gcc archive
date index for March, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

March 30, 2004

23:59 [lno] bootstrap failure Volker Reichelt

22:09 modification of g77 for default 64-bit integers on x86-64 Jiri Pittner

22:02 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Daniel Berlin

21:26 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Eric Botcazou

20:46 PL/1 Front-end for GCC v0.0.5 Henrik Sorensen

20:31 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses Jim Wilson

20:03 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?) Richard Henderson

19:23 Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses Joern Rennecke

19:19 Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree version of enumerators Matt Austern

18:56 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Joe Buck

18:46 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Joe Buck

18:33 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Joern Rennecke

17:48 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?) Paul Koning

17:36 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?) Ashok.A

16:08 unobsoleting m88k Jason

16:07 Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC Sebastian Pop

15:09 Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC Ayal Zaks

14:02 Code generation Primrose.Mbanefo

13:38 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Theodore Papadopoulo

13:10 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Gabriel Dos Reis

12:56 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Gabriel Dos Reis

10:15 Re: GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches Eric Botcazou

09:48 Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses xyzzy

09:46 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization Andreas Schwab

09:39 Re: ld segfault when building objc source with pthread Nick Clifton

09:14 Re: GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches Christian Ehrhardt

08:18 [fortran] Results of g77 3.4.0 testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu poschmid

07:06 Re: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0 Ian Lance Taylor

06:20 Re: Should fold preserve types? Mike Stump

06:13 Ping : H8/300 ABI Document Anil Paranjape

05:59 Re: Should fold preserve types? Andrew Pinski

05:48 Should fold preserve types? Waldek Hebisch

02:17 Re: Best way to create rtl code Jim Wilson

02:10 Re: Operator overloading in (MIPS) assembly-language Jim Wilson

01:56 Re: GCC: structure typedef compilation error Jim Wilson

01:46 Re: Any Question Jim Wilson

01:44 Re: No luck building GCC on sparc-linux using --with-gc=zone Jim Wilson

01:34 Re: String optimisations gone? Jim Wilson

01:20 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests Jim Wilson

01:16 Re: Register objects question Jim Wilson

00:57 Re: machine files from 2.95 to 3.2.3 Jim Wilson

00:53 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization Mike Stump

00:52 Re: Help writing RTL expression ? Jim Wilson

00:38 Re: 128-bit long long? Jim Wilson

00:29 Re: About RTL Jim Wilson

00:24 Re: [MIPS] reduce floating point registers Jim Wilson

00:21 Re: Can -frepo be used with PCH? Jim Wilson

00:20 Re: Is it possible to use libstdc++.so.5 with 3.4? Jim Wilson

00:20 Re: C++: Non-allowed exception diagnostic? Jim Wilson

00:11 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization Jim Wilson

00:06 Re: HP-UX Core Dump in stack unwinding Jim Wilson

March 29, 2004

23:58 Re: Exception handling HowTO?? Jim Wilson

23:22 Re: function template question sashan

23:01 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cacheoperation is required (?) Jim Wilson

21:12 fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds DJ Delorie

21:09 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Richard Guenther

20:39 function template question Glenn MacGregor

20:11 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Wolfgang Bangerth

19:17 {Filename?} tech

19:16 Re: glibc and inline functions Joseph S. Myers

18:57 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher

18:49 Re: GPL legal question Graeme Peterson

18:46 glibc and inline functions Scott Robert Ladd

18:44 Re: GPL legal question Joe Buck

18:14 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? H. J. Lu

17:47 Re: GPL legal question Andrew Haley

17:32 Re: GPL legal question Graeme Peterson

17:18 gcc-ss-3.3-20040329 is now available gccadmin

17:16 Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report Joe Buck

17:02 Re: GPL legal question Robert Dewar

16:50 GPL legal question Graeme Peterson

16:47 Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern. Joe Buck

15:15 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing David Edelsohn

14:03 Re: bitfield-- != 0 still broken Michael Matz

13:57 GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches Kaveh R. Ghazi

13:54 Re: bitfield-- != 0 still broken Falk Hueffner

13:46 bitfield-- != 0 still broken Michael Matz

10:30 RE: Question for ISO C standards gurus Dave Korn

07:57 Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern. Nathan Sidwell

06:36 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Andrew Pinski

06:27 Re: Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc. Christian Joensson

05:59 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Michael Matz

02:21 Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern. Alexandre Oliva

01:39 RE: Double abstract class Inheritance concern. Chris Lattner

March 28, 2004

23:19 Double abstract class Inheritance concern. Tiago Stein

18:40 Re: Warning on cast to const Andreas Schwab

13:50 Re: Warning on cast to const clifford

11:42 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Laurent GUERBY

11:06 Re: Warning on cast to const Falk Hueffner

10:52 Warning on cast to const clifford

07:17 ld segfault when building objc source with pthread Rogelio Serrano

07:07 Re: Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc. James Morrison

06:38 Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc. Christian Joensson

02:37 Re: new GCC mirror Gerald Pfeifer

00:33 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher

March 27, 2004

23:52 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Richard Kenner

22:10 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher

22:05 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher

21:56 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Richard Kenner

21:53 Re: Re: PATCH - [tree-ssa] regrouping of expression tree for single multiply add. David Huddart

21:46 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher

21:41 Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Richard Kenner

21:37 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Geert Bosch

21:26 gcc-ss-3.5-20040327 / gcc 3.3.3 20040217 / icc on bench++ Thomas Veith

19:54 regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing Eric Christopher

19:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed law

18:22 Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed David Edelsohn

15:38 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Andrew Pinski

14:25 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus law

13:32 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Kelley Cook

12:25 [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed Christian Joensson

12:23 gcc-ss-3.5-20040327 is now available Gerald Pfeifer

11:25 Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64? Arnaud Charlet

10:21 GCC-3.3.4 release status report Gabriel Dos Reis

07:28 Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?) Ashok.A

07:07 PR 14400--PCH problem with large files Ian Lance Taylor

06:02 Re: Register Allocation Andi Kleen

02:39 Re: [PATCH] GCC Warning Options Documentation Gerald Pfeifer

02:01 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus Diego Novillo

01:51 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Richard Kenner

01:35 Re: PATCH for Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism Gerald Pfeifer

01:28 PATCH for Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism Gerald Pfeifer

01:26 Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus Ian Lance Taylor

01:16 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Roger Sayle

00:58 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Joe Buck

00:55 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Robert Dewar

00:50 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Robert Dewar

00:48 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Dale Johannesen

00:48 Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks) Robert Dewar

00:42 Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering Robert Dewar

00:41 RE: Question for ISO C standards gurus Diego Novillo

00:40 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar

00:36 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar

00:23 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Joe Buck

00:11 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Laurent GUERBY

March 21, 2004

23:07 Re: m68k-linux regressions Matthias Klose

21:42 Re: m68k-linux regressions Bernardo Innocenti

21:20 Re: jFP religious wars R. D. Flowers

21:11 Re: jFP religious wars Zack Weinberg

21:03 jFP religious wars R. D. Flowers

21:02 DOM doesn't notice some equivalences through phis Daniel Berlin

20:52 Re: gcc Digest 21 Mar 2004 05:08:56 -0000 Issue 3435 R. D. Flowers

20:30 Re: m68k-linux regressions Richard Zidlicky

20:27 GCC Status Report (2004-03-21) Mark Mitchell

19:37 Re: 128-bit long long? Paolo Carlini

19:29 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Richard Henderson

19:24 malloc mutex and exceptions Ignasi Villagrasa

19:22 Re: 128-bit long long? Scott Robert Ladd

19:21 Re: 128-bit long long? Joseph S. Myers

19:10 PL/1 Frontend for GCC v0.0.4 Henrik Sorensen

18:17 Re: Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc Zack Weinberg

18:15 Re: 128-bit long long? Zack Weinberg

18:14 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Eric Botcazou

18:08 Re: 128-bit long long? Erik Trulsson

18:03 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Zack Weinberg

18:02 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Zack Weinberg

17:37 Re: Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc Andreas Jaeger

17:34 Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc H. J. Lu

17:22 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Andreas Schwab

17:00 make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed Alexandre Oliva

16:56 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Paolo Bonzini

16:55 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Alexandre Oliva

16:11 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Hans-Peter Nilsson

16:03 RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct? Hans-Peter Nilsson

15:49 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Joel Sherrill

15:46 Re: 128-bit long long? Paolo Carlini

15:35 Re: 128-bit long long? Andreas Jaeger

15:28 128-bit long long? Scott Robert Ladd

13:02 Re: Requested documentation update [contribution] Ian Lance Taylor

12:36 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Eric Botcazou

11:58 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Giovanni Bajo

08:49 Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test! Robert Dewar

07:17 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Eric Botcazou

06:41 RE: Requested documentation update [contribution] Stephan T. Lavavej

05:25 RFC: failure of gcc.dg/funcorder.c on hppa64 John David Anglin

05:08 Requested documentation update [contribution] James Southard_Jr

02:42 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Zack Weinberg

02:04 About RTL 王逸

01:59 about RTL 王逸

01:47 Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug? Robert Dewar

00:36 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Andrew Pinski

00:18 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Zack Weinberg

March 20, 2004

23:58 Re: Endless loop during bootstrap? James Morrison

23:56 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Andrew Pinski

23:25 Re: Endless loop during bootstrap? Eric Christopher

23:08 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc) Robert Dewar

22:35 Endless loop during bootstrap? James Morrison

22:08 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dorit Naishlos

22:07 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dorit Naishlos

21:56 Re: Patch for PR c/12373 Ian Lance Taylor

21:06 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Paul Koning

20:51 Re: sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1 James Morrison

20:41 sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1 James Morrison

19:51 Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name Joel Sherrill

18:46 RFH: trouble getting gfortran to build multilib'ed Steven Bosscher

18:09 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Richard Henderson

15:01 Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc) Jan Hubicka

14:51 Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2 Ian Lance Taylor

13:59 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Andreas Schwab

11:17 Re: [MIPS] reduce floating point registers Shinpei Kato

11:11 [MIPS] reduce floating point registers Shinpei Kato

11:03 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou

09:06 D-loop : new way for optimizing loop with branch condition d-loop

08:02 Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass Paolo Bonzini

06:48 gcc3.3.2 Dominik Pajak

05:00 LLVM 1.2 Release! Chris Lattner

05:00 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW Stephan T. Lavavej

04:53 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Alexandre Oliva

04:50 Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc Phil Edwards

04:29 Is it possible to use libstdc++.so.5 with 3.4? r6144

04:11 [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc sashan

04:06 Can -frepo be used with PCH? r6144

03:46 m68k-linux regressions Bernardo Innocenti

03:39 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW Stephan T. Lavavej

02:56 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW llewelly

01:41 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW Stephan T. Lavavej

01:17 Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW Gabriel Dos Reis

01:16 Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization Ian Lance Taylor

01:09 [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization sashan

00:56 C++: Non-allowed exception diagnostic? Frank Pilhofer

00:51 Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW Stephan T. Lavavej

March 14, 2004

23:49 Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Gabriel Dos Reis

23:40 GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test! Scott Robert Ladd

22:31 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Daniel Berlin

22:15 Re: gcc and compiling speed Gerald Pfeifer

22:12 Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions Hans-Peter Nilsson

