gcc archive
date index for January, 2004

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

January 31, 2004
23:52 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
23:50 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
23:47 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
23:34 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
23:31 Re: C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due tojava/expr.c] Joseph S. Myers
23:13 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
22:29 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
22:21 Re: why does dump_decl dump the scope of a FIELD_DECL? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:07 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
21:51 Re: BB reordering question Zdenek Dvorak
21:22 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch Jan Hubicka
21:19 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch David Edelsohn
20:41 why does dump_decl dump the scope of a FIELD_DECL? Giovanni Bajo
20:35 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
20:21 RE: multilib default dir. Eric Christopher
20:20 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
20:18 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Mark Mitchell
20:01 Re: BB reordering question Archie Cobbs
19:53 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Oscar Fuentes
19:39 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
19:38 gcc-3_3-branch frozen Gabriel Dos Reis
19:28 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
19:20 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
18:45 Re: C99 usage in gcc Zack Weinberg
18:41 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Zack Weinberg
18:39 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Chris Lattner
18:24 Re: C99 usage in gcc Andrew Haley
18:17 Re: C99 usage in gcc Zack Weinberg
15:25 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Diego Novillo
14:51 My last weekend become Tminter
11:45 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch Jan Hubicka
11:36 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch Jan Hubicka
11:34 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch Jan Hubicka
11:12 RE: multilib default dir. Sanjiv Gupta
11:01 RE: multilib default dir. Sanjiv Gupta
10:41 split_complex_* flaw Alan Modra
10:33 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
10:27 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Kevin Atkinson
10:22 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
10:08 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Gabriel Dos Reis
10:05 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Kevin Atkinson
09:54 documentation regarding gcc \"Gagan Deep Singh\"
09:41 Re: Anonymous Namespaces Andrew Pinski
09:37 Anonymous Namespaces Kevin Atkinson
09:13 Re: BB reordering question Zdenek Dvorak
08:43 Re: Ada runtime build backend ICE on x86-linux on HEAD Laurent GUERBY
08:29 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Gerald Pfeifer
08:12 About different compile address Xue_Pengyu
07:45 multilib default dir. Sanjiv Gupta
07:34 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Joseph S. Myers
07:02 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Mike Stump
04:29 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Diego Novillo
04:29 Re: covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch David Edelsohn
04:22 covariant*.C FAILs on GCC 3.4 branch Mark Mitchell
03:59 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Mike Stump
03:23 Re: --disable-multilib broken on GCC 3.4? Mark Mitchell
03:18 Re: --disable-multilib broken on GCC 3.4? Phil Edwards
02:20 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
02:19 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
02:03 --disable-multilib broken on GCC 3.4? Mark Mitchell
02:00 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function David Edelsohn
01:52 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
01:42 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function David Edelsohn
01:38 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Diego Novillo
01:38 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Ian Lance Taylor
01:21 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
01:20 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
01:07 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
00:58 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
00:55 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Ziemowit Laski
00:54 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Diego Novillo
00:53 Re: Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Ian Lance Taylor
00:47 Help restricting args of an intrinsic function Syd Polk
00:05 BB reordering question Archie Cobbs
00:01 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Richard Henderson

January 30, 2004
23:55 3.3.3 release notes [first draft] Joe Buck
23:51 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 tm_gccmail
23:40 PR 13046: planned for 3.3.3? Joe Buck
23:25 Merging tree-ssa into mainline Mark Mitchell
23:19 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
23:18 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Mark Mitchell
23:15 Re: "Documentation by paper" Mark Mitchell
22:53 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Mark Mitchell
22:52 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Robert Dewar
22:21 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Devang Patel
21:49 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Ian Lance Taylor
21:40 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Kevin B. Hendricks
21:19 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
21:01 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
20:33 Re: About "symbol_ref" expression Jim Wilson
19:57 Re: About "symbol_ref" expression Eric Christopher
19:45 Re: Bootstrap using --with-gc=zone is broken Daniel Berlin
19:27 New PowerPC bootstrap failure David Edelsohn
19:18 Re: [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Kevin B . Hendricks
19:17 Ada runtime build backend ICE on x86-linux on HEAD Laurent GUERBY
18:59 ARM condition code register handling Ian Lance Taylor
18:07 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Ian Lance Taylor
18:05 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Dale Johannesen
17:41 GCC build of gcc-3_4-branch failed for native with your patch on 2004-01-30T12:07:11Z. Andrew Haley
17:29 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Oscar Fuentes
16:53 Re: "Documentation by paper" Robert Dewar
16:36 [Darwin] Patch, take 2: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
15:31 Bootstrap using --with-gc=zone is broken Art Haas
15:19 Re: C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due tojava/expr.c] Bruce Stephens
14:24 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Joern Rennecke
14:19 Announcement: 2004 GCC & GNU Toolchain Developers' Summit Andrew J. Hutton
14:16 Re: gctest failure for gcc 3.4.0 20040130 on i686-linux... Christian Joensson
14:06 Re: [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-01-26 Jan Hubicka
13:38 gctest failure for gcc 3.4.0 20040130 on i686-linux... Christian Joensson
13:36 [tree-ssa] Merge as of 2004-01-26 Diego Novillo
13:35 Re: C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due tojava/expr.c] Michael Matz
13:32 libstdc++-v3 build failure Joern Rennecke
12:37 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Joern Rennecke
11:32 Re: mbox formatted archive for current month Laurent GUERBY
11:03 C99 usage in gcc [was Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c] Andrew Haley
10:54 DejaGnu 1.4.4 release Ben Elliston
10:04 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Andreas Schwab
09:44 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Etienne Lorrain
07:04 Re: About "symbol_ref" expression Shinpei Kato
06:39 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Eric Botcazou
06:10 Re: New loop unroller broken? David Edelsohn
05:46 Re: New loop unroller broken? Andreas Jaeger
04:31 Re: mbox formatted archive for current month Aldy Hernandez
04:21 Re: mbox formatted archive for current month DJ Delorie
04:13 mbox formatted archive for current month Aldy Hernandez
03:52 About "symbol_ref" expression Shinpei Kato
03:11 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Ian Lance Taylor
01:32 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c Andrew Pinski
01:29 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c Andrew Pinski
01:20 Re: Release criteria (eas: [patch] index for 3.4.0 Re: Broken LinkOn Front Page) Mark Mitchell
00:47 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
00:45 Re: Why gimplification regimplifies things? Richard Henderson
00:37 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 DJ Delorie
00:29 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Jonathan Wilson
00:28 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
00:26 Re: Why gimplification regimplifies things? Zdenek Dvorak
00:23 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Jonathan Wilson
00:22 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Dale Johannesen
00:19 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Richard Henderson
00:16 Re: Why gimplification regimplifies things? Richard Henderson

January 29, 2004
23:55 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c Ben Elliston
23:53 Re: build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c Eric Christopher
23:51 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Simon G Best
23:46 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 DJ Delorie
23:43 build failure on mainline due to java/expr.c Ben Elliston
23:32 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Geoff Keating
23:28 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
23:25 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Andreas Schwab
23:23 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1 Jan Hubicka
23:12 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1 Mark Mitchell
22:58 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1 Jan Hubicka
22:50 Re: [Jan Hubicka] Memory reduction patches for 3.4, round 1 Mark Mitchell
22:30 Re: "Documentation by paper" Andrew Sutton
22:25 Re: with-headers should be 'build' != 'host' Felix Lee
22:22 Why gimplification regimplifies things? Zdenek Dvorak
21:41 Re: with-headers should be 'build' != 'host' Ian Lance Taylor
20:59 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Syd Polk
