Dvorak
19:24	Re: Disabling libbanshee and libmudflap	Daniel Jacobowitz
19:22	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Geoff Keating
19:21	Disabling libbanshee and libmudflap	Kelley Cook
19:18	[RFC] Attributes on types	Svein E. Seldal
19:10	Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions	Ranjit Mathew
19:01	Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions	Diego Novillo
19:00	Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions	Diego Novillo
18:34	Re: Overriding cc1	Pat Haugen
18:24	Re: Default values of "struct item *items[MAX_ITEMS]" array?	Richard Guenther
18:24	Re: -ftree-* options	Scott Robert Ladd
18:04	Default values of "struct item *items[MAX_ITEMS]" array?	Andriy Korud
18:02	Re: Overriding cc1	Pat Haugen
18:01	Re: Overriding cc1	Paul Brook
18:00	Re: -ftree-* options	Serge Belyshev
17:50	Re: Overriding cc1	Ian Lance Taylor
17:49	-ftree-* options	Scott Robert Ladd
17:45	Re: Overriding cc1	John R. Shannon
17:40	Overriding cc1	Pat Haugen
17:11	Re: fortran vs gfortran bugs in Bugzilla	Paul Brook
16:59	Re: fortran vs gfortran bugs in Bugzilla	Joe Buck
16:26	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	law
15:57	Re: tree-ssa-20020619-branch merged into mainline	Devang Patel
15:53	RE: IPA Constant Propagation Optimization	Chris Lattner
15:52	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Devang Patel
15:28	Fw: IPA Constant Propagation Optimization	Razya Ladelsky
14:44	Re: Question about RTL	Peter Barada
14:39	[Patch] Re-enable Tree Browser for All Front Ends (WAS: Re: Tree-SSANewbie Questions)	Ranjit Mathew
14:26	Re: Question about RTL	Paul Brook
14:19	Re: tree-ssa-20020619-branch merged into mainline	Diego Novillo
14:14	boehm-gc gctest failure (does not exit) in tree-ssa but not mainline (pre-merge)	Christian Joensson
14:11	Question about RTL	Petar Penchev
13:47	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Mike Stump
13:45	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Mike Stump
13:42	Re: tree-ssa-20020619-branch merged into mainline	Anthony Green
13:42	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Daniel Jacobowitz
13:20	Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions	Sebastian Pop
13:06	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Gunther Nikl
13:00	Re: Tree-SSA Newbie Questions	Andrew Pinski
12:53	Tree-SSA Newbie Questions	Ranjit Mathew
12:48	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Gunther Nikl
12:24	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Richard Guenther
12:10	Re: [lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Zdenek Dvorak
11:53	RE: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Dave Korn
11:53	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Andreas Schwab
11:53	RE: ICE for overlap of asm-register-declared variable and asm clobber list [H8/S target]	Dave Korn
11:41	fortran vs gfortran bugs in Bugzilla	Giovanni Bajo
11:34	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Gunther Nikl
11:25	RE: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Dave Korn
11:03	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Andrew Pinski
10:33	Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed	Giovanni Bajo
09:34	Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed	Richard Earnshaw
08:45	Re: tree-ssa-20020619-branch merged into mainline	Joseph S. Myers
08:34	[lno] what's going to happen with the branch?	Richard Guenther
07:56	Re: Suggestion re tree-ssa merge	Andreas Jaeger
07:50	Re: Suggestion re tree-ssa merge	Alexandre Oliva
07:18	tree-ssa-20020619-branch merged into mainline	Diego Novillo
05:13	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Ian Lance Taylor
04:52	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Gabriel Paubert
04:37	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12	Andreas Tobler
02:15	Re: Compiling differences?	Muthukumar Ratty
01:43	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Peter Barada