19:22 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Andrew Pinski

18:23 Re: signed/unsigned right shift Ian Lance Taylor

18:09 Re: signed/unsigned right shift Christian Groessler

10:59 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Dorit Naishlos

10:57 Fw: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Dorit Naishlos

01:58 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double Richard Henderson

01:56 Re: 3.5 Snapshots (Again) Gerald Pfeifer

01:37 Re: possible regression... where to look at? Roger Sayle

00:56 Re: Two places in GCC doing (float)func(x) -> funcf(x) ?? Roger Sayle

March 11, 2004

23:58 3.3.4 status, and some questions Joe Buck

23:31 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Richard Henderson

22:52 Re: functexcept.cc draws in everything Henning dot Baldersheim at dev

22:38 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers David Edelsohn

22:17 Re: PATCH RFA: Remove SUNOS4_SHARED_LIBRARIES (Was collect2.c hardcoded paths) Richard Henderson

22:16 Re: [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra? Gerald Pfeifer

21:11 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Henderson

21:00 Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code Richard Henderson

20:17 Re: thread enabled ecos support Henning Baldersheim

19:47 Re: Restrict pointers Jim Wilson

19:26 multilib and with/without exceptionsand rtti Henning Baldersheim

19:26 Re: new/delete mismatch Jim Wilson

19:23 Re: GCC3.3.3: building cross compiler powerpc-linux undefined symbol Jim Wilson

18:45 Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code Max Asbock

15:01 info fredy . pena

14:09 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou

13:48 TYPE_VFIELD documentation Richard Kenner

12:49 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Kenner

12:48 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Jakub Jelinek

12:39 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou

12:15 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Richard Kenner

09:45 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09) Eric Botcazou

07:19 Re: [Fwd: require gcc language syntax summary] Zack Weinberg

04:42 [Fwd: require gcc language syntax summary] Zhu Chenyang

02:16 Re: more hardcoded paths Jim Wilson

02:06 Re: genrecog of i386.md under linux, 5 warnings... Jim Wilson

March 08, 2004

23:43 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell

23:32 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Joe Buck

23:07 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Gabriel Dos Reis

22:57 Re: Shebang Andreas Schwab

22:51 Re: Shebang cgd

22:49 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell

22:46 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen

22:46 Re: Shebang Paul Jarc

22:37 Re: Shebang cgd

22:33 Re: Shebang Paul Jarc

22:32 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell

22:32 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly Jamie Lokier

22:29 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Mark Mitchell

22:24 Re: Shebang cgd

22:21 Re: LD vs multilibs Alexandre Oliva

22:01 Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly tm_gccmail

21:45 Re: You ucLinux patches break RTEMS building Bernardo Innocenti

21:38 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti

21:34 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Mark Mitchell

21:27 Re: Turning off tree checking by default for releases Mark Mitchell

21:13 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Ian Lance Taylor

21:04 Re: PCH and exec-shield... Mark Mitchell

20:51 Re: Shebang Ian Lance Taylor

20:49 Re: Shebang Paul Jarc

20:44 Re: Shebang Zack Weinberg

20:24 Shebang Leah

19:34 Re: 3.5 Snapshots (Again) Gerald Pfeifer

19:27 New development branch: stree-branch Matt Austern

19:18 problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code Max Asbock

19:13 Re: Framework support for Linux Ziemowit Laski

18:09 attribute aligned problem with MIPS cross compiler Roy Franz

18:08 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-07 Diego Novillo

17:20 gcc-ss-3.3-20040308 is now available gccadmin

16:31 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Gunther Nikl

14:34 Proposal: fine-grained control over -Werror Omer Shenker

11:38 Re: Building GENERIC trees Lars Segerlund

10:39 Re: gcc and arm interworking Richard Earnshaw

10:24 3.5 Snapshots (Again) Ranjit Mathew

07:51 LD vs multilibs Phil Edwards

06:42 thread enabled ecos support Henning Baldersheim

01:28 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double GOTO Masanori

March 07, 2004

23:52 Re: Framework support for Linux Andrew Pinski

23:22 ppc LE broken. anybody care? Aldy Hernandez

22:34 Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double Ulrich Drepper

22:28 Re: Framework support for Linux Ziemowit Laski

18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage? Aldy Hernandez

18:30 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Aldy Hernandez

18:30 Away from email Kriang Lerdsuwanakij

15:11 Re: Question on valid transformations for cbrt Roger Sayle

15:05 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti

05:58 [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double Richard Henderson

03:54 Stop Spreading Hatred SAR

03:05 Re: gcc and arm interworking Ian Lance Taylor

02:57 gcc and arm interworking Dave Murphy

March 05, 2004

23:48 [tree-ssa] mini merge Diego Novillo

23:31 Re: Building GENERIC trees Tom Crick

23:25 m68k, extendqidi2 problem Richard Zidlicky

22:26 Re: Building GENERIC trees Kai Henningsen

21:35 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue Gabriel Dos Reis

20:58 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage? Zack Weinberg

20:36 Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage? Jim Wilson

20:26 [reload] never-used stack slots? Cyrille Chepelov

19:58 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions intoepilogue Jim Wilson

19:45 Re: init_integral_libfuncs question Richard Henderson

19:44 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Diego Novillo

19:41 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Diego Novillo

19:28 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Devang Patel

19:22 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Diego Novillo

19:17 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Diego Novillo

19:06 Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer Devang Patel

18:23 Re: Building GENERIC trees Paul Brook

18:11 Re: Building GENERIC trees law

17:15 init_integral_libfuncs question Steve Ellcey

17:08 Re: binutils 2.15.90.0.1 break ia64 kernel crosscompiling H. J. Lu

16:19 Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2 cgd

15:46 Re: Taking a stab at register-relative data addressing on m68k... Peter Barada

14:58 TOP 50 de la libert� - - - -- -- - - Marc Buglonnier - - - -- -- -

14:47 Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue Andrew Haley

14:07 Taking a stab at register-relative data addressing on m68k... Ray Whitmer

10:42 Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases perugupa

10:15 Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases Segher Boessenkool

09:15 Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2 Eric Christopher

08:29 Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2 Mile Davidovic

07:54 gcc support for mips32 release 2 Long Li

05:48 Re: FUNCTION_BOUNDARY and FUNCTION_TYPE Geoff Keating

04:27 Re: Declaring Arrays Giovanni Bajo

04:05 Re: support for omvs Edward S. Peschko

03:51 Declaring Arrays Nuwan Kodagoda

03:32 FUNCTION_BOUNDARY and FUNCTION_TYPE Richard Kenner

03:24 Re: support for omvs David Edelsohn

03:10 support for omvs Edward S. Peschko

01:50 Re: My code wont compile in GCC Eric Christopher

01:42 My code wont compile in GCC Jonathan Wilson

00:23 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dale Johannesen

00:06 Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers Dorit Naishlos

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]

Search: Limit to:

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3

23:53	cc1 of nonexistent file still segfaults	Daniel Berlin
23:48	Re: Exception handling HowTO??	Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
22:06	Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)	David Edelsohn
22:03	Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump	Tom Tromey
17:41	gcc-ss-3.4-20040331 is now available	gccadmin
17:32	RE: problems with subversions.gcc.org	Dave Korn
17:15	Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7)	Joe Buck
17:12	problems with subversions.gcc.org	George R Goffe
16:26	Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)	Paul Koning
15:32	Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7)	Eric Botcazou
15:31	Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7)	Daniel Jacobowitz
15:29	Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)	David Edelsohn
14:42	Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)	Mostafa Hagog
14:41	Re: Your change to gengtype-yacc.y	Zack Weinberg
14:40	Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)	Paolo Carlini
14:36	Your change to gengtype-yacc.y	Richard Kenner
14:21	Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)	Paolo Carlini
14:06	Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)	Mostafa Hagog
13:49	Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)	Paolo Carlini
13:37	Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)	Andrew Pinski
13:05	Re: [RTL] -- How to insert code into functions?	sashan
12:53	Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)	Mostafa Hagog
12:43	Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)	Paolo Carlini
12:42	Re: STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7)	Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:23	Re: mainline AIX bootstrap broken in libstdc++-v3 (Also in darwin)	Mostafa Hagog
12:14	Re: Best way to create rtl code	Jared Buttles
11:24	STABS --> DWARF-2 on sparc-sun-solaris2.x (x >= 7)	Eric Botcazou
11:09	[RTL] -- How to insert code into functions?	王逸
10:52	Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses	Robert Dewar
10:49	Handling DWARF call frame labels in the middle of VLIW packets	Daniel Towner
10:18	Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses	xyzzy
09:44	Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses	Richard Earnshaw
09:41	Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds	Zack Weinberg
09:40	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Gabriel Dos Reis
09:11	Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses	xyzzy
09:09	Re: Floating Point Exception Handling	Andrew Haley
08:46	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Eric Botcazou
08:20	Re: new apple-ppc branch	Mike Stump
08:09	Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds	Jim Wilson
08:03	Re: RFH: trouble getting gfortran to build multilib'ed	Jim Wilson
07:55	Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump	Mark Wielaard
07:53	Re: RFC: failure of gcc.dg/funcorder.c on hppa64	Jim Wilson
07:43	Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump	Mark Wielaard
07:43	Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)	Ashok.A
07:27	Re: RFH: trouble getting gfortran to build multilib'ed	Jim Wilson
06:40	Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump	Ranjit Mathew
06:38	Re: No Subject	Jim Wilson
06:29	Re: [lno] bootstrap failure	Zdenek Dvorak
05:58	Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds	Jim Wilson
04:43	Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds	Nathanael Nerode
03:10	Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds	DJ Delorie
02:50	Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds	Jim Wilson
02:03	Re: Floating Point Exception Handling	Joe Buck
01:48	Re: gij 3.3.3 core dump	Jim Wilson
01:45	Re: Floating Point Exception Handling	Jim Wilson
01:43	Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds	DJ Delorie
01:32	Re: fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds	Jim Wilson
01:15	Re: Code generation	Jim Wilson

