This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 06 Dec 2003 23:40:42 -0500
Subject: Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
References: <20031206235918.GA32439@nevyn.them.org><m3fzfxl6q6.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><m3u14dpc7t.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><m3u14di7mk.fsf@gossamer.airs.com><m3u14dntkh.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net><20031207043150.GB2901@nevyn.them.org><m3oeulnt61.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net>

Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:

> the demangler is introducing a vendor-specific operator where there
> weren't. 

Well, do you have a better suggestion for how to demangle
    _ZN2BBcvPFivEEv
?

Ian

References:
- [c++] Another question about demangler output
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [c++] Another question about demangler output
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]