This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
Cc: "S. Bosscher" <S dot Bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, "'paolo dot bonzini at polimi dot it '" <paolo dot bonzini at polimi dot it>, "'gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org '" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "'kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu '" <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 06:31:08 -0800
Subject: Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
References: <4195D82C2DB1D211B9910008C7C9B06F01F3741E@lr0nt3.lr.tudelft.nl> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0402041453321.29200@wotan.suse.de> <4020FF45.9030103@gnat.com>

On Feb 4, 2004, at 06:18, Robert Dewar wrote:

It certainly seems unfortunate that tree-ssa removes a
critical (well documented :-) part of gcc functionality,
and this omission may well cause significant delays
in bringing Ada up to tree-ssa level. Are there any
other features that are being removed like this?

Should really PLACEHOLDER_EXPR be done in the front-end
and be expanded to what it really does in gimplify stage
which every other language needs to do with its language
specific trees.


Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
  - From: Robert Dewar

References:
- RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
  - From: S. Bosscher
- RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
  - From: Michael Matz
- Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged?
  - From: Robert Dewar

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]