gcc archive
date index for January, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 31, 2004
23:52 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
23:50 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
23:47 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
23:34 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
23:31 Re: C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due tojava/expr.c] Joseph S. Myers
23:13 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
22:29 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
22:21 Re: why does dump_decl dump the scope of a FIELD_DECL? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:07 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
21:51 Re: BB reordering question Zdenek Dvorak
21:22 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch Jan Hubicka
21:19 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch David Edelsohn
20:41 why does dump_decl dump the scope of a FIELD_DECL? Giovanni Bajo
20:35 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
20:21 RE: multilib default dir. Eric Christopher
20:20 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
20:18 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Mark Mitchell
20:01 Re: BB reordering question Archie Cobbs
19:53 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Oscar Fuentes
19:39 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
19:38 gcc-3_3-branch frozen Gabriel Dos Reis
19:28 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
19:20 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
18:45 Re: C99 usage in gcc Zack Weinberg
18:41 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Zack Weinberg
18:39 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
18:24 Re: C99 usage in gcc Andrew Haley
18:17 Re: C99 usage in gcc Zack Weinberg
15:25 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Diego Novillo
14:51 My last weekend become Tminter
11:45 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch Jan Hubicka
11:36 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch Jan Hubicka
11:34 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch Jan Hubicka
11:12 RE: multilib default dir. Sanjiv Gupta
11:01 RE: multilib default dir. Sanjiv Gupta
10:41 split_complex_* flaw Alan Modra
10:33 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
10:27 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Kevin Atkinson
10:22 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
10:08 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
10:05 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Kevin Atkinson
09:54 documentation regarding gcc \"Gagan Deep Singh\"
09:41 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Andrew Pinski
09:37 Anonymous Namespaces Kevin Atkinson
09:13 Re: BB reordering question Zdenek Dvorak
08:43 Re: Ada runtime build backend ICE on x86-linux on HEAD Laurent GUERBY
08:29 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Gerald Pfeifer
08:12 About different compile address Xue_Pengyu
07:45 multilib default dir. Sanjiv Gupta
07:34 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Joseph S. Myers
07:02 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Mike Stump
04:29 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Diego Novillo
04:29 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch David Edelsohn
04:22 covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch Mark Mitchell
03:59 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Mike Stump
03:23 Re: --disable-multilib broken on GCC 3.4? Mark Mitchell
03:18 Re: --disable-multilib broken on GCC 3.4? Phil Edwards
02:20 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
02:19 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
02:03 --disable-multilib broken on GCC 3.4? Mark Mitchell
02:00 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function David Edelsohn
01:52 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
01:42 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function David Edelsohn
01:38 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Diego Novillo
01:38 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Ian Lance Taylor
01:21 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
01:20 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
01:07 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
00:58 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
00:55 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Ziemowit Laski
00:54 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Diego Novillo
00:53 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Ian Lance Taylor
00:47 Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
00:05 BB reordering question Archie Cobbs
00:01 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Richard Henderson

January 30, 2004
23:55 3.3.3 release notes [first draft] Joe Buck
23:51 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 tm_gccmail
23:40 PR 13046: planned for 3.3.3? Joe Buck
23:25 Merging tree-ssa into mainline Mark Mitchell
23:19 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
23:18 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Mark Mitchell
23:15 Re: "Documentation by paper" Mark Mitchell
22:53 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Mark Mitchell
22:52 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Robert Dewar
22:21 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Devang Patel
21:49 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Ian Lance Taylor
21:40 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Kevin B. Hendricks
21:19 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
21:01 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
20:33 Re: About "symbol_ref" expression Jim Wilson
19:57 Re: About "symbol_ref" expression Eric Christopher
19:45 Re: Bootstrap using --with-gc=zone is broken Daniel Berlin
19:27 New PowerPC bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
19:18 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Kevin B . Hendricks
19:17 Ada runtime build backend ICE on x86-linux on HEAD Laurent GUERBY
18:59 ARM condition code register handling Ian Lance Taylor
18:07 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Ian Lance Taylor
18:05 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Dale Johannesen
17:41 GCC build of gcc-3_4-branch failed for native with your patch on 2004-01-30T12:07:11Z. Andrew Haley
17:29 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Oscar Fuentes
16:53 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
16:36 [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
15:31 Bootstrap using --with-gc=zone is broken Art Haas
15:19 Re: C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due tojava/expr.c] Bruce Stephens
14:24 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Joern Rennecke
14:19 Announcement: 2004 GCC & GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit Andrew J. Hutton
14:16 Re: gctest failure for gcc 3.4.0 20040130 on i686-linux... Christian Joensson
14:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-01-26 Jan Hubicka
13:38 gctest failure for gcc 3.4.0 20040130 on i686-linux... Christian Joensson
13:36 [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-01-26 Diego Novillo
13:35 Re: C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due tojava/expr.c] Michael Matz
13:32 libstdc++-v3 build failure Joern Rennecke
12:37 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Joern Rennecke
11:32 Re: mbox formatted archive for current month Laurent GUERBY
11:03 C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c] Andrew Haley
10:54 DejaGnu 1.4.4 release Ben Elliston
10:04 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Andreas Schwab
09:44 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Etienne Lorrain
07:04 Re: About "symbol_ref" expression Shinpei Kato
06:39 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Eric Botcazou
06:10 Re: New loop unroller broken? David Edelsohn
05:46 Re: New loop unroller broken? Andreas Jaeger
04:31 Re: mbox formatted archive for current month Aldy Hernandez
04:21 Re: mbox formatted archive for current month DJ Delorie
04:13 mbox formatted archive for current month Aldy Hernandez
03:52 About "symbol_ref" expression Shinpei Kato
03:11 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Ian Lance Taylor
01:32 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c Andrew Pinski
01:29 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c Andrew Pinski
01:20 Re: Release criteria (eas: [patch] index for 3.4.0 Re: Broken LinkOn Front Page) Mark Mitchell
00:47 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
00:45 Re: Why gimplification regimplifies things? Richard Henderson
00:37 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 DJ Delorie
00:29 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Jonathan Wilson
00:28 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
00:26 Re: Why gimplification regimplifies things? Zdenek Dvorak
00:23 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Jonathan Wilson
00:22 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Dale Johannesen
00:19 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Richard Henderson
00:16 Re: Why gimplification regimplifies things? Richard Henderson

January 29, 2004
23:55 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c Ben Elliston
23:53 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c Eric Christopher
23:51 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Simon G Best
23:46 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 DJ Delorie
23:43 build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c Ben Elliston
23:32 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Geoff Keating
23:28 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
23:25 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Andreas Schwab
23:23 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1 Jan Hubicka
23:12 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1 Mark Mitchell
22:58 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1 Jan Hubicka
22:50 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1 Mark Mitchell
22:30 Re: "Documentation by paper" Andrew Sutton
22:25 Re: with-headers should be 'build' != 'host' Felix Lee
22:22 Why gimplification regimplifies things? Zdenek Dvorak
21:41 Re: with-headers should be 'build' != 'host' Ian Lance Taylor
20:59 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Syd Polk
20:50 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Jim Wilson
20:37 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
20:34 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
20:03 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Paul Koning
19:31 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Joel Sherrill
19:26 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Syd Polk
19:25 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Ian Lance Taylor
19:19 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Zack Weinberg
19:16 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Andrew Pinski
19:05 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Richard Henderson
19:04 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:56 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Syd Polk
18:54 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Dale Johannesen
18:52 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Zack Weinberg
18:45 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Joern Rennecke
18:40 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Joern Rennecke
18:37 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Zack Weinberg
18:33 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
18:28 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
18:23 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Ralf Corsepius
18:19 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Richard Henderson
18:12 Re: with-headers should be 'build' != 'host' Daniel Jacobowitz
17:42 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Zack Weinberg
16:08 [Darwin] Patch: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
15:25 Re: linking c code against fortran libraries Craig Maloney
15:04 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Michael Matz
14:54 Re: GCC 3.4.0 040128 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparisonon MICO project sources. Karel Gardas
14:40 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Joern Rennecke
14:33 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Andrew Haley
14:22 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Joern Rennecke
13:44 gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Andrew Haley
13:15 gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Etienne Lorrain
12:19 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
11:52 Re: linking c code against fortran libraries Paul Brook
11:51 preprocessor: % as args to #defines Ralf Corsepius
11:44 Re: New loop unroller broken? Mircea Namolaru
11:27 GCC 3.4.0 040128 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison onMICO project sources. Karel Gardas
11:15 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Andreas Schwab
10:14 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 Jan Hubicka
07:08 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 Ghassan Shobaki
05:31 OpenBSD kernel testcases? Giovanni Bajo
04:22 Re: Removing cut-n-paste comments about target macros/hooks. Zack Weinberg
04:18 Removing cut-n-paste comments about target macros/hooks. Kazu Hirata
03:43 powerpc64 dwarf2 frame unwinding Alan Modra
01:50 Re: When exactly does a type have a variable length? Richard Henderson
01:18 When exactly does a type have a variable length? Kazu Hirata
00:39 Re: SH4 regression testing Kaz Kojima
00:36 Re: Help installing gcc Ben Elliston
00:00 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar

January 28, 2004
23:59 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
23:58 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Diego Novillo
23:50 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Dale Johannesen
23:42 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Joe Buck
23:06 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Daniel Berlin
22:57 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Richard Guenther
22:42 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Robert Dewar
22:23 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Robert Dewar
20:36 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:29 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Phil Edwards
20:27 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Marcel Cox
20:26 Re: SH4 regression testing Jim Wilson
20:25 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Mike Stump
20:23 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Joe Buck
20:22 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Richard Guenther
20:11 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Matthias Klose
20:11 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:07 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Joe Buck
19:47 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Jan Hubicka
18:23 [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Diego Novillo
18:20 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Daniel Berlin
18:17 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Eric Botcazou
18:08 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Richard Kenner
17:59 Re: g++ template function overload resolution failure(?) Giovanni Bajo
17:59 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Phil Edwards
17:57 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
17:53 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Phil Edwards
17:44 Re: about the interfaces of a front end Zack Weinberg
17:28 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Joe Buck
17:28 gcc-ss-3.4-20040128 is now available gccadmin
17:25 linking c code against fortran libraries Craig Maloney
17:13 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Joe Buck
16:42 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:36 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joern Rennecke
16:25 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:06 Re: SH4 regression testing Julian Brown
16:03 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Karel Gardas
15:43 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Arnaud Charlet
15:39 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Karel Gardas
15:26 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Andreas Schwab
15:05 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Bonzini
14:58 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Dylan Cuthbert
14:49 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Eric Botcazou
14:45 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Karel Gardas
14:36 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Andreas Schwab
14:20 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
14:19 Use of automatically generated docs (Doxygen) experience from another project rthorpe
14:03 Many(!) failures for 3.4.0 20040127 (prerelease) testsuite on i786-pc-cygwin Christian Joensson
13:57 How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Karel Gardas
13:20 RE: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 S. Bosscher
13:17 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Aldy Hernandez
12:59 Re: new error when reconfiguring gcc Arnaud Charlet
12:52 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Simon G Best
12:51 Re: new error when reconfiguring gcc Alexandre Oliva
12:32 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 Jan Hubicka
12:23 Re: new error when reconfiguring gcc Andreas Schwab
12:11 Re: g++ template function overload resolution failure(?) Karel Gardas
12:06 g++ template function overload resolution failure(?) Richard Guenther
12:04 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Eric Botcazou
11:41 new error when reconfiguring gcc Arnaud Charlet
11:36 GCC-3.3.3 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
09:55 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Karel Gardas
09:37 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Bonzini
08:49 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Dylan Cuthbert
07:46 Re: Re: about the interfaces of a front end daizisheng
07:30 re: SH4 regression testing Karel Gardas
07:11 Re: about the interfaces of a front end Zack Weinberg
07:10 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
07:09 Re: about the interfaces of a front end Neil Booth
06:49 about the interfaces of a front end daizisheng
06:13 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Matt Austern
06:08 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Simon G Best
05:57 Re: Help needed on "insn does not satisfy its constraints" Kazu Hirata
05:21 Help needed on "insn does not satisfy its constraints" ashwani
03:26 Re: case ranges in C++ (extension) Mark Mitchell
01:48 Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 Ghassan Shobaki

