gcc archive
date index for February, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

February 29, 2004
23:26 Re: Naming of functions Gabriel Dos Reis
23:05 Naming of functions Paolo Bonzini
22:35 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Al Stone
22:17 Re: __attribute__ ((regparm(...))) in function declaration and gcc3.4.0 Nicholas Nethercote
22:04 Re: information (segment 1/2) RFC-INFO Server
19:40 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Gerald Pfeifer
17:27 3.3.3 Build on MacOS X 10.2.8 George Russell
14:25 __attribute__ ((regparm(...))) in function declaration and gcc3.4.0 Serge Belyshev
13:43 Re: Turning off tree checking by default for releases Joseph S. Myers
12:12 Re: Turning off tree checking by default for releases Phil Edwards
11:20 Re: Turning off tree checking by default for releases Joseph S. Myers
09:26 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christian Joensson
09:24 Re: Can't build gcc 3.{4,5}.0 on cygwin: gcc.c:5930: undefined reference to `_mingw_scan' Christian Joensson
07:18 GCC 3.2 runs with glibc-2.2, crashes with glibc-2.3? yuvalk
06:56 Turning off tree checking by default for releases Phil Edwards
06:51 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Phil Edwards
06:48 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Kevin Atkinson
05:50 Re: RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Mark Mielke
05:05 building gcc-3.4 with mingw/msys Dave Murphy
02:40 RFC: New C++ Attribute: final Kevin Atkinson

February 28, 2004
23:25 RFC: Simplifying translate_name in prefix.c Nathanael Nerode
21:40 Why is my executabel in DOS file format? Meg Abyte
20:09 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Mike Stump
20:07 [patch] Re: recount_dominator Zdenek Dvorak
19:55 Re: How to get C++ type from tree Mike Stump
14:25 Successfully built gcc 3.3.3 on Pentium (i586) running Linux 2.6.3,Slackware 9.1, glibc 2.3.2 using gcc 3.3.2 Gabriele Inghirami
13:51 GCC bootstrap. Jose Quiroga
13:00 How to get C++ type from tree Nicolas Wiest-Daesslé
02:41 Re: Ada, gnat1 and gcc-3.4 Jim Wilson
02:38 Re: Building a Fortran Cross Compiler with Gcc-2.95.3 Jim Wilson
02:13 Re: recount_dominator Jim Wilson
01:09 Re: cutting the size of CONST_DECLs Robert Bowdidge
01:06 Re: [tree-ssa] string builtins strikes back law
00:21 Re: cutting the size of CONST_DECLs Dan Nicolaescu

February 27, 2004
23:57 Logging data structure field accesses Robert Bowdidge
22:49 cutting the size of CONST_DECLs Robert Bowdidge
22:41 Re: [lno] internal compiler error: in record_dependences_for_modify_expr, at tree-scalar-evolution.c:3236 Sebastian Pop
22:08 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Christoph Hellwig
22:04 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Arnaud Charlet
22:00 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Neil Booth
21:45 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Geoff Keating
21:15 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Neil Booth
19:10 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Guillermo Ballester Valor
18:55 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Jakub Jelinek
18:52 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? H. J. Lu
18:44 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test? law
18:41 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Daniel Berlin
18:38 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen
18:35 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? law
18:25 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test? Diego Novillo
18:17 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test? law
18:17 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Paolo Carlini
18:16 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Karel Gardas
18:15 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Randy.Dunlap
18:10 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? law
18:06 Ada, gnat1 and gcc-3.4 John R. Shannon
17:53 Re: What to call Intel ia32e processor? Randy.Dunlap
17:50 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test? Diego Novillo
17:41 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test? Joseph S. Myers
17:34 What to call Intel ia32e processor? H. J. Lu
17:28 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test? Diego Novillo
17:19 Re: gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test? Joseph S. Myers
16:52 gcc.c-torture/unsorted/pass.c: what is it supposed to test? Diego Novillo
16:12 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k. Gunther Nikl
15:34 Building a Fortran Cross Compiler with Gcc-2.95.3 aaronchiles
15:18 Re: [lno] internal compiler error: in record_dependences_for_modify_expr,at tree-scalar-evolution.c:3236 Richard Guenther
15:03 recount_dominator Joern Rennecke
14:58 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k. Ray Whitmer
11:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Richard Earnshaw
11:34 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Richard Henderson
10:26 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Richard Earnshaw
10:14 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Richard Henderson
09:52 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Richard Earnshaw
09:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Richard Earnshaw
09:14 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k. Gunther Nikl
09:08 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k. Gunther Nikl
08:28 Re: propagating mem expressions Jim Wilson
08:00 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Richard Henderson
07:52 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Richard Henderson
07:51 Re: Problems with Building a Fortran Cross Compiler Jim Wilson
07:26 Re: Relocatable Symbols in Expression Jim Wilson
03:13 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k. Jim Wilson
01:05 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen
00:47 Re: [lno] loop-optimize2 ICE Zdenek Dvorak
00:21 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa law
00:18 propagating mem expressions Mihai Burcea
00:12 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen

February 26, 2004
23:57 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created Erik Vaughn
23:50 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Gerald Pfeifer
23:47 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa law
23:34 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Geoff Keating
23:30 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen
23:26 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa law
23:20 Re: GCC 3.3 Release Series Web Page Update Gerald Pfeifer
23:20 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen
23:12 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Richard Henderson
23:08 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Richard Henderson
23:08 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen
23:06 Re: GCC 3.3 Release Series Web Page Update Joe Buck
22:52 Re: [tree-ssa] count-branch-reg optimization law
22:49 Re: GCC 3.3 Release Series Web Page Update Joe Buck
22:42 Re: IMA vs tree-ssa law
22:23 IMA vs tree-ssa Dale Johannesen
21:39 GCC 3.3 Release Series Web Page Update Erik Vaughn
21:12 Re: [lno] loop-optimize2 ICE Zdenek Dvorak
20:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan law
20:39 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan law
20:38 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan law
19:43 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer law
19:33 Re: [tree-ssa] testsuite runs with a new pass law
19:01 Re: gcc/binutils or glibc ? RELOC problem while build glibc for alpha. Balint Cristian
18:36 Re: gcc/binutils or glibc ? RELOC problem while build glibc for alpha. Richard Henderson
18:34 Re: [tree-ssa] testsuite runs with a new pass Richard Henderson
18:03 gcc/binutils or glibc ? RELOC problem while build glibc for alpha. Balint Cristian
17:54 Re: [tree-ssa] testsuite runs with a new pass Andrew MacLeod
17:43 Re: [tree-ssa] testsuite runs with a new pass Diego Novillo
17:36 [tree-ssa] testsuite runs with a new pass Andrew MacLeod
17:33 [lno] loop-optimize2 ICE Dorit Naishlos
17:21 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer Diego Novillo
17:12 Re: [lno] internal compiler error: in record_dependences_for_modify_expr,at tree-scalar-evolution.c:3236 Richard Guenther
17:06 [lno] internal compiler error: in record_dependences_for_modify_expr,at tree-scalar-evolution.c:3236 Richard Guenther
17:05 Re: GNU configure breaks on 3.4-20040218 sean darcy
16:23 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k. Ian Lance Taylor
15:38 [tree-ssa] intermodule bootstrap failure under cygwin Kelley Cook
15:35 Problems with Building a Fortran Cross Compiler aaronchiles
15:29 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k. Ray Whitmer
12:40 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k. Gunther Nikl
04:46 Relocatable Symbols in Expression Gagneet Singh
02:54 gcc 3.3.4 20040223 (prerelease) build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
02:46 Re: Error compiling gcc 3.4-20040218 on alpha ev68 osf Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
02:20 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created David O'Brien
00:27 Re: Error compiling gcc 3.4-20040218 on alpha ev68 osf Jim Wilson
00:18 Re: Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k. Jim Wilson

February 25, 2004
23:54 Re: 3.3.3: libstdc++ regression on ia64-hpux - messy EH problem -need help Zack Weinberg
23:50 Re: 3.3.3: libstdc++ regression on ia64-hpux - messy EH problem -need help Jim Wilson
22:04 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Frank Ch. Eigler
21:46 Re: RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org Gerald Pfeifer
21:35 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature Matthew Wilcox
21:01 Re: If-conversion misses many cases Jim Wilson
18:43 Re: Peeling of once rolling loops limited? Zdenek Dvorak
18:09 Peeling of once rolling loops limited? Richard Guenther
17:55 Re: does it belong to you? Support Staff
17:17 gcc-ss-3.4-20040225 is now available gccadmin
16:51 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice Ian Lance Taylor
16:46 [tree-ssa] ARM regressions with respect to trunk Richard Earnshaw
16:37 Lots of testsuite failures in optimized 3.3.3 bootstrap build Andrew Haley
16:36 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature Gabriel Dos Reis
16:27 Lots of testsuite failures in optimized 3.3.3 bootstrap build David Ronis
15:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Richard Earnshaw
15:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan David Edelsohn
15:12 Register-relative data addressing, especially m68k. Ray Whitmer
14:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Richard Earnshaw
13:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Jeff Sturm
13:48 Re: aggregate alias anomaly Jeff Sturm
13:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Diego Novillo
12:42 [tree-ssa] Branch is closed Diego Novillo
12:23 Re: testcase question (portability) Aldy Hernandez
12:06 Re: If-conversion misses many cases Jan Hoogerbrugge
10:36 Re: PGO enhancements in GCC Jan Hubicka
10:25 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Richard Earnshaw
10:23 cartridge herny_so6688
10:09 Re: PGO enhancements in GCC Andi Kleen
09:10 3.3.3: libstdc++ regression on ia64-hpux - messy EH problem - needhelp Zack Weinberg
07:23 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer Zdenek Dvorak
06:10 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature Bernd Jendrissek
04:55 Re: newbie: RTL syntax Michael Matz
03:01 Re: newbie: RTL syntax Daniel Berlin
01:54 Re: newbie: RTL syntax Dale Johannesen
01:53 Re: Problem with post_modify Jim Wilson
01:53 Re: derivation problems with templates Giovanni Bajo
01:47 Re: PGO enhancements in GCC Jim Wilson
01:43 Re: newbie: RTL syntax Mike Stump
01:38 Re: newbie: RTL syntax Jim Wilson
01:29 Re: If-conversion misses many cases Jim Wilson
01:16 Error compiling gcc 3.4-20040218 on alpha ev68 osf Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
00:59 Re: testcase question (portability) Richard Henderson
00:42 Re: testcase question (portability) Janis Johnson
00:42 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer Diego Novillo

