This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, mark at codesourcery dot com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:50:36 -0800
Subject: Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
References: <200312161732.hBGHWGNG019615@doubledemon.codesourcery.com> <jmbrq8wocg.fsf@desire.geoffk.org> <20031216163247.B25562@synopsys.com> <200312172243.hBHMhmW21348@desire.geoffk.org> <20031217144802.A8097@synopsys.com>

On Dec 17, 2003, at 14:48, Joe Buck wrote:

That's a nice feature, but I was trying to assess how much testing confidence we have from the fact that you build a whole distribution with the feature. That's why I was asking the question.

I thought we use it with the libstdc++ testsuite also.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

References:
- GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
  - From: Joe Buck
- Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
  - From: Geoff Keating
- Re: GCC 3.4 Release Status (2003-12-16)
  - From: Joe Buck

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]