This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: "Documentation by paper"

From: Phil Edwards <phil at codesourcery dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:24:19 -0500
Subject: Re: "Documentation by paper"
References: <10401272001.AA00920@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <4016C6D8.5040509@codesourcery.com> <m3smi1hzwn.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:58:32PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> 
> Do source code annotations help produce the sorts of thing you show in
> these examples?

No, those particular examples were done in a "pretend that everything
actually has an invisible comment" mode, as an example of what we can get
out of doxygen even without commenting.  Adding annotations would help
to reduce the clutter, as by default doxygen (and some similar tools)
will only follow/graph entities that have been annotated.

References:
- Re: "Documentation by paper"
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: "Documentation by paper"
  - From: Phil Edwards
- Re: "Documentation by paper"
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]