May 12, 2004

22:52	Draft pre-DR: offsetof	Joseph S. Myers
22:25	Compiling differences?	Matias Bordese
22:08	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Zack Weinberg
21:36	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Andreas Schwab
21:03	Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality	Aldy Hernandez
20:59	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Zack Weinberg
20:42	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Richard Henderson
20:29	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Andreas Schwab
20:13	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Zack Weinberg
20:11	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Andreas Schwab
19:33	Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality	Geert Bosch
19:28	Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed	Wolfgang Bangerth
19:15	Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed	Joe Buck
18:36	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Ian Lance Taylor
18:29	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12	Diego Novillo
18:25	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12	Zack Weinberg
18:21	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Richard Henderson
18:18	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12	Diego Novillo
18:15	Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality	Richard Henderson
18:12	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12	Jonathan Lennox
18:12	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	law
18:04	[tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-05-12	Diego Novillo
17:57	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Richard Henderson
16:45	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Ian Lance Taylor
16:37	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Ian Lance Taylor
16:35	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Gunther Nikl
16:25	RE: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Dave Korn
16:13	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Ian Lance Taylor
16:13	Re: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Andreas Schwab
16:08	Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality	Aldy Hernandez
16:05	Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality	Paolo Bonzini
16:04	RE: [m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Dave Korn
15:55	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Fariborz Jahanian
15:54	Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality	Aldy Hernandez
15:49	Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:45	Re: RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality	Michael Matz
15:41	[m68k] asm regression with 3.3/3.4/3.5	Gunther Nikl
15:18	RFC: generic vectors and GPR/simd duality	Aldy Hernandez
13:55	Re: download GCC 3.4.0 for IBM Aix 5.2	Ian Lance Taylor
13:46	Re: *-*-netware target	Daniel Jacobowitz
13:26	RE: Suggestion re tree-ssa merge	Diego Novillo
13:21	RE: Suggestion re tree-ssa merge	Dave Korn
13:18	RE: question about AltiVec builtins	Dave Korn
13:16	Re: precompiled header support	Ian Lance Taylor
13:15	Re: Suggestion re tree-ssa merge	Diego Novillo
13:09	RE: question about AltiVec builtins	ITN \(L S Rao\)
13:06	RE: question about AltiVec builtins	Dave Korn
12:57	RE: question about AltiVec builtins	ITN \(L S Rao\)
12:49	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Paolo Bonzini
12:38	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Aldy Hernandez
12:23	gcc 3.4.0 running error for 173.applu on Itanium 2	Qiong Cai
12:21	Re: precompiled header support	DJ Delorie
12:11	Re: *-*-netware target	Michael Matz
12:10	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Paolo Bonzini
12:07	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Aldy Hernandez
11:50	Re: precompiled header support	Gunther Nikl
11:39	Re: *-*-netware target	Jan Beulich
10:45	Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed	Richard Earnshaw
10:42	RE: precompiled header support	Dave Korn
10:34	RE: precompiled header support	Dave Korn
10:29	Suggestion re tree-ssa merge	Richard Kenner
10:27	Re: Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed	Giovanni Bajo
10:23	RE: precompiled header support	Dave Korn
10:11	Re: precompiled header support	Andreas Schwab
09:49	Setting milestones on PRs for bugs already fixed	Richard Earnshaw
09:24	Noticias: Especial Oferta WLAN	Ana Puente Diaz
09:15	Noticias: Especial Oferta WLAN	Ana Puente Diaz
08:11	Re: *-*-netware target	Steven Bosscher
07:52	Re: precompiled header support	Gunther Nikl
07:51	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Paolo Bonzini
07:39	*-*-netware target	Jan Beulich
07:21	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Paolo Bonzini
06:30	Re: precompiled header support	Jed Davis
06:16	Re: -isystem and C++ headers	Zack Weinberg
06:11	Re: -isystem and C++ headers	Daniel Jacobowitz
05:28	Re: -isystem and C++ headers	Zack Weinberg
05:15	Re: GCC 3.4 on Mac OS X: compilable, but with problems	Andreas Tobler
05:08	Re: -isystem and C++ headers	Phil Edwards
04:57	download GCC 3.4.0 for IBM Aix 5.2	ITN \(L S Rao\)
03:51	Re: ANN: Merge of tree-ssa into mainline	Ben Elliston
03:51	Re: ANN: Merge of tree-ssa into mainline	Christopher Faylor
03:44	Re: ANN: Merge of tree-ssa into mainline	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:28	Re: ANN: Merge of tree-ssa into mainline	Christopher Faylor
03:28	Re: g++ 3.4.0 : C++ templates' error messages	llewelly
01:20	g++ 3.4.0 : C++ templates' error messages	Shelly Adhikari
00:30	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Janis Johnson
00:07	3.3-e500-branch now closed	Aldy Hernandez

