This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>,Scott Robert Ladd <coyote at coyotegulch dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 20:05:47 -0500
Subject: Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
References: <3FC8E44F.3050105@coyotegulch.com> <3FC9272A.4070302@specifixinc.com> <87isl2vib1.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

Zack Weinberg wrote:

I don't agree.  Major version number bumps should be reserved for
changes which are guaranteed to break compatibility for everyone.

zw


I don't see how any change could meet the requirement of breaking
compatibility for every single user??

(P.S. can someone confirm that my message is properly threaded. I have switched to a mailer that should be generating proper headers)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Scott Robert Ladd
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Jim Wilson
- Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]