20:50 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Jim Wilson
20:37 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
20:34 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
20:03 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Paul Koning
19:31 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Joel Sherrill
19:26 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Syd Polk
19:25 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Ian Lance Taylor
19:19 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Zack Weinberg
19:16 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Andrew Pinski
19:05 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Richard Henderson
19:04 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:56 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Syd Polk
18:54 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Dale Johannesen
18:52 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Zack Weinberg
18:45 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Joern Rennecke
18:40 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Joern Rennecke
18:37 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Zack Weinberg
18:33 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
18:28 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
18:23 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Ralf Corsepius
18:19 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Richard Henderson
18:12 Re: with-headers should be 'build' != 'host' Daniel Jacobowitz
17:42 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Zack Weinberg
16:08 [Darwin] Patch: enable linkonce support for Darwin Matt Austern
15:25 Re: linking c code against fortran libraries Craig Maloney
15:04 Re: preprocessor: % as args to #defines Michael Matz
14:54 Re: GCC 3.4.0 040128 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparisonon MICO project sources. Karel Gardas
14:40 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Joern Rennecke
14:33 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Andrew Haley
14:22 Re: gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Joern Rennecke
13:44 gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Andrew Haley
13:15 gcc 3.4.0 20040121 / ia32 / read-write constraint does not allow a register Etienne Lorrain
12:19 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
11:52 Re: linking c code against fortran libraries Paul Brook
11:51 preprocessor: % as args to #defines Ralf Corsepius
11:44 Re: New loop unroller broken? Mircea Namolaru
11:27 GCC 3.4.0 040128 + GCC 3.3.2 compile-time performance comparison onMICO project sources. Karel Gardas
11:15 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Andreas Schwab
10:14 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 Jan Hubicka
07:08 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 Ghassan Shobaki
05:31 OpenBSD kernel testcases? Giovanni Bajo
04:22 Re: Removing cut-n-paste comments about target macros/hooks. Zack Weinberg
04:18 Removing cut-n-paste comments about target macros/hooks. Kazu Hirata
03:43 powerpc64 dwarf2 frame unwinding Alan Modra
01:50 Re: When exactly does a type have a variable length? Richard Henderson
01:18 When exactly does a type have a variable length? Kazu Hirata
00:39 Re: SH4 regression testing Kaz Kojima
00:36 Re: Help installing gcc Ben Elliston
00:00 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar

January 28, 2004
23:59 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Robert Dewar
23:58 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Diego Novillo
23:50 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Dale Johannesen
23:42 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Joe Buck
23:06 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Daniel Berlin
22:57 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Richard Guenther
22:42 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Robert Dewar
22:23 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Robert Dewar
20:36 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:29 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Phil Edwards
20:27 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Marcel Cox
20:26 Re: SH4 regression testing Jim Wilson
20:25 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Mike Stump
20:23 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Joe Buck
20:22 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Richard Guenther
20:11 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Matthias Klose
20:11 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:07 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Joe Buck
19:47 Re: [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Jan Hubicka
18:23 [tree-ssa] mainline->branch merge status Diego Novillo
18:20 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Daniel Berlin
18:17 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Eric Botcazou
18:08 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Richard Kenner
17:59 Re: g++ template function overload resolution failure(?) Giovanni Bajo
17:59 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Phil Edwards
17:57 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