February 24, 2004
23:44 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer Zdenek Dvorak
23:29 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer Diego Novillo
23:06 testcase question (portability) Aldy Hernandez
23:05 Re: What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch? Eric Christopher
22:45 Re: What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch? Ben Elliston
22:44 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely? Daniel Jacobowitz
22:29 Re: What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch? Eric Christopher
22:28 Re: What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch? Karel Gardas
22:26 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature Gerald Pfeifer
22:13 gcc 3.3.3 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
22:03 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer Zdenek Dvorak
21:52 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely? Kaveh R. Ghazi
21:48 Re: getting non-global variable names from RTL Jim Wilson
21:40 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely? Mike Stump
20:58 derivation problems with templates Robert Schweikert
20:28 Re: getting non-global variable names from RTL Mihai Burcea
20:00 Re: Using gcc to parse C++ sources Oscar Fuentes
19:35 GCC-3.3.3 is released Gabriel Dos Reis
19:33 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature Gabriel Dos Reis
19:09 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Segher Boessenkool
18:23 Re: Using gcc to parse C++ sources Joe Buck
18:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Diego Novillo
18:15 Re: 3.3.3 release and pgp signature Joe Buck
18:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Richard Earnshaw
18:08 Re: GCC3.3.3 announcement Joe Buck
17:58 Using gcc to parse C++ sources Juergen Graf
17:57 3.3.3 release and pgp signature Lasse Kliemann
17:29 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Diego Novillo
17:27 Re: [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Andrew Pinski
17:18 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Paul Schlie
17:07 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge plan Diego Novillo
16:51 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?) law
16:18 Re: [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer Diego Novillo
15:49 [lno] "no flow-sensitive alias info" warning to vectorizer Dorit Naishlos
13:24 Re: Rif: Re: multilibs and gcc 3.x for SuperHitachi SH Joern Rennecke
13:07 Rif: Re: multilibs and gcc 3.x for SuperHitachi SH silverio . di
13:01 Re: multilibs and gcc 3.x for SuperHitachi SH Joern Rennecke
12:31 Re: GCC3.3.3 announcement Gabriel Dos Reis
12:23 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Robert Dewar
12:08 Problem with post_modify Jon Beniston
11:55 GCC3.3.3 announcement Joerg . Richter
11:36 Re: Support for restrict Falk Hueffner
10:44 Support for restrict Jon Beniston
10:29 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs) Paolo Carlini
10:23 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs) Gabriel Dos Reis
10:07 multilibs and gcc 3.x for SuperHitachi SH silverio . di
10:00 Re: CC_MODE and cc0 Richard Earnshaw
09:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?) Steven Bosscher
08:49 Re: Can't build gcc 3.{4,5}.0 on cygwin: gcc.c:5930: undefined referenceto `_mingw_scan' Jim Wilson
08:39 Re: getting non-global variable names from RTL Jim Wilson
08:36 Re: Documentation of ".tu" file format Jim Wilson
08:27 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely? Jim Wilson
08:15 Re: GNU configure breaks on 3.4-20040218 Jim Wilson
06:25 Re: ICE in gcc-3.4-20040218 for arm-iwmmxt-linux-gcc with -M and -include Andrew Pinski
06:19 ICE in gcc-3.4-20040218 for arm-iwmmxt-linux-gcc with -M and -include Dan Kegel
05:39 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs) law
04:43 RE: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice Sanjiv Gupta
04:28 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice Zack Weinberg
04:00 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?) law
03:39 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice Alexandre Oliva
02:30 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related Jim Wilson
01:42 PGO enhancements in GCC Vincent Diepeveen
01:15 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice Daniel Jacobowitz
00:24 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related H. J. Lu

February 23, 2004
23:45 Re: CC_MODE and cc0 Richard Henderson
23:43 Re: CC_MODE and cc0 Zack Weinberg
23:24 Re: CC_MODE and cc0 Kazu Hirata
23:23 Re: PATCH: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.4 Richard Henderson
23:18 PATCH: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.4 H. J. Lu
22:57 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice Zack Weinberg
22:47 Re: Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice Phil Edwards
22:26 two more test results for 3.3.3 Joe Buck
21:32 Multilibs - how to avoid building the default one twice Zack Weinberg
21:09 Fwd: Re: your mail kripa shankar
19:45 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related Jim Wilson
19:40 newbie: RTL syntax Iman Narasamdya
19:21 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Joe Buck
18:17 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?) Richard Guenther
18:08 MODE_CC migration experience on h8300 port Kazu Hirata
18:00 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Richard Guenther
17:23 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Robert Dewar
17:23 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: Nosuch file or directory Bauke van Dijk
17:19 gcc-ss-3.3-20040223 is now available gccadmin
16:56 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Giovanni Bajo
16:48 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Robert Dewar
16:44 Re: your mail Michael Matz
16:36 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?),huge compile time regression Diego Novillo
16:06 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Richard Guenther
16:03 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?), hugecompile time regression Richard Guenther
15:55 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Falk Hueffner
15:53 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?), huge compile time regression law
15:49 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Andrew Pinski
15:48 Re: unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Richard Guenther
15:42 unsigned / double propagation weirdness? Richard Guenther
15:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?),huge compile time regression Diego Novillo
15:20 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?),huge compile time regression Diego Novillo
15:02 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?) Diego Novillo
15:01 Re: [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?), hugecompile time regression Richard Guenther
14:34 [tree-ssa] Miscompilation (SIGSEGV) with -ffast-math (!?) Richard Guenther
09:30 If-conversion misses many cases Jan Hoogerbrugge
07:08 Re: Move rest_of_handle_ branch_prob before GCSE Zdenek Dvorak
04:43 Re: Deprecate -fpack-struct for C++? Mark Mitchell
02:06 RE: Move rest_of_handle_ branch_prob before GCSE Qiong Cai
00:00 3.3.4 20040216 (prerelease) build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.

February 22, 2004
21:09 Re: Filter for warning Sébastien Miguet
20:34 Re: getting non-global variable names from RTL Josef Zlomek
20:11 Can't build gcc 3.{4,5}.0 on cygwin: gcc.c:5930: undefined reference to `_mingw_scan' Christian Joensson
19:41 Re: RS6000_MCOUNT and -fpic gp
18:55 Re: Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely? Bradley Lucier
16:49 Re: GNU configure breaks on 3.4-20040218 sean darcy
13:20 Does running a parallel "make -jN check" work safely? Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:38 Re: GNU configure breaks on 3.4-20040218 Eric Christopher
08:08 Successful bootstrap of gcc 3.3.3 on powerpc-yellowdog-linux-gnu Joshua Michael Root
02:58 GNU configure breaks on 3.4-20040218 sean darcy

February 21, 2004
23:44 GCC-3.3.4 Release Status Gabriel Dos Reis
23:38 gcc-3_3-branch unfrozen Gabriel Dos Reis
23:29 Re: build results for gcc-3.3.3 Gabriel Dos Reis
22:09 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related H. J. Lu
22:01 Re: A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots Jamie Lokier
18:26 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target. Karel Gardas
15:57 A problem with the gcc-patches web archives -- please read Jason Molenda
09:14 Re: ObjC++ Eric Christopher
09:06 Re: ObjC++ Ziemowit Laski
08:36 Re: ObjC++ Eric Christopher
08:33 Re: IA64 compilation failure Jim Wilson
08:22 ObjC++ Marian Krivos
04:19 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
03:26 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
02:44 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
01:36 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
01:11 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related Jim Wilson
00:56 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
00:49 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
00:10 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
00:06 getting non-global variable names from RTL Mihai Burcea
00:03 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
00:02 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
00:00 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo

February 20, 2004
23:56 Re: PCH vs. type canonicalization Jason Merrill
23:51 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
23:50 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target. Jim Wilson
23:49 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
23:45 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
23:44 Re: RS6000_MCOUNT and -fpic Jim Wilson
23:44 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
23:38 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
23:12 Re: PCH vs. type canonicalization Geoff Keating
23:07 Re: PCH vs. type canonicalization David Edelsohn
23:04 PCH vs. type canonicalization Jason Merrill
22:14 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
22:10 Re: AIX Tree-SSA bootstrap failure Richard Henderson
21:35 gcc 3.4.0 20040218 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
21:33 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
21:09 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
21:06 Re: AIX Tree-SSA bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
20:50 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
20:40 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
20:31 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
20:31 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
20:28 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
20:13 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
20:08 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
20:06 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
20:03 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
19:59 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
19:57 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
19:56 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
19:47 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
19:45 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
19:45 Documentation of ".tu" file format Richard Brooksby
19:43 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port Jim Wilson
19:24 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
19:07 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
19:05 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
18:55 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Diego Novillo
18:37 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christopher Faylor
18:36 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christopher Faylor
18:33 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
18:25 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Rainer Orth
18:24 Re: RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org Gabriel Dos Reis
18:22 Re: RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org Gabriel Dos Reis
18:18 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
18:17 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Rainer Orth
18:13 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
18:11 Re: RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org Phil Edwards
18:07 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
18:06 Re: RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org Joe Buck
18:04 build results for gcc-3.3.3 Joe Buck
17:54 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
17:50 Re: [ tree-ssa] PRE problem Daniel Berlin
17:44 [ tree-ssa] PRE problem law
17:09 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christopher Faylor
17:08 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christopher Faylor
16:40 Announcing new libobjc maintainers Gerald Pfeifer
15:21 RFC: release script and ftp.gnu.org Gabriel Dos Reis
15:02 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs) law
14:19 Re: [Ada] ACATS progress between 3.3.3 and 3.4 Arnaud Charlet
14:05 Re: [Ada] ACATS progress between 3.3.3 and 3.4 Rolf Ebert
13:36 Re: [Ada] ACATS progress between 3.3.3 and 3.4 Arnaud Charlet
12:27 [Ada] ACATS progress between 3.3.3 and 3.4 Rolf Ebert
10:25 VIRUS in message to DAVY quarantined Quarantine
10:08 RE: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Rupert Wood
09:06 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Kai Henningsen
08:03 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs) Richard Henderson
07:26 Re: A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots Edward S. Peschko
06:05 Re: A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots Ranjit Mathew
03:06 Re: A thought about cc0 migration. (Re: How aggressive is CSE about Kazu Hirata
03:03 implicit type casts in C front end Vas Litvinov
02:51 Deprecate -fpack-struct for C++? Giovanni Bajo
01:58 Re: IA64 compilation failure Jim Wilson
01:30 Re: gcc-3.3.x compiling bug Jim Wilson
01:23 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port Jim Wilson
00:48 Re: compilation error Jim Wilson
00:43 Re: Filter for warning Jim Wilson

February 19, 2004
23:17 Re: two-element struct performance (was: strict-aliasing and typedefs) law
23:02 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target. Alan Modra
22:53 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target. Alan Modra
21:49 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Geoff Keating
21:49 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port Dale Johannesen
21:49 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target. Karel Gardas
21:45 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port Jim Wilson
19:43 RS6000_MCOUNT and -fpic gp
18:58 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file cgd
18:33 [attn Steering Committee] proposed message to assign@gnu.org Nathanael Nerode
18:23 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Joe Buck
18:08 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Nathanael Nerode
17:52 Re: A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots Richard Guenther
17:51 Re: AIX Tree-SSA bootstrap failure law
17:37 Re: A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots Joe Buck
17:35 AIX Tree-SSA bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
17:18 gcc 3.3.2 build on alphaev68-dec-osf5.1 Stefano Curtarolo, Ph.D.
16:59 Re: Bugzilla and LNO Devang Patel
16:50 Re: using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps Tom Tromey
16:25 Bugzilla and LNO Giovanni Bajo
16:13 Re: Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target. Andrew Pinski
16:00 Bootstrap failure on gcc-3_4-branch for powerpc-eabisim target. Karel Gardas
15:43 Re: gcc-3.3.3 status? Richard Earnshaw
15:40 RE: gcc-3.3.3 status? Dave Murphy
15:33 A request for GCC 3.5 snapshots Kelley Cook
15:26 Re: [lno] Reuse analysis? Daniel Berlin
15:16 gcc-3.3.x compiling bug silverio . di
15:13 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function? Ian Lance Taylor
15:06 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function? Richard Earnshaw
14:43 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function? Ian Lance Taylor
14:11 [lno] Reuse analysis? Zdenek Dvorak
13:41 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Rainer Orth
11:17 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function? Richard Earnshaw
10:07 Re: Ada multilib (was: committed: merge with libada-branch) Joseph S. Myers
08:58 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Phil Edwards
08:43 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port Mostafa Hagog
08:34 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ? Gábor Lóki
08:32 Ada multilib (was: committed: merge with libada-branch) Laurent GUERBY
08:32 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ? Gábor Lóki
07:42 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christian Joensson
07:21 Re: aggregate alias anomaly Dan Nicolaescu
05:40 Re: aggregate alias anomaly Andrew Pinski
05:15 aggregate alias anomaly Jeff Sturm
05:01 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Nathanael Nerode
04:50 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function? Ian Lance Taylor
04:45 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function? Richard Henderson
04:36 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Richard Kenner
04:31 Re: using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
03:11 Re: using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps law
02:44 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function? Zack Weinberg
02:22 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Nathanael Nerode
02:13 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Nathanael Nerode
01:45 Re: Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function? Richard Henderson
01:08 Re: using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
01:02 IA64 compilation failure Steve Ellcey
00:29 Re: A thought about cc0 migration. (Re: How aggressive is CSE about Ulrich Weigand
00:20 Re: ICE with -M and -include Serge Belyshev

February 18, 2004
23:16 Why is targetm.fixed_condition_code_regs a function? Zack Weinberg
23:09 Re: ICE with -M and -include Eric Christopher
23:01 ICE with -M and -include Serge Belyshev
23:00 Re: CC_MODE and cc0 Zack Weinberg
22:30 Re: CC_MODE and cc0 Kazu Hirata
22:07 Re: CC_MODE and cc0 Paul Koning
21:30 Re: using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps law
21:08 Re: Basic block counts? Jim Wilson
20:40 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ? Daniel Berlin
20:19 GCC 3.3.3: Successful build and installation on GNU/Linux PowerPC Luca Saiu
20:05 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ? Jim Wilson
19:58 Re: Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port Jim Wilson
19:29 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization Daniel Berlin
19:03 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization Devang Patel
18:59 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization Richard Henderson
18:53 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization Daniel Berlin
18:47 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization Zdenek Dvorak
18:44 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization Devang Patel
18:43 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization Devang Patel
17:52 gcc-ss-3.4-20040218 is now available gccadmin
17:44 Re: [Steering] ObjC Maintainership Gerald Pfeifer
16:43 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ? Joern Rennecke
16:21 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Robert Dewar
14:10 Re: building a basic global function call Adam Treat
13:31 [Steering] ObjC Maintainership David Ayers
10:02 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ? Gábor Lóki
07:58 Re: Who has the authority to set the target milestone on a bug? Giovanni Bajo
05:29 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization Richard Henderson
05:03 compilation error sandeep
04:59 using distcc to speed up GCC bootstraps Alexandre Oliva
04:32 Re: [lno] copy header and vectorization Daniel Berlin
04:16 [lno] copy header and vectorization Devang Patel
02:50 Re: Who has the authority to set the target milestone on a bug? Joe Buck
02:49 Re: Who has the authority to set the target milestone on a bug? Eric Christopher
02:21 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC Jim Wilson
02:14 Who has the authority to set the target milestone on a bug? David Daney
01:01 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC Mike Stump
00:50 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC Matt Austern
00:18 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC Jim Wilson

February 17, 2004
23:47 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC Matt Austern
23:44 Re: c-torture/execute/990208-1.c XPASSes - remove XFAIL? Richard Henderson
23:39 Re: doubt regarding ppc_405-gcc compiler Jim Wilson
23:31 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC Jim Wilson
23:06 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC Matt Austern
23:05 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ? Joern Rennecke
22:38 Re: 3.4 does not bootstrap on fedora Andrew Pinski
22:35 3.4 does not bootstrap on fedora Per Bothner
22:20 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC Geoff Keating
22:00 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ? Jan Hubicka
21:59 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Matthias Klose
21:59 Re: LIBGCC_SPEC Jim Wilson
21:49 Re: building a basic global function call Jim Wilson
21:30 Re: c-torture/execute/990208-1.c XPASSes - remove XFAIL? Jim Wilson
21:18 Re: Factoring algorithms on rtl ? Jim Wilson
20:26 Filter for warning Sébastien Miguet
19:34 Re: problem with call clobbered regs Jim Wilson
17:43 Split edge fails when performed on a doloop jump on x86 port Mostafa Hagog
17:41 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12] David Daney
17:08 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12] Joe Buck
16:26 Re: ifcvt compile-time performance issue law
16:05 Re: gcc-3.3.3 status? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:38 Basic block counts? Jan Hoogerbrugge
15:27 Re: gcc-3.3.3 status? Richard Earnshaw
15:21 Re: gcc-3.3.3 status? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:35 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Rainer Orth
14:32 Re: problem with call clobbered regs Daniel Bayer
14:18 doubt regarding ppc_405-gcc compiler embo holic
14:00 Re: ifcvt compile-time performance issue Bernd Schmidt
13:36 Re: gcc-3.3.3 status? Richard Earnshaw
13:33 gcc-3.3.3 status? Richard Earnshaw
13:33 gcc-3.3.3 status? Richard Earnshaw
13:32 gcc-3.3.3 status? Richard Earnshaw
12:14 Factoring algorithms on rtl ? Gábor Lóki
10:47 Re: What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch? Eric Christopher
10:27 What's wrong with mips-elf on gcc3.4.x branch? Karel Gardas
08:25 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Kai Henningsen
07:12 c-torture/execute/990208-1.c XPASSes - remove XFAIL? Zack Weinberg

