This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x


stock@stokkie.net (Robert M. Stockmann)  wrote on 11.02.04 in <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402110139330.26983-100000@hubble.stokkie.net>:

> Giving 3rd party software vendors not only the possibility to offer binary
> only kernel driver modules, but also handing them over gcc compiler versions
> which allow the possibility of interfacing with unnamed and anonymous
> structs and unions inside header files, is asking for trouble, in a project
> which has
>
> 	Open Source
>
> as its main goal.

Does anyone think there is anything else to this that this guy's utter  
cluelessness to what "unnamed and anonymous structs and unions" actually  
are? It sure sounds to me like he's just going off on the name of the  
features without even the slightest idea about what the features actually  
are. Why else would he put that in the same pot as binary only modules? I  
sure can't see any *actual* connection here.

MfG Kai


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]