23:59	[lno] bootstrap failure	Volker Reichelt
22:09	modification of g77 for default 64-bit integers on x86-64	Jiri Pittner
22:02	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Daniel Berlin
21:26	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Eric Botcazou
20:46	PL/1 Front-end for GCC v0.0.5	Henrik Sorensen
20:31	Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses	Jim Wilson
20:03	Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)	Richard Henderson
19:23	Re: Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses	Joern Rennecke
19:19	Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree version of enumerators	Matt Austern
18:56	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Joe Buck
18:46	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Joe Buck
18:33	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Joern Rennecke
17:48	Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)	Paul Koning
17:36	Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)	Ashok.A
16:08	unobsoleting m88k	Jason
16:07	Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC	Sebastian Pop
15:09	Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC	Ayal Zaks
14:02	Code generation	Primrose.Mbanefo
13:38	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Theodore Papadopoulo
13:10	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:56	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:15	Re: GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches	Eric Botcazou
09:48	Backend port: Minimizing register usage in favor of memory accesses	xyzzy
09:46	Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization	Andreas Schwab
09:39	Re: ld segfault when building objc source with pthread	Nick Clifton
09:14	Re: GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches	Christian Ehrhardt
08:18	[fortran] Results of g77 3.4.0 testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu	poschmid
07:06	Re: [Bug pch/14400] Cannot compile qt-x11-free-3.3.0	Ian Lance Taylor
06:20	Re: Should fold preserve types?	Mike Stump
06:13	Ping : H8/300 ABI Document	Anil Paranjape
05:59	Re: Should fold preserve types?	Andrew Pinski
05:48	Should fold preserve types?	Waldek Hebisch
02:17	Re: Best way to create rtl code	Jim Wilson
02:10	Re: Operator overloading in (MIPS) assembly-language	Jim Wilson
01:56	Re: GCC: structure typedef compilation error	Jim Wilson
01:46	Re: Any Question	Jim Wilson
01:44	Re: No luck building GCC on sparc-linux using --with-gc=zone	Jim Wilson
01:34	Re: String optimisations gone?	Jim Wilson
01:20	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests	Jim Wilson
01:16	Re: Register objects question	Jim Wilson
00:57	Re: machine files from 2.95 to 3.2.3	Jim Wilson
00:53	Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization	Mike Stump
00:52	Re: Help writing RTL expression ?	Jim Wilson
00:38	Re: 128-bit long long?	Jim Wilson
00:29	Re: About RTL	Jim Wilson
00:24	Re: [MIPS] reduce floating point registers	Jim Wilson
00:21	Re: Can -frepo be used with PCH?	Jim Wilson
00:20	Re: Is it possible to use libstdc++.so.5 with 3.4?	Jim Wilson
00:20	Re: C++: Non-allowed exception diagnostic?	Jim Wilson
00:11	Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization	Jim Wilson
00:06	Re: HP-UX Core Dump in stack unwinding	Jim Wilson

23:58	Re: Exception handling HowTO??	Jim Wilson
23:22	Re: function template question	sashan
23:01	Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cacheoperation is required (?)	Jim Wilson
21:12	fixing vs WARN_CFLAGS vs cross builds	DJ Delorie
21:09	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Richard Guenther
20:39	function template question	Glenn MacGregor
20:11	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Wolfgang Bangerth
19:17	{Filename?}	tech
19:16	Re: glibc and inline functions	Joseph S. Myers
18:57	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Eric Christopher
18:49	Re: GPL legal question	Graeme Peterson
18:46	glibc and inline functions	Scott Robert Ladd
18:44	Re: GPL legal question	Joe Buck
18:14	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	H. J. Lu
17:47	Re: GPL legal question	Andrew Haley
17:32	Re: GPL legal question	Graeme Peterson
17:18	gcc-ss-3.3-20040329 is now available	gccadmin
17:16	Re: GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Joe Buck
17:02	Re: GPL legal question	Robert Dewar
16:50	GPL legal question	Graeme Peterson
16:47	Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern.	Joe Buck
15:15	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	David Edelsohn
14:03	Re: bitfield-- != 0 still broken	Michael Matz
13:57	GCC test request for solaris2.7 w/ability to (de)install OS patches	Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:54	Re: bitfield-- != 0 still broken	Falk Hueffner
13:46	bitfield-- != 0 still broken	Michael Matz
10:30	RE: Question for ISO C standards gurus	Dave Korn
07:57	Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern.	Nathan Sidwell
06:36	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Andrew Pinski
06:27	Re: Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc.	Christian Joensson
05:59	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Michael Matz
02:21	Re: Double abstract class Inheritance concern.	Alexandre Oliva
01:39	RE: Double abstract class Inheritance concern.	Chris Lattner

23:19	Double abstract class Inheritance concern.	Tiago Stein
18:40	Re: Warning on cast to const	Andreas Schwab
13:50	Re: Warning on cast to const	clifford
11:42	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Laurent GUERBY
11:06	Re: Warning on cast to const	Falk Hueffner
10:52	Warning on cast to const	clifford
07:17	ld segfault when building objc source with pthread	Rogelio Serrano
07:07	Re: Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc.	James Morrison
06:38	Can't build libgcj in gcc HEAD 20040327: gcc/libgcc_s_32.so: undefined reference to `_Q_sub' etc.	Christian Joensson
02:37	Re: new GCC mirror	Gerald Pfeifer
00:33	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Eric Christopher

23:52	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Richard Kenner
22:10	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Eric Christopher
22:05	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Eric Christopher
21:56	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Richard Kenner
21:53	Re: Re: PATCH - [tree-ssa] regrouping of expression tree for single multiply add.	David Huddart
21:46	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Eric Christopher
21:41	Re: regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Richard Kenner
21:37	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Geert Bosch
21:26	gcc-ss-3.5-20040327 / gcc 3.3.3 20040217 / icc on bench++	Thomas Veith
19:54	regclass.c: scan_one_insn special casing	Eric Christopher
19:38	Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed	law
18:22	Re: [tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed	David Edelsohn
15:38	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Andrew Pinski
14:25	Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus	law
13:32	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Kelley Cook
12:25	[tree-ssa] Can't build gcc 20040328 on cygwin: libstdc++-v3/include/ext/pool_allocator.h:299: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed	Christian Joensson
12:23	gcc-ss-3.5-20040327 is now available	Gerald Pfeifer
11:25	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Arnaud Charlet
10:21	GCC-3.3.4 release status report	Gabriel Dos Reis
07:28	Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "memory" clobber for cache operation is required (?)	Ashok.A
07:07	PR 14400--PCH problem with large files	Ian Lance Taylor
06:02	Re: Register Allocation	Andi Kleen
02:39	Re: [PATCH] GCC Warning Options Documentation	Gerald Pfeifer
02:01	Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus	Diego Novillo
01:51	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Richard Kenner
01:35	Re: PATCH for Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism	Gerald Pfeifer
01:28	PATCH for Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism	Gerald Pfeifer
01:26	Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus	Ian Lance Taylor
01:16	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Roger Sayle
00:58	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Joe Buck
00:55	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Robert Dewar
00:50	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Robert Dewar
00:48	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Dale Johannesen
00:48	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Robert Dewar
00:42	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Robert Dewar
00:41	RE: Question for ISO C standards gurus	Diego Novillo
00:40	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
00:36	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
00:23	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Joe Buck
00:11	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Laurent GUERBY

23:29	Disqualifying instructions for branch delay slot scheduling	Barry Wealand
23:25	Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Jakub Jelinek
23:17	Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Gabriel Paubert
22:54	invalid_mode_change_p again...	Aldy Hernandez
22:47	Best way to create rtl code	Jared Buttles
22:38	Re: Mainline bootstrap broken	Ziemowit Laski
22:35	Mainline bootstrap broken	Steven Bosscher
22:05	Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4	Aldy Hernandez
21:35	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Toon Moene
21:34	mainline broken on x86-linux?	Laurent GUERBY
21:02	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Laurent GUERBY
20:47	Re: m68k-linux regressions	Jim Wilson
20:46	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests	Chris Proctor
20:45	Re: [tree-ssa] Debugging information issue.	Jan Hubicka
20:42	Should ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN honor __attribute__((packed))?	Daniel Jacobowitz
20:40	new apple-ppc branch	Mike Stump
20:16	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Chris Proctor
20:11	Re: [tree-ssa] Debugging information issue.	Daniel Berlin
19:51	[tree-ssa] Debugging information issue.	Andrew MacLeod
19:47	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Scott Robert Ladd
19:43	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Joe Buck
19:43	new GCC mirror	Jan Teluch
19:40	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests	Laurent GUERBY
19:35	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Scott Robert Ladd
19:24	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Joe Buck
19:19	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Dan Nicolaescu
19:14	Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Scott Robert Ladd
18:59	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Geert Bosch
18:58	Re: It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself?	Richard Henderson
18:54	Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Laurent GUERBY
18:47	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Joost VandeVondele
18:46	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests	Bauke van Dijk
18:38	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Scott Robert Ladd
18:32	Re: [PR bootstrap/14356] Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.	Bauke van Dijk
18:28	RE: Register objects question	Dave Korn
18:19	Register objects question	Jared Buttles
18:18	Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus	Dale Johannesen
18:12	Re: Question for ISO C standards gurus	Paul Jarc
18:09	RE: Question for ISO C standards gurus	Dave Korn
18:06	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Theodore Papadopoulo
18:03	Question for ISO C standards gurus	law
17:58	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Dale Johannesen
17:47	RE: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Dave Korn
17:20	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
17:09	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Joe Buck
16:51	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Per Abrahamsen
16:38	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Per Abrahamsen
16:36	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Scott Robert Ladd
16:22	Re: GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Joseph S. Myers
16:18	Re: Compile-time optimization of mathfn(CST) ?	Joseph S. Myers
16:15	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
16:12	GCC options and floating-point correctness (benchmarks)	Scott Robert Ladd
15:59	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	David Edelsohn
15:32	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	H. J. Lu
15:18	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
15:08	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Wolfgang Bangerth
15:07	Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Scott Robert Ladd
15:04	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	David Edelsohn
14:45	Re: Does var tracking allow debuggable -frename-registers?	Josef Zlomek
14:29	Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Jakub Jelinek
14:28	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Roger Sayle
14:24	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Paul Koning
14:23	Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Scott Robert Ladd
14:21	Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Joost VandeVondele
13:45	Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Robert Dewar
13:21	Compile-time optimization of mathfn(CST) ?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:06	Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Joost VandeVondele
12:43	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Arnaud Charlet
12:37	Re: (a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Robert Dewar
12:03	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Chris Proctor
11:55	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Laurent GUERBY
11:31	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Arnaud Charlet
11:29	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Laurent GUERBY
11:27	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Laurent GUERBY
10:22	Does var tracking allow debuggable -frename-registers?	Paolo Bonzini
08:46	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Arnaud Charlet
08:28	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Chris Proctor
08:18	Re: How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	Arnaud Charlet
07:29	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Robert Dewar
07:24	(a+b)+c should be replaced by a+(b+c)	Joost VandeVondele
06:40	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Ben Elliston
06:14	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Ian Lance Taylor
06:07	re: [c++] Missing strstream.h	Dan Kegel
06:05	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Robert Dewar
06:03	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Robert Dewar
05:56	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
05:45	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
05:41	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
05:36	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
05:34	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
05:34	It it OK to use inline functions in GCC itself?	Kazu Hirata
05:31	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
02:55	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Bradley Lucier
01:23	Re: -ffast-math and floating point reordering	Ian Lance Taylor
01:07	-ffast-math and floating point reordering	Joe Buck
00:22	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
00:11	Successful bootstrap: gcc-3.3.3/sparc-sun-solaris2.9	Choa-lin Chou
00:05	Re: [PR bootstrap/14356] Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:02	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:00	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis

23:48	Re: [Fwd: Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.]	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:01	Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited	Gerald Pfeifer
22:54	How to add timeout to Ada tests on Linux/ia64?	H. J. Lu
22:49	Re: problem compiling code trying to add sscanf function	Stephane Carrez
22:21	Re: [PR bootstrap/14356] Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.	Kelley Cook
22:20	[Fwd: Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.]	Bauke van Dijk
22:19	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Roger Sayle
21:44	No luck building GCC on sparc-linux using --with-gc=zone	Art Haas
21:38	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Toon Moene
21:07	Error building 3.3.4 on i686-cygwin.	Bauke van Dijk
21:00	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Toon Moene
20:57	Re: problem compiling code trying to add sscanf function	Eljay Love-Jensen
20:14	problem compiling code trying to add sscanf function	n f
19:50	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Joseph S. Myers
19:45	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Dale Johannesen
19:43	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Dale Johannesen
19:39	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Richard Guenther
19:29	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Joe Buck
19:23	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Joe Buck
19:14	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Joseph S. Myers
19:12	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Joe Buck
19:10	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Paul Brook
19:10	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Paul Koning
19:04	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Joe Buck
18:58	RE: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Dave Korn
18:56	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Bradley Lucier
18:53	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Paul Brook
18:51	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Joe Buck
18:50	String optimisations gone?	Dave Korn
18:40	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Richard Guenther
18:40	Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and streeversion of enumerators	Gerald Pfeifer
18:29	Re: CVSROOT/modules bug	Paolo Carlini
18:25	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
18:22	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Bradley Lucier
18:04	CVSROOT/modules bug	Serge Belyshev
18:02	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Joe Buck
17:47	gcc-ss-3.4-20040324 is now available	gccadmin
16:35	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
16:28	2.95 to 3.2.3	Feranando Roberto Secco
15:44	Re: stupid C preprocessor question	Steven G. Kargl
15:39	large file support in g++	Gareth Williams
14:42	Re: Making -ffast-math more fine-grained?	Roger Sayle
13:50	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Paul Koning
13:27	Re : - -- - ------ -	Nicolas Poubetier
10:51	Any Question	김명수
08:17	Re: stupid C preprocessor question	Robert Dewar
06:44	Re: stupid C preprocessor question	Zack Weinberg
06:05	Re: stupid C preprocessor question	Steven G. Kargl
05:57	Re: stupid C preprocessor question	Zack Weinberg
05:38	Re: Making -ffast-math more fine-grained?	Andrew Pinski
05:37	stupid C preprocessor question	Steven G. Kargl
05:20	Making -ffast-math more fine-grained?	Nathanael Nerode
03:32	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
02:42	Re: make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed	Alexandre Oliva
00:46	Re: make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed	Richard Henderson

23:48	Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?	H. J. Lu
23:39	Operator overloading in (MIPS) assembly-language	Barry Wealand
23:09	Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Toon Moene
22:46	Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?	Laurent GUERBY
21:59	machine files from 2.95 to 3.2.3	Feranando Roberto Secco
21:52	Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?	H. J. Lu
21:15	Re: Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?	Scott Robert Ladd
18:57	Re: lno new optimization options	Dorit Naishlos
18:45	Re: lno new optimization options	Serge Belyshev
18:33	Does today's gcc 3.4.0 build on x86_64?	H. J. Lu
18:30	Re: [RFC] [tree-ssa] Fix handling of BIT_FIELD_REFs andVECTOR_TYPEs	Diego Novillo
18:27	Re: [RFC] [tree-ssa] Fix handling of BIT_FIELD_REFs andVECTOR_TYPEs	Paolo Bonzini
18:21	Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?	Richard Henderson
17:45	gcc-ss-3.3-20040322 is now available	gccadmin
17:31	Re: lno new optimization options	Sebastian Pop
17:12	Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge	Diego Novillo
17:11	lno new optimization options	Serge Belyshev
17:04	Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge	Richard Kenner
16:34	Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge	Diego Novillo
16:33	Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge	law
16:32	Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge	Richard Kenner
15:27	Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge	Diego Novillo
15:24	Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge	Richard Kenner
15:23	Re: Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge	Diego Novillo
15:05	RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?	Dave Korn
14:57	[c++] Missing strstream.h	Tapio Kelloniemi
14:19	Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Eric Botcazou
14:12	RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Balaji Srinivasa
13:57	Tree flags vs. tree-ssa merge	Richard Kenner
13:25	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Robert Dewar
12:45	RE: malloc mutex and exceptions	Dave Korn
11:37	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)	Jan Hubicka
08:06	Help writing RTL expression ?	Petar Penchev
08:03	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Segher Boessenkool
07:56	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Robert Dewar
07:48	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Segher Boessenkool
07:43	Re: sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1	Eric Botcazou
06:03	Re: Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc	Alan Modra
05:16	Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc	llewelly
04:30	Re: jFP religious wars	Robert Dewar
04:00	Re: jFP religious wars	R. D. Flowers
03:35	Re: jFP religious wars	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:39	Re: jFP religious wars	Robert Dewar
02:38	Re: jFP religious wars	Robert Dewar
02:08	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)	Hans-Peter Nilsson
01:27	Re: m68k-linux regressions	Bernardo Innocenti
00:49	Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc	Alexandre Oliva
00:12	RE: GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)	Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS)

23:07	Re: m68k-linux regressions	Matthias Klose
21:42	Re: m68k-linux regressions	Bernardo Innocenti
21:20	Re: jFP religious wars	R. D. Flowers
21:11	Re: jFP religious wars	Zack Weinberg
21:03	jFP religious wars	R. D. Flowers
21:02	DOM doesn't notice some equivalences through phis	Daniel Berlin
20:52	Re: gcc Digest 21 Mar 2004 05:08:56 -0000 Issue 3435	R. D. Flowers
20:30	Re: m68k-linux regressions	Richard Zidlicky
20:27	GCC Status Report (2004-03-21)	Mark Mitchell
19:37	Re: 128-bit long long?	Paolo Carlini
19:29	Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass	Richard Henderson
19:24	malloc mutex and exceptions	Ignasi Villagrasa
19:22	Re: 128-bit long long?	Scott Robert Ladd
19:21	Re: 128-bit long long?	Joseph S. Myers
19:10	PL/1 Frontend for GCC v0.0.4	Henrik Sorensen
18:17	Re: Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc	Zack Weinberg
18:15	Re: 128-bit long long?	Zack Weinberg
18:14	Re: Patch for PR c/12373	Eric Botcazou
18:08	Re: 128-bit long long?	Erik Trulsson
18:03	Re: Patch for PR c/12373	Zack Weinberg
18:02	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Zack Weinberg
17:37	Re: Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc	Andreas Jaeger
17:34	Gcc 3.4.0 is not compatible with glibc	H. J. Lu
17:22	Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc	Andreas Schwab
17:00	make sure struct real_value's bitfields are packed	Alexandre Oliva
16:56	Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass	Paolo Bonzini
16:55	Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc	Alexandre Oliva
16:11	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Hans-Peter Nilsson
16:03	RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?	Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:49	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Joel Sherrill
15:46	Re: 128-bit long long?	Paolo Carlini
15:35	Re: 128-bit long long?	Andreas Jaeger
15:28	128-bit long long?	Scott Robert Ladd
13:02	Re: Requested documentation update [contribution]	Ian Lance Taylor
12:36	Re: Patch for PR c/12373	Eric Botcazou
11:58	Re: Patch for PR c/12373	Giovanni Bajo
08:49	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
07:17	Re: Patch for PR c/12373	Eric Botcazou
06:41	RE: Requested documentation update [contribution]	Stephan T. Lavavej
05:25	RFC: failure of gcc.dg/funcorder.c on hppa64	John David Anglin
05:08	Requested documentation update [contribution]	James Southard_Jr
02:42	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Zack Weinberg
02:04	About RTL	王逸
01:59	about RTL	王逸
01:47	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Robert Dewar
00:36	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Andrew Pinski
00:18	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Zack Weinberg

23:58	Re: Endless loop during bootstrap?	James Morrison
23:56	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Andrew Pinski
23:25	Re: Endless loop during bootstrap?	Eric Christopher
23:08	Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc)	Robert Dewar
22:35	Endless loop during bootstrap?	James Morrison
22:08	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	Dorit Naishlos
22:07	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	Dorit Naishlos
21:56	Re: Patch for PR c/12373	Ian Lance Taylor
21:06	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Paul Koning
20:51	Re: sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1	James Morrison
20:41	sparc (vis?) tests: 20001013-1, 20001101-1, 20001102-1	James Morrison
19:51	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Joel Sherrill
18:46	RFH: trouble getting gfortran to build multilib'ed	Steven Bosscher
18:09	Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass	Richard Henderson
15:01	Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc)	Jan Hubicka
14:51	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Ian Lance Taylor
13:59	Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc	Andreas Schwab
11:17	Re: [MIPS] reduce floating point registers	Shinpei Kato
11:11	[MIPS] reduce floating point registers	Shinpei Kato
11:03	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Eric Botcazou
09:06	D-loop : new way for optimizing loop with branch condition	d-loop
08:02	Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass	Paolo Bonzini
06:48	gcc3.3.2	Dominik Pajak
05:00	LLVM 1.2 Release!	Chris Lattner
05:00	Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW	Stephan T. Lavavej
04:53	Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc	Alexandre Oliva
04:50	Re: [Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc	Phil Edwards
04:29	Is it possible to use libstdc++.so.5 with 3.4?	r6144
04:11	[Newb] Stepping into cc1plus from gcc	sashan
04:06	Can -frepo be used with PCH?	r6144
03:46	m68k-linux regressions	Bernardo Innocenti
03:39	Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW	Stephan T. Lavavej
02:56	Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW	llewelly
01:41	Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW	Stephan T. Lavavej
01:17	Re: Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:16	Re: [Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization	Ian Lance Taylor
01:09	[Newb] Building with debug info and no optimization	sashan
00:56	C++: Non-allowed exception diagnostic?	Frank Pilhofer
00:51	Failure crossing gcc 3.3.3 from GNU/Linux to MinGW	Stephan T. Lavavej

23:12	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Phil Edwards
23:02	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Michael Eager
23:00	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Ian Lance Taylor
22:57	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Zack Weinberg
22:56	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Ian Lance Taylor
22:54	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Dale Johannesen
22:44	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Andrew Pinski
22:38	Re: [Newb] Building 3.4	Eric Christopher
22:34	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Ian Lance Taylor
22:18	RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Balaji Srinivasa
22:12	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Dale Johannesen
22:09	[Newb] Building 3.4	sashan
22:06	RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Balaji Srinivasa
21:57	RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Balaji Srinivasa
21:40	Re: PATCH RFC: Remove fork from collect2	Andrew Pinski
21:30	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Kai Henningsen
21:02	Re: Mainline regression - ICE c99-complit-2.c	Richard Kenner
21:02	Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Eric Botcazou
20:59	Mainline regression - ICE c99-complit-2.c	Zack Weinberg
20:23	Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass	Richard Henderson
20:08	Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass	Richard Kenner
20:04	Re: Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass	Richard Henderson
20:04	RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Balaji Srinivasa
19:59	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Paul Koning
19:49	Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?	Richard Henderson
19:29	Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Eric Botcazou
18:57	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	Dale Johannesen
18:48	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Mark Mitchell
18:41	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Richard Kenner
18:31	RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Balaji Srinivasa
18:28	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Eric Botcazou
18:11	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Gabriel Paubert
17:55	RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?	Dave Korn
17:38	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Mark Mitchell
17:24	Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?	Joern Rennecke
17:07	Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com	Michael Koch
17:05	RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?	Dave Korn
17:02	Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?	Joern Rennecke
16:59	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Douglas B Rupp
16:48	Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com	Remco Rijnders
16:47	RE: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?	Dave Korn
16:46	Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com	Daniel Berlin
16:28	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Arnaud Charlet
16:25	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Joel Sherrill
16:20	Re: email/mail server woes for bothner.com	Michael Koch
16:10	Marking variable as addressable from within SSA pass	Bonzini
15:58	Re: How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?	Joern Rennecke
15:56	email/mail server woes for bothner.com	Per Bothner
15:48	HP-UX Core Dump in stack unwinding	Michael GZ
15:30	How can INITIAL_FRAME_POINTER_OFFSET be made correct?	Dave Korn
15:01	Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Eric Botcazou
14:52	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Segher Boessenkool
14:45	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Nathan Sidwell
14:31	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Jamie Lokier
14:22	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Segher Boessenkool
14:18	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Segher Boessenkool
14:14	RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Balaji Srinivasa
13:53	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Jamie Lokier
13:47	Re: optmizing gcc 3.3.1 for AMD athlon xp	Kelley Cook
13:11	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Richard Kenner
13:08	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Arnaud Charlet
13:06	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Eric Botcazou
12:33	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Richard Kenner
12:31	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Richard Kenner
12:28	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Joel Sherrill
12:18	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Joel Sherrill
11:30	Re: latest autotools still can't handle libstdc++-v3	Phil Edwards
11:19	Re: license of libmudflap?	Frank Ch. Eigler
10:18	Re: [For "zlomek": Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]	Josef Zlomek
09:18	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Arnaud Charlet
08:45	Re: latest autotools still can't handle libstdc++-v3	Ralf Corsepius
08:31	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Jim Wilson
08:26	Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc)	Jakub Jelinek
08:14	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Jakub Jelinek
08:11	Re: x87 float truncation/accuracy (gcc vs. icc/msvc)	Thomas Kunert
07:53	Re: gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Arnaud Charlet
06:42	latest autotools still can't handle libstdc++-v3	Phil Edwards
06:34	Re: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Eric Botcazou
06:09	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	David Edelsohn
05:46	Re: license of libmudflap?	Andreas Jaeger
05:33	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Phil Edwards
04:42	[For "zlomek": Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender]	Bruce Korb
03:11	Citeseer's replacement?	Scott A Crosby
02:30	RE: GCC 3.2.3 on Solaris 2.7	Balaji Srinivasa
02:04	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Mark Mitchell
01:23	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Richard Kenner

