This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119

From: Robert Moss <robert dot moss at jesus dot ox dot ac dot uk>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Cc: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libc-alpha at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 07:32:39 +0000
Subject: Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
References: <3FC21EDC.5010702@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <3FC2398F.3040401@kegel.com> <3FC2A5D0.6070906@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <3FC2F838.4000306@kegel.com> <3FC32EEC.1000802@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <3FC337FF.9040402@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <3FC3458E.4030504@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <3FC38F41.7090908@kegel.com> <3FC4E42A.2040001@jesus.ox.ac.uk> <u84qwjydys.fsf@gromit.moeb>

Andreas, can you confirm that this is in fact the problem, and that it's nothing to do with the (possibly slightly ridiculous) situation in glibc in which the source uses asm behind gcc's back in relation to weak functions?

Rob

Andreas Jaeger wrote:

It seems that visibilty handling is completly broken, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13134.  Without this bug
fixed, GCC cannot compile glibc correctly.

Andreas

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

References:
- Re: Compiling glibc-2.3.2 (-2.3.3?) snapshot 20031115 with gcc-3.4snapshot 20031119
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]