January 27, 2004
23:38 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:22 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
23:18 Re: "Documentation by paper" Bernd Schmidt
23:15 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:14 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Matt Austern
23:03 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
22:55 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:49 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:43 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Matt Austern
22:42 Re: Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when using gcc3.4.0-20040126 as a bootstrap compiler Arnaud Charlet
22:34 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
22:31 Re: "Documentation by paper" Tom Tromey
22:27 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:27 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
22:12 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:59 Re: "Documentation by paper" Geert Bosch
21:56 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
21:55 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
21:48 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
21:37 re: SH4 regression testing Daniel Kegel
21:24 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
21:23 tree-ssa/13756 Documentation issues Geert Bosch
21:21 Re: how to compile gcc with profiling on.. Zack Weinberg
21:12 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:08 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Aldy Hernandez
20:58 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
20:51 Re: "Documentation by paper" DJ Delorie
20:42 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
20:40 Re: "Documentation by paper" Andrew Sutton
20:39 Re: "Documentation by paper" Laurent GUERBY
20:38 Re: "Documentation by paper" Diego Novillo
20:34 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
20:34 how to compile gcc with profiling on.. perugupa
20:29 Re: "Documentation by paper" Gabriel Dos Reis
20:17 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
20:17 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
20:17 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
20:15 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
20:14 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:13 Doxygen (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper") Matt Austern
20:11 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
20:10 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
20:08 ! HAVE_foo, ! (flags & BIT) Joern Rennecke
20:05 Re: "Documentation by paper" Gabriel Dos Reis
19:59 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
19:55 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
19:53 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
19:44 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size Kazu Hirata
19:43 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
19:43 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
19:31 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
19:31 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
19:28 Re: "Documentation by paper" Diego Novillo
19:25 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
19:20 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Richard Henderson
19:13 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
19:09 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
18:58 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
18:56 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
18:53 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:48 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:38 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Eric Botcazou
18:38 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
18:37 Re: "Documentation by paper" Andrew Sutton
18:33 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
18:31 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Christoph Hellwig
18:26 SH4 regression testing Julian Brown
18:24 Re: commits with multiple PRs Ian Lance Taylor
18:24 Re: "Documentation by paper" Diego Novillo
18:20 Re: "Documentation by paper" Zack Weinberg
18:19 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
18:06 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:04 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:03 Re: "Documentation by paper" Diego Novillo
17:59 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
17:57 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Joe Buck
17:57 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
17:51 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
17:50 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
17:48 Re: ChangeLog as cvs check-in message Phil Edwards
17:40 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Olivier Galibert
17:34 Re: "return" RTL template Joern Rennecke
17:26 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Matt Austern
17:16 Re: libffi package Thomas Heller
17:00 ChangeLog as cvs check-in message Joern Rennecke
16:58 case ranges in C++ (extension) Michael Matz
16:52 Re: commits with multiple PRs Daniel Berlin
16:41 Re: commits with multiple PRs Jakub Jelinek
16:38 Re: commits with multiple PRs Daniel Berlin
16:36 Re: commits with multiple PRs Eric Botcazou
15:56 Re: commits with multiple PRs Daniel Berlin
15:48 Re: commits with multiple PRs Richard Earnshaw
15:48 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
15:42 Re: "Documentation by paper" Lars Segerlund
15:40 Re: commits with multiple PRs Daniel Berlin
15:22 "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
15:00 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size law
14:46 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Eric Botcazou
14:40 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size Ian Lance Taylor
14:35 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size Paul Carpenter
14:14 commits with multiple PRs Richard Earnshaw
14:06 Re: Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when usinggcc3.4.0-20040126 as a bootstrap compiler Karel Gardas
13:14 C++'s 'export' Keyword? Simon G Best
10:01 New performance measurements Richard Guenther
08:53 "return" RTL template Petar Penchev
08:10 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Marcel Cox
08:02 Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size Kazu Hirata
07:37 open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
06:07 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Dylan Cuthbert
02:53 Re: (gcc-3.4.cvs) undefined reference to `__udivdi3' Jim Wilson
02:19 Re: About embedding GCC, GCC compiling with Visual Studio... Jim Wilson
02:12 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Jim Wilson
00:21 Re: bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Eric Christopher

January 26, 2004
22:59 bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Eric Christopher
22:45 Re: Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when using gcc3.4.0-20040126 as a bootstrap compiler Arnaud Charlet
22:34 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC... aspiesrule
21:37 Re: Is Banshee required for tree-ssa? Daniel Berlin
21:18 Is Banshee required for tree-ssa? Phil Edwards
21:16 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Gabriel Dos Reis
20:53 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Eric Botcazou
20:39 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Joern Rennecke
20:38 Substantial sort algorithm slow down from PIII to P4 DAVID MAY
20:06 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Eric Botcazou
19:46 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Gerald Pfeifer
19:42 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Joern Rennecke
19:34 GCC Release Status (2004-01-26) Mark Mitchell
19:30 Re: compile speed [was: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal] Alexandre Oliva
19:20 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Eric Botcazou
19:17 Re: Change in order of compilation passes Steven Bosscher
19:16 Re: ia64-hpux crash in alias.c Zack Weinberg
19:05 Re: ia64-hpux crash in alias.c Jan Hubicka
18:55 Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when using gcc3.4.0-20040126as a bootstrap compiler Karel Gardas
18:52 compile speed [was: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal] Per Bothner
18:46 ia64-hpux crash in alias.c Zack Weinberg
18:24 Re: Change in order of compilation passes Ian Lance Taylor
18:16 Change in order of compilation passes Ian Lance Taylor
17:35 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Florian Weitling
17:18 gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 is now available gccadmin
16:11 Re: My problem on x86-64 Jan Hubicka
15:55 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Tom Tromey
15:45 Re: My problem on x86-64 Michael Matz
15:45 Re: libffi package Tom Tromey
12:41 My problem on x86-64 Richard Kenner
09:18 Re: inlining between sections Andrew Morton
09:06 Re: inlining between sections Geoff Keating
08:37 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Ralf Baechle
06:51 inlining between sections Andrew Morton
05:58 Re: Re: about writing a new front end for gcc daizisheng
05:39 Re: about writing a new front end for gcc Zack Weinberg
05:14 about writing a new front end for gcc ʤ

January 25, 2004
23:28 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Giovanni Bajo
23:15 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Giovanni Bajo
22:32 (gcc-3.4.cvs) undefined reference to `__udivdi3' Axel Siebenwirth
21:43 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Daniel Berlin
21:36 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Zack Weinberg
19:40 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC... Alexandre Oliva
19:28 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Andi Kleen
18:29 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC... Gabriel Dos Reis
18:26 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Ralf Baechle
18:15 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC... Eric Botcazou
17:54 GCC, OOP, and GC... aspiesrule
17:15 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Erik Schnetter
17:04 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Daniel Jacobowitz
16:59 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
16:41 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Gabriel Dos Reis
16:40 Re: New loop unroller broken? Mircea Namolaru
16:09 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Giovanni Bajo
15:48 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Andi Kleen
14:36 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Gabriel Dos Reis
14:13 About embedding GCC, GCC compiling with Visual Studio... Grégoire Péan
14:06 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Erik Schnetter
10:07 Re: [Bug target/13312] [m68k] C++ produces stack frame damaging codefor Coldfire Bernardo Innocenti
10:05 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Jan Hubicka
06:48 gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Dylan Cuthbert
06:21 Creating libobjc branch Andrew Pinski
05:41 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Eric Christopher
01:12 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Andrew Pinski
01:01 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Marc Espie
00:57 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Marc Espie
00:28 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Zack Weinberg

January 24, 2004
22:42 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Richard Sandiford
22:23 Re: mips address+symbol issue. cgd
22:22 Re: mips address+symbol issue. cgd
18:33 Re: Invalid libffi testcase? Eric Botcazou
16:18 Re: Invalid libffi testcase? Andreas Tobler
15:24 Re: Invalid libffi testcase? Eric Botcazou
15:13 Re: Invalid libffi testcase? Andreas Tobler
14:37 Invalid libffi testcase? Eric Botcazou
13:40 Re: Bootstrap failure on Darwin Ian Lance Taylor
13:23 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Bernardo Innocenti
12:44 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Thiemo Seufer
11:43 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Richard Sandiford
10:16 Re: Unreviewed patches Gerald Pfeifer
09:30 Re: Bootstrap failure on Darwin Richard Henderson
09:09 When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Kazu Hirata
08:23 Re: Bootstrap failure on Darwin Andreas Tobler
08:05 Bootstrap failure on Darwin Matt Austern
05:43 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Andrew Pinski
05:29 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Andrew Morton
05:08 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Daniel Jacobowitz
05:08 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Daniel Jacobowitz
02:29 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Richard Kenner
02:18 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Mark Mitchell
01:39 Re: C++ extension not supported in 3.4.0 20040121 (prerelease) Giovanni Bajo
01:37 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Andrew Morton
01:23 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Jan Hubicka
01:20 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Jan Hubicka
01:19 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Daniel Jacobowitz
01:15 GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Michael Eager
01:10 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Daniel Jacobowitz
01:10 C++ extension not supported in 3.4.0 20040121 (prerelease) Shelly Adhikari
01:02 Re: Mainline fails to bootstrap 3.3 branch. Gabriel Dos Reis

January 23, 2004
23:42 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Andrew Morton
23:32 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Daniel Jacobowitz
23:26 mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Andrew Morton
22:54 Re: [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra? Dara Hazeghi
22:47 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Erik Trulsson
22:46 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Erik Trulsson
22:28 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Michel Lespinasse
22:26 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Robert Dewar
22:21 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Andreas Schwab
22:10 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Erik Trulsson
22:00 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html a bit confusing w.r.t. Ada installation. Jim Wilson
21:59 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Ian Lance Taylor
21:55 Re: mips address+symbol issue. cgd
21:48 Re: [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra? Michael Matz
21:44 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Robert Dewar
21:24 Re: @D not replaced Zack Weinberg
21:20 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Ian Lance Taylor
21:18 Re: mips address+symbol issue. cgd
21:09 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Ian Lance Taylor
21:01 mips address+symbol issue. cgd
20:58 Re: Fix for PR/13358 Geoff Keating
20:39 @D not replaced Douglas B Rupp
20:35 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Matthias Klose
20:33 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Alexandre Oliva
20:22 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Joseph S. Myers
20:20 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
20:18 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Phil Edwards
20:09 Re: Fix for PR/13358 Jack Lloyd
20:07 Re: Unreviewed patches Dara Hazeghi
20:07 Re: Mainline fails to bootstrap 3.3 branch. Joseph S. Myers
20:05 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Matthias Klose
19:50 Re: Unreviewed patches Giovanni Bajo
19:46 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
19:44 Re: Unreviewed patches Ian Lance Taylor
19:40 Re: Fix for PR/13358 Geoff Keating
19:17 Re: Unreviewed patches Dara Hazeghi
19:17 Re: New loop unroller broken? David Edelsohn
18:52 Re: Unreviewed patches Gerald Pfeifer
18:47 Re: Unreviewed patches Dara Hazeghi
18:34 Re: Fix for PR/13358 Zack Weinberg
18:30 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Ian Lance Taylor
18:22 Re: Unreviewed patches Gerald Pfeifer
18:17 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Zack Weinberg
18:11 Unreviewed patches Dara Hazeghi
17:58 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Kelley Cook
17:57 [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra? Dara Hazeghi
17:33 Re: Verbose compiling of multiple files. Phil Edwards
17:01 Mainline fails to bootstrap 3.3 branch. Volker Reichelt
16:51 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Wolfgang Bangerth
16:22 Fix for PR/13358 Jack Lloyd
16:13 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Paolo Carlini
15:33 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Jakub Jelinek
15:23 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Michael Matz
15:07 Verbose compiling of multiple files. Nitin Gupta
14:37 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Jakub Jelinek
14:32 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Gerald Pfeifer
14:28 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:21 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Michael Matz
13:46 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Paolo Carlini
13:42 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:24 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Alexandre Oliva
13:13 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Richard Kenner
13:03 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
12:57 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Richard Kenner
12:47 [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Eric Botcazou
12:44 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
11:14 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Andreas Tobler
11:12 bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Gerald Pfeifer
10:24 ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Gerald Pfeifer
03:40 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Richard Kenner
03:28 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Alexandre Oliva
02:56 Re: New loop unroller broken? David Edelsohn
00:12 I'm still stuck on x86-64 Richard Kenner