17:53 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Phil Edwards
17:44 Re: about the interfaces of a front end Zack Weinberg
17:28 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Joe Buck
17:28 gcc-ss-3.4-20040128 is now available gccadmin
17:25 linking c code against fortran libraries Craig Maloney
17:13 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Joe Buck
16:42 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:36 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joern Rennecke
16:25 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:06 Re: SH4 regression testing Julian Brown
16:03 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Karel Gardas
15:43 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Is http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Arnaud Charlet
15:39 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Karel Gardas
15:26 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Andreas Schwab
15:05 Re: C++'s new 'export' Keyword? Bonzini
14:58 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Dylan Cuthbert
14:49 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Eric Botcazou
14:45 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Karel Gardas
14:36 Re: How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Andreas Schwab
14:20 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
14:19 Use of automatically generated docs (Doxygen) experience from another project rthorpe
14:03 Many(!) failures for 3.4.0 20040127 (prerelease) testsuite on i786-pc-cygwin Christian Joensson
13:57 How to build cross-compiled Ada (gcc3.4.x) runtime? (Ishttp://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html wrong?) Karel Gardas
13:20 RE: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 S. Bosscher
13:17 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Aldy Hernandez
12:59 Re: new error when reconfiguring gcc Arnaud Charlet
12:52 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Simon G Best
12:51 Re: new error when reconfiguring gcc Alexandre Oliva
12:32 Re: Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 Jan Hubicka
12:23 Re: new error when reconfiguring gcc Andreas Schwab
12:11 Re: g++ template function overload resolution failure(?) Karel Gardas
12:06 g++ template function overload resolution failure(?) Richard Guenther
12:04 Re: GCC-3.3.3 release status Eric Botcazou
11:41 new error when reconfiguring gcc Arnaud Charlet
11:36 GCC-3.3.3 release status Gabriel Dos Reis
09:55 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Karel Gardas
09:37 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Bonzini
08:49 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Dylan Cuthbert
07:46 Re: Re: about the interfaces of a front end daizisheng
07:30 re: SH4 regression testing Karel Gardas
07:11 Re: about the interfaces of a front end Zack Weinberg
07:10 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
07:09 Re: about the interfaces of a front end Neil Booth
06:49 about the interfaces of a front end daizisheng
06:13 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Matt Austern
06:08 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Simon G Best
05:57 Re: Help needed on "insn does not satisfy its constraints" Kazu Hirata
05:21 Help needed on "insn does not satisfy its constraints" ashwani
03:26 Re: case ranges in C++ (extension) Mark Mitchell
01:48 Superblock Instruction Scheduling in GCC 3.4 Ghassan Shobaki

January 27, 2004
23:38 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:22 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
23:18 Re: "Documentation by paper" Bernd Schmidt
23:15 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
23:14 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Matt Austern
23:03 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
22:55 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:49 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:43 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Matt Austern
22:42 Re: Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when using gcc3.4.0-20040126 as a bootstrap compiler Arnaud Charlet
22:34 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
22:31 Re: "Documentation by paper" Tom Tromey
22:27 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
22:27 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
22:12 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:59 Re: "Documentation by paper" Geert Bosch
21:56 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
21:55 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
21:48 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
21:37 re: SH4 regression testing Daniel Kegel
21:24 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
21:23 tree-ssa/13756 Documentation issues Geert Bosch
21:21 Re: how to compile gcc with profiling on.. Zack Weinberg
21:12 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:08 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Aldy Hernandez
20:58 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
20:51 Re: "Documentation by paper" DJ Delorie
20:42 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
20:40 Re: "Documentation by paper" Andrew Sutton