May 11, 2004

23:57	Re: -isystem and C++ headers	Daniel Jacobowitz
23:51	Re: -isystem and C++ headers	Matt Austern
23:50	Re: -isystem and C++ headers	Andrew Pinski
23:48	Re: -isystem and C++ headers	Geoff Keating
23:46	Re: -isystem and C++ headers	Zack Weinberg
23:34	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Andrew Pinski
23:32	Re: g++ on DEC Alpha V5.1	Ben Elliston
23:29	Re: -isystem and C++ headers	Daniel Jacobowitz
23:24	-isystem and C++ headers	Daniel Jacobowitz
23:21	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Fariborz Jahanian
23:04	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Aldy Hernandez
22:34	Re: Doloop transform resulting in extra code	Zdenek Dvorak
21:25	Re: precompiled header support	Geoff Keating
21:24	GCC 3.4 on Mac OS X: compilable, but with problems	Bojan Antonovic
21:15	RE: precompiled header support	tm_gccmail
21:09	Re: precompiled header support	tm_gccmail
20:58	Re: precompiled header support	DJ Delorie
20:45	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Fariborz Jahanian
20:23	Re: precompiled header support	Ian Lance Taylor
20:23	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Aldy Hernandez
20:13	Re: Doloop transform resulting in extra code	Andrew Pinski
20:05	Doloop transform resulting in extra code	Pat Haugen
19:55	Re: Using EH from C revisited	Stelios Xanthakis
19:36	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Ziemowit Laski
17:59	Re: Resend: GAS embedded-PIC reloc removal vs. mips-linux exception handling	Alexandre Oliva
17:37	Re: precompiled header support	DJ Delorie
17:24	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Kean Johnston
17:08	RE: precompiled header support	Dave Korn
16:57	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Richard Henderson
16:37	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Richard Henderson
16:08	Re: avr-gcc, .debug_frame and bitfields	Denis Chertykov
15:58	Re: precompiled header support	DJ Delorie
15:18	Re: Using EH from C revisited	Stelios Xanthakis
15:13	RE: precompiled header support	Dave Korn
14:59	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Andi Kleen
14:54	[RTL] Generation?	Andrew Haley
14:53	Re: [RTL] Generation?	Ian Lance Taylor
14:27	Re: precompiled header support	Ian Lance Taylor
14:25	Re: to exec a shared object	Ian Lance Taylor
14:21	Re: Using EH from C revisited	Giovanni Bajo
14:21	g++ on DEC Alpha V5.1	Kalmar Tibor
14:20	ANN: Merge of tree-ssa into mainline	Diego Novillo
14:20	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Paolo Bonzini
14:19	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Robert Dewar
14:19	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Aldy Hernandez
14:19	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Michael Matz
14:19	[RTL] Generation?	王 逸
14:06	Re: to exec a shared object	Henry Thor Baldursson
08:05	Re: precompiled header support	Gunther Nikl
07:55	Re: precompiled header support	Gunther Nikl
07:32	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Robert Dewar
06:18	Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86	Zdenek Dvorak
06:17	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Paolo Bonzini
05:55	Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86	Eric Botcazou
05:35	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Neil Booth
03:33	Re: Inline assembly syntax	tm_gccmail
02:10	Re: Inline assembly syntax	Stan Shebs
02:07	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
01:33	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Robert Dewar
01:30	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Robert Dewar
01:16	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Ziemowit Laski
01:15	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Robert Dewar
01:13	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Aldy Hernandez
00:57	Re: Inline assembly syntax	tm_gccmail
00:52	Re: Inline assembly syntax	tm_gccmail
00:51	Re: question about AltiVec builtins	Fariborz Jahanian
00:43	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Ziemowit Laski
00:40	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	tm_gccmail
00:37	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Kean Johnston
00:28	question about AltiVec builtins	Janis Johnson

