This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: dwarf2 loclist question

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Josef Zlomek <zlomj9am at artax dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz>
Cc: "Dhananjay R. Deshpande" <dhananjayd at KPITCummins dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 10:24:12 -0500
Subject: Re: dwarf2 loclist question
References: <69595093233BB547BB70CF5E492B63F204D2BA90@sohm.kpit.com> <20040402135521.GA5436@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 03:55:21PM +0200, Josef Zlomek wrote:
> > The third party debugger I am using requires DW_AT_return_addr be generated
> > for subroutines. It uses this for stack trace. The return address location can
> > be specified correctly only by loclist. The return address location before
> > prologue, after prologue and  at epilogue will be different. 
> 
> Is not return address supposed to be at the same offset from frame base or in
> the same register in the whole function?

No, not necessarily.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

References:
- dwarf2 loclist question
  - From: Dhananjay R. Deshpande
- Re: dwarf2 loclist question
  - From: Josef Zlomek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]