February 16, 2004
23:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Too conservative optimization with global variables?? law
23:27 ifcvt compile-time performance issue law
22:10 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12] Giovanni Bajo
22:06 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12] Florian Weimer
22:01 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12] David Daney
21:53 Re: Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12] Florian Weimer
21:34 Possible new[] regression in 3.4 WRT 3.3.[12] David Daney
20:40 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
19:56 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Eric Christopher
19:34 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file law
18:40 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Geoff Keating
17:38 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful Jamie Lokier
17:37 gcc-ss-3.3-20040216 is now available gccadmin
17:14 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful Jamie Lokier
16:30 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful Mat Hostetter
16:22 Re: A thought about cc0 migration. (Re: How aggressive is CSE about Joern Rennecke
16:20 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Daniel Berlin
16:14 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Daniel Berlin
16:11 Re: New branch (tree-profling-branch) Gerald Pfeifer
15:35 Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu on 3.4 branch Volker Reichelt
15:05 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful Jakub Jelinek
14:56 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful Mat Hostetter
14:46 A thought about cc0 migration. (Re: How aggressive is CSE aboutremoving redundant CC sets?) Kazu Hirata
13:37 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Richard Earnshaw
13:01 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Andrew Pinski
12:44 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Giovanni Bajo
11:44 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful Richard Earnshaw
11:20 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Richard Earnshaw
11:15 New branch (tree-profling-branch) Jan Hubicka
09:13 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Phil Edwards
09:02 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file law
08:29 Re: Your change to sdbout.c Zack Weinberg
07:36 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Phil Edwards
06:04 Re: __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful Richard Henderson
04:40 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssa merge? Geoff Keating
03:45 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE Richard Henderson
03:33 Re: [PATCH] GCC Warning Options Documentation James Morrison
03:05 __attribute__((naked) on x86 would be useful Mat Hostetter
02:27 [PATCH] GCC Warning Options Documentation Stephan T. Lavavej

February 15, 2004
23:48 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE Diego Novillo
23:43 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE Richard Henderson
22:46 building a basic global function call Adam Treat
22:01 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE Diego Novillo
21:28 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssa merge? Alexandre Oliva
20:07 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE Diego Novillo
18:51 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssamerge? Andreas Jaeger
18:34 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
18:09 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE Gabriel Dos Reis
17:42 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE Richard Henderson
17:30 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssamerge? Paul Schlie
17:19 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssamerge? Paul Schlie
17:11 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssamerge? Andreas Jaeger
17:07 Re: backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssa merge? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:47 backport 3.4 <- 3.5 after today's freeze, but prior to ssa merge? Paul Schlie
16:29 Re: [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE Diego Novillo
14:54 Failure linking gengtype when using non-GCC stage1 compiler Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:58 Your change to sdbout.c Richard Kenner
12:19 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator Paolo Bonzini
10:04 Re: GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC Eric Botcazou
08:09 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christian Joensson
08:04 [RFH] [tree-ssa] disabling lowering for &a->b causes ICE Andrew Pinski
07:02 Re: GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC Eric Botcazou
03:12 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets? Kazu Hirata
02:28 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Richard Henderson
02:27 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets? Ulrich Weigand
01:58 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets? Kazu Hirata

February 14, 2004
23:27 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) oni586-suse-linux-gnu Gerald Pfeifer
23:07 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Florian Weimer
21:48 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Daniel Berlin
21:48 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Daniel Berlin
21:37 Re: GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC Gerald Pfeifer
21:28 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:22 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Paolo Carlini
19:19 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets? Ulrich Weigand
17:33 Re: Including GMP as an upstream package (was problems building fortran) Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:59 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Marc Espie
13:30 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christian Joensson
13:24 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christian Joensson
07:53 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Eric Botcazou
05:16 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets? Kazu Hirata
04:51 Re: GCC feature request: warn on "if (function_name)" Andrew Pinski
04:47 GCC feature request: warn on "if (function_name)" Jamie Lokier
04:17 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Alexandre Oliva
04:15 Re: How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets? Ian Lance Taylor
02:55 How aggressive is CSE about removing redundant CC sets? Kazu Hirata

February 13, 2004
23:18 LIBGCC_SPEC Matt Austern
23:13 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Joseph S. Myers
23:09 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Gerald Pfeifer
22:46 Re: -ffixed-di vs. strlen Richard Henderson
22:23 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Paolo Carlini
22:22 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:22 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:21 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:16 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Daniel Berlin
22:05 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Gerald Pfeifer
22:00 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Daniel Berlin
21:59 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC) Rainer Orth
21:41 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Stan Shebs
21:07 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs Mark Mitchell
20:56 Re: What's gcc-prs for?!? Gerald Pfeifer
20:20 What's gcc-prs for?!? Paolo Carlini
20:17 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} Gabriel Dos Reis
20:11 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Phil Edwards
20:04 Re: -shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc Zack Weinberg
20:04 Re: -ffixed-di vs. strlen Ian Lance Taylor
20:03 Re: typedefs and attribute aligned in gcc-3.3.3 Graeme Peterson
19:57 Re: -ffixed-di vs. strlen Richard Henderson
19:53 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} Jan Hubicka
19:52 Re: -shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc Matt Austern
19:48 Re: -shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc Zack Weinberg
19:47 Re: -shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc Richard Henderson
19:44 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Geoff Keating
19:41 Re: typedefs and attribute aligned in gcc-3.3.3 Gabriel Dos Reis
19:40 Re: -ffixed-di vs. strlen Ian Lance Taylor
19:34 -shared-libgcc vs -static-libgcc Matt Austern
19:33 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs Zack Weinberg
19:31 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
19:31 Criteria for performing Ada-included bootstraps Zack Weinberg
19:22 Re: typedefs and attribute aligned in gcc-3.3.3 Giovanni Bajo
19:17 Re: -ffixed-di vs. strlen Richard Henderson
19:06 typedefs and attribute aligned in gcc-3.3.3 Graeme Peterson
18:58 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Alexandre Oliva
18:51 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-02-05) Mark Mitchell
18:42 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel Zack Weinberg
18:27 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs Tom Tromey
17:30 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs Giovanni Bajo
16:25 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs Ian Lance Taylor
16:13 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs Richard Earnshaw
16:01 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator Douglas Gregor
15:59 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs Ian Lance Taylor
15:55 Re: Using bugzilla to track XFAILs Joseph S. Myers
14:35 RE: Exception Handling Bug with Purify Dana, Eric
14:28 Using bugzilla to track XFAILs Giovanni Bajo
14:26 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator Gabriel Dos Reis
14:25 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator Gabriel Dos Reis
14:23 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator Gabriel Dos Reis
13:20 [tree-ssa] Mainline merge as of 2004-02-11 Diego Novillo
12:03 Re: problem with call clobbered regs Daniel Bayer
12:01 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christian Joensson
11:26 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} Jan Hubicka
11:16 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Gerald Pfeifer
11:13 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Joseph S. Myers
11:04 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Robert Dewar
10:52 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Gerald Pfeifer
10:36 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC) Arnaud Charlet
10:36 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Joseph S. Myers
09:41 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Gerald Pfeifer
09:36 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} John Vickers
08:59 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel Olivier Hainque
08:20 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC) Arnaud Charlet
06:44 re: Exception Handling Bug with Purify Dan Kegel
06:05 [Darwin] enable linkonce support Matt Austern
04:35 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} Daniel Berlin
03:34 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} law
02:54 Re: gcj vs. SIGSEGV Jeff Sturm
01:05 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} John Vickers
01:03 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} Daniel Berlin
01:02 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} Giovanni Bajo
01:00 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} Eric Christopher
00:56 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} John Vickers
00:52 Re: Using precompiled headers with gcc? Eric Christopher
00:43 Re: Using precompiled headers with gcc? Totte Karlsson
00:41 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} Giovanni Bajo
00:41 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} Zack Weinberg
00:33 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} Mike Stump
00:27 Re: 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} Mike Stump
00:23 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel Zack Weinberg
00:08 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel Arnaud Charlet
00:01 Re: Using precompiled headers with gcc? Geoff Keating

February 12, 2004
23:52 Re: Adding assembly after end of functions in GCC-3.4 Jim Wilson
23:49 Re: Exception Handling Bug with Purify Jim Wilson
23:47 Re: setjmp() and longjmp() from threads Jim Wilson
23:37 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Zack Weinberg
23:31 Re: problem with call clobbered regs Jim Wilson
23:01 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC) Rainer Orth
23:00 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC) Gerald Pfeifer
22:56 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC) Rainer Orth
22:50 Using precompiled headers with gcc? Totte Karlsson
22:33 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Kai Henningsen
22:15 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Joern Rennecke
21:56 100x -O0 Compile Time Regression {3.2,3.3} -> {3.4,3.5} John Vickers
21:56 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Joern Rennecke
20:44 Re: GCC 3.3.2: Some bug in the preprocessor? Denis Zaitsev
20:37 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel Laurent GUERBY
20:34 Re: Mention intermodule in changes.html Gerald Pfeifer
20:34 Re: GCC 3.3.2: Some bug in the preprocessor? Zack Weinberg
20:30 GCC 3.3.2: Some bug in the preprocessor? Denis Zaitsev
20:06 -ffixed-di vs. strlen Ian Lance Taylor
20:05 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Gerald Pfeifer
19:58 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Mark Mitchell
19:51 Re: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Joseph S. Myers
19:41 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch? Ian Lance Taylor
19:37 Re: [tree-ssa] Heads up. Branch will freeze Feb/15. Diego Novillo
19:30 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-02-05) Giovanni Bajo
19:30 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch? Giovanni Bajo
19:27 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel Geoff Keating
19:15 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related Gerald Pfeifer
19:11 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel Zack Weinberg
19:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Heads up. Branch will freeze Feb/15. Richard Guenther
19:03 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel Paolo Bonzini
19:01 Fw: Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Paolo Bonzini
18:23 Copyright assignments and the MAINTAINERS file Mark Mitchell
18:22 Re: How can I release every memory that gcc holds? Zack Weinberg
18:18 Re: [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel Zack Weinberg
17:55 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch? Gabriel Dos Reis
17:53 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
17:45 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Alexandre Oliva
17:28 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch? Ian Lance Taylor
16:55 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch? Giovanni Bajo
16:52 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Robert Dewar
16:51 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch? Mark Mitchell
16:38 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Robert Dewar
16:29 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Jan Hubicka
16:26 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Matt Fago
16:18 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Jan Hubicka
16:14 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Robert Dewar
15:51 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC) Arnaud Charlet
15:46 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Matt Fago
15:41 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC) Gerald Pfeifer
15:41 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch? Ian Lance Taylor
15:40 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Robert Dewar
15:29 [RFC] Move --enable-languages logic to the toplevel Paolo Bonzini
15:23 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Matt Fago
15:11 Re: Including GMP as an upstream package (was problems buildingfortran) Roger Sayle
14:30 Re: compiler performance Gareth McCaughan
14:21 Adding assembly after end of functions in GCC-3.4 Etienne Lorrain
13:02 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps? Diego Novillo
12:40 Re: [tree-ssa] Heads up. Branch will freeze Feb/15. Diego Novillo
11:58 RE: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Konark Goel, Noida
11:35 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Jan Hubicka
11:23 RE: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Konark Goel, Noida
10:43 Re: gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Jan Hubicka
10:30 gcc loop unrolling problem ?? Konark Goel, Noida
10:28 How can I release every memory that gcc holds? Hee Jeong
10:22 [tree-ssa] problems building fortran Richard Earnshaw
10:04 Re: problem with call clobbered regs Daniel Bayer
09:26 RE: Unable to reload subreg René Willemink
09:11 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christian Joensson
09:02 Re: profile-guided optimization Jan Hubicka
07:49 Re: How do we run autoconf for the top-level configure.in? Zack Weinberg
07:19 How do we run autoconf for the top-level configure.in? Kazu Hirata
05:03 Re: Should the patch for PR inline-asm/6162 go into 3.4? Mark Mitchell
03:24 Re: Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch? Mark Mitchell
03:08 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps? Rajeev Joshi
03:05 Mention intermodule in changes.html Ian Lance Taylor
03:04 profile-guided optimization Qiong Cai
03:01 Re: problem with call clobbered regs Jim Wilson
02:55 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps? Robert Dewar
02:53 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps? Jim Wilson
02:24 Re: IA64 inline division question Jim Wilson
02:11 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps? Diego Novillo
01:54 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps? Joseph S. Myers
01:21 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps? Ian Lance Taylor
01:21 Re: Generating object files from translation unit dumps? Diego Novillo
01:11 Generating object files from translation unit dumps? Rajeev Joshi
00:54 Re: Should the patch for PR inline-asm/6162 go into 3.4? Ian Lance Taylor
00:51 Re: Should the patch for PR inline-asm/6162 go into 3.4? Giovanni Bajo
00:39 Re: IA64 inline division question Steve Ellcey

February 11, 2004
23:59 Should patches for PR target/1532 go on 3.4 branch? Ian Lance Taylor
23:15 Re: compiler performance Felix Lee
22:47 Re: compiler performance Kaveh R. Ghazi
22:14 Re: File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
22:01 Re: File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Ian Lance Taylor
21:54 Re: File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
21:54 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Gerald Pfeifer
21:42 Should the patch for PR inline-asm/6162 go into 3.4? Ian Lance Taylor
21:06 Re: File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Ian Lance Taylor
20:56 Re: File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
20:11 Re: PATCH: for cpp breakage in gcc cvs head Per Bothner
20:06 File permissions in GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease John Marshall
19:27 Re: compiler performance Robert Dewar
19:25 re: Exception Handling Bug with Purify Vikram Anantha
19:16 Re: compiler performance Felix Lee
19:13 Re: compiler performance Richard Guenther
18:51 RE: Unable to reload subreg Jim Wilson
18:37 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Laurent GUERBY
18:01 Re: PATCH: for cpp breakage in gcc cvs head Zack Weinberg
17:35 Re: compiler performance Robert Dewar
17:34 Re: compiler performance Robert Dewar
17:22 Re: compiler performance Dara Hazeghi
17:22 gcc-ss-3.4-20040211 is now available gccadmin
17:21 Re: Complicated dg test cases Segher Boessenkool
17:14 RTTI Enhancement Feature Davy Durham
17:08 PATCH: for cpp breakage in gcc cvs head Per Bothner
17:02 Re: compiler performance Robert Dewar
16:15 Re: [tree-ssa] ccp/aliasing problem Andrew Pinski
16:10 compiler performance Danny Angelo
15:56 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
15:51 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
15:51 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
15:42 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
15:21 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Alexandre Oliva
14:59 Re: Going on vacation Phil Edwards
14:05 [tree-ssa] Can not compile correctly on ia64 with -O1 option. Feng Wang
13:00 Re: [tree-ssa] ccp/aliasing problem Diego Novillo
12:38 Re: "Documentation by paper" Jamie Lokier
12:31 Re: "Documentation by paper" Jamie Lokier
11:45 setjmp() and longjmp() from threads Bhaskara Narasimha Raju Dantul
10:38 Disable checking in CSiBE Arpad Beszedes
10:22 Ihre Zukunft ?? hostup . 24
10:16 Ihre Zukunft ?? hostup . 24
10:07 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
10:04 problem with call clobbered regs Daniel Bayer
09:59 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Ulrich Weigand
08:35 RE: Unable to reload subreg René Willemink
08:15 Re: va_start still... [and again] with test case: Zack Weinberg
07:50 va_start still... [and again] with test case: Ingo Krabbe
07:43 Re: Retargetting GCC - Document Dan Kegel
07:32 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Arnaud Charlet
03:10 Re: Going on vacation Daniel Berlin
03:01 Going on vacation Nathanael Nerode
02:26 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Giovanni Bajo
01:48 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Marc Espie
01:18 [tree-ssa] Heads up. Branch will freeze Feb/15. Diego Novillo
00:45 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Robert M. Stockmann
00:26 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Zack Weinberg
00:19 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Joseph S. Myers
00:10 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Arnaud Charlet
00:08 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Arnaud Charlet

February 10, 2004
23:52 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Marc Espie
23:48 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Andrew Pinski
23:46 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Arnaud Charlet
23:45 Re: Retargetting GCC - Document Joe Buck
23:43 Re: Unable to reload subreg Jim Wilson
23:38 Re: Retargetting GCC - Document Joseph S. Myers
23:33 Re: How to disanle optimizations Jim Wilson
23:31 Re: Retargetting GCC - Document Jim Wilson
23:29 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Andrew Pinski
23:27 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Joel Sherrill
23:14 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa law
22:54 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Toon Moene
22:42 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Zack Weinberg
22:30 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Daniel Jacobowitz
21:35 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Laurent GUERBY
21:15 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Zack Weinberg
21:11 GCC FP code regressions on i386? Alexander Kabaev
21:00 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
20:52 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Andrew Pinski
20:51 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
20:50 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Henderson
20:49 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Ian Lance Taylor
20:49 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joern Rennecke
20:44 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Kenner
20:43 Re: gcj vs. SIGSEGV Dr. Franz Fehringer
20:41 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Laurent GUERBY
20:41 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
20:39 Re: C++ Language Lawyer Question Joel Sherrill
20:31 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
20:28 Re: Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC Jan Hubicka
20:18 Re: Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC Vladimir Makarov
20:16 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Joseph S. Myers
20:11 Re: C++ Language Lawyer Question Gabriel Dos Reis
20:10 Re: Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC Vladimir Makarov
20:09 Re: C++ Language Lawyer Question Gabriel Dos Reis
20:09 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Kenner
20:07 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Kenner
20:06 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
20:05 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Zack Weinberg
20:00 Re: [lno] ICE in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:545 Zdenek Dvorak
20:00 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Daniel Jacobowitz
19:57 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
19:56 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Zack Weinberg
19:51 Re: "Documentation by paper" Kai Henningsen
19:51 Re: "Documentation by paper" Kai Henningsen
19:51 Re: "Documentation by paper" Kai Henningsen
19:49 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Kenner
19:46 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Kenner
19:43 Re: C++ Language Lawyer Question Giovanni Bajo
19:42 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
19:40 Re: C++ Language Lawyer Question Eric Christopher
19:36 Re: committed: merge with libada-branch Laurent GUERBY
19:34 C++ Language Lawyer Question Joel Sherrill
19:34 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
18:58 Superblock Scheduling Alg in GCC Ghassan Shobaki
18:49 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Kenner
18:48 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Kenner
18:45 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
18:44 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
18:35 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Henderson
18:26 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Kenner
18:23 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
18:14 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Henderson
18:06 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Kenner
17:59 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
17:47 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Kenner
16:55 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
16:44 Re: Move rest_of_handle_ branch)prob before GCSE Jan Hubicka
16:30 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Richard Kenner
16:28 Re: Useless test in gen_binary Richard Kenner
16:09 Re: RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
16:03 RFC: merging MEM_ATTRS Joern Rennecke
15:55 Re: [lno] ICE in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:545 Richard Guenther
15:54 Useless test in gen_binary Bonzini
15:41 [lno] ICE in tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:545 Richard Guenther
15:31 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
15:30 Unable to reload subreg René Willemink
15:27 Re: GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Giovanni Bajo
15:13 GCC-3.3.3 second prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
11:06 gcj vs. SIGSEGV Andrew Haley
10:36 Re: Integrating libada branch Arnaud Charlet
09:37 Re: Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christian Joensson
09:29 Re: Possibly bogus `invalid operands to binary &' Bonzini
08:58 How to disanle optimizations Petar Penchev
07:48 gcj vs. SIGSEGV Dr. Franz Fehringer
06:58 Possibly bogus `invalid operands to binary &' Andrew Morton
05:37 Re: cpp breakage in gcc cvs head Alexandre Oliva
03:53 Move rest_of_handle_ branch)prob before GCSE Qiong Cai

February 09, 2004
23:12 Re: Integrating libada branch Jim Wilson
23:11 Re: Integrating libada branch Kelley Cook
23:09 Re: Integrating libada branch Kelley Cook
22:35 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c DJ Delorie
19:44 Re: Complicated dg test cases Michael Matz
19:12 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
19:05 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:59 Re: "Documentation by paper" Paul Koning
18:55 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:54 Re: "Documentation by paper" Zack Weinberg
18:52 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:45 Re: "Documentation by paper" Zack Weinberg
18:39 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
18:37 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:34 Re: "Documentation by paper" Zack Weinberg
18:28 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
18:26 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
18:20 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
18:14 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
18:14 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
18:07 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
17:53 Re: "Documentation by paper" Jamie Lokier
17:50 Re: [tree-ssa] Bug in jump threading law
17:49 Another bootstrap failure on powerpc64 Josef Zlomek
17:44 Re: Complicated dg test cases Janis Johnson
17:19 Re: Complicated dg test cases Segher Boessenkool
17:19 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
17:17 gcc-ss-3.3-20040209 is now available gccadmin
17:00 Re: Complicated dg test cases Zack Weinberg
16:45 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
16:31 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Gerald Pfeifer
16:28 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
16:25 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
15:25 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Paul Brook
14:57 Re: Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be doneon 3.2.x? Michael Matz
14:57 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
14:45 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Jonathan Thornburg
14:44 Re: Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be done on 3.2.x? Giovanni Bajo
14:40 Re: Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be doneon 3.2.x? Kriang Lerdsuwanakij
14:35 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Joern Rennecke
14:18 Re: Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be doneon 3.2.x? Michael Matz
13:55 Re: Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be done on 3.2.x? Gabriel Dos Reis
11:58 Re: Complicated dg test cases Segher Boessenkool
11:55 Re: Complicated dg test cases Dan Kegel
11:46 Re: Complicated dg test cases Segher Boessenkool
11:24 Re: Complicated dg test cases Dan Kegel
11:05 Can PR c++/3905 (sizeof on function call in template) be done on3.2.x? Michael Matz
06:29 Re: question about the usage of DECL_INCOMING_RTL in a stack-smashingprotector Hiroaki Etoh
03:22 Re: cpp breakage in gcc cvs head Andrew Morton
02:30 PR 14042: C++ abstraction penalty (tree-ssa regression/opportunity) Timothy J. Wood
02:29 Re: cpp breakage in gcc cvs head Per Bothner
01:47 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti

February 08, 2004
12:31 Re: GCC, Opteron and IA64 Andreas Jaeger
12:10 Re: Programs compiled with "-fPIE" + "-pie" seg fault on sparc-linux [testcase]. Petter Reinholdtsen
12:01 Re: Integrating libada branch Arnaud Charlet
11:56 GCC, Opteron and IA64 (was [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa) Laurent GUERBY
11:10 Re: cpp breakage in gcc cvs head Neil Booth
10:56 cpp breakage in gcc cvs head Andrew Morton
10:51 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Robert Dewar
06:23 Re: "Documentation by paper" Jamie Lokier
03:18 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Andrew Pinski
02:22 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Robert Dewar
00:53 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Mark Hahn

February 07, 2004
18:56 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Bud Davis
16:19 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Kaelin Colclasure
15:37 Bootstrap failure on powerpc64 Josef Zlomek
14:57 Re: Integrating libada branch Kelley Cook
11:58 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Markus Hitter
09:37 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere. Richard Sandiford
06:57 Re: Integrating libada branch Jim Wilson
06:46 Re: global constructors Jim Wilson
04:28 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Nicola Pero
01:05 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Kaelin Colclasure
00:39 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Mike Stump
00:15 Re: "Documentation by paper" Kai Henningsen
00:14 Re: "Documentation by paper" Kai Henningsen

February 06, 2004
23:59 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Nicola Pero
23:50 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Ziemowit Laski
23:49 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Alexander Malmberg
23:46 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Paul Schlie
23:46 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Nicola Pero
23:44 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:43 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:32 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Greg Parker
23:24 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Andrew Pinski
23:05 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Mike Stump
23:00 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Alexander Malmberg
22:24 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Ziemowit Laski
22:20 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Ziemowit Laski
22:19 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Andrew Pinski
22:14 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Ziemowit Laski
22:13 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Alexander Malmberg
22:08 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Ziemowit Laski
22:05 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Alexander Malmberg
22:01 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Ziemowit Laski
21:11 Re: [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Andrew Pinski
21:00 Re: ARM condition code register handling Ian Lance Taylor
20:52 [libobjc] May I tweak objc-api.h? Ziemowit Laski
20:01 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related H. J. Lu
19:58 Re: Bugzilla Daniel Berlin
19:38 Bugzilla gcc
19:31 Email Problems Philip S. Brown
19:19 Retargetting GCC - Document Philip S. Brown
19:09 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related Gabriel Dos Reis
18:55 Re: [tree-ssa] -fgcse and friends useless Daniel Berlin
18:30 Re: [tree-ssa] -fgcse and friends useless Zdenek Dvorak
18:18 Re: restrict in c99 Joseph S. Myers
18:11 Re: restrict in c99 Andreas Schwab
17:52 Re: restrict in c99 Nathan Sidwell
17:41 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related H. J. Lu
17:40 restrict in c99 Mike Stump
15:41 RE: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem Coulter, Scott
13:58 Integrating libada branch Arnaud Charlet
13:55 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-02-05) Nathanael Nerode
12:41 Re: [tree-ssa] -fgcse and friends useless Richard Guenther
12:25 [tree-ssa] -fgcse and friends useless Richard Guenther
11:58 (objective-C runtime) dynamicly creating new classes Ronald Oussoren
11:44 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere. Richard Earnshaw
11:17 subscribe for gcc mailing list Praveen kumar Jonnalagadda
11:15 Re: IA64 inline division question Robert Dewar
11:03 Re: INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS change breaks ada Alan Modra
10:58 INIT_CUMULATIVE_ARGS change breaks ada Andreas Jaeger
10:51 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
08:38 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem Joerg . Richter
07:55 global constructors Dave Murphy
07:25 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Jan Hubicka
03:05 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-02-05) Giovanni Bajo
02:57 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20040206 is now available Joseph S. Myers
02:50 gcc-ss-3.4-20040206 is now available gccadmin
01:36 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere. Zack Weinberg
00:09 Re: GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC) Arnaud Charlet

February 05, 2004
23:59 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Richard Henderson
23:55 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere. Ulrich Weigand
23:44 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Jan Hubicka
23:43 GNAT 3.4 bootstrap binaries for IRIX 5.3 (Attn. SC) Rainer Orth
23:42 Re: IA64 inline division question Jim Wilson
23:37 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Steven Bosscher
23:25 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere. Jim Wilson
23:24 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Jan Hubicka
23:21 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release Michael Elizabeth Chastain
23:01 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release Joe Buck
22:39 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere. Kazu Hirata
22:35 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere. Kazu Hirata
22:24 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere. Eric Botcazou
22:18 Re: GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC Eric Botcazou
22:04 Elegant way to make -no-integrated-cpp the default? Daniel Kegel
22:04 Re: Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere. Joseph S. Myers
21:59 Re: GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC James Morrison
21:55 Macros that are defined under config but not used anywhere. Kazu Hirata
21:47 [tree-ssa] Is this a known bug (It prevents gap to build with IMI) Fariborz Jahanian
21:32 Re: ICE building on darwin Syd Polk
21:10 Re: IA64 inline division question Al Stone
20:58 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Steve Kargl
20:50 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release Gerald Pfeifer
20:46 GCC vs Sun CC on SPARC Eric Botcazou
20:38 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release Ben Elliston
20:35 Re: GCC Status Report (2004-02-05) Daniel Berlin
20:24 GCC Status Report (2004-02-05) Mark Mitchell
20:09 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
20:04 Re: IA64 inline division question Gerald Pfeifer
19:57 Re: "Documentation by paper" Felix Lee
19:38 Re: A problem with aligment attribute Jim Wilson
19:34 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release Andrew Cagney
19:32 Re: IA64 inline division question Vladimir Makarov
19:28 Re: [tree-ssa] Bug in jump threading law
19:23 Re: linux-ia64 fails to bootstrap on mainline Jan Hubicka
19:20 Re: IA64 inline division question Jim Wilson
19:03 Re: linux-ia64 fails to bootstrap on mainline Jim Wilson
19:00 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem David Edelsohn
18:59 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Linus Sjöberg
18:41 IA64 inline division question Steve Ellcey
18:07 RE: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem Coulter, Scott
18:04 Re: gcc for gdl Jim Wilson
17:34 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem Joe Buck
17:25 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem David Edelsohn
17:22 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem Joe Buck
16:16 Re: gcc on superdome Bob Proulx
16:16 Re: Removing REG_OK_STRICT Kazu Hirata
16:09 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Joost VandeVondele
15:55 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA Jan Hubicka
15:51 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA Daniel Berlin
15:43 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA Richard Guenther
15:32 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA Jan Hubicka
15:16 Re: AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem David Edelsohn
15:12 AIX 5.1 dlopen shared library exception handling problem Coulter, Scott
15:03 Re: pdp11-g77 Paul Koning
14:44 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA Daniel Berlin
14:37 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA Diego Novillo
13:51 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA Richard Guenther
13:10 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS? Theodore Papadopoulo
12:24 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA Jan Hubicka
12:14 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA Richard Guenther
11:45 Re: Tree-ssa status with POOMA Jan Hubicka
11:41 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Joseph S. Myers
11:25 Can't bootstrap gcc 3.4.0 20040205 on cygwin: xgcc: cygwin1.o: No such file or directory Christian Joensson
11:18 RE: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease -- bootstrap failure Rainer Orth
11:13 RE: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease -- bootstrap failure Karl Vogel
11:03 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease -- bootstrap failure Rainer Orth
10:57 Tree-ssa status with POOMA Richard Guenther
10:48 Re: A problem with aligment attribute Robert Dewar
10:27 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper") Jan Hubicka
10:13 gcc on superdome Balou Aggeliki
10:00 [tree-ssa] Bug in jump threading Zdenek Dvorak
09:57 Re: question about the usage of DECL_INCOMING_RTL in a stack-smashingprotector Jim Wilson
09:51 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog David Ayers
09:48 Re: A problem with aligment attribute Jim Wilson
09:36 Re: pdp11-g77 Jim Wilson
09:26 Re: Function section Jim Wilson
09:21 ghdl - gcc version mount me
09:14 Re: Efficient 64b operations Jim Wilson
09:03 gcc for gdl mount me
09:02 Re: gcc-3.4-pre ia32, Compound Literals and optimisation, memcpy(20bytes) Jim Wilson
08:58 Re: preparing a list of companies providing support for GCC Jim Wilson
08:56 Re: documentation regarding gcc Jim Wilson
08:55 Re: About different compile address Jim Wilson
08:53 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Bernd Jendrissek
08:47 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease -- bootstrap failure Karl Vogel
08:35 Re: multilib default dir. Jim Wilson
05:50 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Geert Bosch
05:32 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Henderson
04:49 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator Matt Austern
04:19 Re: question on how to experiment with register pressure Ian Lance Taylor
03:19 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator Douglas Gregor
02:29 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was:Re: "Documentation by paper") Robert Dewar
02:28 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Christopher Faylor
02:15 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Mike Stump
02:11 question on how to experiment with register pressure Joe Landman
01:32 question about the usage of DECL_INCOMING_RTL in a stack-smashing protector Hiroaki Etoh
01:28 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related Gabriel Dos Reis
01:11 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related H. J. Lu
00:06 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Joe Buck

February 04, 2004
23:16 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Ziemowit Laski
23:10 Re: Removing REG_OK_STRICT Kazu Hirata
23:07 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Ziemowit Laski
23:07 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Ian Lance Taylor
23:04 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Robert M. Stockmann
23:03 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Joe Buck
23:03 Re: Removing REG_OK_STRICT Kazu Hirata
23:01 Re: Removing REG_OK_STRICT Zack Weinberg
22:59 Re: ICE building on darwin David Edelsohn
22:58 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Phil Edwards
22:58 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper") Joe Buck
22:53 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Richard Guenther
22:52 Re: Removing REG_OK_STRICT Geoff Keating
22:51 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Ziemowit Laski
22:50 Readiness of tree-ssa Wolfgang Bangerth
22:40 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Ian Lance Taylor
22:28 Removing REG_OK_STRICT Kazu Hirata
22:02 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Steven Bosscher
21:58 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Mike Stump
21:55 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
21:55 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Robert M. Stockmann
21:51 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Paul Brook
21:39 Re: ICE building on darwin Geoff Keating
21:38 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Daniel Berlin
21:32 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper") Steven Bosscher
21:29 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Robert M. Stockmann
21:25 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
21:22 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Gabriel Dos Reis
21:21 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Paul Brook
21:09 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
21:06 Re: [tree-ssa] cfg.texi needs reviewing by a native speaker (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper") Richard Kenner
21:04 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Zack Weinberg
20:56 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Mike Stump
20:55 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
20:53 A problem with aligment attribute H. J. Lu
20:36 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Phil Edwards
20:35 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Daniel Berlin
20:31 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Zack Weinberg
20:31 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Mike Stump
20:28 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Mike Stump
20:22 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Andrew Pinski
20:19 Re: C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Diego Novillo
20:15 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Henderson
20:09 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Joseph S. Myers
20:08 pdp11-g77 Paul Koning
20:01 C Code mutilation by using gcc-3.3.x Robert M. Stockmann
19:59 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Ziemowit Laski
19:59 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Dan Nicolaescu
19:56 Re: [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Mike Stump
19:49 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Paul Brook
19:10 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
18:58 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
18:43 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
18:39 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Paul Brook
18:18 Re: RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator Paolo Carlini
18:18 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Mike Stump
18:05 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
17:57 RFC: change in std::type_info's equality operator Matt Austern
17:54 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
17:50 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
17:37 gcc-ss-3.4-20040204 is now available gccadmin
17:26 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
17:25 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Robert Dewar
16:56 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Simon G Best
16:54 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Karel Gardas
16:40 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Diego Novillo
16:39 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Michael Matz
16:35 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Simon G Best
16:22 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Paolo Bonzini
16:14 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
16:10 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Michael Matz
16:07 Glossary (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper") Joern Rennecke
15:56 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
15:49 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
15:31 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Michael Matz
15:21 RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
15:19 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
15:16 RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? S. Bosscher
15:15 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Michael Matz
15:09 [objc] RFC: Move the ChangeLog objc/* entries to objc/ChangeLog Kelley Cook
15:08 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related Gabriel Dos Reis
15:00 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
14:57 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease gdr
14:53 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Robert Dewar
14:48 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
14:46 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
14:44 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Andrew Pinski
14:43 Re: "Documentation by paper" Arnaud Charlet
14:37 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Eric Botcazou
14:36 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
14:35 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
14:31 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Andrew Pinski
14:30 Re: "Documentation by paper" Michael Matz
14:19 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Robert Dewar
14:11 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
14:10 Function section Petar Penchev
14:10 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Diego Novillo
14:08 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
14:07 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Diego Novillo
14:05 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Karel Gardas
14:04 RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Michael Matz
13:55 Re: [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Richard Kenner
13:52 RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
13:49 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Paul Brook
13:49 Re: "Documentation by paper" Michael Matz
13:48 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
13:30 [RFC] Merge criteria for tree-ssa Diego Novillo
13:29 RE: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? S. Bosscher
13:20 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
13:10 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
12:30 Re: What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Richard Kenner
11:28 non-virtual thunk functions Brian Ryner
03:13 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Loren James Rittle
02:57 Re: ICE building on darwin Jonathan Wilson
02:56 Re: "Documentation by paper" Russ Allbery
02:42 Re: ICE building on darwin Roger Sayle
02:07 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Michael Elizabeth Chastain
00:00 Re: "Documentation by paper" Felix Lee

February 03, 2004
23:26 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS? Eric Christopher
23:16 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS? Paolo Bonzini
22:25 [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related Kelley Cook
22:22 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
22:20 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
22:20 Re: "Documentation by paper" Dale Johannesen
22:18 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
22:16 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
22:11 -fhidden-one-only and the EH runtime Matt Austern
22:07 Re: ICE building on darwin Syd Polk
22:06 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
22:00 Re: [i386] pni => sse3 -- GCC 3.3.3 related Kelley Cook
21:54 Re: ICE building on darwin Mike Stump
21:45 ICE building on darwin Syd Polk
21:28 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS? Zack Weinberg
21:27 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
21:21 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
21:15 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS? Geoff Keating
21:14 Re: Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS? Richard Henderson
20:13 Re: C99 usage in gcc Zack Weinberg
19:51 Re: C99 usage in gcc Neil Booth
19:10 Re: VMA different from LMA Eric Christopher
19:03 VMA different from LMA Srinivasa Kanduru
17:52 Re: C99 usage in gcc Joe Buck
17:28 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
17:28 Re: "Documentation by paper" Peter Barada
17:13 Re: "Documentation by paper" Lars Segerlund
17:09 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
17:07 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
17:03 Re: "Documentation by paper" Paul Koning
16:58 What to remove after tree-ssa is merged? Paolo Bonzini
16:57 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
16:56 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
16:55 Getting rid of GET_RTX_CLASS? Paolo Bonzini
16:54 Re: "Documentation by paper" Jan Hubicka
16:48 Re: "Documentation by paper" Peter Barada
16:46 Re: "Documentation by paper" Felix Lee
16:44 Re: "Documentation by paper" Felix Lee
16:40 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
16:38 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
16:37 Re: "Documentation by paper" Paolo Bonzini
16:35 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
16:28 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
16:23 Re: "Documentation by paper" Steven Bosscher
16:20 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
16:16 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
16:07 Re: "Documentation by paper" Paolo Bonzini
16:00 Re: "Documentation by paper" Steven Bosscher
15:48 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
15:40 Re: "Documentation by paper" Paolo Bonzini
15:22 Re: Using tree-ssa Diego Novillo
14:50 Re: Using tree-ssa Paolo Carlini
14:41 Re: Using tree-ssa Tom Crick
14:21 Re: Using tree-ssa Paolo Carlini
14:18 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Etienne Lorrain
14:15 Re: Using tree-ssa Tom Crick
13:35 Re: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target Joern Rennecke
12:25 Efficient 64b operations Jan Hoogerbrugge
12:20 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
12:17 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joern Rennecke
12:12 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
11:19 Re: ARM condition code register handling Richard Earnshaw
09:49 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Andrea 'fwyzard' Bocci
09:33 gcc-3.4-pre ia32, Compound Literals and optimisation, memcpy(20 bytes) Etienne Lorrain
09:33 Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC Pop Sebastian
08:09 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
07:22 Re: C99 usage in gcc Zack Weinberg
07:13 Re: C99 usage in gcc Neil Booth
05:31 segment fault on GCC 3.5 Robert McNulty Junior
02:40 Re: move-if-change dependencies Zack Weinberg
02:26 move-if-change dependencies Matt Kraai
01:56 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Gabriel Dos Reis
01:16 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Mike Stump
00:59 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
00:43 Re: C99 usage in gcc Zack Weinberg
00:39 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Richard Henderson
00:35 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Daniel Jacobowitz
00:31 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Mike Stump
00:29 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk

February 02, 2004
23:56 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Richard Henderson
23:50 Re: C99 usage in gcc Joe Buck
23:45 Re: C99 usage in gcc Joseph S. Myers
23:45 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Joe Buck
23:44 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
23:40 Re: C99 usage in gcc Zack Weinberg
23:40 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Jason Merrill
23:37 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Mike Stump
23:34 Re: C99 usage in gcc Joe Buck
23:30 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
23:26 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Joe Buck
23:26 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Mike Stump
23:19 Re: Installing and working with gcc Joe Buck
22:55 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
22:39 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Mike Stump
22:15 linux-ia64 fails to bootstrap on mainline Al Stone
22:10 Re: template functions not inlined Dan Nicolaescu
22:02 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Loren James Rittle
22:02 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joern Rennecke
21:12 Installing and working with gcc kitiku
19:59 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Ian Lance Taylor
19:58 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Mike Stump
19:57 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
19:28 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
19:26 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Florian Weitling
19:12 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Jason Merrill
19:07 Re: help for the use of G95 compiler Zack Weinberg
19:06 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Tom Tromey
19:03 help for the use of G95 compiler RAFFAELE COTZA
19:00 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
18:55 Re: "Documentation by paper" Alexandre E. Kopilovitch
18:47 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Jason Merrill
18:21 preparing a list of companies providing support for GCC Brian Gough
17:57 Re: template functions not inlined Joe Buck
17:51 Re: "Documentation by paper" Jamie Lokier
17:30 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
17:22 gcc-ss-3.3-20040202 is now available gccadmin
17:19 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
17:16 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
17:10 Re: "Documentation by paper" Jamie Lokier
16:59 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
16:19 Re: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target Kazu Hirata
15:56 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
15:40 Re: "Documentation by paper" Jamie Lokier
15:23 RE: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target Ivan Warren
15:05 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Ian Lance Taylor
14:04 Re: FP negation optimization Roger Sayle
13:53 Re: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target Steven Bosscher
13:10 Re: Invalid alias info through crossjumping Michael Matz
13:10 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Andrew Walrond
12:46 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease gdr
12:20 Invalid alias info through crossjumping Andreas Krebbel
12:18 RE: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target Ivan Warren
11:02 Re: "Documentation by paper" Lars Segerlund
10:45 Re: C++/altivec issue on 3.4 branch Kostadin Dabov
10:40 Re: [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC Canqun Yang
10:06 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Andrew Walrond
09:39 Re: FP negation optimization Gabriel Paubert
08:35 Re: bootstrap failure "sorry, unimplemented:" Michael Matz
07:15 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
06:01 C++/altivec issue on 3.4 branch Timothy J. Wood
05:54 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 Ghassan Shobaki
04:36 Re: A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target Kazu Hirata
04:14 RE: multilib default dir. Sanjiv Gupta
03:52 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Zack Weinberg
02:13 Re: FP negation optimization Robert Dewar
01:13 Re: FP negation optimization Geoff Keating
00:53 Re: FP negation optimization Robert Dewar
00:33 Re: split_complex_* flaw Alan Modra
00:04 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Andrew Walrond

February 01, 2004
23:41 [RFC] Implementing Swing Modulo Scheduling in GCC Ayal Zaks
23:27 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
23:26 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
23:11 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Richard Guenther
23:09 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Eric Botcazou
23:05 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
23:05 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
23:05 Re: FP negation optimization Andrew Pinski
23:00 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Andrew Pinski
22:52 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease gdr
22:45 Re: FP negation optimization Chris Lattner
22:34 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Eric Botcazou
22:00 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
21:56 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 Jan Hubicka
21:52 Re: split_complex_* flaw David Edelsohn
21:47 Re: split_complex_* flaw David Edelsohn
21:35 Re: GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Ulrich Weigand
21:13 Re: "Documentation by paper" Jamie Lokier
19:54 Re: FP negation optimization Richard Henderson
19:46 Re: split_complex_* flaw Richard Henderson
19:22 Re: Complicated dg test cases Phil Edwards
18:19 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 Ghassan Shobaki
17:01 Re: Complicated dg test cases Dan Kegel
16:09 Re: Using tree-ssa Diego Novillo
14:43 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Kai Henningsen
14:25 Re: split_complex_* flaw Ian Lance Taylor
14:24 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Kevin Atkinson
14:21 GCC-3.3.3 first prerelease Gabriel Dos Reis
14:16 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Jan Hubicka
14:09 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Kevin Atkinson
12:26 Using tree-ssa Tom Crick
12:19 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
12:17 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
12:08 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
12:03 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Jan Hubicka
12:01 Re: template functions not inlined Jan Hubicka
11:51 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Robert Dewar
08:30 FP negation optimization Chris Lattner
07:37 get it up in a hurry Jeffery Franklin
07:30 Re: split_complex_* flaw Alan Modra
06:48 Re: split_complex_* flaw David Edelsohn
06:29 Re: split_complex_* flaw Alan Modra
06:19 Re: "Documentation by paper" Andrew Sutton
06:12 template functions not inlined Dan Nicolaescu
06:08 Re: "Documentation by paper" Andrew Sutton
05:53 [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
05:38 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Richard Henderson
05:27 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
05:25 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
04:59 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
04:44 Re: Complicated dg test cases Janis Johnson
04:26 Re: Complicated dg test cases Janis Johnson
04:15 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
04:05 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
03:44 Re: split_complex_* flaw David Edelsohn
03:18 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch Mark Mitchell
03:17 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Kevin Atkinson
03:08 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
03:03 Hello! Seymour Marsh
03:01 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Geoff Keating
02:42 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
02:35 Re: bootstrap failure "sorry, unimplemented:" Eyal Lebedinsky
02:33 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Marc Espie
02:18 Re: bootstrap failure "sorry, unimplemented:" Andrew Pinski
02:11 bootstrap failure "sorry, unimplemented:" Eyal Lebedinsky
02:01 Re: DejaGnu 1.4.4 release Michael Elizabeth Chastain
01:54 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
01:01 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
00:49 Re: split_complex_* flaw Richard Henderson
00:43 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
00:28 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
00:27 Complicated dg test cases Matt Austern


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3