January 22, 2004
23:53 Re: mainline (2004-01-22 12:00 UTC) rejects valid code Serge Belyshev
23:04 http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html a bit confusing w.r.t.Ada installation. Karel Gardas
22:51 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
22:06 Re: function name in labels Per Bothner
21:44 Re: gcc help Jim Wilson
20:51 Re: 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos? Richard Henderson
20:09 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
20:07 Re: MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4 Michael Eager
20:06 Re: New loop unroller broken? Ulrich Weigand
20:00 Re: New loop unroller broken? Andrew Pinski
20:00 Re: New loop unroller broken? Richard Guenther
19:53 Tree-SSA versus 3.4 branch garbage production Jan Hubicka
19:50 Re: New loop unroller broken? Dale Johannesen
19:41 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
19:36 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
19:33 Re: STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ? Richard Henderson
19:32 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Zdenek Dvorak
19:27 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Richard Henderson
19:12 Re: libffi package Thomas Heller
19:08 Re: New loop unroller broken? Dale Johannesen
19:04 Re: New loop unroller broken? Dale Johannesen
18:53 Re: New loop unroller broken? Andrew Pinski
18:47 New loop unroller broken? Ulrich Weigand
17:59 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Jakub Jelinek
17:54 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Andreas Jaeger
17:34 Re: libffi package Tom Tromey
17:27 Re: DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks Joe Buck
17:23 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Wolfgang Bangerth
17:02 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c Daniel Jacobowitz
17:00 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Mark Mitchell
17:00 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Jakub Jelinek
16:58 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Jan Hubicka
16:56 Re: Inline questions Jan Hubicka
16:41 GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Andreas Jaeger
16:23 Re: 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos? duchier
16:18 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Mark Mitchell
15:54 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:52 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka
15:32 Re: 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos? Robert Dewar
15:21 Re: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Giovanni Bajo
15:07 Inline questions Manuel Báez
15:07 Re: libffi package Thomas Heller
14:59 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Andrew MacLeod
14:53 Re: mainline (2004-01-22 12:00 UTC) rejects valid code Josef Zlomek
14:50 [leadership/opensource] invitation to online survey Gianluca Bosco
14:38 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoffrey Furnish
14:14 mainline (2004-01-22 12:00 UTC) rejects valid code Serge Belyshev
13:49 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:41 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:24 Re: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Richard Guenther
13:12 Re: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Giovanni Bajo
12:34 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos? duchier
12:33 Re: fstream behaviour error / wrong installation ? Paolo Carlini
11:39 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ??? Zdenek Dvorak
11:31 Re: STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ? Olivier Hainque
11:29 Re: MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4 Richard Sandiford
11:22 Re: MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4 Richard Sandiford
10:38 RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Richard Guenther
10:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Richard Earnshaw
10:04 Re: gcc web site note Gerald Pfeifer
10:01 Release criteria (eas: [patch] index for 3.4.0 Re: Broken Link OnFront Page) Gerald Pfeifer
10:00 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ??? Andreas Schwab
09:49 Re: STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ? Olivier Hainque
09:39 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Richard Sandiford
09:03 gcc web site note Ilya
08:51 [RFC] Multiple memory-spaces in GCC feature request Svein E. Seldal
08:50 fstream behaviour error / wrong installation ? Stephane MILLET
08:49 Re: [PATCH] [COMMITTED] Fix Re: <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Segher Boessenkool
08:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Gerald Pfeifer
08:30 Re: DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks Segher Boessenkool
08:22 Re: DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks Gerald Pfeifer
06:48 gcc help Andrew
06:42 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Florian Weitling
06:37 Re: MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4 Eric Christopher
06:27 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Segher Boessenkool
06:27 Re: DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks Segher Boessenkool
06:27 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Segher Boessenkool
06:27 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Segher Boessenkool
06:27 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386 Segher Boessenkool
06:26 Re: [PATCH] [COMMITTED] Fix Re: <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Segher Boessenkool
05:54 Cant build 3.4 ss's 20040114 or 20040121 dean richey
04:19 Re: Predicated execution / if-conversion? Jim Wilson
03:39 Re: Predicated execution / if-conversion? Geert Bosch
03:37 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386 Jamie Lokier
03:15 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ??? Kazu Hirata
02:41 Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:09 MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4 Michael Eager
01:59 Re: gcc's limits.h vs POSIX DJ Delorie
01:49 Re: An error message enhancement request Giovanni Bajo
01:43 Re: gcc's limits.h vs POSIX Ian Lance Taylor
01:40 Re: gcc's limits.h vs POSIX DJ Delorie
01:39 An error message enhancement request Donald R. Laster Jr.
01:26 Re: gcc's limits.h vs POSIX Joseph S. Myers
01:26 Re: gcc's limits.h vs POSIX Ian Lance Taylor
01:17 gcc's limits.h vs POSIX DJ Delorie
00:28 Re: tree-ssa and compile-time performance regressions Diego Novillo
00:21 Re: tree-ssa and compile-time performance regressions law
00:08 Re: Declaring automatic variables inside a while loop Robert Dewar

January 21, 2004
23:58 tree-ssa and compile-time performance regressions Diego Novillo
23:37 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Marcel Weiher
23:33 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Marcel Weiher
22:30 Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa) Jim Wilson
22:29 Re: Declaring automatic variables inside a while loop Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
22:12 Re: Darwin 3.4 make check results with -mcpu=G5 Andrew Pinski
21:54 Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa) Richard Guenther
21:38 Re: switch statement performance tm_gccmail
21:31 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Daniel Berlin
21:30 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Wolfgang Bangerth
21:22 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Gabriel Dos Reis
21:13 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c Jim Wilson
21:00 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Daniel Berlin
20:59 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c DJ Delorie
20:52 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Paul Jarc
20:50 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Diego Novillo
20:46 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Wolfgang Bangerth
20:42 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Diego Novillo
20:38 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Ziemowit Laski
20:16 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Wolfgang Bangerth
19:44 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c Jim Wilson
19:43 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Diego Novillo
19:14 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Mike Stump
19:13 Re: Could GCC interested in a faster STRSTR function ? Alexandre Oliva
19:04 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c DJ Delorie
19:04 Re: Predicated execution / if-conversion? Jim Wilson
18:57 gcc-ss-3.4-20040121 is now available gccadmin
18:52 DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks Gerald Pfeifer
18:47 Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa) Jim Wilson
18:44 Darwin 3.4 make check results with -mcpu=G5 Bradley Lucier
18:39 Re: Predicated execution / if-conversion? Richard Henderson
18:33 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20040121 Gerald Pfeifer
18:24 gcc-ss-3.4-20040121 John R. Shannon
18:20 Re: RTL/SYMREF/VOLATILE question Jim Wilson
18:16 Re: STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ? Richard Henderson
18:13 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page Gerald Pfeifer
18:10 Re: Inlining function into itself (via transitivity Josef Zlomek
18:08 Re: gcc-ss-3.4-20040121 is now available Gerald Pfeifer
18:05 Re: RFC Decrease excessive string literal alignment on IA-32/AMD64 Richard Henderson
17:58 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka
17:36 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ steve naroff
17:16 [withdrawn] Re: Suggestion: Add -ffast-math to default BOOT_CFLAGS Kelley Cook
17:07 gcc-ss-3.4-20040121 is now available gccadmin
16:54 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Pascal J . Bourguignon
16:47 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page Chiaki
16:47 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page Kelley Cook
16:16 Re: Inlining function into itself (via transitivity Geoff Keating
16:12 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ David Ayers
16:11 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Diego Novillo
15:58 Could GCC interested in a faster STRSTR function ? jfmaquine
15:58 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Andrew MacLeod
15:33 Predicated execution / if-conversion? Jan Hoogerbrugge
15:29 Re: RTL/SYMREF/VOLATILE question xyzzy
15:05 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page Gerald Pfeifer
14:58 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ steve naroff
14:56 Re: Compilation-time suggestion #2 Segher Boessenkool
14:56 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Segher Boessenkool
14:35 Re: GCC 3.5 "integration branch" Paul Jarc
14:27 STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ? Olivier Hainque
14:20 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page Kelley Cook
14:11 Inlining function into itself (via transitivity Josef Zlomek
13:58 Re: [new-ra] Development status? Michael Matz
12:12 RE: binutils for irix 6.5 17M Sanjiv Gupta
11:57 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Richard Earnshaw
11:15 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ David Ayers
11:12 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political pointof view Zack Weinberg
10:31 Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa) Richard Guenther
10:22 GCC3.4.0/profiled bootstrap compile-time testing on MICO's ORB coresources Karel Gardas
10:07 Re: GCC 3.5 "integration branch" Momchil Velikov
09:34 RFC Decrease excessive string literal alignment on IA-32/AMD64 Jakub Jelinek
08:47 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Markus Hitter
07:48 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386 law
07:44 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386 Richard Henderson
07:24 Re: Declaring automatic variables inside a while loop Jim Wilson
07:15 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web pageexplicitly. Also a GCC source mirror? Chiaki
07:10 Re: GCC 3.5 "integration branch" Paul Jarc
06:41 Re: Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web pageexplicitly. Also a GCC source mirror? Zack Weinberg
06:39 RE: binutils for irix 6.5 17M Sanjiv Gupta
06:36 Re: Improvements for ColdFire v4 Andreas Jaeger
06:32 Improvements for ColdFire v4 Peter Barada
06:30 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386 law
06:10 binutils for irix 6.5 17M Pranay Chandrashekhar Tembheka
05:34 Please mention the CVS parameter has changed in the web page explicitly.Also a GCC source mirror? Chiaki
05:15 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386 law
04:13 Re: switch statement performance Paul Vixie
03:54 Re: switch statement performance Ian Lance Taylor
03:24 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c Jim Wilson
03:08 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386 Ian Lance Taylor
02:23 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c DJ Delorie
02:05 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Zack Weinberg
01:55 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c Jim Wilson
01:27 Re: GCC 3.5 "integration branch" Joe Buck
01:26 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c DJ Delorie
01:03 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c Jim Wilson
00:51 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Dara Hazeghi
00:47 Re: gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386 Richard Henderson
00:34 Re: RTL/SYMREF/VOLATILE question Jim Wilson
00:32 Re: gcc Jim Wilson
00:30 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Jim Wilson
00:30 Re: GCC XML back end Jim Wilson
00:30 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
00:29 Re: switch statement performance Paul Vixie
00:28 Re: Suggestion: Add -ffast-math to default BOOT_CFLAGS Richard Henderson
00:26 Re: [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on ia64 Jim Wilson
00:20 Re: libffi package Tom Tromey
00:20 Re: Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa) Richard Henderson
00:09 Re: gcc Alexandre Oliva
00:07 Re: switch statement performance Geoff Keating
00:02 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Alexandre Oliva
00:00 Re: GCC 3.5 "integration branch" Geoff Keating

January 20, 2004
23:42 Declaring automatic variables inside a while loop Swaminathan Venkatakrishnapras
23:42 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Ziemowit Laski
23:34 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Alexander Malmberg
23:28 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Zack Winkles
23:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gerald Pfeifer
23:18 Re: --with-libs busted? Ian Lance Taylor
23:08 Re: povray: Revised numbers Steven Bosscher
23:07 Re: --with-libs busted? Jim Wilson
22:59 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mike Stump
22:55 Re: TARGET_HARD_FLOAT for Single preciscion. Jim Wilson
22:52 Bootstrap failures on ia64 (was Re: Readiness of tree-ssa) Richard Guenther
22:50 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re:gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal] Toon Moene
22:36 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4 Mike Stump
22:30 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoffrey Keating
22:27 g++ 3.3.1 (cygwin) Jimen Ching
22:26 Re: switch statement performance Paul Vixie
22:15 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Ziemowit Laski
22:13 Re: switch statement performance Geoff Keating
22:12 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Alexandre Oliva
22:06 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Alexandre Oliva
22:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoff Keating
22:01 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Marc Espie
21:55 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Alex Perez
21:55 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Richard Guenther
21:44 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Ziemowit Laski
21:42 gcc/1532: Redundant compare instructions on i386 Ian Lance Taylor
21:38 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal] Mike Stump
21:14 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9 Bruce Korb
21:05 Re: [tree-ssa]: darwin SPEC numbers Dale Johannesen
21:04 Re: Suggestion: Add -ffast-math to default BOOT_CFLAGS Nathanael Nerode
20:56 Re: [tree-ssa]: darwin SPEC numbers Andreas Jaeger
20:54 Re: [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Alex Perez
20:50 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9 Nathanael Nerode
20:45 Re: povray: Revised numbers Daniel Berlin
20:42 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9 Nathanael Nerode
20:41 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mike Stump
20:39 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9 Nathanael Nerode
20:38 Re: povray: Revised numbers Steven Bosscher
20:32 Re: povray: Revised numbers Daniel Berlin
20:25 Suggestion: Add -ffast-math to default BOOT_CFLAGS Kelley Cook
20:21 Re: [tree-ssa]: darwin SPEC numbers Dale Johannesen
20:14 Re: [tree-ssa]: darwin SPEC numbers Andreas Jaeger
20:09 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Nathanael Nerode
20:08 [tree-ssa]: darwin SPEC numbers Dale Johannesen
20:08 Re: libffi package Thomas Heller
20:07 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Diego Novillo
20:00 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Richard Guenther
19:48 Readiness of tree-ssa Wolfgang Bangerth
19:41 GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c Graeme Peterson
19:24 Re: povray: Revised numbers Richard Guenther
19:24 [objc-improvements-branch] About to start ObjC++ Ziemowit Laski
19:21 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Joern Rennecke
19:05 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Joern Rennecke
19:03 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Alexandre Oliva
19:01 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Zack Weinberg
18:52 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoffrey Keating
18:49 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9 Gerald Pfeifer
18:48 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoffrey Keating
18:47 Bugreports from MICO compile-time testing submited [was: Re: [UPDATED]GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison on MICOproject sources.] Karel Gardas
18:32 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka
18:24 GCC 3.5 "integration branch" David Edelsohn
18:15 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references. Richard Henderson
18:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Zack Weinberg
18:04 Re: -mfpmath=sse question Kelley Cook
17:51 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4 Giovanni Bajo
17:40 GGC per call allocation statistics Jan Hubicka
17:35 -mfpmath=sse question Neal D. Becker
17:26 Re: [new-ra] Development status? Denis Chertykov
17:17 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Richard Henderson
17:16 Re: GCC 3.4.0 040114/GCC 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 compilation speedcomparison. Karel Gardas
17:02 Re: GCC 3.4.0 040114/GCC 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 compilation speed comparison. Steven Bosscher
16:59 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4 Richard Guenther
16:57 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references. Andrew Pinski
16:54 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Gabriel Dos Reis
16:54 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a politicalpoint of view Diego Novillo
16:51 GCC 3.4.0 040114/GCC 3.5-tree-ssa 040120 compilation speed comparison. Karel Gardas
16:48 Re: [new-ra] Development status? Michael Matz
16:35 Re: [new-ra] Development status? Denis Chertykov
16:16 Comparison of compilation speed of GCC 3.4.0 040114, ICC 8.0 andCOMO 4.3.3 on MICO ORB core sources (C++) Karel Gardas
16:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
16:07 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political pointof view Benjamin Kosnik
15:29 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4 Richard Guenther
15:27 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Haley
15:21 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Karel Gardas
15:19 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Scott Robert Ladd
15:16 Re: function name in labels Steven Bosscher
15:16 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Daniel Jacobowitz
15:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Steven Bosscher
15:13 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Daniel Jacobowitz
15:08 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Paul Koning
15:08 Re: matching a call followed by a jump law
15:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Daniel Jacobowitz
14:59 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4 Richard Guenther
14:55 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Karel Gardas
14:52 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Daniel Berlin
14:41 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Karel Gardas
14:27 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Scott Robert Ladd
14:25 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references. Jan Hubicka
14:25 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Scott Robert Ladd
14:22 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Giovanni Bajo
14:20 function name in labels Jan Hoogerbrugge
14:07 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Gabriel Dos Reis
13:59 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Jan Hubicka
13:59 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Marc Espie
13:55 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Jan Hubicka
13:54 matching a call followed by a jump Jan Hoogerbrugge
13:51 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Giovanni Bajo
13:38 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Gabriel Dos Reis
13:35 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4 Jan Hubicka
13:09 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4 Jakub Jelinek
13:01 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4 Richard Guenther
12:49 Re: Speed/profile of gcc3.4 Zack Winkles
12:42 Speed/profile of gcc3.4 Richard Guenther
12:36 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
12:28 RTL/SYMREF/VOLATILE question xyzzy
12:07 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Laurent GUERBY
12:05 Re: A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Giovanni Bajo
11:57 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Steven Bosscher
11:52 Re: [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison on MICO project sources. Giovanni Bajo
11:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
11:31 Re: [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison on MICO project sources. Giovanni Bajo
11:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
10:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Russ Allbery
10:36 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
10:21 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references. Richard Henderson
10:08 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Jan Hubicka
10:04 A quick summary of gcc compilation speed from a political point of view Marc Espie
09:55 profiledbootstrap success! Richard Guenther
09:52 Re: [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performancecomparison on MICO project sources. Karel Gardas
09:50 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references. Jan Hubicka
09:48 Re: [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison on MICO project sources. Steven Bosscher
09:30 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Richard Sandiford
09:23 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal] Bernd Jendrissek
09:20 [UPDATED] GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performancecomparison on MICO project sources. Karel Gardas
09:15 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Andreas Schwab
09:09 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal] Eric Botcazou
08:38 Re: GCC on SPEC.org Dara Hazeghi
08:25 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Karel Gardas
08:12 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re:gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal] Laurent GUERBY
07:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Marc Espie
07:40 Re: gcc compilation speed Karel Gardas
07:23 Re: gcc compilation speed Steven Bosscher
06:27 gcc compilation speed Matt Austern
05:19 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal D. Starner
04:52 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Eric Botcazou
04:35 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
04:28 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Pinski
04:23 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
03:53 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
03:50 Re: libffi package Jeff Sturm
03:49 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Zack Weinberg
03:45 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
03:27 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
03:23 gcc Bill Cunningham
03:17 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal] Andrew Pinski
03:14 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Andrew Pinski
03:13 Re: GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal] Andrew Pinski
03:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Geert Bosch
03:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mike Stump
03:00 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal D. Starner
02:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Alexandre Oliva
02:44 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Alexandre Oliva
02:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Gabriel Dos Reis
02:19 switch statement performance Paul Vixie
02:14 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mike Stump
02:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
02:08 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Mark Mitchell
02:05 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mike Stump
02:00 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Gabriel Dos Reis
01:57 Re: Your change causing regressions Richard Henderson
01:39 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:59 Re: tree-SSA and indirect references. Richard Henderson
00:31 tree-SSA and indirect references. Jan Hubicka
00:20 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Dale Johannesen
00:17 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
00:01 GCC's hardware requirements - Where is the freedom? [was: Re: gcc3.5 integration branch proposal] Matthias Benkmann