23:22	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	Jan Hubicka
22:59	Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]	Jim Wilson
22:45	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Michael Eager
22:42	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Michael Eager
22:35	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Diego Novillo
22:27	Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]	Richard Zidlicky
22:19	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Daniel Berlin
22:18	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	David Edelsohn
22:11	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	law
22:11	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	Eric Christopher
22:02	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	Joseph S. Myers
21:59	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	David Edelsohn
21:56	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	David Edelsohn
21:54	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	Diego Novillo
21:40	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	Richard Guenther
21:32	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	David Edelsohn
21:05	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	Richard Henderson
20:58	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	Diego Novillo
20:10	Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]	Jim Wilson
20:06	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	law
19:56	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	David Edelsohn
19:56	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	Scott Robert Ladd
19:46	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	Daniel Berlin
19:38	Re: LNO Branch merge proposal	law
19:23	LNO Branch merge proposal	David Edelsohn
19:19	Oh my god, it's full of NULLs	Dave Korn
19:09	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Devang Patel
18:49	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Daniel Berlin
18:47	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Mike Stump
18:46	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	law
18:44	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	law
18:42	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	law
18:21	Exception and pthread on HPUX	Michael GZ
18:19	Re: IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding	H. J. Lu
18:11	Exception and pthread on HPUX	Michael GZ
17:57	Re: Proposed standard scheme for maintainers' debugging code	Sebastian Pop
17:37	gcc-ss-3.4-20040317 is now available	gccadmin
17:09	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Andrew MacLeod
17:05	Re: Newb question about code style	Ian Lance Taylor
16:40	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Chris Lattner
16:05	Re: explicit instantiation: function vs. class	Giovanni Bajo
15:55	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Per Abrahamsen
15:54	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Mark Mitchell
15:43	IA64 Crashes in stack unwinding	Otto Bruggeman
15:36	gcc 3.4 - gnatmake has wrong gcc name	Joel Sherrill
15:29	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Hans-Peter Nilsson
15:22	explicit instantiation: function vs. class	Vladimir Prus
15:18	Re: Newb question about code style	Bernd Jendrissek
15:17	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
15:13	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Diego Novillo
15:12	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Diego Novillo
14:59	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	law
14:51	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Diego Novillo
13:13	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Per Abrahamsen
13:05	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Gunther Nikl
12:51	RE: Newb question about code style	Dave Korn
12:50	Re: [Savannah-hackers] Savannah down	Paul Smith
12:43	RE: Savannah down	Andrew Haley
12:38	RE: Warning on dangerous use of assert() ?	Dave Korn
12:35	RE: Savannah down	Dave Korn
12:28	Warning on dangerous use of assert() ?	hartmut . schirmer
12:23	Re: RFD: profile standard deviation of # of loop iterations?	Joern Rennecke
12:22	Re: Newb question about code style	Nathan Sidwell
12:21	Re: Newb question about code style	sashan
12:20	Re: Newb question about code style	Paul Brook
12:16	Re: [rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]	Gunther Nikl
12:13	Re: Newb question about code style	sashan
12:02	Newb question about code style	Andrew Haley
12:00	Savannah down	Andrew Haley
11:58	Newb question about code style	sashan
11:49	Savannah down	Dave Korn
11:02	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Eric Botcazou
10:56	[rz@linux-m68k.org: Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem]	Richard Zidlicky
10:55	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Eric Botcazou
10:55	Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree versionof enumerators	Paolo Carlini
10:46	Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree versionof enumerators	Ranjit Mathew
10:28	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Gunther Nikl
09:10	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Andris Pavenis
08:08	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
07:21	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Zdenek Dvorak
07:10	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
06:45	Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and streeversion of enumerators	Andreas Jaeger
06:37	Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree version of enumerators	Matt Austern
06:05	Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Andrew Pinski
05:53	Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Mark Mitchell
04:39	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
04:35	Re: 3.3/3.4/head (was: [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535)	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:39	Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree versionof enumerators	Mark Mitchell
03:32	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	law
03:30	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	law
03:00	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Ian Lance Taylor
02:55	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Ian Lance Taylor
02:51	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Ian Lance Taylor
02:18	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Ian Lance Taylor
01:49	Proposed standard scheme for maintainers' debugging code	Nathanael Nerode
01:30	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Mike Stump
01:19	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Richard Henderson
00:55	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Phil Edwards
00:55	Re: Building collect2 for C?	DJ Delorie
00:52	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Michael Eager
00:51	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Devang Patel
00:44	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Phil Edwards
00:44	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Stephan T. Lavavej
00:36	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Diego Novillo
00:31	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
00:30	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Stephan T. Lavavej
00:28	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	law
00:19	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Michael Eager
00:09	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
00:07	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar

23:55	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Kai Henningsen
23:51	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Zack Weinberg
23:50	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Diego Novillo
23:48	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Zack Weinberg
23:44	Re: [stree] Committed: initial stree infrastructure, and stree version of enumerators	Matt Austern
23:42	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	law
23:37	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Toon Moene
23:33	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Richard Henderson
23:28	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Eric Christopher
23:27	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Toon Moene
23:22	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Richard Henderson
23:20	Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables	Joe Buck
23:18	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Devang Patel
23:13	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Diego Novillo
23:12	GCC 3.3.3 build status for Solaris 2.5.1 on x86	Dennis Clarke
23:10	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Joseph S. Myers
23:10	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Kai Henningsen
23:10	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Kai Henningsen
23:10	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Kai Henningsen
23:08	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Devang Patel
23:07	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Richard Henderson
23:06	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Richard Henderson
23:02	Re: Building collect2 for C?	E. Weddington
22:58	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Diego Novillo
22:57	3.3/3.4/head (was: [3.3/3.4/head] fix 14535)	Gerald Pfeifer
22:57	Re: Building collect2 for C?	DJ Delorie
22:51	Re: Building collect2 for C?	E. Weddington
22:49	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Toon Moene
22:46	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Eric Christopher
22:45	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Michael Eager
22:44	Re: Building collect2 for C?	DJ Delorie
22:40	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Mike Stump
22:37	Re: Building collect2 for C?	E. Weddington
22:32	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Mark Mitchell
22:31	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Devang Patel
22:20	RE: Building collect2 for C?	Dave Murphy
22:17	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Diego Novillo
22:15	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Mike Stump
22:01	Re: Building collect2 for C?	DJ Delorie
22:00	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Devang Patel
21:56	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Phil Edwards
21:51	Re: Building collect2 for C?	DJ Delorie
21:47	Re: [tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Diego Novillo
21:40	[tree-ssa] reaching def. question	Devang Patel
21:37	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Phil Edwards
21:18	Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch	Jim Wilson
21:03	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Zack Weinberg
21:01	Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch	Joel Sherrill
20:36	Re: Building collect2 for C?	DJ Delorie
20:31	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Mike Stump
20:14	Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch	Jim Wilson
20:00	Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables	Mike Stump
19:57	Re: asm memory barrier question	Falk Hueffner
19:50	Undeliverable Email	Administrator
19:43	Re: RFD: profile standard deviation of # of loop iterations?	Dale Johannesen
19:39	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Zack Weinberg
19:22	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Joe Buck
19:20	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Joe Buck
19:17	Re: Building collect2 for C?	DJ Delorie
19:03	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Zack Weinberg
18:34	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Richard Henderson
18:33	Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation	Richard Kenner
18:32	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Richard Henderson
18:17	Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation	Geert Bosch
18:05	Re: Building collect2 for C?	E. Weddington
17:54	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Nathan Sidwell
17:47	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Michael Eager
17:44	Re: Building collect2 for C?	DJ Delorie
17:35	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Eric Christopher
17:25	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Paul Koning
17:24	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Zack Weinberg
17:17	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Zack Weinberg
17:16	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Zack Weinberg
17:14	RE: Building collect2 for C?	Dave Murphy
17:12	Re: Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help	Joern Rennecke
17:11	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Ian Lance Taylor
16:59	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Paul Koning
16:59	Re: Building collect2 for C?	E. Weddington
16:58	Re: Building collect2 for C?	E. Weddington
16:53	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Mark Mitchell
16:45	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Andrew Pinski
16:42	RE: Building collect2 for C?	Dave Murphy
16:38	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Ian Lance Taylor
16:33	Re: Building collect2 for C?	E. Weddington
16:25	*powerpc--elf versus powerpc--eabi*	Dave Murphy
16:10	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Michael Eager
15:45	Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch	Joel Sherrill
15:24	Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables	law
15:08	Re: Building collect2 for C?	David Edelsohn
15:03	Re: Moving from mcpu to march/mtune everywhere?	Kelley Cook
14:59	Re: Building collect2 for C?	Ian Lance Taylor
14:54	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Gunther Nikl
14:47	Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function	Ian Lance Taylor
14:22	Reloading does not proper work on my new 8 bit target, please help	ildar
14:18	Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function	Wolfgang Kuehn
14:18	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Gunther Nikl
14:05	asm memory barrier question	jhjk jhj
13:31	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Jakub Jelinek
13:31	Building collect2 for C?	E. Weddington
13:21	RE: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function	Dave Korn
13:05	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Joseph S. Myers
13:00	Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function	Ian Lance Taylor
12:43	RE: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function	Dave Korn
12:39	Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function	Michael Matz
12:34	RFD: profile standard deviation of # of loop iterations?	Joern Rennecke
12:32	Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation	Richard Kenner
12:30	Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function	Michael Matz
12:27	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Robert Dewar
12:14	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
11:50	Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function	Wolfgang Kuehn
10:30	gcc for Texas Instruments DSP 64xx	Rakesh Avichal Ughreja
10:20	RE: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function	Dave Korn
09:36	Re: TYPE_VFIELD documentation	Jim Wilson
09:19	Re: -fdump-translation-unit[-option]	Jim Wilson
09:12	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Nathan Sidwell
09:02	The account for daniele has been removed [Re: Re: excuse me]	anonymous NFS user
09:02	Re: Expr Constructor Question Part 2	Jim Wilson
09:00	Re: weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch	Jim Wilson
08:57	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Jim Wilson
08:48	Re: multilib and with/without exceptionsand rtti	Jim Wilson
08:45	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Per Abrahamsen
06:54	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Richard Henderson
06:33	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Devang Patel
05:33	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Robert Dewar
05:14	Moving from mcpu to march/mtune everywhere?	Nathanael Nerode
04:57	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Richard Henderson
04:34	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Mark Mitchell
04:15	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	David Edelsohn
03:46	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Chris Lattner
03:36	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Mike Stump
03:33	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Richard Henderson
03:12	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Eric Christopher
03:02	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Diego Novillo
02:56	Re: Question !!	Zack Weinberg
02:47	Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables	Zack Weinberg
02:45	Question !!	김명수
02:15	Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables	Mike Stump
02:09	C++ status (Was: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09))	Giovanni Bajo
01:46	Re: [PATCH] fix warning about duplicate 'const'	Mike Stump
01:09	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Nathanael Nerode
01:08	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Michael Eager
01:00	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Zack Weinberg
00:45	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Richard Henderson
00:37	libstdc++ (was Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!)	Kevin Atkinson
00:13	Re: locking problem with mips atomicity	Phil Edwards
00:07	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Diego Novillo
00:02	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Devang Patel

