This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Will tree-ssa be GCC 3.5?


kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes:

|     I don't agree.  Major version number bumps should be reserved for
|     changes which are guaranteed to break compatibility for everyone.
| 
| That certainly was not the case for GCC 2 to GCC 3.  Perhaps there was
| a compatibility issue with some g++ users, but it didn't affect any
| compatibility with C, Obj-C, Fortran, or Ada.
| 
| I agree that the tree-ssa framework would be a significantly large
| enough change to justify a major version number increment.

Yup, I'm also of the opinion that the tree-ssa work, when merged into
mainline, should be followed by major bump 3.x -> 4.0.0.  It represents a
significant restructure of the overall GCC structrure and external
behaviour that it makes the most sense to do that bump.

-- Gaby


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]