This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain)
- Cc: ian at wasabisystems dot com, drow at mvista dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 07 Dec 2003 19:06:24 +0100
- Subject: Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
- References: <20031207172837.561D34B412@berman.michael-chastain.com>
mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) writes:
[...]
| (4) BB::operator __typeof__(int (*)()) ()
|
| I suggest this improvement to (3). This is my favorite.
|
| (5) _ZN2BBcvPFivEEv
|
| Hey, it's an option, but I don't like it and I doubt that anybody
| else likes it either.
|
| My preference order is (4) > (3) > (2) > (1) > (5).
I suppose we can't do better given current state.
-- Gaby