This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: must_alias question


> On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 16:44, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> 
> > The bug is probably reason for the FIXME disabling the function for
> > pointer types BTW :)
> >
> Bonus!
> 
> 
> >  I will test all the changes I cumulated for mustalias pass.
> > I think we can kill ADDRESSOF beast now that will make things a lot
> > easier.
> > 
> OK.  I'm very interested in these changes.  We need to be able to remove
> the FIXME in promote_var safely.  Otherwise, we miss several
> scalarizations that are important to finish fixing PR 12747.

I think I noticed another must_alias bug. flor local static variables we
may suceed to elliminate all ADDR_EXPRs for given variable in one inline
copy, but not in the otehrs, so the function remains call clobbered.
Does disabling promote_vars for static functions look like the way to
go? 

Honza
> 
> 
> Diego.
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]