May 10, 2004

22:29	Configure problem	Zdenek Dvorak
21:22	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Ziemowit Laski
21:16	Question about the order global declarations are output	Mike Lerwill
20:51	Re: Using EH from C revisited	Richard Henderson
20:50	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Richard Henderson
20:49	Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07)	Jason Merrill
20:19	Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86	Zdenek Dvorak
20:18	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Andrew Pinski
20:09	Web archive at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-05/ stuck?	Kelley Cook
20:00	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Ziemowit Laski
19:52	Re: arm cross compiler	Daniel Kegel
19:37	arm cross compiler	kripashankar
19:33	Re: Using EH from C revisited	Giovanni Bajo
19:27	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Andrew Pinski
19:22	Re: PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Steven Bosscher
19:18	PROPOSAL: targetm.expand_tree_builtin hook	Ziemowit Laski
18:27	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Jack Lloyd
18:05	Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86	Eric Botcazou
17:18	Using EH from C revisited	Stelios Xanthakis
17:12	Re: to exec a shared object	Ian Lance Taylor
16:45	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Robert Dewar
16:43	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Ian Lance Taylor
16:35	Re: Where is rd_gen computed in gcse.c	Steven Bosscher
16:21	Re: Where is rd_gen computed in gcse.c	law
16:20	Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86	Nathan Sidwell
15:18	HELP: GCC Passes and Files	perugupa
15:09	Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86	Eric Botcazou
14:53	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Paul Koning
14:47	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Jack Lloyd
14:34	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Robert Dewar
14:29	Re: [lno] ICE with large unsigned loop bound	Sebastian Pop
14:27	Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont.	Diego Novillo
14:24	Re: [lno] ICE with large unsigned loop bound	Zdenek Dvorak
14:18	Re: -fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86	Andrew Pinski
14:16	Re: [lno] ICE with large unsigned loop bound	Sebastian Pop
14:12	RE: savannah trailing sources?	Dave Korn
14:11	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Paul Koning
13:59	Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont.	Steven Bosscher
13:59	Re: Where is rd_gen computed in gcse.c	Michael Matz
13:59	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Kai Henningsen
13:59	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Andreas Schwab
13:59	Re: -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs	Toon Moene
13:59	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Nathan Sidwell
13:59	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Andreas Jaeger
13:59	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Richard Earnshaw
13:59	-fnon-call-exceptions + -fprofile-arcs on x86	Eric Botcazou
13:59	RE: savannah trailing sources?	Dave Korn
13:58	Re: [lno] tree loop optimization causes a problem in RTL alias analysis	Mostafa Hagog
13:58	Re: [lno] tree loop optimization causes a problem in RTL alias analysis	Zdenek Dvorak
13:57	Re: [lno] tree loop optimization causes a problem in RTL alias analysis	Mostafa Hagog
13:43	Re: Inline assembly syntax	Paul Koning
13:35	to exec a shared object	Henry Thor Baldursson
04:54	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Phil Edwards
02:55	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Zack Weinberg
02:55	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Matthew Galgoci
02:50	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Andreas Jaeger
02:44	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Matthew Galgoci
02:40	Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont.	Andreas Jaeger
02:36	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Christopher Faylor
02:17	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Jeff Sturm
02:06	Re: pthread on Linux	Ben Elliston
02:02	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Christopher Faylor
01:41	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Bernardo Innocenti
00:01	Re: Is this bug : g++ in gcc-3.4.0 ?	llewelly

May 09, 2004

23:48	Is this bug : g++ in gcc-3.4.0 ?	yuki shimada
23:27	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Christopher Faylor
22:21	Re: RFC: use predicates for RTL objects more	Eric Christopher
22:18	Re: RFC: use predicates for RTL objects more	Andrew Pinski
22:10	Draft pre-DR on unprototyped function types	Joseph S. Myers
22:10	RFC: use predicates for RTL objects more	Steven Bosscher
20:33	tree-ssa/lno compute_may_aliases failure	Dorit Naishlos
19:51	Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont.	Paul Brook
18:59	Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont.	Kevin Handy
18:46	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Andreas Schwab
18:46	successful build of GCC 3.4 on Mac OS X 10.3.3 (Java only)	Bojan Antonovic
18:46	[lno] ICE with large unsigned loop bound	Falk Hueffner
18:43	Re: [lno] ICE with large unsigned loop bound	Zdenek Dvorak
17:26	Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont.	Tom Crick
17:26	Re: [PATCH] provide means to access the zone from the correspondingchunk	Paolo Bonzini
17:26	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Christopher Faylor
17:26	Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont.	Paul Brook
17:26	Re: savannah trailing sources?	Aldy Hernandez
15:33	Order Free Brochure: How to Build an Immortal Organization	Agata Stanusch
15:22	savannah trailing sources?	Aldy Hernandez
15:17	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Adrian Bunk
15:04	savannah trailing sources?	Aldy Hernandez
14:52	Re: [lno] tree loop optimization causes a problem in RTL alias analysis	Zdenek Dvorak
14:41	Re: [tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont.	Paul Brook
14:18	[tree-ssa] Building GENERIC trees cont.	Tom Crick
14:09	Where is rd_gen computed in gcse.c	Steven Bosscher
13:52	[lno] tree loop optimization causes a problem in RTL alias analysis	Mostafa Hagog

