Re: Unreviewed patches

[Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>]

--- Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Dara Hazeghi wrote:
> > on the topic of unreviewed patches, I'd like to
> point
> > out that gcc bugzilla has a 'patch' keyword, so if
> you
> > make a patch for a PR, please don't hesitate to
> update
> > that field and include a link to your patch
> 
> Would you mind adding something on this to
> bugs/management.html?

Certainly, patch doing so is attached. Comments are
welcome.

> > Also, if you have a patch for a defect which isn't
> reported in bugzilla,
> > by all means, open a PR for the defect, and
> include a reference to your
> > patch when you send it to gcc-patch@. It makes it
> much easier to find
> > problems fixed by unreviewed patches...
> 
> This is a very good idea.  How about only doing this
> for patches which are
> not reviewed "immediately", though?

That sounds reasonable. Those people whose patches
routinely are routinely left unreviewed for large
periods of time no doubt know who they are, and can
act accordingy.

Dara

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/

Attachment: management.patch
Description: management.patch