20:39 Re: "Documentation by paper" Laurent GUERBY
20:38 Re: "Documentation by paper" Diego Novillo
20:34 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
20:34 how to compile gcc with profiling on.. perugupa
20:29 Re: "Documentation by paper" Gabriel Dos Reis
20:17 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
20:17 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
20:17 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
20:15 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
20:14 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:13 Doxygen (Was: Re: "Documentation by paper") Matt Austern
20:11 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
20:10 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
20:08 ! HAVE_foo, ! (flags & BIT) Joern Rennecke
20:05 Re: "Documentation by paper" Gabriel Dos Reis
19:59 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
19:55 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
19:53 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
19:44 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size Kazu Hirata
19:43 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
19:43 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
19:31 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
19:31 Re: "Documentation by paper" Phil Edwards
19:28 Re: "Documentation by paper" Diego Novillo
19:25 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
19:20 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Richard Henderson
19:13 Re: "Documentation by paper" law
19:09 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
18:58 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
18:56 Re: "Documentation by paper" Ian Lance Taylor
18:53 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:48 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:38 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Eric Botcazou
18:38 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
18:37 Re: "Documentation by paper" Andrew Sutton
18:33 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
18:31 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Christoph Hellwig
18:26 SH4 regression testing Julian Brown
18:24 Re: commits with multiple PRs Ian Lance Taylor
18:24 Re: "Documentation by paper" Diego Novillo
18:20 Re: "Documentation by paper" Zack Weinberg
18:19 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
18:06 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:04 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
18:03 Re: "Documentation by paper" Diego Novillo
17:59 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
17:57 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Joe Buck
17:57 Re: "Documentation by paper" Daniel Berlin
17:51 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Paolo Carlini
17:50 Re: "Documentation by paper" Joe Buck
17:48 Re: ChangeLog as cvs check-in message Phil Edwards
17:40 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Olivier Galibert
17:34 Re: "return" RTL template Joern Rennecke
17:26 Re: C++'s 'export' Keyword? Matt Austern
17:16 Re: libffi package Thomas Heller
17:00 ChangeLog as cvs check-in message Joern Rennecke
16:58 case ranges in C++ (extension) Michael Matz
16:52 Re: commits with multiple PRs Daniel Berlin
16:41 Re: commits with multiple PRs Jakub Jelinek
16:38 Re: commits with multiple PRs Daniel Berlin
16:36 Re: commits with multiple PRs Eric Botcazou
15:56 Re: commits with multiple PRs Daniel Berlin
15:48 Re: commits with multiple PRs Richard Earnshaw
15:48 Re: "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
15:42 Re: "Documentation by paper" Lars Segerlund
15:40 Re: commits with multiple PRs Daniel Berlin
15:22 "Documentation by paper" Richard Kenner
15:00 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size law
14:46 Re: [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Eric Botcazou
14:40 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size Ian Lance Taylor
14:35 Re: Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size Paul Carpenter
14:14 commits with multiple PRs Richard Earnshaw
14:06 Re: Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when usinggcc3.4.0-20040126 as a bootstrap compiler Karel Gardas
13:14 C++'s 'export' Keyword? Simon G Best
10:01 New performance measurements Richard Guenther
08:53 "return" RTL template Petar Penchev
08:10 Re: open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Marcel Cox
08:02 Changing the frame layout of H8 port to reduce code size Kazu Hirata
07:37 open watcom compiling gcc on win32 Edward S. Peschko
06:07 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Dylan Cuthbert
02:53 Re: (gcc-3.4.cvs) undefined reference to `__udivdi3' Jim Wilson
02:19 Re: About embedding GCC, GCC compiling with Visual Studio... Jim Wilson
02:12 Re: gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Jim Wilson
00:21 Re: bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Eric Christopher

January 26, 2004
22:59 bootstrap failure on i686-pc-linux-gnu Eric Christopher
22:45 Re: Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when using gcc3.4.0-20040126 as a bootstrap compiler Arnaud Charlet
22:34 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC... aspiesrule
