Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119

[Robert Moss <robert dot moss at jesus dot ox dot ac dot uk>]

Okay, thanks. Just so long as I know!

Rob

Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> Robert Moss <robert.moss@jesus.ox.ac.uk> writes:
>
>
> > Andreas, can you confirm that this is in fact the problem, and that
> > it's nothing to do with the (possibly slightly ridiculous) situation
> > in glibc in which the source uses asm behind gcc's back in relation to
> > weak functions?
> >
> > Rob
>
>
> Let's wait for a GCC patch - but looking at the assembly it really
> seems to be a issue with broken hidden support.
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
> > Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that visibilty handling is completly broken, see
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13134.  Without this bug
> > > fixed, GCC cannot compile glibc correctly.
> > > Andreas
>
> Andreas

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature