This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output


Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
> "Zack Weinberg" <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:
> | If this is the case, then the alternatives would seem to be either
> | printing out demangled expressions that are invalid C++ but
> | comprehensible to a human, or else making up names as necessary and
> | printing their definitions too.  The latter seems like too much
> | trouble, and liable to confuse humans more than the former.
>
> Well, if it is invlid C++, it is not obvious that it would be
> comprehensible to a human :-)

Good point.  Do you have a better idea?

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]