This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
- From: "Stephan T. Lavavej" <stl at caltech dot edu>
- To: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 13:10:26 -0800
- Subject: Re: Should -fcross-jumping be part of -O1?
- Reply-to: <stl at caltech dot edu>
[Felix Lee]
> I think saying what direction you're going is less confusing
> than saying what axis you're moving on. "quickly", "small",
> "fast" instead of "speed", "size", "time". use words that
> will fit the sentence, "I want my code ____".
I disagree strongly with making the optimization options even more
complicated than they are now; O0/O1/O2/O3/Os is plenty already.
But, /if/ gcc were to take the confusing and complicated route, I suggest
that the "increase compilation speed" option be called -Onow. :->
Stephan T. Lavavej
http://nuwen.net