21:37 Re: Is Banshee required for tree-ssa? Daniel Berlin
21:18 Is Banshee required for tree-ssa? Phil Edwards
21:16 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Gabriel Dos Reis
20:53 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Eric Botcazou
20:39 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Joern Rennecke
20:38 Substantial sort algorithm slow down from PIII to P4 DAVID MAY
20:06 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Eric Botcazou
19:46 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Gerald Pfeifer
19:42 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Joern Rennecke
19:34 GCC Release Status (2004-01-26) Mark Mitchell
19:30 Re: compile speed [was: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal] Alexandre Oliva
19:20 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Eric Botcazou
19:17 Re: Change in order of compilation passes Steven Bosscher
19:16 Re: ia64-hpux crash in alias.c Zack Weinberg
19:05 Re: ia64-hpux crash in alias.c Jan Hubicka
18:55 Cannot bootstrap Ada in gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 when using gcc3.4.0-20040126as a bootstrap compiler Karel Gardas
18:52 compile speed [was: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal] Per Bothner
18:46 ia64-hpux crash in alias.c Zack Weinberg
18:24 Re: Change in order of compilation passes Ian Lance Taylor
18:16 Change in order of compilation passes Ian Lance Taylor
17:35 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Florian Weitling
17:18 gcc-ss-3.3-20040126 is now available gccadmin
16:11 Re: My problem on x86-64 Jan Hubicka
15:55 Re: gcj and handling own packages question Tom Tromey
15:45 Re: My problem on x86-64 Michael Matz
15:45 Re: libffi package Tom Tromey
12:41 My problem on x86-64 Richard Kenner
09:18 Re: inlining between sections Andrew Morton
09:06 Re: inlining between sections Geoff Keating
08:37 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Ralf Baechle
06:51 inlining between sections Andrew Morton
05:58 Re: Re: about writing a new front end for gcc daizisheng
05:39 Re: about writing a new front end for gcc Zack Weinberg
05:14 about writing a new front end for gcc ÀîÊÀʤ

January 25, 2004
23:28 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Giovanni Bajo
23:15 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Giovanni Bajo
22:32 (gcc-3.4.cvs) undefined reference to `__udivdi3' Axel Siebenwirth
21:43 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Daniel Berlin
21:36 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Zack Weinberg
19:40 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC... Alexandre Oliva
19:28 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Andi Kleen
18:29 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC... Gabriel Dos Reis
18:26 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Ralf Baechle
18:15 Re: GCC, OOP, and GC... Eric Botcazou
17:54 GCC, OOP, and GC... aspiesrule
17:15 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Erik Schnetter
17:04 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Daniel Jacobowitz
16:59 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
16:41 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Gabriel Dos Reis
16:40 Re: New loop unroller broken? Mircea Namolaru
16:09 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Giovanni Bajo
15:48 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Andi Kleen
14:36 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Gabriel Dos Reis
14:13 About embedding GCC, GCC compiling with Visual Studio... Grégoire Péan
14:06 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Erik Schnetter
10:07 Re: [Bug target/13312] [m68k] C++ produces stack frame damaging codefor Coldfire Bernardo Innocenti
10:05 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Jan Hubicka
06:48 gcc + vector (v4sf) implementation guide Dylan Cuthbert
06:21 Creating libobjc branch Andrew Pinski
05:41 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Eric Christopher
01:12 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Andrew Pinski
01:01 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Marc Espie
00:57 Re: 3.4 regressions: are 2.95 regressions still actual Marc Espie
00:28 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Zack Weinberg

January 24, 2004
22:42 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Richard Sandiford
22:23 Re: mips address+symbol issue. cgd
22:22 Re: mips address+symbol issue. cgd
18:33 Re: Invalid libffi testcase? Eric Botcazou
16:18 Re: Invalid libffi testcase? Andreas Tobler
15:24 Re: Invalid libffi testcase? Eric Botcazou
15:13 Re: Invalid libffi testcase? Andreas Tobler
14:37 Invalid libffi testcase? Eric Botcazou
13:40 Re: Bootstrap failure on Darwin Ian Lance Taylor
13:23 Re: When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Bernardo Innocenti
12:44 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Thiemo Seufer
11:43 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Richard Sandiford
10:16 Re: Unreviewed patches Gerald Pfeifer
09:30 Re: Bootstrap failure on Darwin Richard Henderson
09:09 When are we going to remove deprecated ports? Kazu Hirata
08:23 Re: Bootstrap failure on Darwin Andreas Tobler
08:05 Bootstrap failure on Darwin Matt Austern