May 08, 2004

20:48	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Geoff Keating
17:08	Re: registering with bugzilla	Andreas Schwab
16:44	Re: const_double - RTL	Paul Brook
16:22	Re: Inline assembly syntax	Ian Lance Taylor
16:07	Re: const_double - RTL	Iman Narasamdya
16:06	Re: registering with bugzilla	Peter Barada
15:54	Re: registering with bugzilla	Kai Henningsen
15:54	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Richard Kenner
15:53	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Richard Earnshaw
15:53	Re: [PATCH] provide means to access the zone from the corresponding chunk	Daniel Berlin
15:53	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Ian Lance Taylor
15:50	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Diego Novillo
07:00	Re: [PATCH] provide means to access the zone from the correspondingchunk	Paolo polimi
06:53	Re: [PATCH] make zone collector work without mmap	Paolo polimi
06:03	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Daniel Jacobowitz
05:56	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Kevin Atkinson
05:45	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Kevin Atkinson
04:56	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Peter Barada
03:26	building 3.4.0 for powerpc-elf target	Dave Murphy
02:12	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Paul Jarc
01:53	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Adrian Bunk
01:50	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Adrian Bunk
01:34	Re: Inline assembly syntax	Zack Weinberg
01:33	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization	Jim Wilson
01:30	Re: Testcases on 3.4 branch	Mark Mitchell
01:19	Re: Inline assembly syntax	Stan Shebs
01:18	Re: registering with bugzilla	Zack Weinberg
01:15	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization	Jim Wilson
01:12	registering with bugzilla	Doug McIlroy
01:10	registering with bugzilla	Doug McIlroy
01:02	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Bernardo Innocenti
00:56	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Bernardo Innocenti
00:51	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Bernardo Innocenti
00:28	Re: Inline assembly syntax	Timothy J. Wood

