This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [lno] internal compiler error: in record_dependences_for_modify_expr, at tree-scalar-evolution.c:3236

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 03:18:38PM +0100, Richard Guenther wrote:
> 
> Btw. - all the use of switch (TREE_CODE_LENGTH (TREE_CODE (x))) in 
> tree-scalar-evolution.c looks fragile, no?  Shouldn't this switch for 
> the TREE_CODE(x) instead to avoid surprises?  At least a comment should 
> describe why this "optimization" is legal.
> 
> For the ICE below, s/abort()/return/ works for me, but that doesn't look 
> less fragile either ;)
> 

I'm rewriting all this stuff, and probably this is already fixed in
the new version of the analyzer.  I plan to contribute it during this
weekend, and before I will check that this works in the new version.

Thanks for the bug report.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]