Re: [tree-ssa, RFC] CFG transparent RTL expansion

[Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>]

> Clearly, as long as the CFG exists, thats where the information ought to
> be stored. The only real question I want to deal with is should the CFG
> be kept after SSA right through to RTL, or when the CFG is destroyed,
> should the information be attached to the trees somehow and then used
> during expansion to annotate the new CFG rtl creates, and/or used to
> annotate the CFG for trees when the function is inlined. I think thats
> fundamentally where we have decisions to make, so I would like to work
> through the various differences. Im also about to go on vacation, so the
> more I have to think about the better :-)

I guess the vacation is about to over :)  What are your conclusions?

Honza