This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A complexity in the mangling ABI
ian@wasabisystems.com (Ian Lance Taylor) wrote on 23.11.03 in <m3smkeh4kn.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>:
> "Mark Mitchell" <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> > The specification doesn't actually say how to deal with mangling
> > order-sensitive qualifiers.
>
> I think you meant to say order-insensitive here. (I know that I'm
> confused about the difference.)
>
> > If there are vendor-extended order-sensitive qualifiers, that would
> > clearly need to change.
>
> Again, I think you mean to say order-insensitive.
That doesn't make sense.
Order-sensitive means it matters what order they're in; order-insensitive
means any order is equivalent. Mark was clearly meaning what he said.
> g++ supports one vendor-extended type qualifier, and it handles it in
> an order-sensitive manner.
Really? const vector is different from vector const?
> I realize that I got confused between order-sensitive and
> order-insensitive in part of my earlier note. I said
Sure seems so.
MfG Kai