January 19, 2004
23:53 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mark Hahn
23:48 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Kenner
23:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Joe Buck
23:46 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Zack Weinberg
23:43 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Daniel Berlin
23:42 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Kenner
23:40 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
23:37 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Joe Buck
23:36 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Zack Weinberg
23:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline tm_gccmail
23:30 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Joe Buck
23:16 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Daniel Berlin
23:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
23:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Laurent GUERBY
23:01 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
22:41 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Pinski
22:40 Re: Your change causing regressions Richard Henderson
22:38 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Eric Botcazou
22:29 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Marc Espie
22:22 Re: Ada commits to branch (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa tomainline) Laurent GUERBY
22:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoff Keating
22:18 Your change causing regressions law
22:17 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Geoff Keating
22:11 Re: Ada commits to branch (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline) Arnaud Charlet
22:09 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Laurent GUERBY
22:03 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Eric Botcazou
21:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Eric Botcazou
21:38 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Richard Henderson
21:34 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoff Keating
21:25 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Joern Rennecke
21:25 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Kenner
21:20 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
21:20 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9 Bruce Korb
21:18 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Eric Christopher
21:15 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Zack Weinberg
21:09 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Eric Botcazou
21:06 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9 Gerald Pfeifer
20:57 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Dale Johannesen
20:51 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Dale Johannesen
20:49 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Diego Novillo
20:41 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Henderson
20:41 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Richard Henderson
20:38 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
20:38 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9 Bruce Korb
20:36 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails Eric Botcazou
20:33 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Joern Rennecke
20:30 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails Jeff Sturm
20:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Eric Botcazou
20:06 Re: GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparisonon MICO project sources. Karel Gardas
20:04 Re: fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9 Gabriel Dos Reis
20:02 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Henderson
20:01 Re: GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparisonon MICO project sources. Gerald Pfeifer
19:57 Re: GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performancecomparison on MICO project sources. Eric Christopher
19:53 Re: GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparisonon MICO project sources. Karel Gardas
19:49 Re: GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performancecomparison on MICO project sources. Eric Christopher
19:46 fixinc regression for <math.h> with C++ on Solaris 9 Gerald Pfeifer
19:43 GCC 3.4.0 20040114 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparisonon MICO project sources. Karel Gardas
19:41 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails Gerald Pfeifer
19:39 latest snapshot does not build on x86_64 Robert Schweikert
19:39 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Jan Hubicka
19:33 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? DJ Delorie
19:15 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Marc Espie
19:13 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
19:10 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Marc Espie
19:06 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
19:05 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Kenner
19:04 A bug ?? Theodore Papadopoulo
18:39 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Jeff Sturm
18:35 Re: Ada commits to branch (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa tomainline) Laurent GUERBY
18:34 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Marc Espie
18:34 Re: g++ parser problem Gabriel Dos Reis
18:30 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Paul Koning
18:29 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Giovanni Bajo
18:28 Re: g++ parser problem Giovanni Bajo
18:28 Re: g++ parser problem Gabriel Dos Reis
18:27 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
18:26 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Zack Weinberg
18:25 Re: g++ parser problem Paolo Carlini
18:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
18:20 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
18:18 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Kenner
18:18 Re: g++ parser problem Paolo Carlini
18:12 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Scott Robert Ladd
18:11 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Haley
18:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Geert Bosch
18:09 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Scott Robert Ladd
18:08 Re: Compilation-time suggestion #2 Scott Robert Ladd
18:08 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Scott Robert Ladd
18:07 g++ parser problem Robert Schweikert
18:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
18:03 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Zack Weinberg
18:03 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
18:02 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
18:00 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Tom Tromey
17:58 Re: Compilation-time suggestion Gabriel Dos Reis
17:58 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Dan Nicolaescu
17:58 Compilation-time suggestion #2 Roger Sayle
17:58 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Jan Hubicka
17:57 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
17:56 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline John R. Shannon
17:54 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
17:51 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
17:51 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
17:48 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
17:46 Compilation-time suggestion Roger Sayle
17:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
17:42 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Geert Bosch
17:41 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
17:34 Buglets In http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.4/changes.html Stephan T. Lavavej
17:30 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
17:27 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
17:23 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
17:09 gcc-ss-3.3-20040119 is now available gccadmin
17:07 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Scott Robert Ladd
17:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Jan Hubicka
16:26 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Per Bothner
16:24 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Marc Espie
16:24 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Paul Koning
16:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
16:09 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Scott Robert Ladd
16:07 GCC XML back end Делчо Делов
15:56 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
15:51 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
15:49 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
15:34 Re: GCC on SPEC.org Vladimir Makarov
15:05 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
14:48 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Vladimir Makarov
14:48 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Lars Segerlund
14:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
14:23 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
14:18 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Jan Hubicka
14:17 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
14:16 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Robert Dewar
14:13 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
14:02 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
13:55 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert Dewar
13:51 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Ian Lance Taylor
13:39 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Jan Hubicka
13:35 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Diego Novillo
13:35 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Jan Hubicka
13:28 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Marc Espie
13:26 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Theodore Papadopoulo
13:18 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Jan Hubicka
12:51 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Jan Hubicka
12:49 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
12:39 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Paul Brook
12:38 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Haley
12:36 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Paul Brook
12:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Haley
12:29 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
12:24 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
12:23 Re: Ada commits to branch (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline) Arnaud Charlet
12:21 Re: gcc-3.3.2 freebsd 4.9 bug? Gerald Pfeifer
12:19 Ada commits to branch (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa tomainline) Laurent GUERBY
12:13 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Pinski
12:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Henderson
12:01 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Guenther
12:00 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Jan Hubicka
11:51 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Kenner
11:44 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
11:29 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Jan Hubicka
10:54 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI Joseph S. Myers
10:43 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Steven Bosscher
10:40 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Nick Burrett
09:58 Re: [new-ra] Development status? Michael Matz
09:35 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
08:45 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Steven Bosscher
08:38 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
08:19 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Steven Bosscher
08:12 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Steven Bosscher
07:10 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Andreas Jaeger
07:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Eric Botcazou
05:48 gcc-3.3.2 freebsd 4.9 bug? znsoft
05:31 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI Kazu Hirata
05:29 I have built gcc 3.3.2(C,C++) on AIX 4.3.3.0 negimoto
04:58 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails Eric Botcazou
04:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
04:37 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Giovanni Bajo
03:59 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Zack Weinberg
03:49 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal David Edelsohn
03:47 RE: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Robert McNulty Junior
03:42 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Marc Espie
01:51 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
01:36 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Chris Lattner
01:31 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Marc Espie
01:18 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Geoff Keating
01:12 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Geoff Keating
01:10 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Geoff Keating
00:53 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Ian Lance Taylor

January 18, 2004
23:51 Re: <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Timothy J. Wood
23:45 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Andrew Pinski
23:36 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Ziemowit Laski
23:34 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Jakub Jelinek
23:27 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Jan Hubicka
23:26 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails Tom Tromey
23:23 Re: <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Ziemowit Laski
23:18 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Andrew Pinski
23:17 Re: Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails Gabriel Dos Reis
23:11 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Ziemowit Laski
23:07 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI Joseph S. Myers
22:56 Re: Broken Link On Front Page Toon Moene
22:55 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI Gerald Pfeifer
22:52 [tree-ssa]: Interprocedural aliasing and function local results Daniel Berlin
22:52 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI Kazu Hirata
22:50 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Chris Lattner
22:48 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Jan Hubicka
22:44 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Chris Lattner
22:42 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Joseph S. Myers
22:42 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Chris Lattner
22:41 Building GCC with native Solaris ld fails Gerald Pfeifer
22:40 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Chris Lattner
22:37 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Henderson
22:37 Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism Mark Mitchell
22:36 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Henderson
22:33 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Jan Hubicka
22:29 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Richard Henderson
22:25 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Zack Weinberg
22:22 Re: Documenting GCC-only ABI Gerald Pfeifer
22:22 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Jan Hubicka
22:18 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Chris Lattner
22:05 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Henderson
21:14 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Joseph S. Myers
20:42 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Richard Kenner
20:38 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 bootstrap broken due to final.c change Roger Sayle
20:28 Re: Broken Link On Front Page Gerald Pfeifer
20:20 Re: Broken Link On Front Page Gerald Pfeifer
20:17 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Ian Lance Taylor
20:10 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Richard Henderson
20:02 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 bootstrap broken due to final.c change Daniel Jacobowitz
19:54 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Ian Lance Taylor
19:49 [PATCH] [COMMITTED] Fix Re: <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Andrew Pinski
19:31 <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Timothy J. Wood
19:31 RE: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level jgrant
19:29 Re: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level Andrew Pinski
19:27 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Timothy J. Wood
19:08 Re: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level Ian Lance Taylor
19:01 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Richard Henderson
18:26 RE: Optimisation options turned on at a certain level jgrant
18:10 Re: sparc-sun-solaris2.9 bootstrap broken due to final.c change Andreas Tobler
18:06 sparc-sun-solaris2.9 bootstrap broken due to final.c change Gerald Pfeifer
18:05 Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Roger Sayle
16:50 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Daniel Berlin
16:45 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Jan Hubicka
16:36 [tree-ssa] bootstrap failure on ia64 Richard Guenther
16:07 Re: 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Andrew Pinski
15:54 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Daniel Berlin
15:50 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Daniel Berlin
15:48 Migration to target hooks Kazu Hirata
14:09 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Ian Lance Taylor
13:58 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
11:30 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Joseph S. Myers
11:22 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Steven Bosscher
10:36 Re: GCC on SPEC.org Andreas Jaeger
10:23 Oopack.C: mainline vs tree-ssa Paolo Carlini
10:07 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
09:59 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Matthias Klose
09:40 GCC on SPEC.org Dara Hazeghi
09:23 Broken Link On Front Page Stephan T. Lavavej
09:03 Re: Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Zack Weinberg
08:37 Can we speed up the gcc_target structure? Ian Lance Taylor
07:23 Re: Testable pooma Mark Mitchell
07:18 Re: Cross compiler build fails for bad inclusion Dara Hazeghi
07:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
07:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
06:08 gcc-3.3.2 OK [000](|)ETeria
04:52 Re: more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
04:39 3.4 bootstrap failure on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Timothy J. Wood
04:37 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Zack Weinberg
03:47 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Daniel Berlin
03:15 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Zack Weinberg
03:13 [new-ra] Development status? Giovanni Bajo
02:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Scott A Crosby
02:34 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Zack Weinberg
01:50 more m68k breakage on m68k-linux Bernardo Innocenti
01:24 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline David Edelsohn
01:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Phil Edwards
00:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Toon Moene