23:57	locking problem with mips atomicity	Michael Eager
23:20	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Richard Henderson
23:08	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Richard Henderson
23:08	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Devang Patel
22:51	Re: register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function	Richard Henderson
22:42	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Robert Dewar
22:38	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Richard Henderson
22:24	Re: signed/unsigned right shift	Christian Groessler
22:18	Re: signed/unsigned right shift	Andreas Schwab
22:17	Re: signed/unsigned right shift	Ian Lance Taylor
22:14	Re: signed/unsigned right shift	Andreas Schwab
22:02	Re: signed/unsigned right shift	Christian Groessler
20:52	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Jamie Lokier
20:41	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:39	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Joseph S. Myers
20:25	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Jamie Lokier
20:18	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	David Edelsohn
19:56	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Eric Botcazou
19:50	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
19:44	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Laurent GUERBY
19:43	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Andreas Tobler
19:18	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Andrew Pinski
19:00	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Toon Moene
18:22	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Dan Nicolaescu
18:14	Re: possible regression... where to look at?	Dmitry
18:13	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Joe Buck
18:12	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in (poorly designed) trig test!	Nathanael Nerode
18:01	C++ Front-end or inliner bug with tree-ssa	law
17:58	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:53	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Phil Edwards
17:52	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Joe Buck
17:50	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Nathan Sidwell
17:48	gcc-ss-3.3-20040315 is now available	gccadmin
17:47	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:46	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Geert Bosch
17:45	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Joe Buck
17:44	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Geert Bosch
17:42	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Joe Buck
17:28	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Ian Lance Taylor
17:15	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Paolo Carlini
17:10	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:59	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
16:56	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Paolo Carlini
16:46	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Ian Lance Taylor
16:41	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Gunther Nikl
16:40	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Jakub Jelinek
16:30	Re: Bad mode-change inside subreg: DImode to SImode	Julian Brown
16:25	RE: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Stephan T. Lavavej
16:06	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Robert Dewar
15:54	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Nathan Sidwell
15:40	Re: PR java/14581: gcj internal error: Segmentation fault involvingswitch to a final var	Cedric Berger
15:36	PR java/14581: gcj internal error: Segmentation fault involving switch to a final var	Andrew Haley
15:35	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Gunther Nikl
15:20	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Nathan Sidwell
15:19	Re:[tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage ?	Hartmut Penner
15:11	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Ian Lance Taylor
15:09	Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Paolo Carlini
15:01	Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Giovanni Bajo
14:49	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Gunther Nikl
14:47	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Segher Boessenkool
14:43	Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Paolo Carlini
14:29	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Segher Boessenkool
14:28	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Joseph S. Myers
14:18	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Zdenek Dvorak
14:13	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Paolo Carlini
14:05	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Joseph S. Myers
14:03	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Nathan Sidwell
14:00	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Zdenek Dvorak
13:56	Re: [tree-ssa] mainline destabilizing tree-ssa?	Diego Novillo
13:55	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Paolo Carlini
13:51	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Zdenek Dvorak
13:50	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Gunther Nikl
13:42	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Paolo Carlini
13:37	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
13:29	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Zdenek Dvorak
13:28	[tree-ssa] mainline destabilizing tree-ssa?	Richard Guenther
13:15	Re: Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu	Paolo Carlini
12:53	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:40	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
12:05	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Stelios Xanthakis
11:46	Re: statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Nathan Sidwell
11:46	Re: IWMMXT vector type alignment	Richard Earnshaw
11:43	IWMMXT vector type alignment	Paul Brook
11:31	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Paolo Carlini
11:26	statement expressions and extended asm bug?	Gunther Nikl
11:25	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Paolo Carlini
10:54	register variable is clobbered by passing parameter to a function	Wolfgang Kuehn
10:19	Re: C++ language lawyer question	Gabriel Dos Reis
10:00	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Sebastian Pop
09:54	Re: C++ language lawyer question	Nathan Sidwell
09:37	Results for g++ 3.4.0 application testing on i686-pc-linux-gnu	poschmid
08:57	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
08:20	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Jakub Jelinek
07:42	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Ranjit Mathew
06:56	gctest failure for 3.5-tree-ssa 20040314 (merged 20040307) on cygwin: KERNEL32!IsBadWritePtr	Christian Joensson
06:06	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Andreas Jaeger
05:50	tree-ssa performance from rebuild_jump_labels's view	Kazu Hirata
05:15	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	James Morrison
04:44	-fdump-translation-unit[-option]	J. Buchanan
04:06	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
03:29	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:19	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Stephan T. Lavavej
03:05	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:01	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:41	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
02:41	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:38	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
02:36	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
02:31	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Daniel Berlin
02:30	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
02:29	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Alex Rosenberg
02:22	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Dan Nicolaescu
02:07	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Daniel Berlin
01:55	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Roger Sayle
01:47	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
01:47	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
01:31	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
00:32	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Paolo Carlini
00:12	Re: GCC beaten by ICC in stupid trig test!	Andrew Pinski
00:11	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Paolo Carlini

23:49	Re: GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Gabriel Dos Reis
23:40	GCC viciously beaten by ICC in trig test!	Scott Robert Ladd
22:31	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Daniel Berlin
22:15	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Gerald Pfeifer
22:12	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Hans-Peter Nilsson
19:22	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Andrew Pinski
18:23	Re: signed/unsigned right shift	Ian Lance Taylor
18:09	Re: signed/unsigned right shift	Christian Groessler
10:59	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Dorit Naishlos
10:57	Fw: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Dorit Naishlos
01:58	Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double	Richard Henderson
01:56	Re: 3.5 Snapshots (Again)	Gerald Pfeifer
01:37	Re: possible regression... where to look at?	Roger Sayle
00:56	Re: Two places in GCC doing (float)func(x) -> funcf(x) ??	Roger Sayle

23:05	Two places in GCC doing (float)func(x) -> funcf(x) ??	Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:41	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Devang Patel
21:25	Re: possible regression... where to look at?	Richard Sandiford
20:59	Re: Basic g++ Compiler Question	llewelly
20:10	Bad mode-change inside subreg: DImode to SImode	Julian Brown
16:36	Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double	Ulrich Weigand
16:35	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Andreas Jaeger
15:58	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Jan Hubicka
15:54	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Richard Guenther
15:47	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Gerald Pfeifer
15:44	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Richard Guenther
15:41	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Diego Novillo
15:40	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Richard Guenther
15:37	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Diego Novillo
15:35	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Diego Novillo
15:05	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Richard Guenther
14:57	Re: [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in3.5-tree-ssa 040120	Diego Novillo
14:57	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Paolo Bonzini
14:47	Basic g++ Compiler Question	FGales
12:34	Re: [Bug c++/13776] [tree-ssa] Many C++ compile-time regression in3.5-tree-ssa 040120	Richard Guenther
10:17	Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double	Jakub Jelinek
09:24	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Zdenek Dvorak
03:30	GCC-3.3.4 release status	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:51	Expr Constructor Question Part 2	Weihaw Chuang
00:26	Re: [tree-ssa] Merge status	Diego Novillo
00:07	[tree-ssa] Merge status	Diego Novillo

23:30	Re: possible regression... where to look at?	Richard Henderson
22:37	Re: signed/unsigned right shift	Dale Johannesen
22:24	Re: signed/unsigned right shift	Andreas Schwab
21:49	Re: GCC version compatible problem	Eric Christopher
21:25	signed/unsigned right shift	Christian Groessler
20:18	Re: GCC version compatible problem	Joseph S. Myers
20:09	Re: GCC version compatible problem	Eric Christopher
20:05	Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0	Kelley Cook
19:47	Re: GCC version compatible problem	Lu Peng
19:41	Re: GCC version compatible problem	Kazu Hirata
19:26	GCC version compatible problem	Lu Peng
18:56	Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0	Joseph S. Myers
18:45	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Devang Patel
18:35	Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0	Christopher Faylor
18:31	weirdness with ada/Make-lang.in on 3.4 branch	Joel Sherrill <joel at OARcorp
18:21	Re: Restrict pointers	Diego Novillo
18:17	Re: Restrict pointers	Dan Nicolaescu
17:38	Re: Restrict pointers	Diego Novillo
17:24	Re: Building GENERIC trees and passing the symbol table	Paul Brook
17:23	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Richard Earnshaw
17:18	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Joe Buck
17:18	Re: Restrict pointers	Dan Nicolaescu
17:17	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Phil Blundell
17:12	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Joe Buck
17:03	RE: Building GENERIC trees and passing the symbol table	Tom Crick
17:02	Re: [overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0	Ian Lance Taylor
16:51	[overseers] Suggestion to upgrade to CVSweb 3.0	Kelley Cook
16:50	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Phil Blundell
16:46	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Joe Buck
16:00	Re: Restrict pointers	Diego Novillo
15:58	Re: Restrict pointers	Daniel Berlin
15:45	Re: Restrict pointers	Diego Novillo
15:28	Re: Restrict pointers	Jan Hoogerbrugge
13:21	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Gerhard Tonn
12:44	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Philip Blundell
12:26	possible regression... where to look at?	Dmitry
12:08	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Richard Earnshaw
10:44	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Philip Blundell
09:57	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Andreas Schwab
06:58	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Gabriel Dos Reis
06:42	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Matthias Klose
03:14	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	David Edelsohn
02:49	Re: 3.3.4 status, and some questions	Ian Lance Taylor

