This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Earn $$$ writing free software.
- From: Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>
- To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 20:17:37 -0500
- Subject: Re: Earn $$$ writing free software.
- References: <3FCBE5C5.4020400@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>
Toon Moene wrote:
OK, so now the whole world knows that LLNL, LANL, Sandia and two other
labs are looking for, and willing to pay for a free Fortran 95 compiler.
I'm not certain it was a deep dark secret, just obscure. I wouldn't have
found it without your original post, and I'm always hunting for Fortran
stuff on the web.
An obscure (in the Web sense) report at
http://www.llnl.gov/asci/pathforward_trilab/OSSODA_PF_RFI_V9e.pdf
suddenly bursts onto the scene because it might mean that
<some-free-software> might get a funding.
With an emphasis on "might." I was hoping GCC "might" benefit from any
available monies.
Let's make one thing clear from the beginning:
I'm *not* in it for the money.
[ yes, that's a play on a Zappa quote ]
I am not interested in the money, other than if they can send it
no-strings-attached so that I could spend the rest of my life developing
free software on a nice, Pacific, island (unmarked $100 bills, please).
The same here. I like making money; heck, I have a wonderful menagerie
and family to feed. My original motivation was somewhat altruistic --
and I should have know better. Altruism is seldom rewarded...
However, we're talking about tax-payer's money and as a civil servant, I
*have* strong feelings about spending that.
For one thing, I don't like government agencies spending money due to
ill-advised (or ill-researched) needs/opportunities.
Exactly. I have a strong sense of patriotism when it comes to the
National Labs; I know people who work at Los Alamos, and used to live in
its shadow. If they are going to spend tax dollars on Fortran, I would
hate to see them start an entirely new project because of misperceptions
of gfortran and GCC.
That's why I wrote what I wrote on the fortran@gcc.gnu.org list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2003-11/msg00052.html
which started this avalanche ...
By the Gods, I would *never* have asked my simple little questions had I
know it would cause an avalanche (especially since this one has landed
on my head).
Didn't Gandalf say something about "like a pebble that causes an
avalanche?" One simple question, and I get every agenda in the GCC world
rolling down on me like a horde of orcs...
I think I'll go watch The Two Towers with my wife, and ignore this whole
mess for a while. My apologies if I somehow created a tempest in a stewpot.
..Scott
--
Scott Robert Ladd
Coyote Gulch Productions (http://www.coyotegulch.com)
Software Invention for High-Performance Computing