05:43 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Andrew Pinski
05:29 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Andrew Morton
05:08 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Daniel Jacobowitz
05:08 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Daniel Jacobowitz
02:29 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Richard Kenner
02:18 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Mark Mitchell
01:39 Re: C++ extension not supported in 3.4.0 20040121 (prerelease) Giovanni Bajo
01:37 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Andrew Morton
01:23 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Jan Hubicka
01:20 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Jan Hubicka
01:19 Re: GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Daniel Jacobowitz
01:15 GCC-3.4 reorders asm() with -O2 Michael Eager
01:10 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Daniel Jacobowitz
01:10 C++ extension not supported in 3.4.0 20040121 (prerelease) Shelly Adhikari
01:02 Re: Mainline fails to bootstrap 3.3 branch. Gabriel Dos Reis

January 23, 2004
23:42 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Andrew Morton
23:32 Re: mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Daniel Jacobowitz
23:26 mysterious failure with latest gcc cvs Andrew Morton
22:54 Re: [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra? Dara Hazeghi
22:47 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Erik Trulsson
22:46 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Erik Trulsson
22:28 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Michel Lespinasse
22:26 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Robert Dewar
22:21 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Andreas Schwab
22:10 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Erik Trulsson
22:00 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html a bit confusing w.r.t. Ada installation. Jim Wilson
21:59 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Ian Lance Taylor
21:55 Re: mips address+symbol issue. cgd
21:48 Re: [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra? Michael Matz
21:44 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Robert Dewar
21:24 Re: @D not replaced Zack Weinberg
21:20 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Ian Lance Taylor
21:18 Re: mips address+symbol issue. cgd
21:09 Re: mips address+symbol issue. Ian Lance Taylor
21:01 mips address+symbol issue. cgd
20:58 Re: Fix for PR/13358 Geoff Keating
20:39 @D not replaced Douglas B Rupp
20:35 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Matthias Klose
20:33 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Alexandre Oliva
20:22 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Joseph S. Myers
20:20 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
20:18 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Phil Edwards
20:09 Re: Fix for PR/13358 Jack Lloyd
20:07 Re: Unreviewed patches Dara Hazeghi
20:07 Re: Mainline fails to bootstrap 3.3 branch. Joseph S. Myers
20:05 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Matthias Klose
19:50 Re: Unreviewed patches Giovanni Bajo
19:46 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
19:44 Re: Unreviewed patches Ian Lance Taylor
19:40 Re: Fix for PR/13358 Geoff Keating
19:17 Re: Unreviewed patches Dara Hazeghi
19:17 Re: New loop unroller broken? David Edelsohn
18:52 Re: Unreviewed patches Gerald Pfeifer
18:47 Re: Unreviewed patches Dara Hazeghi
18:34 Re: Fix for PR/13358 Zack Weinberg
18:30 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Ian Lance Taylor
18:22 Re: Unreviewed patches Gerald Pfeifer
18:17 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Zack Weinberg
18:11 Unreviewed patches Dara Hazeghi
17:58 Re: ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Kelley Cook
17:57 [PATCH] Document experimental nature of -fnew-ra? Dara Hazeghi
17:33 Re: Verbose compiling of multiple files. Phil Edwards
17:01 Mainline fails to bootstrap 3.3 branch. Volker Reichelt
16:51 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Wolfgang Bangerth
16:22 Fix for PR/13358 Jack Lloyd
16:13 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Paolo Carlini
15:33 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Jakub Jelinek
15:23 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Michael Matz
15:07 Verbose compiling of multiple files. Nitin Gupta
14:37 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Jakub Jelinek
14:32 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Gerald Pfeifer
14:28 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:21 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Michael Matz
13:46 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Paolo Carlini
13:42 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:24 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Alexandre Oliva
13:13 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Richard Kenner
13:03 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
12:57 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Richard Kenner
12:47 [RFC] ABI compatibility with vendor compiler on SPARC/Solaris Eric Botcazou
12:44 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
