This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctlyon AMD64
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
- Cc: Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>, drow at mvista dot com, aj at suse dot de, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Jan 2004 21:37:33 -0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctlyon AMD64
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <200401101800.i0AI0Zm6026623@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040110183622.GA8108@nevyn.them.org> <200401101858.i0AIwdhk032901@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040111041009.GA15714@nevyn.them.org> <200401111237.i0BCbVPL010349@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20040111132924.GA1964@kam.mff.cuni.cz>
> This seems obviously wrong to me. If you do have testcase, you may want
> to fill it in GCC bugzilla. Especially if you can write simple testcase
> that fails when copy constructor is not properly used.
> I hope that Mark or Jason can take a look into this issue themselves.
Jan's advise is exactly correct; you should file a bug report in
Bugzilla and then we can take a look.
--
Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
CodeSourcery, LLC