This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 6 Feb, 2004, at 14.02, Alexander Malmberg wrote:
Ziemowit Laski wrote:typedef struct objc_super {[snip]
id self; /* Id of the object sending
the message. */
Class class; /* Object's super class.
*/
} Super, *Super_t;So, do you think it would be OK to rename 'class' above to, say, 'super_class'?
This field is used in GNUstep. What do you propose that code should do to work with both versions? Change the name only if __cplusplus is defined?
Change the name unconditionally... please? :-)
--Zem -------------------------------------------------------------- Ziemowit Laski 1 Infinite Loop, MS 301-2K Mac OS X Compiler Group Cupertino, CA USA 95014-2083 Apple Computer, Inc. +1.408.974.6229 Fax .5477
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |