This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: IA64 inline division question

From: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
To: Gerald Pfeifer <gp at suse dot de>
Cc: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Andreas Schwab<schwab at suse dot de>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 15:34:45 -0800
Subject: Re: IA64 inline division question
References: <200402051841.KAA15925@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <402299CE.3060002@redhat.com> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402052052160.23473@lifschitz.suse.de>

Gerald Pfeifer wrote:

Do we really need to care for Itanium1 in the context of GCC 3.5?

I removed brl relaxation from the linker thinking no one cared about Itanium1 performance anymore. However, H.J. readded it in October, enabled via an option. Apparently, someone does still care. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com

References:
- IA64 inline division question
  - From: Steve Ellcey
- Re: IA64 inline division question
  - From: Vladimir Makarov
- Re: IA64 inline division question
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]