This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.

From: Gunther Nikl <gni at gecko dot de>
To: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
Cc: Ray Whitmer <ray at xmission dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:14:46 +0100
Subject: Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402250724080.28652@xmission.xmission.com> <403D3B35.4090504@specifixinc.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402260727060.29513@xmission.xmission.com> <1077851618.1057.227.camel@leaf.tuliptree.org>

On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 07:13:38PM -0800, Jim Wilson wrote:
> It should be possible to get something like this [baserel support]
> accepted into the FSF gcc sources, but it is likely to take some
> time and effort to get everything reviewed and accepted.

  I intend to contribute m68k-amigaos which adds baserel support to m68k.
  However, I don't know what would be needed to make it a generic m68k
  addition. Currently its restricted to the target. And without binutils
  support its not very useful. The m68k-amigaos binutils modifications
  are not in mainline binutils.

  Gunther

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
  - From: Ray Whitmer

References:
- Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
  - From: Ray Whitmer
- Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
  - From: Ray Whitmer
- Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k.
  - From: Jim Wilson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]