This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Anonymous Namespaces
Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> writes:
| > On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 02:47:19AM +0100, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > > cxx_used_only_in_this_tu (tree_decl *decl)
| > > {
| > > return !TREE_PUBLIC (decl)
| > > || (cxx_no_export && declared_at_unnamed_scope (decl));
| >
| > I would resist this strongly. As a language-independent flag, TREE_PUBLIC
| > corresponds directly to "does .global need to be emitted in the assembly".
| >
| > If C++ knows that a decl cannot be referenced outside this TU, then it
| > should clear TREE_PUBLIC. Anything less is a QOI mistake.
|
| Hi,
| I am having related problem with unit-at-a-time. With -fwhole program I
| need to make functions that are public in C/C++ static for the backend.
| I am having prototype patch, but still I am holding because I am unsure
| whether clearing up TREE_PUBLIC in cgraph_optimize is TRT.
| Given that we want to declare TREE_PUBLIC to be in backend's semantic
| and make frontends to use different flag when these don't match (that is
| with -fwhole-program almost always), I think I can update the patch and
| propose it for mainline once I am done with merging the tree-SSA cgraph
| code back.
I'll hold on your patch then.
-- Gaby