This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Is CATCH_ALL_TYPE still relevant?
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: rth at redhat dot com, jason at redhat dot com
- Date: 29 Nov 2003 20:13:15 +0100
- Subject: Is CATCH_ALL_TYPE still relevant?
- Organization: Integrable Solutions
doc/c-tree.texi has the following section:
@item HANDLER
Used to represent a C++ @code{catch} block. The @code{HANDLER_TYPE}
is the type of exception that will be caught by this handler; it is
equal (by pointer equality) to @code{CATCH_ALL_TYPE} if this handler
is for all types. [...]
But it looks like CATCH_ALL_TYPE is defined nowhere in our source
files. So my question: Is it relevant? I suspect no and that it
was gone when the EH codes were rewritten. If so, what it is the
semantic equivalent (as described above) of CATCH_ALL_TYPE.
(I'll update the docs once I have those information)
Thanks,
-- Gaby