January 17, 2004
23:38 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Toon Moene
23:37 Re: New tree-ssa bootstrap failure Richard Henderson
23:33 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Toon Moene
23:27 Testable pooma Steven Bosscher
23:27 New tree-ssa bootstrap failure Gerald Pfeifer
23:13 Re: [patch] MAINTAINERS cleanup Volker Reichelt
22:58 Re: cfg.texi (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline) Steven Bosscher
22:55 cfg.texi (was: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline) Steven Bosscher
22:41 Re: povray: Revised numbers Richard Henderson
22:24 Re: povray: Revised numbers Richard Guenther
22:23 Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism Gerald Pfeifer
22:12 Re: povray: Revised numbers Jan Hubicka
22:08 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Eric Christopher
22:00 Re: povray: Revised numbers Richard Guenther
21:48 Re: povray: Revised numbers Jan Hubicka
21:47 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
21:45 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
21:34 povray: Revised numbers Scott Robert Ladd
21:33 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Steven Bosscher
21:32 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Henderson
21:24 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
21:23 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
20:36 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc Diego Novillo
20:35 Re: RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Daniel Berlin
20:21 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Steven Bosscher
20:21 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc Scott Robert Ladd
20:20 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc Jan Hubicka
20:19 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc Zack Winkles
20:18 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc Scott Robert Ladd
20:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Steven Bosscher
20:13 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc Daniel Berlin
20:10 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc Daniel Berlin
20:09 Re: povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc Andrew Pinski
20:02 povray: a benchmark with mainline, tree-ssa, and icc Scott Robert Ladd
20:00 Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism Joseph S. Myers
19:34 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Guenther
19:31 Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism Gerald Pfeifer
19:23 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Pinski
19:22 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Daniel Jacobowitz
19:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Arnaud Charlet
19:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Mark Mitchell
18:43 Documenting GCC-only ABI Kazu Hirata
18:34 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Mark Mitchell
18:11 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Joseph S. Myers
18:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Joseph S. Myers
18:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Mark Mitchell
18:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Joseph S. Myers
18:01 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created Mark Mitchell
17:58 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Scott Robert Ladd
17:58 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
17:51 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
17:50 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
17:50 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Scott Robert Ladd
17:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Joseph S. Myers
17:40 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Daniel Berlin
17:37 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
17:31 RFC: GC allocating everything with a type, part 1 Steven Bosscher
17:30 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:26 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
17:17 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Dara Hazeghi
17:16 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Scott Robert Ladd
17:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
17:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Kaveh R. Ghazi
17:07 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Joseph S. Myers
17:04 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:55 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Gerald Pfeifer
16:26 Re: [tree-ssa] ia64 bootstrap broken Diego Novillo
16:19 [tree-ssa] ia64 bootstrap broken Andreas Schwab
15:59 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created Andreas Tobler
15:57 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created Eric Botcazou
15:35 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created Andreas Tobler
15:28 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Scott Robert Ladd
15:26 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andreas Jaeger
15:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Daniel Berlin
15:07 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Jan Hubicka
14:57 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
14:57 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Paul Brook
14:54 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Scott Robert Ladd
14:53 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Florian Weimer
14:49 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Scott Robert Ladd
14:48 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Daniel Berlin
14:45 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Daniel Berlin
14:44 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Jan Hubicka
14:37 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Jan Hubicka
14:30 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Scott Robert Ladd
14:29 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Roger Sayle
14:20 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Roger Sayle
14:05 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Steven Bosscher
14:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Jan Hubicka
13:53 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Jan Hubicka
13:47 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Florian Weimer
13:35 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
13:33 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
13:29 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
13:20 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
13:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Giovanni Bajo
12:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline John R. Shannon
12:07 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
11:20 Re: Regenerating gcc.pot Joseph S. Myers
11:16 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Joseph S. Myers
11:09 Re: Help with changing snapshot mechanism Joseph S. Myers
11:08 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Walrond
08:00 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
06:38 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
06:36 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created Eric Botcazou
06:22 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Pinski
06:19 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline David Edelsohn
06:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
06:13 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
06:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Pinski
06:04 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Roger Sayle
05:52 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Per Bothner
05:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
05:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
05:06 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
05:04 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Roger Sayle
04:02 Regenerating gcc.pot Mark Mitchell
03:57 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
03:55 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Pinski
03:38 All 3.4 regressions have been marked as 3.5 regressions Daniel Berlin
03:36 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
03:26 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
03:26 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
03:21 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
03:20 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
03:18 Help with changing snapshot mechanism Mark Mitchell
03:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
03:14 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Steven Bosscher
03:12 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Steven Bosscher
03:09 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Steven Bosscher
03:04 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
03:02 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
03:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
03:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Daniel Berlin
02:58 GCC 3.4 Release Branch Created Mark Mitchell
02:56 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
02:52 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
02:48 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
02:39 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
02:28 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Richard Kenner
02:19 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Steven Bosscher
02:17 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:15 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Steven Bosscher
02:01 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Gabriel Dos Reis
01:51 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo
01:37 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Gerald Pfeifer
01:28 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
01:02 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Joseph S. Myers
01:01 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
00:55 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Eric Christopher
00:54 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
00:53 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline law
00:44 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Gerald Pfeifer
00:35 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Andrew Pinski
00:31 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Daniel Berlin
00:19 [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Diego Novillo

January 16, 2004
23:47 Re: [patch] MAINTAINERS cleanup Andrew Pinski
23:44 [patch] MAINTAINERS cleanup Volker Reichelt
21:35 Re: Snapshots v.s. CVS Head Jeffrey Creem
20:18 Re: Query for removing file support from Newlib Mike Stump
20:17 libffi package Thomas Heller
19:03 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
18:36 Re: compile-time type introspection Joe Buck
18:20 Re: succesful bootstrap: 3.3.2/sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Eric Botcazou
17:30 succesful bootstrap: 3.3.2/sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Victor Leo Kallen Soto
17:30 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x law
17:20 compile-time type introspection Lally Singh
17:09 Re: Snapshots v.s. CVS Head Andreas Jaeger
17:07 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x Joe Buck
16:48 Re: trouble in attempt_auto_inc Joern Rennecke
16:41 Re: Snapshots v.s. CVS Head Jeffrey Creem
16:15 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu Dan Kegel
16:01 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu Robert Schiele
15:39 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu Dan Kegel
14:54 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE Arpad Beszedes
14:32 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu Robert Schiele
12:23 Query for removing file support from Newlib pankaj dev
12:00 Problem with zlib on x86-64 Richard Kenner
11:27 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
10:15 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x Robert Dewar
09:30 Re: [Bug optimization/13629] [tree-ssa][Regression] dominator optimizations can pessimize code Steven Bosscher
05:18 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x Russ Allbery
05:00 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Ranjit Mathew
04:18 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
03:57 Re: [Bug optimization/13629] [tree-ssa][Regression] dominator optimizations can pessimize code Daniel Berlin
03:39 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Daniel Jacobowitz
03:34 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
03:29 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x Robert Dewar
03:23 re [14] Leeanna Bouchard
02:17 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x Marc Espie
01:36 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Henderson
00:29 SingleReel.com Streaming Host SingleReel News

January 15, 2004
23:45 SingleReel.com Streaming Host SingleReel News
23:21 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
23:21 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
23:04 Re: libgcc linking oddity Richard Henderson
22:10 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
19:36 trouble in attempt_auto_inc Richard Zidlicky
19:35 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andrew Pinski
19:10 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
18:46 Re: [tree-ssa] moving phi nodes? law
17:53 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE Joe Buck
17:53 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu Ian Lance Taylor
17:48 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Florian Weitling
17:46 Re: gcj and handling own packages question - now the files! Florian Weitling
16:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
14:15 RE: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE S. Bosscher
14:12 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Matthias Klose
14:09 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE Gábor Lóki
14:00 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
13:49 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Matthias Klose
13:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
13:03 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE Steven Bosscher
13:01 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE Arpad Beszedes
12:57 Re: Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE Steven Bosscher
12:55 Tree SSA measurement in CSiBE Arpad Beszedes
12:32 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
12:20 Re: compilation error ssa-branch David Berner
11:06 libgcc linking oddity Richard Zidlicky
10:09 bootstrap failure, gcc HEAD, Boolean.java Andrew Haley
09:40 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
08:06 bootstrap failure, gcc HEAD, Boolean.java Michael Elizabeth Chastain
06:22 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Henderson
06:20 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu dank
04:31 Re: 3.5 integration branch created Geoffrey Keating
03:58 Re: 3.5 integration branch created Richard Kenner
02:50 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
02:46 --with-libs busted? Daniel Kegel
01:52 RE:software Globalscreen
01:16 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
01:16 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Joe Buck
01:15 Re: Bogus/outdated entries in MAINTAINERS Mark Mitchell
01:01 TARGET_HARD_FLOAT for Single preciscion. Spundun Bhatt
00:29 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
00:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
00:00 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky

January 14, 2004
23:24 Bug 13689 as further evidence of my point about maintainers Daniel Berlin
23:15 Re: x86: -Os -msse2 needs -maccumulate-outgoing-args Jan Hubicka
23:14 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Gunther Nikl
22:52 Re: x86: -Os -msse2 needs -maccumulate-outgoing-args Stuart Hastings
22:30 The Linux binutils 2.14.90.0.8 is released H. J. Lu
22:24 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Richard Henderson
22:20 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Jan Hubicka
22:14 Re: 3.5 integration branch created Geoffrey Keating
21:26 Re: 3.5 integration branch created Geoffrey Keating
21:02 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Andrew Haley
21:02 Re: Duplicate unspec instruction entries in rs6000.md? Dale Johannesen
20:59 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Laurent GUERBY
20:50 Re: Duplicate unspec instruction entries in rs6000.md? Mike Stump
20:21 C++ support question Darren Humphrey
20:12 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Andrew Haley
19:56 Re: Duplicate unspec instruction entries in rs6000.md? Daniel Jacobowitz
19:56 Re: Duplicate unspec instruction entries in rs6000.md? Richard Henderson
19:47 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mike Stump
18:55 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
18:53 Duplicate unspec instruction entries in rs6000.md? Syd Polk
18:35 Re: Bogus/outdated entries in MAINTAINERS Joe Buck
18:28 Re: ./ diff config DJ Delorie
18:09 Re: ./ diff config Nathanael Nerode
17:42 Re: swap does not compile Benjamin Kosnik
17:13 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
17:13 gcc-ss-3.4-20040114 is now available gccadmin
17:10 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
17:09 Re: compilation error ssa-branch Benjamin Kosnik
17:07 g++ 3.4 breakage Benjamin Kosnik
17:07 g++ 3.4 breakage Benjamin Kosnik
17:05 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Gunther Nikl
16:47 Re: Bogus/outdated entries in MAINTAINERS Mark Mitchell
16:18 Re: 3.5 integration branch created Phil Edwards
15:29 compilation error ssa-branch David Berner
14:58 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Paul Koning
13:45 Games game
13:11 Re: 3.5 integration branch created Richard Kenner
12:31 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Florian Weitling
12:17 g++ 3.4 breakage Richard Guenther
11:01 Bogus/outdated entries in MAINTAINERS Volker Reichelt
10:15 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Gunther Nikl
10:01 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Gunther Nikl
08:48 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Steven Bosscher
08:39 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Laurent GUERBY
08:38 Re: *** bootstrap fails for 3.4.0 20040113 (experimental) on i586-suse-linux-gnu Robert Schiele
08:35 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Laurent GUERBY
07:13 Re: GCC configuration help, please? Zack Weinberg
06:13 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mark Mitchell
05:18 Re: swap does not compile Mark Mitchell
05:05 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Rens Sankar
05:04 GCC configuration help, please? Michelle
02:55 Re: 3.5 integration branch created Eric Christopher
02:52 Re: 3.5 integration branch created Andrew Pinski
01:43 Re: 3.5 integration branch created Steven Bosscher
01:36 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Joe Buck
01:14 3.5 integration branch created Geoffrey Keating
01:13 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
01:05 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Andrew Pinski
01:03 Re: x86: -Os -msse2 needs -maccumulate-outgoing-args Jan Hubicka
00:59 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
00:56 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
00:55 Re: x86: -Os -msse2 needs -maccumulate-outgoing-args Stuart Hastings
00:47 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Andrew Pinski
00:46 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
00:26 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
00:01 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoff Keating

January 13, 2004
23:58 Regression testers and --enable-intermodule Vaclav Haisman
23:53 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Daniel Berlin
23:51 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Eric Christopher
23:31 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Michael Elizabeth Chastain
23:29 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mike Stump
23:24 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Paul Koning
23:13 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Daniel Berlin
23:00 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
22:55 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
22:41 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal David Edelsohn
22:15 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Nathanael Nerode
21:58 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
21:31 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoff Keating
21:25 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x Nathanael Nerode
21:19 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o" Daniel Jacobowitz
21:02 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o" Daniel Kegel
20:21 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Geoff Keating
20:20 Re: [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions Devang Patel
19:57 Re: [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions Jan Hubicka
19:48 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gerald Pfeifer
18:42 Re: [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions Devang Patel
18:39 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Tom Tromey
18:22 Successfully built gcc 3.3.2 on Pentium running Linux 2.4.24 Gabriele Inghirami
17:18 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
16:03 RE: Number of functions optimized by GCSE module Chris Lattner
15:18 Re: [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions Zdenek Dvorak
15:12 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Gunther Nikl
15:04 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Daniel Jacobowitz
14:36 Re: Register Coalescing Ian Lance Taylor
14:07 g77 failures on Panther under fink Jack Howarth
13:58 Re: swap does not compile Alexandre Oliva
13:24 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Gunther Nikl
12:28 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Ranjit Mathew
12:18 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
12:14 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
11:30 Number of functions optimized by GCSE module Qiong Cai
11:11 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x Marc Espie
11:04 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Gunther Nikl
10:53 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x Gerald Pfeifer
10:26 Register Coalescing Jon Beniston
09:33 Re: [www-patch] frontends.html (Was: Re: PL/1 Front-end for GCCv0.0.3) Gerald Pfeifer
09:19 gcj and handling own packages question Florian Weitling
08:57 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Gabriel Paubert
07:15 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x Andreas Jaeger
07:13 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x neil
06:44 [www-patch] frontends.html (Was: Re: PL/1 Front-end for GCC v0.0.3) Ranjit Mathew
06:15 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Jim Wilson
04:58 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Rens Sankar
04:46 Re: [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions Richard Henderson
04:39 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o" Janis Johnson
04:15 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o" Alan Modra
03:34 Re: gcc/cp/cxxfilt.c Zack Weinberg
03:27 gcc/cp/cxxfilt.c Ian Lance Taylor
03:26 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o" Daniel Jacobowitz
02:24 [tree-ssa] cfghooks questions Devang Patel
02:19 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
01:37 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o" Daniel Kegel
01:35 Re: offering a full implementation of C99 compound initializers traversal Jim Wilson
01:33 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
01:26 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mark Mitchell
01:19 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
01:16 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Ziemowit Laski
01:13 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Jan Hubicka
01:12 Re: swap does not compile Mark Mitchell
01:08 Re: Question regarding mipsisa32r2 instruction set Jim Wilson
01:02 Re: swap does not compile Alexandre Oliva
01:01 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mark Mitchell
00:59 Altivec (Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal) Matt Austern
00:55 Re: RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x Andrew Pinski
00:55 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Ziemowit Laski
00:54 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Ziemowit Laski
00:54 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Gabriel Dos Reis
00:49 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Jan Hubicka
00:47 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Daniel Jacobowitz
00:46 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Daniel Jacobowitz
00:45 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Jan Hubicka
00:42 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Geoffrey Keating
00:37 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Jan Hubicka
00:37 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Steven Bosscher
00:28 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Joe Buck
00:27 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Zack Weinberg
00:23 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Ziemowit Laski
00:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Steven Bosscher
00:22 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Jan Hubicka
00:21 Re: libstdc++/configure problem Richard Zidlicky
00:18 Re: bump libgcc_s.so version number? Richard Zidlicky
00:16 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Daniel Jacobowitz
00:16 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mark Mitchell
00:15 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Steven Bosscher
00:11 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Ziemowit Laski
00:06 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Daniel Jacobowitz

January 12, 2004
23:55 Re: --with-sysroot demands /usr/include? Daniel Jacobowitz
23:50 RFC: OpenBSD configurations for gcc 3.3.x Marc Espie
23:49 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mark Mitchell
23:48 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Zack Weinberg
23:42 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoff Keating
23:31 Re: [www-patch] bugs/management.html: Clarify how to handleregressions Mark Mitchell
23:10 [www-patch] bugs/management.html: Clarify how to handle regressions Volker Reichelt
23:06 Re: --with-sysroot demands /usr/include? Daniel Kegel
22:40 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mike Stump
22:05 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Arnaud Charlet
21:57 Re: --with-sysroot demands /usr/include? Alexandre Oliva
21:12 Re: libstdc++/configure problem Phil Edwards
21:07 Re: libstdc++/configure problem Jim Wilson
21:04 Re: parallel code generation Diego Novillo
20:56 parallel code generation Viktor Przebinda
20:49 --with-sysroot demands /usr/include? Daniel Kegel
20:48 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Zack Weinberg
19:44 Re: Question regarding mipsisa32r2 instruction set cgd
19:32 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Laurent GUERBY
19:22 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Mark Mitchell
18:47 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoffrey Keating
18:39 Re: va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Geoffrey Keating
18:19 Re: swap does not compile Mark Mitchell
17:14 gcc-ss-3.3-20040112 is now available gccadmin
17:11 Warning!: (YOU WILL SUCCEED!) gzxlicrrqwyouid wsz Helene Winter
16:51 Re: swap does not compile Alexandre Oliva
16:24 Re: swap does not compile Mark Mitchell
16:18 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Mark Mitchell
16:15 Re: swap does not compile Alexandre Oliva
16:04 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Rainer Orth
16:02 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Giovanni Bajo
15:41 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Giovanni Bajo
15:39 Re: problem installing gcc Phil Edwards
15:37 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Wolfgang Bangerth
15:33 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Arnaud Charlet
15:33 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Volker Reichelt
15:32 Question regarding mipsisa32r2 instruction set Mile Davidovic
15:28 RE: Classifying bugs Wolfgang Bangerth
15:24 RE: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Wolfgang Bangerth
15:21 Request for information Mile Davidovic
15:21 RE: Classifying bugs S. Bosscher
15:18 RE: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual S. Bosscher
15:08 Re: Classifying bugs Wolfgang Bangerth
15:05 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Giovanni Bajo
14:57 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Wolfgang Bangerth
14:48 Classifying bugs Andrew Haley
14:48 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Wolfgang Bangerth
14:38 Re: [Makefile] PR bootstrap/12744 Allow release tarballs to build without bison/flex/makeinfo Kelley Cook
14:09 Re: Classifying bugs Gabriel Dos Reis
13:02 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Richard Kenner
12:53 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Arnaud Charlet
12:06 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Laurent GUERBY
11:47 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Rainer Orth
10:55 Re: Classifying bugs Giovanni Bajo
10:52 Re: Classifying bugs Giovanni Bajo
10:41 problem installing gcc Mohammed Abdul Sami
10:15 Re: State of gcc 3.3 Richard Guenther
09:53 Re: Porting to Windows Ranjit Mathew
09:11 Re: Classifying bugs Steven Bosscher
09:07 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Steven Bosscher
09:06 Re: Classifying bugs Gabriel Dos Reis
09:04 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Nathan Sidwell
08:48 Re: Classifying bugs Arnaud Charlet
08:40 Re: Classifying bugs Gabriel Dos Reis
08:39 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Jakub Jelinek
08:34 Re: Classifying bugs Arnaud Charlet
08:31 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Steven Bosscher
07:54 Porting to Windows Gagneet Singh
07:52 FP registers alignment on SPARC64 Eric Botcazou
06:52 Classifying bugs Gabriel Dos Reis
05:37 Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctlyon AMD64 Mark Mitchell
05:21 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Mark Mitchell
01:42 Re: Bootstrap time jumps on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Bradley Lucier
01:20 Re: Please benchmark --param large-function-insns=3000 (Was Re: Some updates on tree-ssa and PR8361) Jan Hubicka
01:15 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Geert Bosch
00:50 Re: PR7455: What is expected behavior for #pragma weak. Richard Henderson
00:49 Programs compiled with "-fPIE" + "-pie" seg fault on sparc-linux [testcase]. Balint Cristian
00:39 Re: PR7455: What is expected behavior for #pragma weak. Ian Lance Taylor
00:37 Re: PR7455: What is expected behavior for #pragma weak. Richard Henderson

January 11, 2004
22:51 Re: Bootstrap time jumps on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 David Edelsohn
22:41 Bootstrap time jumps on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Bradley Lucier
22:38 Cause of lno failure on powerpc Daniel Berlin
22:25 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
22:23 PR7455: What is expected behavior for #pragma weak. Steven Bosscher
21:48 Please benchmark --param large-function-insns=3000 (Was Re: Some updates on tree-ssa and PR8361) Jan Hubicka
21:45 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
21:21 Some updates on tree-ssa and PR8361 Gerald Pfeifer
21:21 VAX support (was: m68k bootstrapping broken) Jan-Benedict Glaw
20:37 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
20:10 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
18:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Matt Thomas
18:01 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
16:55 注册成立香港公司只需5600元人民币 香港公司注册网
16:55 注册成立香港公司只需5600元人民币 香港公司注册网
16:55 注册成立香港公司只需5600元人民币 香港公司注册网
16:35 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
16:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
15:05 Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctly on AMD64 Gabriel Dos Reis
14:59 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
14:18 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Henderson
13:29 Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctly on AMD64 Jan Hubicka
12:37 Re: [PATCH] Classify non-POD struct types more or less correctly on AMD64 Mark Kettenis
11:55 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
11:44 Re: Release Criteria (Was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Michael Elizabeth Chastain
11:07 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
07:29 Release Criteria (Was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Andrew Pinski
06:58 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Eric Christopher
06:33 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
04:49 Modern way of losing twisters we;ght natural Ukrainians Apodmaniczky
01:37 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98 Christopher Faylor
01:35 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Henderson
00:26 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Gabriel Dos Reis
00:23 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Giovanni Bajo
00:06 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Michael Elizabeth Chastain

January 10, 2004
23:41 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Gabriel Dos Reis
23:35 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Steven Bosscher
23:33 Re: libstdc++/configure problem Richard Zidlicky
23:11 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Gerald Pfeifer
22:45 Re: Less radical proposal (was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Chris Lattner
22:19 Re: Less radical proposal (was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Daniel Berlin
22:09 Re: Less radical proposal (was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Nathanael Nerode
22:08 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) David Edelsohn
21:31 Re: 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Arnaud Charlet
21:29 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) Albert Chin
21:09 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
20:28 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Steven Bosscher
20:26 Re: Richard Sandiford appointed MIPS maintainer Eric Christopher
20:25 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Eric Christopher
20:21 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Kean Johnston
17:20 Re: State of gcc 3.3 Richard Guenther
15:52 Less radical proposal (was Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Phil Edwards
15:41 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Phil Edwards
14:40 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Steven Bosscher
14:27 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
13:56 Richard Sandiford appointed MIPS maintainer Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:38 Re: State of gcc 3.3 Steven Bosscher
13:30 Re: State of gcc 3.3 Richard Guenther
13:29 Re: State of gcc 3.3 Richard Guenther
11:54 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Steven Bosscher
11:45 3.4 Ada bugs (was: Radical proposal: skip 3.4) Laurent GUERBY
11:31 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Jan Hubicka
11:25 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Steven Bosscher
11:06 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing Eric Botcazou
10:03 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing Andreas Tobler
09:39 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing Eric Botcazou
09:06 Re: value of __cplusplus neil
08:50 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing Andreas Tobler
08:27 Re: How to Online Compiler Using GCC Mike Stump
08:06 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Andreas Tobler
07:50 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Andrew Pinski
07:07 va-arg-25.c still fails on i686-linux Zack Weinberg
06:47 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98 Eric Christopher
06:14 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98 Stephan T. Lavavej
05:48 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98 Christopher Faylor
05:38 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Jim Wilson
03:15 offering a full implementation of C99 compound initializers traversal Daniel S. Wilkerson
02:06 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o" Daniel Kegel
01:40 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Steven Bosscher
01:38 How to Online Compiler Using GCC Dennis Foong
01:38 Re: Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Giovanni Bajo
01:34 Bugzilla: bootstrap should not be a component Nathanael Nerode
01:27 Radical proposal: skip 3.4 Nathanael Nerode
01:12 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues Devang Patel
00:47 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoffrey Keating
00:25 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Phil Edwards
00:11 gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoffrey Keating
00:10 Re: Does/will gcc support REAL(16) in Fortran? Jim Wilson
00:07 Re: State of gcc 3.3 Gabriel Dos Reis

