This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: split_complex_* flaw

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:03:37 +1030
Subject: Re: split_complex_* flaw
References: <20040131104133.GC5080@bubble.modra.org> <200402010343.i113hkT33526@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20040201062920.GA2866@bubble.modra.org> <200402010648.i116mlT33284@makai.watson.ibm.com> <20040201072958.GC2866@bubble.modra.org> <20040201194601.GA3242@redhat.com> <200402012152.i11LqkT26772@makai.watson.ibm.com>

On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 04:52:46PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> Richard Henderson writes:
> Richard> Oh please.
> 	I completely agree.

I'm being ganged up on. :)  

> [snip from another email] not what IBM XLC does.

Well, that really trumps any argument I might have.

> 	Let's just follow the example of the Alpha port and implement the
> code in rs6000_va_arg() for complex.

Agreed.  Easier too.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- Re: split_complex_* flaw
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: split_complex_* flaw
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: split_complex_* flaw
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: split_complex_* flaw
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: split_complex_* flaw
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: split_complex_* flaw
  - From: David Edelsohn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]