This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10

From: Andi Kleen <ak at muc dot de>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 05:26:49 +0200
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10
References: <1081896717.10464.50.camel@localhost.localdomain><200404140238.i3E2cnT36250@makai.watson.ibm.com>

David Edelsohn <dje@watson.ibm.com> writes:

>>>>>> Diego Novillo writes:
>
>> Bootstrapped and tested x86, ia64, alpha, ppc and x86-64.
>
> 	All of these architectures bootstrapped without the fixes for
> hot/cold partitioning from mainline?  If that is the case, then the
> coverage from the bootstrap tests are meaningless.  All of the breakage
> from the hot/cold partitioning patch is now in the tree-ssa branch.

FWIW I recently bootstrapped a --enable-languages=c,c++ mainline
kernel on i686 linux which included hot/cold, but no fixes to it 
and it worked. So it cannot be that bad.

-Andi

References:
- [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa] mainline merge as of 2004-04-10
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]