January 09, 2004
23:23 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
22:31 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Richard Henderson
21:24 Re: Does/will gcc support REAL(16) in Fortran? H. J. Lu
21:20 RFC: Thumb and unwind information Daniel Jacobowitz
21:09 Re: State of gcc 3.3 Joe Buck
20:52 Re: 784 unexpected failures with g77-3.3 on HP-UX 11.11 (long) Jim Wilson
20:39 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Jim Wilson
20:24 Re: Does/will gcc support REAL(16) in Fortran? Toon Moene
20:12 Re: wanna add -march=c3 and -march=c3-2 support Jim Wilson
19:30 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Devang Patel
19:23 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Daniel Jacobowitz
19:08 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Devang Patel
18:54 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Geert Bosch
16:25 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing Rainer Orth
15:31 Re: [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing Eric Botcazou
14:50 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Roger Sayle
14:04 State of gcc 3.3 Richard Guenther
13:56 Re: A linker problem Ian Lance Taylor
13:39 [RFC] LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 for sparc solaris testing Andreas Tobler
12:38 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Rens Sankar
12:19 Re: CVS on savannah Gerald Pfeifer
12:14 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Jan Hubicka
12:11 A linker problem sandeep . rm
10:29 Re: Strange error with current HEAD Richard Guenther
10:23 Re: ELF instruction for section and branch. Richard Sandiford
10:12 Strange error with current HEAD Richard Guenther
09:38 RE: ELF instruction for section and branch. Gagneet Singh
09:16 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Richard Guenther
08:07 Re: [Savannah-hackers] Re: CVS on savannah Hugo Gayosso
08:01 Re: Adding soft-registers Eric Botcazou
07:44 Re: CVS on savannah Paul Fisher
06:43 Re: CORRECTED: Is there a '__builtin_compiletime_error' function of some sort? Ziemowit Laski
06:41 RE: [ECOS] Will gcc3.3 will work with eCos?. Sanjiv Gupta
06:37 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
05:53 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
05:49 Re: Problem building libsdc++-v3 in a cross compile environment (zSeries, PPC64) Alan Modra
05:43 Re: CORRECTED: Is there a '__builtin_compiletime_error' function of some sort? Andrew Pinski
05:12 CORRECTED: Is there a '__builtin_compiletime_error' function of some sort? Ziemowit Laski
05:06 Is there a '__builtin_compiletime_error' function of some sort? Ziemowit Laski
03:45 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation Daniel Berlin
03:37 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues Diego Novillo
03:35 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation Sidney Page Bennett
02:13 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
00:48 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
00:15 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function Daniel Jacobowitz
00:13 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function Jim Blandy
00:03 Does/will gcc support REAL(16) in Fortran? H. J. Lu

January 08, 2004
23:55 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
23:55 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Jan Hubicka
23:50 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues Devang Patel
23:09 Re: Adding soft-registers James Dessart
23:06 Re: Adding soft-registers tm_gccmail
22:42 Re: --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o" Daniel Jacobowitz
22:11 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
22:09 --with-sysroot newbie troubles: "ld: cannot open crt1.o" Daniel Kegel
22:05 Re: Adding soft-registers Stephane Carrez
21:56 Re: CVS on savannah Gerald Pfeifer
21:56 Re: Adding soft-registers Stephane Carrez
21:41 Re: Adding soft-registers tm_gccmail
21:28 Re: Adding soft-registers James Dessart
20:16 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) David Edelsohn
20:06 Re: if/then/else hint ? Kelley Cook
20:00 Re: Adding soft-registers Stephane Carrez
19:51 Re: [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question Diego Novillo
19:47 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation Daniel Berlin
19:44 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation Sidney Bennett
19:32 Re: [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question Devang Patel
19:16 Re: What happened to the PPro DFA scheduler description? law
19:13 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation Daniel Berlin
19:13 Re: SSA for Trees - PRE implementation Diego Novillo
19:05 SSA for Trees - PRE implementation Sidney Bennett
18:45 PL/1 Front-end for GCC v0.0.3 Henrik Sorensen
18:39 re: GCC porting problem help Daniel Kegel
18:27 Re: if/then/else hint ? Richard Earnshaw
18:26 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) Albert Chin
18:26 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
18:22 Re: if/then/else hint ? Paul Koning
18:05 Re: if/then/else hint ? Jamie Lokier
18:00 Re: if/then/else hint ? Richard Earnshaw
17:49 if/then/else hint ? Greg Smith
17:47 Is __default_alloc_template thread safe on Solaris? Dhammika Pathirana
17:43 Re: [tree-ssa] Question: going in and out of SSA Diego Novillo
17:41 Re: [tree-ssa] 'out_of_ssa_tag' question Diego Novillo
17:39 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa) Diego Novillo
17:18 784 unexpected failures with g77-3.3 on HP-UX 11.11 (long) Bob Hall
16:52 Re: [tree-ssa] a tree-ssa beginner question - creating newvariables Diego Novillo
16:42 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues Diego Novillo
16:30 Successfull build of gcc 3.3.2 under AIX 5.1 V Alex Brennen
16:29 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Daniel Berlin
16:25 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Daniel Berlin
16:13 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Richard Guenther
16:08 Re: g++ invokes cc1plus on *.c files Phil Edwards
16:08 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Gerald Pfeifer
16:07 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Richard Guenther
16:06 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Daniel Berlin
16:04 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Daniel Berlin
16:04 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Daniel Berlin
16:04 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Daniel Berlin
15:39 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Jan Hubicka
15:39 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Richard Guenther
15:34 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Richard Guenther
15:30 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Jan Hubicka
15:21 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Jan Hubicka
15:19 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Richard Guenther
15:00 Re: tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Diego Novillo
14:53 tree-ssa memory and compile-time regressions Richard Guenther
14:38 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Peter Barada
14:37 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Peter Barada
13:19 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Zdenek Dvorak
11:56 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
11:34 wanna add -march=c3 and -march=c3-2 support =?big5?b?o6upWw==?=
10:54 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) Joseph S. Myers
10:32 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
10:03 Re: libstdc++/configure problem Andreas Schwab
09:57 Re: CVS on savannah Andreas Schwab
09:49 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
09:48 Re: [SH4] splits after reload Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida
09:45 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
09:45 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Jan Hubicka
09:32 Re: libstdc++/configure problem Richard Zidlicky
09:28 GCC porting problem help Nithya Babu
08:06 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) Richard Sandiford
07:55 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) Eric Botcazou
06:28 g++ invokes cc1plus on *.c files Stephen Ma
04:53 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) David Edelsohn
04:50 Re: mainline -mcpu=power4 Geoff Keating
04:48 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Devang Patel
04:38 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) Andrew Pinski
04:31 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) Eric Christopher
04:25 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Devang Patel
04:18 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) Giovanni Bajo
03:20 Adding soft-registers (was: trouble with porting architecture) James Dessart
02:08 Re: less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Jim Wilson
02:03 Re: libstdc++/configure problem Jim Wilson
01:52 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Zdenek Dvorak
01:47 Re: embedding c code in assembly source Jim Wilson
01:07 Re: mainline -mcpu=power4 David Edelsohn
00:57 Re: mainline -mcpu=power4 Alan Modra
00:52 Re: mainline -mcpu=power4 David Edelsohn
00:40 Re: mainline -mcpu=power4 Geoff Keating
00:08 mainline -mcpu=power4 Alan Modra

January 07, 2004
22:27 RE: libffi automake question Cook, Kelley (R.K.)
21:48 Re: libffi automake question Andreas Tobler
21:46 New Vi@gra store Denny
21:37 Re: libffi automake question Joseph S. Myers
21:36 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction Kumar Gala
21:32 Re: libffi automake question Andreas Tobler
21:17 Re: embedding c code in assembly source Jan-Benedict Glaw
21:12 Re: CVS on savannah Rudy Gevaert
21:03 Re: Recog/asm_operands problem with MIPS/gcc3.3 Richard Henderson
20:58 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
20:46 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Jan Hubicka
20:43 embedding c code in assembly source Paul Cadaret
20:40 libffi automake question Kelley Cook
20:35 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Devang Patel
20:28 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Devang Patel
19:42 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
18:55 Re: trouble with porting architecture Eric Botcazou
18:40 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
17:53 Re: [SH4] splits after reload Joern Rennecke
17:02 gcc-ss-3.4-20040107 is now available gccadmin
13:49 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Joseph S. Myers
12:16 Re: calculate_global_regs_live Joern Rennecke
11:10 RE: Building gcc for SunOS5.6 Sanjiv Gupta
11:03 Re: Building gcc for SunOS5.6 Eric Botcazou
11:02 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
10:54 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Andreas Schwab
10:21 value of __cplusplus Nathan Sidwell
08:55 Re: [tree-ssa] Removing CALL_PLACEHOLDER mess, when? law
08:03 [ping] [SH4]splits after reload Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida
06:48 Re: EOF character in parser neil
06:13 less dwarf2 debug info stored in .o on ia64 Rens Sankar
03:25 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Peter Barada
02:22 Re: EOF character in parser Geert Bosch
02:20 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
01:24 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Zdenek Dvorak
01:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
00:55 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Joseph S. Myers
00:50 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Peter Barada
00:40 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Daniel Berlin
00:30 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
00:26 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Peter Barada
00:15 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
00:10 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Jan Hubicka

January 06, 2004
23:56 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Daniel Berlin
23:42 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
23:36 Recog/asm_operands problem with MIPS/gcc3.3 Daniel Jacobowitz
23:26 Re: "generic" vectorization? Falk Hueffner
23:24 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
23:05 Re: "generic" vectorization? Dale Johannesen
23:04 Re: EOF character in parser Toon Moene
22:44 Re: "generic" vectorization? Falk Hueffner
22:39 Re: "generic" vectorization? Dale Johannesen
22:18 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
22:18 libstdc++/configure problem Richard Zidlicky
22:16 Re: EOF character in parser neil
21:48 Re: FP consistency and -O2 Peter Barada
21:30 Re: New configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Nathanael Nerode
21:17 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Roger Sayle
21:16 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Jan Hubicka
20:41 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Jan Hubicka
20:24 FP consistency and -O2 Andrew Haley
20:23 Re: [tree-ssa]: Implementing unimodular and non-singular loop transforms Daniel Berlin
20:23 Re: [tree-ssa] Question: going in and out of SSA Devang Patel
20:21 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Devang Patel
20:09 FP consistency and -O2 Stuart Reynolds
19:40 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
19:14 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
19:13 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Roger Sayle
19:08 Re: [tree-ssa]: Implementing unimodular and non-singular loop transforms Richard Henderson
19:05 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Joe Buck
18:54 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
18:48 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Jan Hubicka
18:33 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
17:54 Re: [tree-ssa]: Implementing unimodular and non-singular loop transforms Daniel Berlin
17:50 [tree-ssa]: Implementing unimodular and non-singular loop transforms Daniel Berlin
17:37 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
17:10 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Roger Sayle
16:36 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function Daniel Jacobowitz
16:33 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function Josef Zlomek
16:23 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function Daniel Jacobowitz
16:21 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? Jan Hubicka
15:59 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Peter Barada
15:27 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function Josef Zlomek
15:02 Re: GDB does not show variables in inlined function Daniel Jacobowitz
14:49 GDB does not show variables in inlined function Josef Zlomek
13:54 Re: gcc download Heiko Joerg Schick
13:46 New configure bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:42 Recall: gcc download Shalom Berman
13:42 gcc download Shalom Berman
13:42 gcc download Shalom Berman
11:41 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
10:40 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Zack Weinberg
09:29 Re: [csl-arm-branch] Mainline merge policy? Nathan Sidwell
09:24 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
09:24 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Paul Eggert
07:21 Re: [tree-ssa] vectorizer related issues law
07:17 Re: Bootstrap failure on sh-linux target (PR 13567) kaz Kojima
07:08 Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) Mark Mitchell
06:49 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Steven Bosscher
06:35 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Richard Henderson
06:27 Re: bump libgcc_s.so version number? Richard Henderson
06:09 Re: [tree-ssa] Question: going in and out of SSA law
05:56 Re: references to compilation library in libstdc.la Phil Edwards
05:55 Re: [tree-ssa] a tree-ssa beginner question - creating new variables law
05:42 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
05:36 Re: Help with fixing weak aliases Jim Wilson
05:30 Re: fastjar question Andreas Tobler
05:29 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? law
05:15 Re: [tree-ssa] where to fix this? (tentative patch) law
05:07 Re: fastjar question Ranjit Mathew
05:02 Re: fastjar question Ranjit Mathew
04:57 Re: Bootstrap failure on sh-linux target (PR 13567) Jim Wilson
04:22 RE: Building gcc for SunOS5.6 Sanjiv Gupta
03:51 references to compilation library in libstdc.la Ton Hospel
03:45 Re: Combined tree build broken? Bernardo Innocenti
03:05 Re: [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Andrew Pinski
03:05 Re: EOF character in parser Geert Bosch
02:54 Re: EOF character in parser DJ Delorie
02:43 Re: Combined tree build broken? Jim Wilson
02:42 Re: EOF character in parser Zack Weinberg
02:35 Re: Installation Clarification Jim Wilson
02:33 Re: gcc 3.3.1 Superblock Scheduling Jim Wilson
02:30 Re: Determine the target of a build in gcc Jim Wilson
02:21 [tree-ssa] [RFC] loop versioning Devang Patel
02:19 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Zack Weinberg
02:15 Re: EOF character in parser DJ Delorie
01:56 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Paul Jarc
01:53 Re: EOF character in parser Zack Weinberg
01:42 Re: help :: virtual-incoming-args Jim Wilson
01:27 Re: Can I generate debug info without relocations? Jim Wilson
01:22 GCC 3.4 Release Status (2004-01-05) Mark Mitchell
01:19 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Zack Weinberg
01:19 Re: EOF character in parser DJ Delorie
01:10 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Joseph S. Myers
01:07 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
01:07 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Zack Weinberg
01:05 Re: EOF character in parser Jim Wilson
00:57 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Zack Weinberg
00:57 Re: insn "type" attribute Jim Wilson
00:54 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Zack Weinberg
00:53 Re: How can I get the line number and file name from GCC tree. Jim Wilson
00:50 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Joseph S. Myers
00:43 Re: autoconf changes break bootstrap on hppa*-*-hpux* John David Anglin
00:12 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Paul Eggert

