This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
- From: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>
- To: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner),coyote at coyotegulch dot com
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:14:18 +0100
- Subject: Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
- References: <10312011502.AA26074@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
On Monday 01 December 2003 16:02, Richard Kenner wrote:
> "GCC developers" are not a homogeneous set of people. Some people
> currently doing work on GCC are indeed people who are not used to
> dealing with schedules, but many others are.
True. But the bulk of the work is done by people who can deal with schedules
(and also get paid for their contributions).
> However, nobody can work
> on "specific schedules" without specific *funding* for those schedules
> because projects that *are* funded will take priority.
So there's your chicken-and-egg problem. There is money out there, but it
depends on this work being finished at some given date&time. And this work,
you claim, may not be finished by then because people cannot work on it
without funding.
This sounds a lot like the "MS vs. OSS innovation" debate ;-)
> If you want something done, you need to approach specific people who
> are doing the work and solicit proposals from those people as to
> funding and schedules.
Those specific people will want to know that the rest of the GCC contributors
will support them. In the case of tree-ssa for example, this means that
there has to be consensus that this project makes sense, can make a real
improvement and therefore has to be included in release x.y. You need a
development plan and a timeline for that. GCC has neither...
Gr.
Steven