23:58	3.3.4 status, and some questions	Joe Buck
23:31	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	Richard Henderson
22:52	Re: functexcept.cc draws in everything	Henning dot Baldersheim at dev
22:38	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	David Edelsohn
22:17	Re: PATCH RFA: Remove SUNOS4_SHARED_LIBRARIES (Was collect2.c hardcoded paths)	Richard Henderson
22:16	Re: [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra?	Gerald Pfeifer
21:11	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Richard Henderson
21:00	Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code	Richard Henderson
20:17	Re: thread enabled ecos support	Henning Baldersheim
19:47	Re: Restrict pointers	Jim Wilson
19:26	multilib and with/without exceptionsand rtti	Henning Baldersheim
19:26	Re: new/delete mismatch	Jim Wilson
19:23	Re: GCC3.3.3: building cross compiler powerpc-linux undefined symbol	Jim Wilson
18:45	Re: problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code	Max Asbock
15:01	info	fredy . pena
14:09	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Eric Botcazou
13:48	TYPE_VFIELD documentation	Richard Kenner
12:49	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Richard Kenner
12:48	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Jakub Jelinek
12:39	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Eric Botcazou
12:15	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Richard Kenner
09:45	Re: GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Eric Botcazou
07:19	Re: [Fwd: require gcc language syntax summary]	Zack Weinberg
04:42	[Fwd: require gcc language syntax summary]	Zhu Chenyang
02:16	Re: more hardcoded paths	Jim Wilson
02:06	Re: genrecog of i386.md under linux, 5 warnings...	Jim Wilson

23:38	Expr constructor question	Weihaw Chuang
22:50	Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables	Joe Buck
22:47	Re: Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables	Joe Buck
22:35	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Bernardo Innocenti
22:30	Anonymous types and [basic.link] for nonlocal variables	Matt Austern
22:03	Copyright assignment from Motorola for Altivec testsuite?	Zack Weinberg
21:32	Re: handling of FIXED_REGISTERS	Ian Lance Taylor
21:29	Re: handling of FIXED_REGISTERS	Andreas Schwab
21:17	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Matthias Benkmann
20:04	handling of FIXED_REGISTERS	Olatunji Ruwase
19:47	collect2.c hardcoded paths	Edward S. Peschko
19:15	"make check" faulures in glibc with gcc 3.4	H. J. Lu
18:59	Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59	Alexandre Oliva
18:49	genrecog of i386.md under linux, 5 warnings...	Christian Joensson
18:46	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	David Edelsohn
18:38	Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double	Falk Hueffner
18:09	GCC Status Report (2004-03-09)	Mark Mitchell
18:03	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20040309 on i686-linux: cp/call.c:6459:warning: 'init' might be used uninitialized in this function	Mark Mitchell
17:46	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Mark Mitchell
17:37	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Joseph S. Myers
17:26	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Mark Mitchell
16:20	Re: Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20040309 on i686-linux: cp/call.c:6459: warning: 'init' might be used uninitialized in this function	Christian Joensson
16:17	Failure to bootstrap gcc cvs HEAD 20040309 on i686-linux: cp/call.c:6459: warning: 'init' might be used uninitialized in this function	Christian Joensson
14:00	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Gabriel Dos Reis
12:11	Re: request for a copyright assignment	Nick Clifton
11:54	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Joseph S. Myers
11:14	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Mark Mitchell
10:42	Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59	Hans-Peter Nilsson
10:41	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Joseph S. Myers
09:59	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Mark Mitchell
09:39	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Joseph S. Myers
08:57	request for a copyright assignment	Petko Manolov
08:40	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Gunther Nikl
08:15	Re: attribute aligned problem with MIPS cross compiler	Richard Sandiford
08:03	RE: gcc and arm interworking	Dave Murphy
06:51	Re: 3.5 Snapshots (Again)	Ranjit Mathew
04:14	Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59	Zack Weinberg
03:43	Re: Move mainline to autoconf 2.59	Benjamin Kosnik
03:36	Questions about the instruction selection for sse2 intrinsic with -O optimization	haibo
03:22	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:21	Move mainline to autoconf 2.59	Kelley Cook
03:17	Question about GCC -O optimization with sse2 programming.	haibo
03:15	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Paul Jarc
03:09	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Gabriel Dos Reis
02:53	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Paul Jarc
02:52	GCC3.3.3 Successful build in ia64-hpux11.23(hp rx5670)	이규호
02:43	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Gabriel Dos Reis
01:37	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Mark Mitchell
01:06	Re: attribute aligned problem with MIPS cross compiler	Eric Christopher
00:54	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Joe Buck
00:49	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Joseph S. Myers
00:34	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Mark Mitchell
00:17	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Joseph S. Myers
00:07	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Dale Johannesen

23:43	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Mark Mitchell
23:32	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Joe Buck
23:07	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Gabriel Dos Reis
22:57	Re: Shebang	Andreas Schwab
22:51	Re: Shebang	cgd
22:49	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Mark Mitchell
22:46	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Dale Johannesen
22:46	Re: Shebang	Paul Jarc
22:37	Re: Shebang	cgd
22:33	Re: Shebang	Paul Jarc
22:32	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Mark Mitchell
22:32	Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly	Jamie Lokier
22:29	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Mark Mitchell
22:24	Re: Shebang	cgd
22:21	Re: LD vs multilibs	Alexandre Oliva
22:01	Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly	tm_gccmail
21:45	Re: You ucLinux patches break RTEMS building	Bernardo Innocenti
21:38	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Bernardo Innocenti
21:34	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Mark Mitchell
21:27	Re: Turning off tree checking by default for releases	Mark Mitchell
21:13	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Ian Lance Taylor
21:04	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Mark Mitchell
20:51	Re: Shebang	Ian Lance Taylor
20:49	Re: Shebang	Paul Jarc
20:44	Re: Shebang	Zack Weinberg
20:24	Shebang	Leah
19:34	Re: 3.5 Snapshots (Again)	Gerald Pfeifer
19:27	New development branch: stree-branch	Matt Austern
19:18	problems parsing dwarf frame info on amd64 optimized code	Max Asbock
19:13	Re: Framework support for Linux	Ziemowit Laski
18:09	attribute aligned problem with MIPS cross compiler	Roy Franz
18:08	[tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-07	Diego Novillo
17:20	gcc-ss-3.3-20040308 is now available	gccadmin
16:31	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Gunther Nikl
14:34	Proposal: fine-grained control over -Werror	Omer Shenker
11:38	Re: Building GENERIC trees	Lars Segerlund
10:39	Re: gcc and arm interworking	Richard Earnshaw
10:24	3.5 Snapshots (Again)	Ranjit Mathew
07:51	LD vs multilibs	Phil Edwards
06:42	thread enabled ecos support	Henning Baldersheim
01:28	Re: [rfc] alpha-linux changing to 128-bit long double	GOTO Masanori

gcc archivedate index for March, 2004

gcc archive
date index for March, 2004

20:26	Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly	Jamie Lokier
19:52	Re: Can't bootstrap tree-ssa on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu now for over a week.	Richard Henderson
19:38	Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly	Andi Kleen
19:27	Re: m68k, extendqidi2 problem	Richard Henderson
19:26	Re: Can't bootstrap tree-ssa on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu now for over a week.	Andrew Pinski
19:15	Can't bootstrap tree-ssa on powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu now for overa week.	Toon Moene
18:58	Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly	Jamie Lokier
18:54	Question on valid transformations for cbrt	Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:41	Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly	Andi Kleen
18:01	Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly	Jamie Lokier
15:31	Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly	Matthew Tippett
12:58	Re: Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly	Andi Kleen
06:06	Converting MSVC to intel-style gcc inline assembly	Matthew Tippett
03:00	local vars transmission (fwd)	Mihai Burcea
02:59	local vars transmission	Mihai Burcea
02:43	The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.1.1 is released	H. J. Lu

23:48	[tree-ssa] mini merge	Diego Novillo
23:31	Re: Building GENERIC trees	Tom Crick
23:25	m68k, extendqidi2 problem	Richard Zidlicky
22:26	Re: Building GENERIC trees	Kai Henningsen
21:35	Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:58	Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?	Zack Weinberg
20:36	Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?	Jim Wilson
20:26	[reload] never-used stack slots?	Cyrille Chepelov
19:58	Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions intoepilogue	Jim Wilson
19:45	Re: init_integral_libfuncs question	Richard Henderson
19:44	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Diego Novillo
19:41	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Diego Novillo
19:28	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Devang Patel
19:22	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Diego Novillo
19:17	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Diego Novillo
19:06	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Devang Patel
18:23	Re: Building GENERIC trees	Paul Brook
18:11	Re: Building GENERIC trees	law
17:15	init_integral_libfuncs question	Steve Ellcey
17:08	Re: binutils 2.15.90.0.1 break ia64 kernel crosscompiling	H. J. Lu
16:19	Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2	cgd
15:46	Re: Taking a stab at register-relative data addressing on m68k...	Peter Barada
14:58	TOP 50 de la libert� - - - -- -- - -	Marc Buglonnier - - - -- -- -
14:47	Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue	Andrew Haley
14:07	Taking a stab at register-relative data addressing on m68k...	Ray Whitmer
10:42	Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases	perugupa
10:15	Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases	Segher Boessenkool
09:15	Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2	Eric Christopher
08:29	Re: gcc support for mips32 release 2	Mile Davidovic
07:54	gcc support for mips32 release 2	Long Li
05:48	Re: FUNCTION_BOUNDARY and FUNCTION_TYPE	Geoff Keating
04:27	Re: Declaring Arrays	Giovanni Bajo
04:05	Re: support for omvs	Edward S. Peschko
03:51	Declaring Arrays	Nuwan Kodagoda
03:32	FUNCTION_BOUNDARY and FUNCTION_TYPE	Richard Kenner
03:24	Re: support for omvs	David Edelsohn
03:10	support for omvs	Edward S. Peschko
01:50	Re: My code wont compile in GCC	Eric Christopher
01:42	My code wont compile in GCC	Jonathan Wilson
00:23	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	Dale Johannesen
00:06	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	Dorit Naishlos