January 05, 2004
22:09 Re: fastjar question Andreas Tobler
22:03 Re: Current status of Objective-C++ Mike Stump
21:52 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Paul Jarc
21:49 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Alfred M. Szmidt
21:44 Re: CVS on savannah Gerald Pfeifer
21:40 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Alfred M. Szmidt
21:38 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - dank
21:33 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Joseph S. Myers
21:33 Re: fastjar question Tom Tromey
21:20 Re: Building binutils/gcc/glibc - Zack Weinberg
21:09 Re: malloc attributes and realloc tm_gccmail
20:47 Re: malloc attributes and realloc tm_gccmail
20:44 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Jim Wilson
20:42 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:27 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:25 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:18 Building binutils/gcc/glibc - (Was NPTL bind 9.2.3 issue) shawn.starr
20:17 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Daniel Jacobowitz
20:14 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Daniel Berlin
20:11 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:08 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:08 Re: bump libgcc_s.so version number? Geoff Keating
20:02 Re: Objective-C name (de)mangling Ian Lance Taylor
19:38 Re: New GCC extension hint Kai Henningsen
19:38 Objective-C name (de)mangling Kai Henningsen
19:36 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Devang Patel
19:35 Objective-C name (de)mangling Kai Henningsen
19:18 Re: [tree-ssa]: The dangers of keeping constants in phi nodes Daniel Berlin
19:15 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Devang Patel
19:03 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Devang Patel
19:02 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Daniel Jacobowitz
18:49 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Devang Patel
18:48 Re: Combined tree build broken? Hans-Peter Nilsson
18:39 Re: [tree-ssa] merge to 2004-01-02 checked in law
18:34 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Devang Patel
18:28 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Devang Patel
18:28 Re: [tree-ssa] merge to 2004-01-02 checked in Gerald Pfeifer
18:26 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98 Robert Dewar
18:13 Re: Building gcc for SunOS5.6 Eric Botcazou
18:07 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa) law
18:03 RE: C compiler for Win 95/98 Stephan T. Lavavej
17:59 Re: [tree-ssa]: The dangers of keeping constants in phi nodes law
17:35 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Daniel Berlin
17:30 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Daniel Jacobowitz
17:28 Building gcc for SunOS5.6 Sanjiv Gupta
17:28 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Joe Buck
17:25 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Joe Buck
17:14 gcc-ss-3.3-20040105 is now available gccadmin
16:50 Re: CVS on savannah Ian Lance Taylor
16:41 How to install multiple versions of gcc FAQ David Ohlemacher
16:34 Re: CVS on savannah Andreas Schwab
16:08 bump libgcc_s.so version number? Richard Zidlicky
15:23 Re: CVS on savannah Andrew Haley
15:20 Re: CVS on savannah Andrew Walrond
13:34 Re: Calling convention that gets frame pointer register clobbered Etienne Lorrain
13:20 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky
12:23 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98 Andris Pavenis
12:21 Re: %0 and match_dup in .md Paul Brook
12:13 fastjar question Andreas Tobler
12:06 %0 and match_dup in .md Vimal Kumar
11:45 Re: C compiler for Win 95/98 Gerald Pfeifer
10:46 Re: CVS on savannah Andrew Haley
09:22 C compiler for Win 95/98 admin2
08:27 Re: CVS on savannah Andrew Pinski
08:17 Re: CVS on savannah Andrew Walrond
07:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Dan Nicolaescu
06:50 Re: Right way to add testcase that contains shared library? Dan Kegel
06:34 Re: [tree-ssa] pre vs asm statements Daniel Berlin
06:15 Re: [tree-ssa] pre vs asm statements Richard Henderson
06:12 Bootstrap failure on sh-linux target (PR 13567) kaz Kojima
06:05 Re: [tree-ssa] pre vs asm statements Daniel Berlin
05:58 [tree-ssa] pre vs asm statements Richard Henderson
05:25 Re: Right way to add testcase that contains shared library? kaz Kojima
05:07 re: Cross Compiler Build Fails due to an Object File ! John David Anglin
04:49 Re: New GCC extension hint Kazu Hirata
04:46 Right way to add testcase that contains shared library? Dan Kegel
04:35 re: Cross Compiler Build Fails due to an Object File ! Dan Kegel
04:27 Re: [tree-ssa]: The dangers of keeping constants in phi nodes Daniel Berlin
04:24 Re: autoconf changes break bootstrap on hppa*-*-hpux* John David Anglin
04:08 Re: m68k bootstrapping broken Bernardo Innocenti
03:30 Re: autoconf changes break bootstrap on hppa*-*-hpux* Nathanael Nerode
03:29 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Chris Lattner
03:10 [tree-ssa]: The dangers of keeping constants in phi nodes Daniel Berlin
03:08 autoconf changes break bootstrap on hppa*-*-hpux* John David Anglin
02:08 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Dan Nicolaescu
00:52 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Daniel Berlin
00:42 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
00:38 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
00:37 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
00:20 m68k bootstrapping broken Richard Zidlicky

January 04, 2004
23:09 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Bruce Korb
21:48 tree-ssa branch on savannah Erik Schnetter
21:23 New GCC extension hint Jan Ringoš
20:25 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Daniel Jacobowitz
20:17 CVS on savannah Rudy Gevaert
20:16 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD Joseph S. Myers
20:11 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Geoff Keating
20:07 Re: 3.3 branch: varargs documentation is bogus Joseph S. Myers
20:06 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD Paolo Carlini
19:54 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD Zack Weinberg
19:42 Re: 3.3 branch: varargs documentation is bogus Geoff Keating
19:19 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:59 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD Daniel Jacobowitz
18:54 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Daniel Jacobowitz
18:50 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Bruce Korb
18:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Bruce Korb
18:40 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kaveh R. Ghazi
18:12 3.3 branch: varargs documentation is bogus Marc Espie
17:59 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Bruce Korb
17:59 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD Andreas Schwab
17:50 Re: Combined tree build broken? Bernardo Innocenti
17:45 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
17:13 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
17:07 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Bruce Korb
16:34 Combined tree build broken? Bernardo Innocenti
16:28 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
16:25 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
12:55 Re: small test case for memset problem Jan Hubicka
12:26 cris-axis-elf on trunk broken; structure member assignments Hans-Peter Nilsson
11:37 Re: autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD Steven Bosscher
11:34 autconf changes, bootstrap broken on FreeBSD Gerald Pfeifer
11:12 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Geoff Keating
08:17 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Chris Lattner
08:15 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Geoff Keating
07:57 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Chris Lattner
06:15 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Geoff Keating
03:10 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kaveh R. Ghazi
02:56 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Daniel Berlin
01:37 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Geoff Keating
01:02 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kaveh R. Ghazi
00:57 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Daniel Berlin
00:47 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Chris Lattner
00:36 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
00:22 Re: "generic" vectorization? David Edelsohn
00:20 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Ross Smith

January 03, 2004
23:08 [tree-ssa] merge to 2004-01-02 checked in Richard Henderson
22:50 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
22:17 Re: "generic" vectorization? Falk Hueffner
22:12 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kai Henningsen
22:12 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kai Henningsen
22:11 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kai Henningsen
22:11 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kai Henningsen
21:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kai Henningsen
21:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kai Henningsen
21:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kai Henningsen
21:32 Re: XPASSes: testcases fixed? Andrew Pinski
21:25 XPASSes: testcases fixed? Nathanael Nerode
21:25 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Geoff Keating
19:25 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Zack Weinberg
18:12 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? Daniel Jacobowitz
18:10 Keeping builtins in non-gimple form? Jan Hubicka
18:03 Re: When to emit C++ debug info? B. Kosnik
16:57 Cross Compiler Build Fails due to an Object File ! Ghassan Shobaki
16:08 Problem with reg-stack.c on x86-64 Richard Kenner
16:02 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
16:01 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
15:25 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
15:21 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
15:09 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
14:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Andreas Schwab
14:47 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
14:38 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
14:34 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
14:31 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
14:16 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Andreas Schwab
13:12 RE: [Bug target/13547] [3.4 Regression] avr port does not build S. Bosscher
11:13 Re: [wince-devel] Link .o generated by GCC(arm-wince-pe) from EmbededVC ??? Dmitry Semyonov
11:05 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
10:57 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
07:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Olivier Galibert
07:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Olivier Galibert
05:54 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Bruce Korb
05:23 When to emit C++ debug info? Daniel Jacobowitz
05:03 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
04:50 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
04:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Daniel Jacobowitz
04:45 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
04:29 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Geoff Keating
04:17 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Zack Weinberg
04:05 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Nathanael Nerode
04:01 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
03:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:23 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:15 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Dan Nicolaescu
03:08 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
02:55 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
02:53 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
02:48 Re: "generic" vectorization? Geert Bosch
00:59 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
00:55 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Andreas Schwab
00:53 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
00:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Andreas Schwab
00:48 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
00:19 Re: "generic" vectorization? Richard Henderson
00:04 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis

January 02, 2004
23:55 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
23:50 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
23:50 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
23:48 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
23:47 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Zack Weinberg
23:43 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
23:40 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
23:29 Re: Scalar analyzer dependent on DCE2? Pop Sébastian
23:18 Re: Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64? Geoff Keating
23:13 Scalar analyzer dependent on DCE2? Daniel Berlin
23:07 Re: Bogus PPC64 return-colum? Was: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] S/390 DWARF-2 CFI frame support] Geoff Keating
23:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Geoff Keating
22:48 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Zack Weinberg
22:39 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
22:28 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
22:19 "generic" vectorization? Falk Hueffner
22:15 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
22:01 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Zack Weinberg
20:55 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Jonathan Lennox
20:10 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Daniel Berlin
19:54 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:53 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Ian Lance Taylor
19:48 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Bruce Korb
19:39 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Andreas Schwab
19:33 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Andreas Schwab
19:26 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Russ Allbery
19:25 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Zack Weinberg
19:21 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Russ Allbery
19:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
19:02 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
18:44 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Jonathan Lennox
18:01 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Bruce Korb
17:57 Re: ada broken on mainline (i686-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu) Andreas Jaeger
17:40 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Andreas Schwab
17:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
16:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
16:51 Re: where are char_traits<wchar_t> instances built ? Marc Espie
16:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Daniel Berlin
16:46 Re: Incorrect DWARF-2 register numbers on PPC64? Andrew Cagney
16:42 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
16:31 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Bruce Korb
16:30 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
16:27 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:23 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
14:57 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Ian Lance Taylor
14:45 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
14:07 Re: GCJ and $PREFIX/include revisited Gerald Pfeifer
11:21 RE: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
11:11 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
09:44 A Case to maintain target i370-*-mvs as a live target Ivan Warren
09:35 Installation Clarification Nageshwara rao M
09:00 [SH4] splits after reload Rakesh Kumar - Software, Noida
08:58 Re: download of c compiler for Sun Solaris 8 O/S Gerald Pfeifer
08:45 ada broken on mainline (i686-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu) Andreas Jaeger
05:08 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
03:53 RE: malloc attributes and realloc Bruce Korb
02:25 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Jeff Sturm
01:39 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
00:45 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
00:25 gcc 3.3.1 Superblock Scheduling Ananda Vardhan
00:23 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
00:16 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
00:14 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
00:07 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis

January 01, 2004
23:58 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
23:53 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
23:47 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
23:45 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
23:44 Re: Bogus PPC64 return-colum? Was: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] S/390 DWARF-2 CFI frame support] Alan Modra
23:40 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
23:38 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
23:37 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
23:11 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Robert Dewar
22:59 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Daniel Jacobowitz
22:33 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction Geoff Keating
22:06 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Jeff Sturm
21:52 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Jeff Sturm
19:38 Re: Bogus PPC64 return-colum? Was: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] S/390 DWARF-2 CFI frame support] Mark Kettenis
19:13 [csl-arm-branch] Mainline merge policy? Giovanni Bajo
18:11 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Gabriel Dos Reis
18:04 Re: malloc attributes and realloc wmglo
17:49 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Daniel Berlin
17:32 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Jeff Sturm
15:38 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Ian Lance Taylor
15:31 Re: malloc attributes and realloc Jeff Sturm
14:46 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa) Daniel Berlin
14:11 Re: [tree-ssa] vdefs question (to make vectorizer pass verify ssa) Dorit Naishlos
13:01 Determine the target of a build in gcc J. Grant
11:24 malloc attributes and realloc Joseph S. Myers
08:21 download of c compiler for Sun Solaris 8 O/S harpreet singh
03:30 Re: trouble with porting architecture Hans-Peter Nilsson
02:34 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction Alex Rosenberg
00:19 Re: Request for help performing CVS branch trick Phil Edwards
00:00 Re: Altivec discussion summary, future direction Gabriel Dos Reis


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3