May 07, 2004

23:49	Inline assembly syntax	Ian Lance Taylor
23:11	Re: const_double - RTL	Jim Wilson
23:01	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Paul Jarc
22:54	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Jim Wilson
22:52	gcc-ss-3.4-20040507 is now available	gccadmin
22:09	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
22:07	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Andrew Pinski
21:55	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Ian Lance Taylor
21:44	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Paul Koning
21:39	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization	Camm Maguire
21:36	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Richard Henderson
21:23	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Diego Novillo
21:15	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
21:14	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Andrew Haley
21:01	Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07)	Richard Henderson
20:37	Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07)	Toon Moene
20:24	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Diego Novillo
20:21	Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07)	Andrew Pinski
20:15	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Andrew Haley
20:13	Re: [tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07)	Diego Novillo
20:11	[tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07)	Andrew Haley
20:06	[tree-ssa] Regressions vs mainline (2004-05-07)	Diego Novillo
20:03	Re: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64?	H. J. Lu
20:02	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Mark Mitchell
19:55	Re: [PATCH] make zone collector work without mmap	Richard Henderson
19:55	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Matt Austern
19:45	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
19:42	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Richard Henderson
19:39	Re: precompiled header support	Geoff Keating
19:38	Re: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64?	Jan Hubicka
19:38	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Mark Mitchell
17:25	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Dale Johannesen
17:24	Arm-elf-gcc	frostflare
17:11	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Andrew Haley
16:15	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Ian Lance Taylor
16:15	Re: [PATCH] provide means to access the zone from the corresponding chunk	Daniel Berlin
16:11	sourceware downtime	Frank Ch. Eigler
16:02	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Devang Patel
15:40	pthread on Linux	sadf sadf
15:40	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Andrew Haley
15:24	Re: precompiled header support	Ian Lance Taylor
15:22	Re: precompiled header support	Ian Lance Taylor
15:20	[PATCH] make zone collector work without mmap	Paolo Bonzini
15:16	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:10	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Adrian Bunk
15:10	[PATCH] provide means to access the zone from the corresponding chunk	Paolo Bonzini
14:12	template matching variable size array	Neal D. Becker
13:40	Another attempt to send a rejected message	Paul Koning
13:23	RE: precompiled header support	Dave Korn
13:11	Contributing to GCC / copyright assignment request	Jonah Graham
12:24	precompiled header support	Gunther Nikl
12:04	Re: Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64?	Michel Lespinasse
11:13	Why is x86_sahf_1 pattern disabled in x86_64?	Uros Bizjak
11:01	Re: Testcases on 3.4 branch	Paolo Bonzini
10:22	Re: Testcases on 3.4 branch	Mark Mitchell
09:54	Re: lno: Bootstrap failure	Sebastian Pop
09:26	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Jim Wilson
09:12	[tree-ssa] on sparc-linux: comparison of test results between 3.5.0 20040504 (experimental) and 3.5-tree-ssa 20040504 (merged 20040428)	Christian Joensson
09:08	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Kazu Hirata
08:27	Muchas gracias por contactarse	Romulo y Remo
08:16	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Bernd Jendrissek
07:55	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Rogelio Serrano
07:44	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Kazu Hirata
07:28	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Paolo Bonzini
07:24	Testcases on 3.4 branch	Eric Botcazou
05:26	Re: Question about REG_OFFSET on big endian machines	Josef Zlomek
05:13	Re: Question about REG_OFFSET on big endian machines	Jim Wilson
04:52	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
04:39	lno: Bootstrap failure	Andreas Jaeger
04:23	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
03:28	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Andrew Pinski
03:14	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Peter Barada
02:53	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Michel Lespinasse
02:49	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Alex Rosenberg
02:45	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
02:38	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Daniel Berlin
02:37	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Mark Mitchell
02:35	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Ian Lance Taylor
02:34	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Andrew Pinski
02:30	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Ian Lance Taylor
02:19	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Ziemowit Laski
02:14	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Andrew Pinski
02:11	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Mike Stump
02:09	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
02:02	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
01:50	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Ian Lance Taylor
01:40	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Mark Mitchell
01:02	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Ian Lance Taylor
00:56	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Oscar Fuentes
00:25	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
00:20	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Giovanni Bajo

May 06, 2004

22:21	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
22:11	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Mark Mitchell
22:05	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Richard Guenther
21:52	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization	Jim Wilson
21:49	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
20:29	PL/1 Front-end for GCC v0.0.6	Henrik Sorensen
19:47	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Mark Mitchell
19:39	Re: ACATS cxa5015 on x86_64	Laurent GUERBY
19:32	Re: Draft pre-DR on type compatibility intransitivity	Mark Mitchell
18:56	ACATS cxa5015 on x86_64	John R. Shannon
18:42	FDO regression in Skidmarks component ParserVid	Peter Steinmetz
17:31	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Peter Barada
16:44	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	tm_gccmail
16:37	Resend: GAS embedded-PIC reloc removal vs. mips-linux exceptionhandling	cgd
16:30	Re: Saving a process' context	Joe Buck
16:27	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Adrian Bunk
15:55	Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss	Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:50	const_double - RTL	Iman Narasamdya
15:24	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Serge Belyshev
15:02	reg_equiv_memory_loc vs. garbage collection	Joern Rennecke
15:00	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization	Camm Maguire
14:48	Re: How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Paul Jarc
14:27	Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss	Daniel Jacobowitz
14:16	Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks	Andreas Schwab
13:55	Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss	Michael LeBlanc
13:53	How to build an RPATH into gcc?	Adrian Bunk
13:51	Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss	Paul Koning
13:46	Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks	Kean Johnston
13:05	Draft pre-DR on type compatibility intransitivity	Joseph S. Myers
12:58	Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss	Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:54	Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss	Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:40	Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks	Andrew Haley
12:36	Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks	Gunther Nikl
12:27	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Andreas Schwab
12:21	Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks	Andreas Schwab
12:00	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Gunther Nikl
11:53	Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks	Gunther Nikl
11:45	Re: -fzero-initialized-in-bss	Michael LeBlanc
10:55	-fzero-initialized-in-bss	Michael LeBlanc
09:02	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Paolo Bonzini
05:46	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization	Jim Wilson
03:24	Saving a process' context	Lucas Correia Villa Real
00:39	Re: [tree-ssa] Analysis of testsuite differences	Diego Novillo