23:52	Re: Logging data structure field accesses	Robert Bowdidge
23:38	Re: PR12928 mystery: sigsuspend.s:82: Error: non-constant expressionin ".if" statement	Daniel Kegel
23:34	Re: PR12928 mystery: sigsuspend.s:82: Error: non-constant expression in ".if" statement	Andrew Pinski
23:19	PR12928 mystery: sigsuspend.s:82: Error: non-constant expressionin ".if" statement	Daniel Kegel
23:06	Re: Help with writing RTL for RISC CPU	Richard Henderson
22:51	Help with writing RTL for RISC CPU	David Addison
22:46	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Andreas Schwab
21:49	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	H. J. Lu
21:46	Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases	Daniel Jacobowitz
21:46	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Daniel Jacobowitz
21:43	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	H. J. Lu
21:10	Re: i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases	Jim Wilson
21:03	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Richard Henderson
21:02	Re: constant pool issues	Jim Wilson
20:53	Re: Porting GCC Toolchain	Jim Wilson
20:48	Re: Intrinsic support without -sse2	Richard Henderson
20:45	Re: Clarification Req: Regarding "+m" constraints in inline asm	Jim Wilson
20:39	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Devang Patel
20:23	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Richard Kenner
20:21	Re: pthread issue...	Jim Wilson
20:20	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Eric Botcazou
20:13	Building GENERIC trees	Tom Crick
20:12	Re: [lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Andrew Pinski
20:08	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Joe Buck
20:03	Re: Logging data structure field accesses (Mozilla-friendly)	Mike Capp
20:00	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Eric Botcazou
19:59	[lno] [RFC] if-conversion and auto vectorizer	Devang Patel
19:42	Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?	Ziemowit Laski
19:17	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Joe Buck
18:45	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Richard Zidlicky
18:38	Re: IMA vs tree-ssa	Dale Johannesen
18:38	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Zack Weinberg
18:27	Re: Logging data structure field accesses	Joe Buck
18:07	Re: Logging data structure field accesses	Andrew Pinski
18:02	Re: Logging data structure field accesses	law
17:53	Successful bootstrap: 3.3.3/sparcv9-sun-solaris2.9 (64-bit)	Chuck Cox
17:21	Re: binutils 2.15.90.0.1 doesn't install as.1 man page	H. J. Lu
17:11	Re: Why doesn't Ada testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Arnaud Charlet
16:47	Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?	Timothy J. Wood
16:04	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	H. J. Lu
15:48	[tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-03-03	Diego Novillo
15:32	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Gunther Nikl
13:45	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Roman Zippel
13:27	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Bernardo Innocenti
10:58	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Gunther Nikl
10:47	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Robert Dewar
09:36	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Arnaud Charlet
09:35	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Arnaud Charlet
09:13	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Zack Weinberg
09:10	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Rolf Ebert
08:01	Re: Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	Arnaud Charlet
07:25	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Gunther Nikl
07:08	Re: [tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?	Andrew Pinski
05:54	[tree-ssa] recent C++ Altivec breakage?	Timothy J. Wood
05:30	Re: Porting GCC Toolchain	Ranjit Mathew
04:53	Intrinsic support without -sse2	Matthew Tippett
03:03	i am getting same profile(for gcc) for all testcases	perugupa
00:50	Re: [tree-ssa] 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4	Per Bothner
00:35	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Richard Henderson
00:00	Re: IA64 GCC bootstrap problem	Steve Ellcey

23:13	The Linux binutils 2.15.90.0.1 is released	H. J. Lu
22:38	IA64 GCC bootstrap problem	Steve Ellcey
22:38	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Bernardo Innocenti
21:58	constant pool issues	Mihai Burcea
21:55	Why doesn't ADA testsuite use newly built gnatchop/gnatmake?	H. J. Lu
19:30	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Mark Mitchell
19:23	Re: bug report with downloaded copiler	Joe Buck
19:14	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Eric Christopher
19:09	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Mark Mitchell
19:06	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Richard Sandiford
19:04	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:44	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	Dale Johannesen
18:39	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Eric Christopher
18:37	bug report with downloaded copiler	Nathan Holladay
18:37	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Eric Christopher
18:33	Re: installing gcc on HP UX 11	Jim Wilson
18:27	Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue	Jim Wilson
18:16	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	Dorit Naishlos
18:12	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Joe Buck
17:52	Re: rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	David Edelsohn
17:49	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Mark Mitchell
17:34	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
17:18	gcc-ss-3.4-20040303 is now available	gccadmin
16:49	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Alexandre Oliva
16:46	rs6000.md/altivec.md problem in setting of vector registers	Dorit Naishlos
15:39	Porting GCC Toolchain	mbroadst
15:34	Re: [tree-ssa] c++/14408 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4	Diego Novillo
15:28	Re: [tree-ssa] c++/14408 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4	Richard Guenther
14:46	[tree-ssa] 20% compile time regression vs. 3.4	Richard Guenther
14:44	Clarification Req: Regarding "+m" constraints in inline asm	Ashok.A
14:23	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Richard Sandiford
13:27	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Richard Zidlicky
12:39	[gnu.org #27612] Request for copyright assignment form	Arpad Beszedes
11:37	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:08	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
11:03	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Andreas Schwab
10:13	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Roman Zippel
10:04	Re: gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions intoepilogue	Andrew Haley
09:49	Re: GCC 3.2 runs with glibc-2.2, crashes with glibc-2.3?	Yuval Kfir
08:53	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Bernardo Innocenti
08:22	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Bernardo Innocenti
08:20	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Mark Mitchell
08:15	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Jim Wilson
08:09	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Mark Mitchell
08:08	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Mark Mitchell
08:03	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Jim Wilson
08:01	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Jim Wilson
07:48	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Richard Henderson
07:47	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Eric Christopher
07:38	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Eric Christopher
07:25	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Mark Mitchell
07:01	Re: Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Eric Christopher
05:39	pthread issue...	wilson k.j
04:04	Re: PCH and exec-shield...	Ian Lance Taylor
03:53	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Alexandre Oliva
03:05	Bugs in MIPS FUNCTION_ARG_REGNO_P ?	Mark Mitchell
01:51	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Joe Buck
01:21	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:58	Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan	Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
00:57	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:52	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
00:39	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Dale Johannesen
00:33	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Richard Henderson
00:33	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Robert Dewar
00:31	Re: g++ 3.5.0 and tree-ssa parse problem: incomplete types	Alexandre Oliva
00:30	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Alexandre Oliva
00:27	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Alexandre Oliva
00:23	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Dale Johannesen
00:09	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Richard Henderson
00:08	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final (sorry, wrong subject)	Jim Wilson

23:58	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Chris Lattner
23:26	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Mark Mitchell
23:05	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Robert Dewar
22:54	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Geoff Keating
22:34	09.KK. john holmes ..... YOU	Junior Smith
22:30	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Andreas Schwab
22:21	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Chris Lattner
22:05	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Richard Zidlicky
22:03	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Mark Mitchell
21:48	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Dale Johannesen
21:46	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Geoff Keating
21:45	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Mark Mitchell
21:41	Re: Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bug c++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...)	Daniel Berlin
21:40	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
21:40	Re: Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bug c++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...)	Daniel Berlin
21:22	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Joe Buck
21:19	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Geoff Keating
21:19	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Zack Weinberg
21:15	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Zack Weinberg
21:02	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Dale Johannesen
20:58	Re: Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project	Joe Buck
20:58	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Kevin Atkinson
20:57	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:37	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
20:33	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Jan Hubicka
20:33	Re: Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project	Christopher Faylor
20:27	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Mark Mitchell
20:25	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Mark Mitchell
20:24	Re: Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project	Russ Allbery
20:21	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Geoff Keating
20:20	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Jan Hubicka
20:19	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Zack Weinberg
20:18	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Joe Buck
20:16	Question regarding g++ and GPL in my own project	Michael Stather
20:15	Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux	Richard Zidlicky
20:15	Re: gcc and compiling speed	William Ahern
20:11	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Mark Mitchell
20:09	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Joe Buck
20:05	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Peter Galbavy
19:57	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Zack Weinberg
19:57	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:51	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Andreas Jaeger
19:48	Re: retry_ice mechanism doesn't work reliably with C++	Geoff Keating
19:48	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
19:47	Re: Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Geoff Keating
19:47	Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?	H. J. Lu
19:40	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Peter Galbavy
19:39	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Jeff Sturm
19:34	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Chris Lattner
19:14	Re: inernal compiler error	gavinband
19:11	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Joe Buck
19:10	Lazy allocation of DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME	Mark Mitchell
19:05	RE: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final (sorry, wrong subject)	Cheng, Cheuk
19:03	RE: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Cheng, Cheuk
19:00	Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?	Joe Buck
18:57	Re: GCC bootstrap.	Joe Buck
18:56	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
18:53	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Joe Buck
18:45	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Joe Buck
18:34	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Joe Buck
18:22	Re: retry_ice mechanism doesn't work reliably with C++	Joe Buck
18:19	Re: inernal compiler error	Joe Buck
17:31	gcc-ss-3.3-20040301 is now available	gccadmin
17:16	Re: Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bug c++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...)	Ian Lance Taylor
17:08	inernal compiler error	gavinband
17:02	Bugzilla moving to another bug in the list (was Re: [Bugc++/14029] [tree-ssa] ...)	Diego Novillo
16:56	Re: Wrong code and ICEs on valid PRs	Eric Botcazou
16:53	Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?	H. J. Lu
15:51	Re: Can't build gcc 3.4.0 20040301 on cygwin: gcc.c:3661: error: assignment of read-only location	Christopher Faylor
15:44	Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely?	Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:04	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Nathan Sidwell
15:02	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Gabriel Dos Reis
14:51	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Jeff Sturm
14:45	gcc 3.4 regression: sched2 moving "may throw" instructions into epilogue	Andrew Haley
14:39	retry_ice mechanism doesn't work reliably with C++	Michael Matz
14:24	Unnamed Structure declaration	Rob . McConnell
13:51	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Per Abrahamsen
13:25	Re: Your software	japetersen
10:20	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Nathan Sidwell
10:04	Successful build of gcc-3.3.3 on mips-sgi-irix6.5	Julian R. Parramore
10:03	Successful build of gcc-3.3.2 on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0e	Julian R. Parramore
09:17	Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?	Allan Sandfeld
08:12	Re: Can't build gcc 3.4.0 20040301 on cygwin: gcc.c:3661: error: assignment of read-only location	Andrew Pinski
08:09	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Steven Bosscher
08:06	Can't build gcc 3.4.0 20040301 on cygwin: gcc.c:3661: error: assignment of read-only location	Christian Joensson
08:04	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Kevin Atkinson
08:03	Re: __attribute__ ((regparm(...))) in function declaration and gcc3.4.0	Michael Matz
07:27	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Zack Weinberg
07:05	Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?	Alexandre Oliva
06:15	Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final	Kevin Atkinson
06:14	Re: Munging gcc-testresults@ messages	James Morrison
06:00	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Andreas Jaeger
05:31	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Zack Weinberg
05:18	GCC Status Report (2004-02-29)	Mark Mitchell
05:12	Re: Obsolete mn10200?	law
05:04	Wrong code and ICEs on valid PRs	Mark Mitchell
05:00	Re: gcc and compiling speed	John S. Dyson
04:39	Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4	Mark Mitchell
04:23	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Vincent Diepeveen
04:20	Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4	Aldy Hernandez
04:15	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Daniel Berlin
04:14	Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4	Mark Mitchell
04:11	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Eric Christopher
04:05	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Theo de Raadt
04:01	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Zack Weinberg
04:00	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Eric Christopher
04:00	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:59	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Theo de Raadt
03:55	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Gabriel Dos Reis
03:49	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Theo de Raadt
03:46	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Theo de Raadt
03:10	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Zack Weinberg
03:07	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Daniel Jacobowitz
03:00	Re: Vector problems with GCC 3.4	Andrew Pinski
02:58	Re: gcc and compiling speed	Theo de Raadt
02:54	gcc 3.3.3 built on PowerPC Mac OS X 10.3.2 7D24/Darwin 7.2.0	Hunter Horsman
02:40	Obsolete mn10200?	William Reading
02:32	Problems with cp_expr_size and friends in GCC 3.4	Mark Mitchell
02:29	Vector problems with GCC 3.4	Mark Mitchell
01:29	Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?	Daniel Jacobowitz
01:19	Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan	Al Stone
01:12	Munging gcc-testresults@ messages	Al Stone
01:09	Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan	Diego Novillo
00:46	Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor?	H. J. Lu
00:43	gcc and compiling speed	Andrew Pinski
00:41	Re: __attribute__ ((regparm(...))) in function declaration and gcc 3.4.0	Giovanni Bajo