This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Regression information in Bugzilla
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo at libero dot it>,"Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>,"Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 14:57:11 -0500
- Subject: Re: Regression information in Bugzilla
- References: <199701c3c7f0$220cf9a0$b7b92997@bagio> <email@example.com>
On Dec 21, 2003, at 1:45 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
"Giovanni Bajo" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
I understand that this system is far from being optimal. We are
discussing this issue in these days on the bugzilla-master list, and
trying to come up to a decent solution to handle this. A first
stopgap would be to be able to set multiple target milestones for
each gap, as suggested by Daniel Berlin. A more efficient solution
(solving also other problems with version tracking) is at study.
Other projects that use bugzilla seem to use X.Y-regression tags
instead of putting this information into the bug title.
I have no idea why we don't use keywords to track this.