This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 3.4.0 vs 3.3.3

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>
To: "Shelly Adhikari" <shelly at interrasystems dot com>
Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:44:31 +0200
Subject: Re: 3.4.0 vs 3.3.3
References: <40858A64.4090806@InterraSystems.com> <06d901c42736$4c292a60$394e2a97@bagio> <4085C1A2.4010403@InterraSystems.com>

Shelly Adhikari wrote:

> By - 'the code is ill formed' - do you mean it is not allowed by the
> C++ standard?

Exactly, sorry for being unclear. GCC 3.4.0 is right in rejecting it.
 
Giovanni Bajo

References:
- 3.4.0 vs 3.3.3
  - From: Shelly Adhikari
- Re: 3.4.0 vs 3.3.3
  - From: Giovanni Bajo
- Re: 3.4.0 vs 3.3.3
  - From: Shelly Adhikari

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]