This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?


Jim Wilson wrote:

That is also why I mentioned maintaining gcc3 and gcc4 in parallel. It isn't a tragedy if a front end is missing from gcc4 if we are still supporting it in gcc3.

Indeed, it would make *my* life much easier to have f77 in gcc3 and f95 in gcc4.


Strictly speaking, a Fortran 90/95 compiler *is* a Fortran 77 compiler, but things are not that easy in practice. g77 supports a larger language than Fortran 77 and not all of its extensions are in Fortran 90/95. This means that the initial release of gfortran won't compile all of the language that g77 compiles, even though that isn't a "bug", per se.

Having two physically different compilers residing in different distributions makes this more obvious to the Fortran public.

--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/ (under construction)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]