May 05, 2004

23:51	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Richard Henderson
23:48	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Kean Johnston
23:38	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Diego Novillo
23:33	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Jan Hubicka
23:14	gcc-ss-3.3-20040505 is now available	gccadmin
23:13	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Jan Hubicka
23:11	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Diego Novillo
23:10	Re: Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks	Andreas Schwab
23:07	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Jan Hubicka
22:47	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Jim Wilson
22:46	Re: [tree-ssa] Analysis of testsuite differences	Jan Hubicka
22:27	Autoconf 2.59 breaks libstdc++ checks	Kean Johnston
21:58	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Richard Guenther
21:18	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Gerald Pfeifer
20:21	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Daniel Berlin
20:12	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Karel Gardas
19:59	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Daniel Berlin
19:57	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Richard Guenther
19:50	Re: scrambled source for breakfest?	Stuart Hastings
19:43	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Steven Bosscher
19:39	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Steven Bosscher
19:19	Re: PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce	Zack Weinberg
19:18	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Richard Guenther
19:14	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Karel Gardas
19:05	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Phil Edwards
19:00	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Matt Austern
18:56	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Robert Dewar
18:53	Re: PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce	H. J. Lu
18:49	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Laurent GUERBY
18:47	Question about REG_OFFSET on big endian machines	Josef Zlomek
18:42	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Richard Guenther
18:39	Re: PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce	Zack Weinberg
18:35	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Joe Buck
18:26	PATCH: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce	H. J. Lu
18:26	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Mark Mitchell
18:22	Re: Letter to DDJ	Andrew Pinski
18:21	Re: Letter to DDJ	Laurent GUERBY
18:09	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Laurent GUERBY
17:42	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Robert Dewar
17:37	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Joe Buck
17:07	scrambled source for breakfest?	Mike Stump
16:51	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Robert Dewar
16:47	Re: Letter to DDJ	Andi Kleen
16:38	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Joe Buck
16:34	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Peter Barada
16:23	Re: ::delete() reference generated but not used	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:55	Re: RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Andreas Schwab
15:40	RFC: split ColdFire from m68k backend	Peter Barada
15:17	::delete() reference generated but not used	Paul Koning
15:00	Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: sibling call optimization	Camm Maguire
14:17	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSAtrees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Diego Novillo
14:17	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Diego Novillo
14:14	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Diego Novillo
11:23	gcc-3.4.0 successfully installs on x86_64--netbsdelf2.0	John R. Shannon
09:10	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Kean Johnston
08:05	Re: Letter to DDJ	Andrew Pinski
08:00	Re: Letter to DDJ	Andi Kleen
07:53	Away at Drupa	Peter Skarpetis
07:10	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Jim Wilson
04:33	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Michael Elizabeth Chastain
04:10	Re: cvs problems...EOF while looking for end of string in RCS file	Daniel Jacobowitz
03:55	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
02:33	Re: cvs problems...EOF while looking for end of string in RCS file	Ian Lance Taylor
02:18	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Jim Wilson
01:59	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Mike Stump
01:43	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Mike Stump
01:27	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Mike Stump
01:08	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Richard Kenner
00:14	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Kean Johnston
00:06	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Kean Johnston

