This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Mainline Is Busted for Java
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at hotmail dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 08:34:16 -0400
- Subject: Re: Mainline Is Busted for Java
- References: <c50nmq$s6u$1@sea.gmane.org> <16499.58135.441465.990794@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com> <4073F359.6010804@hotmail.com>
On Apr 7, 2004, at 08:26, Ranjit Mathew wrote:
Andrew Haley wrote:
Andrew Pinski thinks this is because of Caroline Tice's
recent patch:
This is weird. I mean, how come the patch was checked in if the build
failed. Anyway, I recommend we give Caroline a little while to fix
it, if indeed it is caused by her patch.
Because it looks like she did not test by building libjava which is
enabled
by default on PPC Darwin by the way, so there should be no excuse for
this
one.
FWIW, I just successfully bootstrapped (c,c++,java) on
i686-pc-linux-gnu by reverting Caroline's patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-03/msg02101.html
in my local tree.
So Andrew (Pinski) seems to be correct in his conjecture.
That is because I finally reverted the patch also and did a bootstrap
my self when I figured out the problem.
Also note the problem is being tracked by PR 14874.
Ranjit.
PS: "make new-bootstrap" has been producing a gcj that
fails spectacularly on i686-pc-linux-gnu. What *is* this
make target for?
new-bootstrap is the new top level bootstrap target in the
Makefiles, it is experimental at this point.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski