This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Anonymous Namespaces


On 31 Jan 2004, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> Kevin Atkinson <kevina@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> |  There is no way for the symbol defined in
> | an anonymous namespace to be used outside if the translation unit. It
> | should have the same effect as static.  The new unit-at-a-time optimizations 
> | will be a lot more beneficial in C++ programs is anonymous namespaces were 
> | treated that way.
> 
> If you're having trouble with unit-at-a-time not recognizing functions
> in unnamed namespacen, then the right course of action to do is to teach
> that programmed inliner to recognize those functions.  Asking for
> deviating from standard semantics is wrong.

What that is what I am REALLY asking for.  How difficult would that be?

-- 
http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]