May 04, 2004

23:38	Re: Different register sets for local and global register allocation?	Jim Wilson
23:32	Re: avr-gcc, .debug_frame and bitfields	Jim Wilson
23:04	Re: RFC: [tree ssa] DSE extension	law
22:56	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	law
22:34	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Steven Bosscher
22:17	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Karel Gardas
22:14	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
22:13	Re: [tree-ssa] Merged missing testsuite directories	Diego Novillo
22:12	tree-ssa question - replacing data-refs in stmts	Dorit Naishlos
22:10	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Diego Novillo
22:08	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Karel Gardas
21:51	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
21:38	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Daniel Berlin
21:35	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Richard Henderson
21:28	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Karel Gardas
21:26	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA treeson MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Karel Gardas
21:24	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Daniel Berlin
21:20	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Andrew Pinski
21:16	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
21:13	Re: Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees on MICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Mike Stump
21:03	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Richard Guenther
20:52	Re: [apple-ppc-branch] My CONSTRUCTORs are getting cloned!	Ziemowit Laski
20:52	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Jim Wilson
20:50	Compilation performance comparison of 3.5.0 and TreeSSA trees onMICO sources as requested in: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Karel Gardas
20:44	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Jim Wilson
20:43	Re: [tree-ssa] Analysis of testsuite differences	Andrew Pinski
20:40	[tree-ssa] Merged missing testsuite directories	Diego Novillo
20:30	[tree-ssa] Analysis of testsuite differences	Diego Novillo
20:15	Re: sibling call optimization	Andrew Pinski
20:13	Re: [apple-ppc-branch] My CONSTRUCTORs are getting cloned!	Andrew Pinski
19:55	Re: copyright assignment	Joe Buck
19:46	Re: Letter to DDJ	Laurent GUERBY
19:38	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Geert Bosch
19:34	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Andrew Pinski
19:05	Re: avr-gcc, .debug_frame and bitfields	E. Weddington
19:01	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
18:56	Re: [tree-ssa/java] remaining null-pointer-check hits	law
18:54	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Andrew Haley
18:53	Re: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce?	Mike Stump
18:52	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Joseph S. Myers
18:49	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	James Morrison
18:44	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Richard Henderson
18:39	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Richard Henderson
18:34	Re: [tree-ssa/java] remaining null-pointer-check hits	Steven Bosscher
18:33	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
18:28	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Andrew Haley
18:26	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Andrew Haley
18:19	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
18:10	[apple-ppc-branch] My CONSTRUCTORs are getting cloned!	Ziemowit Laski
18:08	sibling call optimization	Camm Maguire
18:07	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Matt Austern
17:54	Build success for gcc 3.4.0 on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 (CompaqTru64UNIX)	Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
17:53	Re: Letter to DDJ	Joel Sherrill
17:47	Re: avr-gcc, .debug_frame and bitfields	Denis Chertykov
17:45	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Kean Johnston
16:49	Letter to DDJ	Andrew Haley
16:33	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	David Edelsohn
16:14	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:31	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Matt Austern
15:30	Re: [tree-ssa/java] remaining null-pointer-check hits	law
15:29	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Paul Koning
15:28	Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc	Scott Robert Ladd
15:26	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Richard Guenther
15:19	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Diego Novillo
15:17	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Michael Matz
14:58	Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc	Diego Novillo
14:54	Re: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce?	H. J. Lu
14:54	Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc	Scott Robert Ladd
14:51	Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc	Scott Robert Ladd
14:44	Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc	Steven Bosscher
14:37	Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc	Paul Brook
14:33	Re: C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc	Diego Novillo
14:27	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Paul Koning
14:17	C Optimization, Pentium 4, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4/icc	Scott Robert Ladd
14:17	C Optimization, Opteron, 4 May 2004, tree-ssa/3.5/3.4	Scott Robert Ladd
13:29	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Robert Dewar
13:26	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Robert Dewar
12:48	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Richard Guenther
11:31	cvs problems...EOF while looking for end of string in RCS file	Christian Joensson
11:07	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Richard Guenther
11:04	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Richard Guenther
10:48	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Steven Bosscher
10:40	Re: [tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Steven Bosscher
10:22	[tree-ssa] POOMA compile time / memory requirement comparison	Richard Guenther
09:05	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	GRAHAM STOTT
07:43	Re: copyright assignment	Jim Wilson
07:37	Re: copyright assignment	Jim Wilson
06:52	Re: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce?	Jim Wilson
06:02	[tree-ssa] on sparc-linux: comparison of test results for 3.5-tree-ssa 20040428 (merged 20040414) and 3.5.0 20040428 (experimental)	Christian Joensson
05:59	Re: Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce?	Zack Weinberg
05:46	Use COMDAT section group instead of gnu.linkonce?	H. J. Lu
05:41	Re: gcc/g++ 3.4.0 cygwin, binutils, SSE & alignment	tbp
04:42	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Richard Henderson
04:40	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Andreas Jaeger
04:19	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Richard Henderson
04:00	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Jim Wilson
03:42	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Geert Bosch
03:33	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Diego Novillo
03:30	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Ben Elliston
03:30	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Andrew Pinski
03:26	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status 2004-05-03	Geert Bosch
02:05	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Diego Novillo
01:32	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Mike Stump
01:25	Re: Promoting floats to doubles?	Kean Johnston
00:35	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Stan Shebs
00:01	Re: MS/CW-style inline assembly for GCC	Richard Henderson