This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: IA64 inline division question
- From: Gerald Pfeifer <gp at suse dot de>
- To: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Steve Ellcey <sje at cup dot hp dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 21:03:14 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Re: IA64 inline division question
- References: <200402051841.KAA15925@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <402299CE.3060002@redhat.com>
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> According to Intel's documentation of Itanium2 it should
> be fmac. So we could change it to fmac if Itanium1 has no problems.
Do we really need to care for Itanium1 in the context of GCC 3.5?
Personally, I really wouldn't care about anything older than McKinley
for GCC 3.5, but YMMV. Andreas, what do you think?
> Unfortunately I have no available Itanium1, so can not check this.
Andreas and me have.
Gerald