11:14 Re: bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Andreas Tobler
11:12 bootstrap broken: nan() does not match prototype Gerald Pfeifer
10:24 ./configure --program-suffix and man pages Gerald Pfeifer
03:40 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Richard Kenner
03:28 Re: I'm still stuck on x86-64 Alexandre Oliva
02:56 Re: New loop unroller broken? David Edelsohn
00:12 I'm still stuck on x86-64 Richard Kenner

January 22, 2004
23:53 Re: mainline (2004-01-22 12:00 UTC) rejects valid code Serge Belyshev
23:04 http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html a bit confusing w.r.t.Ada installation. Karel Gardas
22:51 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
22:06 Re: function name in labels Per Bothner
21:44 Re: gcc help Jim Wilson
20:51 Re: 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos? Richard Henderson
20:09 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
20:07 Re: MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4 Michael Eager
20:06 Re: New loop unroller broken? Ulrich Weigand
20:00 Re: New loop unroller broken? Andrew Pinski
20:00 Re: New loop unroller broken? Richard Guenther
19:53 Tree-SSA versus 3.4 branch garbage production Jan Hubicka
19:50 Re: New loop unroller broken? Dale Johannesen
19:41 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
19:36 Re: New loop unroller broken? Zdenek Dvorak
19:33 Re: STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ? Richard Henderson
19:32 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Zdenek Dvorak
19:27 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Richard Henderson
19:12 Re: libffi package Thomas Heller
19:08 Re: New loop unroller broken? Dale Johannesen
19:04 Re: New loop unroller broken? Dale Johannesen
18:53 Re: New loop unroller broken? Andrew Pinski
18:47 New loop unroller broken? Ulrich Weigand
17:59 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Jakub Jelinek
17:54 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Andreas Jaeger
17:34 Re: libffi package Tom Tromey
17:27 Re: DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks Joe Buck
17:23 Re: Readiness of tree-ssa Wolfgang Bangerth
17:02 Re: GCC_DRIVER_HOST_INITIALIZATION in gcc.c Daniel Jacobowitz
17:00 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Mark Mitchell
17:00 Re: GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Jakub Jelinek
16:58 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Jan Hubicka
16:56 Re: Inline questions Jan Hubicka
16:41 GCC 3.4 and glibc/nptl: Cancellation broken Andreas Jaeger
16:23 Re: 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos? duchier
16:18 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Mark Mitchell
15:54 Re: RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Gabriel Dos Reis
15:52 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Jan Hubicka
15:32 Re: 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos? Robert Dewar
15:21 Re: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Giovanni Bajo
15:07 Inline questions Manuel Báez
15:07 Re: libffi package Thomas Heller
14:59 Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion Andrew MacLeod
14:53 Re: mainline (2004-01-22 12:00 UTC) rejects valid code Josef Zlomek
14:50 [leadership/opensource] invitation to online survey Gianluca Bosco
14:38 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Geoffrey Furnish
14:14 mainline (2004-01-22 12:00 UTC) rejects valid code Serge Belyshev
13:49 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:41 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ??? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:24 Re: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Richard Guenther
13:12 Re: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Giovanni Bajo
12:34 2.95/3.x regression in the compilation of computed gotos? duchier
12:33 Re: fstream behaviour error / wrong installation ? Paolo Carlini
11:39 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ??? Zdenek Dvorak
11:31 Re: STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ? Olivier Hainque
11:29 Re: MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4 Richard Sandiford
11:22 Re: MIPS glibc-2.3.2 build failure with gcc-3.4 Richard Sandiford
10:38 RFC: cache uses_template_parms in tree node? Richard Guenther
10:04 Re: gcc 3.5 integration branch proposal Richard Earnshaw
10:04 Re: gcc web site note Gerald Pfeifer
10:01 Release criteria (eas: [patch] index for 3.4.0 Re: Broken Link OnFront Page) Gerald Pfeifer
10:00 Re: Optimizing if (foo==1 || foo==3 || foo==7 || etc...) ??? Andreas Schwab
09:49 Re: STACK_BOUNDARY on alpha ports ? Olivier Hainque
09:39 Re: Floating point registers vs. LOAD_EXTEND_OP on alpha Richard Sandiford
09:03 gcc web site note Ilya
08:51 [RFC] Multiple memory-spaces in GCC feature request Svein E. Seldal
08:50 fstream behaviour error / wrong installation ? Stephane MILLET
08:49 Re: [PATCH] [COMMITTED] Fix Re: <altivec.h> not happy with 3.4 on powerpc-apple-darwin7.2.0 Segher Boessenkool
08:46 Re: [RFC] Contributing tree-ssa to mainline Gerald Pfeifer
08:30 Re: DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks Segher Boessenkool
08:22 Re: DLV (= PR8361) benchmarks